1. bookVolume 13 (2019): Issue 5 (October 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1875-855X
First Published
01 Jun 2007
Publication timeframe
6 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Anatomical study of quadriceps tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Published Online: 04 Jun 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 13 (2019) - Issue 5 (October 2019)
Page range: 179 - 183
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1875-855X
First Published
01 Jun 2007
Publication timeframe
6 times per year
Languages
English

The two most popular tendons used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are bone-patellar tendon bone (BPTB) and hamstring tendon [1]. However, there are some donor-site morbidities when using these grafts, e.g., anterior knee pain and risk of patella fracture after harvesting the BPTB autograft [2] and graft laxity and hamstring weakness after harvesting hamstring autograft [3].

The quadriceps tendon is an alternative graft choice that provides promising outcomes for ACL reconstruction reported from several studies [4, 5]. Advantages of using this type of graft are lower risk of anterior knee pain [2] and more preserved hamstring function. Quadriceps tendon can be used with or without patella bone plug. Most of the proposed techniques require at least 7–9 cm of tendon portion [2, 6, 7, 8].

The biomechanical properties of quadriceps tendon have been studied [6, 9]. However, there are few studies evaluating the anatomical structures of quadriceps tendon as graft in ACL reconstruction [9, 10, 11, 12]. Most studies had small number of specimens. A study by Iriuchishima et al. [11] reported the morphology of quadriceps tendon using Asian cadaveric knees, but the study focused on the rectus femoris tendon which is only a part of quadriceps tendon. Lippe et al. [12] reported that quadriceps tendon is asymmetrical. Findings from our data may change the current harvesting techniques of quadriceps tendon that is mostly harvested at the central 10 mm of the tendon [13, 14].

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anatomical structures of quadriceps tendon and the suitability to use quadriceps tendon graft as an alternative for ACL reconstruction.

Materials and methods

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University (certificate of approval no. 005/2014).

Forty-nine formalin-fixed cadaveric knees from 33 cadavers were used. Our inclusion criteria were specimens that were used for medical students. Our exclusion criteria were specimens that were not in good condition. Skin and subcutaneous tissue were removed to expose the superficial quadriceps tendon and patella. We used electronic caliper (Baker model EC-10, Mumbai, India) for all measurements.

The most proximal point of superficial quadriceps tendon was identified and marked with a surgical marking pen. After that, we created a transverse line connecting medial and lateral edges of the patella tendon insertion. Then, we drew a line from the most proximal point of the tendon down and perpendicular to the transverse line passing proximal edge of patella. The line from the most proximal point of the tendon to the proximal edge of the patella represents tendon maximum length (Figure 1). We measured the width of quadriceps tendon at patella insertion and every 10-mm increments proximally up to the most proximal point of the tendon. We also measured the distance from medial edge of the tendon at patella insertion to the line of maximum length of the tendon. This provided the location with maximum length of the tendon at its insertion onto the patella.

Figure 1

It demonstrates morphology of the quadriceps tendon in left cadaveric knee. Three reference points were identified: the most proximal point of the tendon, medial, and lateral edge of tendon insertion on patella (black solid dot). We created a transverse line connecting medial and lateral edges of the tendon (transverse solid line). Then, we created a longitudinal line from the most proximal point of the tendon perpendicular to the transverse solid line passing the superior border of patella (curve dot line). The grid line illustrates how to measure the length (starting at the longitudinal solid line and every 5-mm increments medially and laterally from this line) and the width of the tendon (starting at the level of patella insertion and every 10-mm increments proximally up to the most proximal point of the tendon). The maximum length of quadriceps tendon was located at 61.4% from the medial edge of the patella.

Next, we measured the length of quadriceps tendon from the musculotendinous junction to the patella tendon insertion, starting from the line of the maximum length of the tendon and every 5-mm increments medially and laterally to the edge of the tendon at patella insertion.

After all of the surface measurements were done, we dissected the quadriceps tendon to measure the tendon thickness (Figure 2). The thickness of the quadriceps tendon was measured at the line of the maximum length starting from the patella tendon insertion and every 10-mm increments proximally to the most proximal point of quadriceps tendon. Finally, we measured the maximum length of quadriceps tendon at the deepest part of the tendon from the patella insertion to the musculotendinous junction.

