Cite

Fig. 1

Map of the locations of all the urban gardens in Kuala Lumpur for the years 2016–2020.Source: Urus Setia Local Agenda 21 Kuala Lumpur, Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Map of the locations of all the urban gardens in Kuala Lumpur for the years 2016–2020.Source: Urus Setia Local Agenda 21 Kuala Lumpur, Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Socio-demographic profile of respondents.

Characteristics Frequency Percentage (%)
Gender
  Male 39 36.8
  Female 67 63.2
Age
  <15 5 4.7
  15–40 43 40.6
  41–60 51 48.1
  >60 7 6.6
Race
  Malay 83 78.3
  Chinese 15 14.2
  Indian 4 3.8
  Others 4 3.8
Educational level
  Primary school 5 4.7
  Secondary school 40 37.7
  Tertiary school 61 57.5
  Other 0 0.0
Number of people in households
  1–3 38 35.8
  4–6 53 50.0
  >6 15 14.2
Household income (RM)
  ≤3,000 50 47.2
  ≤6,275 27 25.5
  ≤13,148 29 27.4
Experience (years)
  <1 26 24.5
  <3 45 42.5
  <5 19 17.9
  >5 16 15.1

Environmental constraints.

Constraint SD freq., % D freq., % N freq., % A freq., % SA freq., %
Highly fluctuating weather will affect the yield 4 (3.8) 8 (7.5) 26 (24.5) 39 (36.8) 29 (27.4)
Rain reduces soil fertility 7 (6.6) 16 (15.1) 29 (27.4) 42 (39.6) 12 (11.3)
Lack of rain reduces water availability 5 (4.7) 22 (20.8) 22 (20.8) 51 (48.1) 6 (5.7)
Flood will damage the yields 8 (7.5) 18 (17.0) 22 (20.8) 40 (37.7) 18 (17.0)
Increase in the number of pests 3 (2.8) 11 (10.4) 32 (30.2) 52 (49.1) 8 (7.5)

Prioritising challenges facing urban gardens.

Mean Standard deviation Priority
Highly fluctuating weather will affect the yield 3.76 1.06 1
Access to available land is a major problem 3.65 1.07 2
Financial problems is the main issue 3.48 1.11 3
Increased number of pests 3.48 0.89 4
Shortage in the number of members to help in managing the garden 3.47 1.07 5
Price of pesticide in the market is too high 3.41 1.15 6
Flood will damage the yields 3.40 1.18 7
Hard to access financial institutions to lend money 3.40 1.03 8
Rain will reduce soil fertility 3.34 1.08 9
Lack of rain reduces water availability 3.29 1.01 10
I am afraid of my produce being stolen 3.25 1.29 11
Most of the available land belongs to private owners 3.19 1.08 12
Available land is contaminated 3.09 1.09 13
Hard to get volunteers to manage the garden 3.09 1.04 14
Need to compete for available land with industries 3.08 1.16 15
Lack of commitments from communities 2.99 1.02 16
Lack of marketing skills 2.97 0.99 17
Lack of cold storage 2.96 1.26 18
Difficult to access financial resources from the government 2.90 0.98 19
Hard to get regular customers 2.82 1.02 20
Hard to buy cheap fertiliser near the garden 2.81 1.14 21
Hard to find a leader 2.81 1.18 22
Hard to access water supply near the garden 2.80 1.23 23
Lack of equipment and tools 2.76 1.17 24
Price for the produce is too low 2.70 1.03 25
Lack of awareness and promotion programmes delivered to urban farmers 2.67 0.95 26
Inability and lack of supply of seed 2.61 1.13 27
Mostly selling produce to middlemen 2.49 1.16 28
Farm is located far from supermarkets 2.34 0.96 29
Difficult to get training and consultation from relevant agencies 2.28 0.86 30
Difficult to access technical support from authorities or non-governmental organisations to improve knowledge 2.12 0.86 31
Hard to access local urban farming information online 1.95 0.79 32

Technical constraints.

Constraint SD freq., % D freq., % N freq., % A freq., % SA freq., %
Lack of awareness and promotion programmes delivered to urban farmers 11 (10.4) 38 (35.8) 32 (30.2) 25 (23.6) 0 (0.0)
Difficult to access technical support from authorities or non-governmental organisations to improve knowledge 26 (24.5) 48 (45.3) 25 (23.6) 7 (6.6) 0 (0.0)
Difficult to get training and consultation from relevant agencies 16 (15.1) 53 (50.0) 31 (29.2) 3 (2.8) 3 (2.8)
Hard to access local urban farming information online 29 (27.4) 58 (54.7) 15 (14.2) 3 (2.8) 1 (0.9)

Perspective of practitioners on benefits of urban gardens.