Figure 2

Quadriceps tendon after dissection. Length of the quadriceps tendon at the deepest part and the thickness of the tendon were measured (A). Musculotendinous junction of the deep part of the quadriceps tendon was located more distal than the superficial part in this cadaveric knee (B).

Two investigators were assigned to carry out each measurement. The interobserver reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; two-way mixed average measures). Descriptive statistics were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD). Paired t tests were used to compare left- and right-sided data of the same cadaver. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between the height of cadaver and the maximum length of quadriceps tendon. All calculations were performed using SPSS software (version 16; SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois).

Results

The ICCs for intra- and inter-rater agreements were >0.9 for all measurements. The ICCs value of >0.8 defined an excellent agreement. Mean age of our population was 75.6 years (range 38–96) and mean height was 165.4 cm (range 149–184).

The maximum length of superficial quadriceps tendon was 63.2 ± 12.5 mm (range 37.6–83.4). The tendon length was decreased to 53.0 ± 14.5 mm and 38.2 ± 15.5 mm at a distance of 5 mm and 10 mm medial to the maximum length of the tendon, respectively. The tendon length was decreased to 49.5 ± 12.8 mm and 38.0 ± 13.9 mm at a distance of 5 mm and 10 mm lateral to the maximum length of the tendon, respectively (Figure 3).

Figure 3

The bar graph represents quadriceps tendon length. The number labeled above each bar represents the mean length of tendon at each location that was measured. The number labeled below each bar represents the location of measurement, either medially or laterally, away from the maximum length of the tendon (0).

By stratifying the height of the cadavers into three groups (140–155 cm, 156–170 cm, and 171–185 cm). We found positive correlation between the height of cadaver and the maximum length of the superficial quadriceps tendon (R2 = 0.96, P = 0.025).

The maximum length of quadriceps tendon at the deepest part was 57.2 ± 11.5 mm (range 30.9–83.4). We found that musculotendinous junction of the deepest part of the tendon was located more distal than the superficial part in 32 (65.31%) of 49 of the specimens.

The quadriceps tendon width at patella insertion was 46.2 ± 4.7 mm (range 36.7–56.7). The maximum length of quadriceps tendon was located at 61.4% ± 13% (range 31.8–83.6) from the medial edge of the patella insertion. It is located at approximately 5 mm laterally from the midline of patella insertion of the quadriceps tendon. The quadriceps tendon thickness at its maximum length of the tendon on patella insertion was 6.9 ± 2.0 mm (range 1.5–9.5).

There were no differences in the maximum length, the location of the maximum length, the width at patella insertion, and the thickness at patella insertion of the quadriceps tendon between the left and right sides of the same cadaver.

Discussion

ACL injuries can be managed with surgical or nonsurgical treatments. Surgical treatment is indicated to a patient who has knee instability, young age, high-functional demand, or failed to nonsurgical treatment. The ACL reconstruction became a common orthopedic surgery, and the number is increasing every year [15, 16]. Available graft options include autografts, allografts, and synthetic grafts. The numbers of allografts and synthetic grafts used are increasing but limited by their cost and availability [17, 18]. Hamstring tendon, patellar tendon, and quadriceps tendon are commonly used due to biological advantage of autografts [19]. The quadriceps tendon grafts have been proposed as a promising alternative due to its lower donor site morbidity. It also has comparable clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, range of motion, and complications to other autografts [20, 21, 22].

The majority of techniques for harvesting quadriceps tendon either with or without patella bone plug require at least 7–9 cm of the tendon portion [2, 6, 7, 8]. According to the anatomical study of the quadriceps tendon reported by Lippe et al. [12], the maximum (peak) length of quadriceps tendon was 88.3 mm (range 78.3–99.7 mm). However, in our study, we found that the maximum length of the quadriceps tendon was only 63.23 ± 12.49 (range 37.61–83.41) at the superficial quadriceps tendon and 57.23 ± 11.53 (range 30.94–83.41) at the deepest part. If the minimal length of quadriceps tendon required for ACL reconstruction was 7 cm, we found that 61.22% of our quadriceps tendons (30 of 49) were too short. These results might warn surgeons that quadriceps tendon autograft might not be adequate for ACL reconstruction, especially in short statured patients. Our study is the first study to investigate the correlation between the height of cadaver and the maximum length of the quadriceps tendon. We found a positive correlation between these two variables.

Similar to previous study [12], we found that the maximum length of quadriceps tendon was not located at the center of the tendon width at the patella insertion but located about 61.4% from the medial border of the width (approximately 5 mm lateral from the center of tendon insertion). In addition, the length of quadriceps tendon decreased dramatically even 5 mm from either medial or lateral to the area of maximum quadriceps tendon length. Thus, harvesting quadriceps graft using the original technique (10 mm midline) might not achieve its maximum graft length. The graft will get significantly shorter if surgeons move the harvesting area only 5 mm medially. We recommend marking midline of patella as the medial border of the graft and harvesting the graft laterally from this line (Figure 4).

Figure 4

Original technique of quadriceps tendon graft harvest (A). The midline of patella (solid line) is marked as the center of the graft. New proposed technique of graft harvest (B). The midline of patella is marked as the medial border of the graft. The graft was harvested laterally from the midline of patella.

Another important finding, which is different from the previous study [12], that we found is the musculotendinous junction of the deepest part of some quadriceps tendon was located more distal compared to the superficial part. From our study, surgeons should not rely only on superficial anatomy of quadriceps tendon when harvesting the graft, otherwise graft shortening might occur.

The strengths of this study were that we evaluated the anatomical structures of quadriceps tendon in Asian cadavers. The sample size of this study was relatively large. However, our limitation was that we performed the study in embalmed cadaveric knees which might not actually reflect the in vivo situation. However, a previous study reported by Cutts [23] showed that graft shrinkage of embalmed specimen was minimal if it was fixed to bone. We believe that our measured data similarly resembled in vivo conditions.

Conclusion

The maximum length of quadriceps tendon was located 5 mm lateral to the center of quadriceps tendon insertion. Thus, we recommend marking midline of the quadriceps tendon insertion as a medial border of the harvested graft to get maximum length of the graft. Quadriceps tendon might not be suitable to use as an autograft in short statured patients because of graft length inadequacy. Graft length measurement using superficial anatomy should be cautioned because graft shortening might occur.

Figure 1

It demonstrates morphology of the quadriceps tendon in left cadaveric knee. Three reference points were identified: the most proximal point of the tendon, medial, and lateral edge of tendon insertion on patella (black solid dot). We created a transverse line connecting medial and lateral edges of the tendon (transverse solid line). Then, we created a longitudinal line from the most proximal point of the tendon perpendicular to the transverse solid line passing the superior border of patella (curve dot line). The grid line illustrates how to measure the length (starting at the longitudinal solid line and every 5-mm increments medially and laterally from this line) and the width of the tendon (starting at the level of patella insertion and every 10-mm increments proximally up to the most proximal point of the tendon). The maximum length of quadriceps tendon was located at 61.4% from the medial edge of the patella.
It demonstrates morphology of the quadriceps tendon in left cadaveric knee. Three reference points were identified: the most proximal point of the tendon, medial, and lateral edge of tendon insertion on patella (black solid dot). We created a transverse line connecting medial and lateral edges of the tendon (transverse solid line). Then, we created a longitudinal line from the most proximal point of the tendon perpendicular to the transverse solid line passing the superior border of patella (curve dot line). The grid line illustrates how to measure the length (starting at the longitudinal solid line and every 5-mm increments medially and laterally from this line) and the width of the tendon (starting at the level of patella insertion and every 10-mm increments proximally up to the most proximal point of the tendon). The maximum length of quadriceps tendon was located at 61.4% from the medial edge of the patella.

Figure 2

Quadriceps tendon after dissection. Length of the quadriceps tendon at the deepest part and the thickness of the tendon were measured (A). Musculotendinous junction of the deep part of the quadriceps tendon was located more distal than the superficial part in this cadaveric knee (B).
Quadriceps tendon after dissection. Length of the quadriceps tendon at the deepest part and the thickness of the tendon were measured (A). Musculotendinous junction of the deep part of the quadriceps tendon was located more distal than the superficial part in this cadaveric knee (B).

Figure 3

The bar graph represents quadriceps tendon length. The number labeled above each bar represents the mean length of tendon at each location that was measured. The number labeled below each bar represents the location of measurement, either medially or laterally, away from the maximum length of the tendon (0).
The bar graph represents quadriceps tendon length. The number labeled above each bar represents the mean length of tendon at each location that was measured. The number labeled below each bar represents the location of measurement, either medially or laterally, away from the maximum length of the tendon (0).