Statement Frequency Percentage (%)
It is one of the green initiatives by the government to sustain the urban environment. 104 98.1
Building social relationships among farmers 103 97.2
Safe food sources can be produced in the garden. 101 95.3
More nutritional food can be produced from the garden. 101 95.3
Urban people can easily access vegetables and fruits. 101 95.3
Encouraging farmers to do exercise for their health 198 92.5
Urban wastes can be reduced. 197 91.5
People can generate sources of income. 193 87.7
It helps urban poor save their money to buy food sources. 192 86.8
Price of food sources from the garden is cheaper than from the market. 183 78.3

Correlation coefficient (r) between the socio-demographic background and the challenges of urban gardens

Technical Resource-related Economical Social Environmental
Gender Spearman rho −0.031 −0.173 −0.166 −0.058 −0.062
Significance 0.750 0.077 0.089 0.552 0.527
Age Spearman rho −0.031 −0.131 −0.103 −0.164 −0.410**
Significance 0.753 0.179 0.294 0.193 0.0
Race Spearman rho 0.210* −0.051 −0.112 0.201* −0.149
Significance 0.031 0.603 0.255 0.039 0.128
Education level Spearman rho 0.225* 0.041 −0.088 0.021 −0.097
Significance 0.021 0.674 0.370 0.830 0.323
Number of people in households Spearman rho −0.177 −0.047 0.111 0.072 0.109
Significance 0.070 0.631 0.256 0.464 0.267
Monthly household income Spearman rho 0.043 −0.126 −0.223* −0.119 −0.197**
Significance 0.660 0.199 0.021 0.226 0.043
Experience Spearman rho −0.143 0.018 −0.003 −0.052 −0.002
Significance 0.143 0.857 0.979 0.594 0.981

Resource-related constraints.

Constraint SD freq., % D freq., % N freq., % A freq., % SA freq., %
Access to available land is a major problem 6 (5.7) 12 (11.3) 13 (12.3) 57 (53.8) 18 (17.0)
Most of the available land belongs to private owners 8 (7.5) 20 (18.9) 31 (29.2) 38 (35.8) 9 (8.5)
Need to compete for the available land with industries 10 (9.4) 25 (23.6) 30 (28.3) 29 (27.4) 12 (11.3)
Available land is contaminated 9 (8.5) 23 (21.7) 31 (29.2) 35 (33.0) 8 (7.5)
Hard to access water supply near the garden 14 (13.2) 38 (35.8) 21 (19.8) 21 (19.8) 12 (11.3)
Price of pesticide in the market is too high 7 (6.6) 16 (15.1) 30 (28.3) 33 (31.1) 20 (18.9)
Hard to buy cheap fertiliser near the garden 14 (13.2) 33 (31.1) 23 (21.7) 31 (29.2) 5 (4.7)
Inability and lack of supply of seed 16 (15.1) 41 (38.7) 23 (21.7) 20 (18.9) 6 (5.7)
No access to equipment and tools 13 (12.3) 39 (36.8) 23 (21.7) 22 (20.8) 9 (8.5)

Social constraints.

Constraint SD freq., % D freq., % N freq., % A freq., % SA freq., %
Shortage in the number of members to help in managing the garden 4 (3.8) 13 (12.3) 40 (37.7) 27 (25.5) 22 (20.8)
Hard to get volunteers to manage the garden 6 (5.7) 27 (25.6) 31 (29.2) 35 (33.0) 7 (6.6)
Lack of commitment from the public 10 (9.4) 23 (21.7) 33 (31.1) 38 (35.8) 2 (1.9)
Hard to find a leader 13 (12.3) 36 (34.0) 25 (23.6) 22 (20.8) 10 (9.4)
I’m afraid of having my produce stolen. 9 (8.5) 27 (25.5) 22 (20.8) 25 (23.6) 23 (21.7)

Economic constraints.

Constraint SD freq., % D freq., % N freq., % A freq., % SA freq., %
Financial problem is a main issue 9 (8.5) 7 (6.6) 31 (29.2) 42 (39.6) 17 (16.0)
Difficult to access financial resources from the government 9 (8.5) 24 (22.6) 47 (44.3) 21 (19.8) 5 (4.7)
Hard to access financial institutions to borrow money 3 (2.8) 21 (19.8) 26 (24.5) 43 (40.6) 13 (12.3)
Lack of marketing skill 8 (7.5) 23 (21.7) 45 (42.5) 24 (22.6) 6 (5.7)
Price for the produce is too low 11 (10.4) 39 (36.8) 31 (29.2) 21 (19.8) 4 (3.8)
Hard to get regular customers 9 (8.5) 35 (33.0) 32 (30.2) 26 (24.5) 4 (3.8)
Mostly sell produce to middlemen 22 (20.8) 38 (35.8) 26 (24.5) 12 (11.3) 8 (7.5)
Farm is located far from supermarkets 21 (19.8) 41 (38.7) 33 (31.1) 9 (8.5) 2 (1.9)
Lack of cold storage 16 (15.1) 29 (27.4) 12 (11.3) 41 (38.7) 8 (7.5)
eISSN:
2081-6383
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Geosciences, Geography