Figure 4

Original technique of quadriceps tendon graft harvest (A). The midline of patella (solid line) is marked as the center of the graft. New proposed technique of graft harvest (B). The midline of patella is marked as the medial border of the graft. The graft was harvested laterally from the midline of patella.
Original technique of quadriceps tendon graft harvest (A). The midline of patella (solid line) is marked as the center of the graft. New proposed technique of graft harvest (B). The midline of patella is marked as the medial border of the graft. The graft was harvested laterally from the midline of patella.

Reinhardt KR, Hetsroni I, Marx RG. Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a level I systematic review comparing failure rates and functional outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010; 41:249–62.ReinhardtKRHetsroniIMarxRGGraft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a level I systematic review comparing failure rates and functional outcomesOrthop Clin North Am2010412496210.1016/j.ocl.2009.12.009Search in Google Scholar

Rabuck SJ, Musahl V, Fu FH, West RV. Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft. Clin Sports Med. 2013; 32:155–64.RabuckSJMusahlVFuFHWestRVAnatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograftClin Sports Med2013321556410.1016/j.csm.2012.08.014Search in Google Scholar

Bizzini M, Gorelick M, Munzinger U, Drobny T. Joint laxity and isokinetic thigh muscle strength characteristics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone patellar tendon bone versus quadrupled hamstring autografts. Clin J Sport Med. 2006; 16:4–9.BizziniMGorelickMMunzingerUDrobnyTJoint laxity and isokinetic thigh muscle strength characteristics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone patellar tendon bone versus quadrupled hamstring autograftsClin J Sport Med2006164910.1097/01.jsm.0000188040.97135.43Search in Google Scholar

Geib TM, Shelton WR, Phelps RA, Clark L. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft: intermediate-term outcome. Arthroscopy. 2009; 25:1408–14.GeibTMSheltonWRPhelpsRAClarkLAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft: intermediate-term outcomeArthroscopy20092514081410.1016/j.arthro.2009.06.004Search in Google Scholar

Schulz AP, Lange V, Gille J, Voigt C, Frohlich S, Stuhr M, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone plug-free quadriceps tendon autograft: intermediate-term clinical outcome after 24–36 months. Open Access J Sports Med. 2013; 4:243–9.SchulzAPLangeVGilleJVoigtCFrohlichSStuhrMAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone plug-free quadriceps tendon autograft: intermediate-term clinical outcome after 24–36 monthsOpen Access J Sports Med20134243910.2147/OAJSM.S49223Search in Google Scholar

Kim DW, Kim JO, You JD, Kim SJ, Kim HK. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon composite autograft. Arthroscopy. 2001; 17:546–50.KimDWKimJOYouJDKimSJKimHKArthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon composite autograftArthroscopy2001175465010.1053/jars.2001.21834Search in Google Scholar

Sonnery-Cottet B, Chambat P. Anatomic double bundle: a new concept in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the quadriceps tendon. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22:1249 e1–4.Sonnery-CottetBChambatPAnatomic double bundle: a new concept in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the quadriceps tendonArthroscopy2006221249 e1410.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.042Search in Google Scholar

Theut PC, Fulkerson JP, Armour EF, Joseph M. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction utilizing central quadriceps free tendon. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003; 34:31–9.TheutPCFulkersonJPArmourEFJosephMAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction utilizing central quadriceps free tendonOrthop Clin North Am20033431910.1016/S0030-5898(02)00068-8Search in Google Scholar

Staubli HU, Schatzmann L, Brunner P, Rincon L, Nolte LP. Quadriceps tendon and patellar ligament: cryosectional anatomy and structural properties in young adults. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996; 4:100–10.StaubliHUSchatzmannLBrunnerPRinconLNolteLPQuadriceps tendon and patellar ligament: cryosectional anatomy and structural properties in young adultsKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc199641001010.1007/BF014772628884731Search in Google Scholar

Harris NL, Smith DA, Lamoreaux L, Purnell M. Central quadriceps tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: morphometric and biomechanical evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1997; 25:23–8.HarrisNLSmithDALamoreauxLPurnellMCentral quadriceps tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: morphometric and biomechanical evaluationAm J Sports Med19972523810.1177/0363546597025001059006687Search in Google Scholar

Iriuchishima T, Shirakura K, Yorifuji H, Fu FH. Anatomical evaluation of the rectus femoris tendon and its related structures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 132:1665–8.IriuchishimaTShirakuraKYorifujiHFuFHAnatomical evaluation of the rectus femoris tendon and its related structuresArch Orthop Trauma Surg20121321665810.1007/s00402-012-1597-1Search in Google Scholar

Lippe J, Armstrong A, Fulkerson JP. Anatomic guidelines for harvesting a quadriceps free tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2012; 28:980–4.LippeJArmstrongAFulkersonJPAnatomic guidelines for harvesting a quadriceps free tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionArthroscopy201228980410.1016/j.arthro.2012.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Fink C, Herbort M, Abermann E, Hoser C. Minimally invasive harvest of a quadriceps tendon graft with or without a bone block. Arthrosc Tech. 2014; 3:e509–13.FinkCHerbortMAbermannEHoserCMinimally invasive harvest of a quadriceps tendon graft with or without a bone blockArthrosc Tech20143e5091310.1016/j.eats.2014.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Fulkerson JP, Langeland R. An alternative cruciate reconstruction graft: the central quadriceps tendon. Arthroscopy. 1995; 11:252–4.FulkersonJPLangelandRAn alternative cruciate reconstruction graft: the central quadriceps tendonArthroscopy199511252410.1016/0749-8063(95)90078-0Search in Google Scholar

Chechik O, Amar E, Khashan M, Lador R, Eyal G, Gold A. An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices. Int Orthop. 2013; 37:201–6.ChechikOAmarEKhashanMLadorREyalGGoldAAn international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practicesInt Orthop201337201610.1007/s00264-012-1611-9356090522782378Search in Google Scholar

Middleton KK, Hamilton T, Irrgang JJ, Karlsson J, Harner CD, Fu FH. Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a global perspective. Part 1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 22:1467–82.MiddletonKKHamiltonTIrrgangJJKarlssonJHarnerCDFuFHAnatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a global perspective. Part 1Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc20142214678210.1007/s00167-014-2846-324497054Search in Google Scholar

Satora W, Królikowska A, Czamara A, Reichert P. Synthetic grafts in the treatment of ruptured anterior cruciate ligament of the knee joint. Polim Med. 2017; 47:55–9.SatoraWKrólikowskaACzamaraAReichertPSynthetic grafts in the treatment of ruptured anterior cruciate ligament of the knee jointPolim Med20174755910.17219/pim/7681929160630Search in Google Scholar

Legnani C, Ventura A, Terzaghi C, Borgo E, Albisetti W. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with synthetic grafts. A review of literature. Int Orthop. 2010; 34:465–71.LegnaniCVenturaATerzaghiCBorgoEAlbisettiWAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with synthetic grafts. A review of literatureInt Orthop2010344657110.1007/s00264-010-0963-2290313320157811Search in Google Scholar

Macaulay AA, Perfetti DC, Levine WN. Anterior cruciate ligament graft choices. Sports Health. 2012; 4:63–8.MacaulayAAPerfettiDCLevineWNAnterior cruciate ligament graft choicesSports Health2012463810.1177/1941738111409890343589823016071Search in Google Scholar

Akoto R, Albers M, Balke M, Bouillon B, Höher J. ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon graft and press-fit fixation versus quadruple hamstring graft and interference screw fixation – a matched pair analysis after one year follow up. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2019; 20:109.AkotoRAlbersMBalkeMBouillonBHöherJACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon graft and press-fit fixation versus quadruple hamstring graft and interference screw fixation – a matched pair analysis after one year follow upBMC Musculoskeletal Disord20192010910.1186/s12891-019-2499-y641949830871508Search in Google Scholar

Jia Z-Y, Zhang C, Cao S-Q, Xue C-C, Liu T-Z, Huang X, et al. Comparison of artificial graft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis. BMC musculoskeletal disord. 2017; 18:309.JiaZ-YZhangCCaoS-QXueC-CLiuT-ZHuangXComparison of artificial graft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysisBMC musculoskeletal disord20171830910.1186/s12891-017-1672-4551780228724372Search in Google Scholar

Xerogeanes JW. Quadriceps tendon graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the graft of the future! Arthroscopy. 2019; 35:696–7.XerogeanesJWQuadriceps tendon graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the graft of the future!Arthroscopy201935696710.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.01130827423Search in Google Scholar

Cutts A. Shrinkage of muscle fibres during the fixation of cadaveric tissue. J Anat. 1988; 160:75–8.CuttsAShrinkage of muscle fibres during the fixation of cadaveric tissueJ Anat1988160758Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD