1. bookTom 23 (2015): Zeszyt 2 (June 2015)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2658-2430
Pierwsze wydanie
30 Mar 2015
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
access type Otwarty dostęp

Regulatory Impact Analysis Practice in New Zealand in the Light of Models of Evaluation Use – Inspiration for the Polish Government

Data publikacji: 11 Jul 2015
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 23 (2015) - Zeszyt 2 (June 2015)
Zakres stron: 109 - 128
Otrzymano: 12 Jan 2015
Przyjęty: 23 Apr 2015
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2658-2430
Pierwsze wydanie
30 Mar 2015
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Abstract

Purpose: The paper describes the functioning of the RIA system in New Zealand using the analogy of RIA and the evaluation of public interventions. Presented solutions can provide inspiration for the Polish government in the process of improving the quality and extent of the use of RIA.

Methodology: The analysis is based on a review of government documents and literature, as well as individual interviews and correspondence with representatives of the government of NZ.

Conclusions: The RIA system in NZ is not error-free and its shortcomings include inter alia the lack of solutions with respect to ex-post analysis and insufficiently rigorous methodological approach. At the same time, a number of solutions can be regarded as good practice, e.g.: regular external quality reviews of RIS, obligation to supplement each RIS with ‘quality assessment’ and a ‘disclosure statement’ outlining their credibility and utility.

Practical implications: The presented strengths of the RIA system in NZ may serve as an inspiration for modifying the RIA system in Poland.

Originality: The RIA system is presented through the prism of the model of evaluation use, which is a related tool of collecting information about non-regulatory interventions

Keywords

Alkin, M.C. (1985). A guide for evaluation decision makers. Beverly Hills: CA, Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Alkin, M.C. and Coyle, K. (1988). Thoughts on Evaluation Utilization, Misutilization and Non- Utilization. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 14(3): 331-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(88)90027-210.1016/0191-491X(88)90027-2Search in Google Scholar

Cabinet Office (2008). Cabinet Manual 2008, Cabinet Office, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Wellington, New Zealand.Search in Google Scholar

Caroll, P. (2014). Ex Ante Evaluation in Australia and New Zealand: the case of Regulatory Impact Assessment, http://reggov2014.ibei.org/bcn-14-papers/41-19.pdf (15.10.2014).Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, P. (2010). Does regulatory impact assessment lead to better policy? Policy and Society, 29(2): 113-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.00910.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.009Search in Google Scholar

Castalia (2012). Regulatory Impact Analysis Evaluation 2012, http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/regulatory/riareview/ria-review-jun12.pdf (15.10.2014).Search in Google Scholar

Castalia (2013). Regulatory Impact Analysis Evaluation 2013, http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/regulatory/riareview/ria-review-jun13.pdf (15.12.2014).Search in Google Scholar

Castalia (2014). Regulatory Impact Analysis Evaluation 2014: A Detailed Review of Options Analysis, http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/regulatory/riareview/ria-review-jun14.pdf (15.10.2014).Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, A. (1999). Evaluation Research: An Introduction to Principles, Methods and Practice. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849209113Search in Google Scholar

Cousins, J.B. (2003). Utilization effects of participatory evaluation. In: T. Kellaghan, D.L. Stufflebeam and L.A. Wingate (eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation. Boston: Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_1610.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_16Search in Google Scholar

Cousins, J.B. and Leithwood, K.A. (1986). Current empirical research on evaluation utilization. Review of Educational Research, 56(3): 331-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654305600333110.3102/00346543056003331Search in Google Scholar

Cousins, J.B. and Leithwood, K.A. (1993). Enhancing knowledge utilization as a strategy for school improvement. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 14: 305-333.Search in Google Scholar

Drozd, M. (2014). Ocena skutków regulacji. Lecture in the framework of a post-graduate programme “Akademia Ewaluacji Programów Rozwoju Społeczno-Gospodarczego” (6th edition). Warszawa.Search in Google Scholar

Dunlop, C.A., Maggetti, M., Radaelli, C.M. and Russel, D. (2012). The many uses of regulatory impact assessment: A meta-analysis of EU and UK cases. Regulation & Governance, 6(1): 23-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01123.x Gruening, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management. International Public Management Journal, 4(2001): 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7494(01)00041-110.1016/S1096-7494(01)00041-1Search in Google Scholar

Guerin, K. (2003). Encouraging Quality Regulation: Theory and Tools. New Zealand Treasury Working Paper 03/24. Wellington, http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/research-policy/wp/2003/03-24/twp03-24.pdf (15.12.2014).Search in Google Scholar

Haber, A. and Szałaj, M. (eds.) (2009). Ewaluacja wobec wyzwań stojących przed sektorem finansów publicznych. Warszawa: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości.Search in Google Scholar

Hertin, J., Jacob, K., Pesch, U. and Pacchi, C. (2009). The Production and Use of Knowledge in Regulatory Impact Assessment - An Empirical Analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 11: 413-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.01.00410.1016/j.forpol.2009.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Højlund, S. (2014). Evaluation use in the organizational context - changing focus to improve theory. Evaluation, 20(1): 26-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135638901351605310.1177/1356389013516053Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, K., Greenseid, L.O., Toal, S.A., King, J.A., Lawrenz, F. and Volkov, B. (2009). Research on Evaluation Use: A Review of the Empirical Literature From 1986 to 2005. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(3): 377-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109821400934166010.1177/1098214009341660Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, K.W. (1980). Stimulating Evaluation Use by Integrating Academia and Practice. Science Communication, 2(2): 237-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10755470800020020510.1177/107554708000200205Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, R.B. (1998). Toward a theoretical model of evaluation utilization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 21(4): 93-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(97)00048-710.1016/S0149-7189(97)00048-7Search in Google Scholar

Kupiec, T. (2014a). Użyteczność ewaluacji jako narzędzia zarządzania regionalnymi programami operacyjnymi. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 2(56): 52-67.Search in Google Scholar

Kupiec, T. (2014b). Wykorzystanie ewaluacji w zarządzaniu programem operacyjnym na przykładzie RPO. Evaluation Conference, Kozminski University, Warszawa, 6 March 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Kupiec, T. (2015). Ewaluacja jako narzędzie zarządzania w sektorze publicznym. Studia z Polityki Publicznej, 2, Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społeczne SGH.Search in Google Scholar

Ledermann, S. (2011). Exploring the Necessary Conditions for Evaluation Use in Program Change. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(2): 159-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109821401141157310.1177/1098214011411573Search in Google Scholar

Leeuw, F.L. and Furubo, J.E. (2008). Evaluation Systems: What Are They and Why Study Them?. Evaluation, 14(2): 157-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135638900708753710.1177/1356389007087537Search in Google Scholar

Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Mark, M.M. and Henry, G.T. (2004). The Mechanisms and Outcomes of Evaluation Influence. Evaluation 10(1): 35-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135638900404232610.1177/1356389004042326Search in Google Scholar

New Zealand Treasury (2013). Regulatory impact analysis handbook. Wellington.Search in Google Scholar

Nilsson, M., Jordan, A., Turnpenny, J., Hertin, J., Nykvist, B. and Russel, D. (2008). The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making: an analysis of three European countries and the European Union. Policy Sciences, 41(4): 335-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-008-9071-110.1007/s11077-008-9071-1Search in Google Scholar

NZIER (2008). Compliance with Regulatory Impact Analysis Requirements: 2007 Evaluation [for the Ministry of Economic Development], http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/regulatory/riareview/ria-review-feb08.pdf (15.12. 2014).Search in Google Scholar

NZIER (2011). Regulatory Impact Assessment Evaluation 2010, http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/regulatory/riareview/ria-review-feb11.pdf (15.12.2014).Search in Google Scholar

OECD (1997). Regulatory Impact Analysis - Best Practices in OECD Countries. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/35258828.pdf (7.12.2014).10.1787/9789264162150-enSearch in Google Scholar

OECD (2002). Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries: From Interventionism to Regulatory Governance.Search in Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2008). Building an Institutional Framework for Regulatory Impact Analysis: Guidance for Policy Makers. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/40984990.pdf (7.12.2014).10.1787/9789264050013-enSearch in Google Scholar

OECD (2008). Introductory Handbook for Undertaking Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA). Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/44789472.pdf (7.12. 2014). OECD (2009). Regulatory Impact Analysis: A Tool for Policy Coherence. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/42047618.pdf (7.12.2014).Search in Google Scholar

Offices of the Ministers of Finance & Regulatory Reform (2013). Regulatory systems paper two: improving New Zealand’s regulatory performance, www.treasury.govt.nz/economy/regulation/inforeleases/pdfs/reg-2597298.pdf (15.10. 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Olejniczak, K. (2008). Mechanizmy wykorzystania ewaluacji. Studium ewaluacji średniookresowych INTERREG III. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.Search in Google Scholar

Olejniczak, K., Kupiec, T. and Raimondo, E. (2015). Brokerzy wiedzy. Nowe spojrzenie na rolę jednostek ewaluacyjnych. In: A. Haber and K. Olejniczak (eds.), (R)ewaluacja 2. Warszawa: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości.Search in Google Scholar

Osbourne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing Government. New York: Plume.Search in Google Scholar

Owen, J.M. (2007). Program evaluation: forms and approaches. London: The Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pallot, J. (1998). New Public Management Reform in New Zealand. The Collective Strategy Phase. International Public Management Journal, 1(1): 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7494(99)80083-X 10.1016/S1096-7494(99)80083-XSearch in Google Scholar

Patton, M.Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Patton, M.Q., Grimes, P.S., Guthrie, K.M., Brennan, N.J., French, B.D. and Blyth, D.A. (1977). In search of impact: An analysis of the utilization of federal health evaluation research. In: C.H.Search in Google Scholar

Weiss (ed.), Using social research in public policy making. Lexington, MA: Heath.Search in Google Scholar

Pawson, R. (2002). Evidence-based Policy: In: Search of a Method. Evaluation 8(2): 157-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135890200200800251210.1177/1358902002008002512Search in Google Scholar

Productivity Commission (2014). Regulatory institutions and practices. The New Zealand Productivity Commission, 30 June 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Radaelli, C.M. (2009). Desperately Seeking Regulatory Impact Assessments: Diary of a Reflective Researcher. Evaluation, 15: 31-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135638900809787010.1177/1356389008097870Search in Google Scholar

Radaelli, C.M. (2010). Rationality, Power, Management and Symbols: Four Images of Regulatory Impact Assessment. Scandinavian Political Studies, 33(2): 164-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2009.00245.x 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2009.00245.xSearch in Google Scholar

Renda, A. (2006). Impact Assessment in the EU: The State of the Art and the Art of the State. Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels.Search in Google Scholar

Rissi C., Sager F. (2013). Types of knowledge utilization of regulatory impact assessments: Evidence from Swiss policymaking. Regulation & Governance, 7: 348-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.1200210.1111/rego.12002Search in Google Scholar

Rist, R. and Stame, N. (eds.) (2006). From Studies to Streams: Managing Evaluative Systems. London: Transaction Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

RM (Council of Ministers) (2002). Rules of Procedure of the Council of Ministers. Act No 49 of the Council of Ministers of 19 March 2002, M.P. No. 13, item 221.Search in Google Scholar

RM (Council of Ministers) (2013). “Better Regulations” programme (“Lepsze Regulacje”) for 2012-2015, adopted by the Council of Ministers on 22 January 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Rossi, P.H., Freeman H.E. and Lipsey, M.W. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, 7th edition, Thousand Oaks, London, Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Sanderson, I. (2002). Making Sense of ‘What Works’: Evidence Based Policy Making as Instrumental Rationality? Public Policy and Administration, 17(3): 61-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095207670201700305 Saunders, M. (2012). The use and usability of evaluation outputs: A social practice approach.Search in Google Scholar

Evaluation, 18(4): 421-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135638901245911310.1177/1356389012459113Search in Google Scholar

Sawyer, A. (2008). Regulatory Impact Statements and Accountability: Recent Australasian Evidence. Journal of Australian Taxation, 11(1): 42-107.Search in Google Scholar

SGI (2014). Sustainable Governance Indicators, http://www.sgi-network.org/2014/ (7.10.2014).Search in Google Scholar

Shulha, L.M. and Cousins, J.B. (1997). Evaluation use: Theory, research, and practice since 1986. Evaluation Practice, 18(3): 195-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0886-1633(97)90027-110.1016/S0886-1633(97)90027-1Search in Google Scholar

SSC (2014). A guide to New Zealand’s Central government agencies, State Service Commission 2014, http://www.ssc.govt.nz/sites/all/files/guide-to-central-govt-agencies-5sep2014.pdf (15.10. 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Staroňová, K. (2014). Analyzing scientific knowledge in documents: The case of regulatory impact assessment. Human Affairs, 24(3): 299-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0228-710.2478/s13374-014-0228-7Search in Google Scholar

The Treasury (2011). Regulatory Impact Statement - Regulating for Better Regulation - What is the Potential of a Regulatory Responsibility Act? http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/informationreleases/ris/pdfs/ris-tsy-rbr-mar11.pdf (15.10. 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Weiss, C.H., Murphy-Graham, E., Petrosino, A. and Gandhi, A.G. (2008). The Fairy Godmother - and Her Warts: Making the Dream of Evidence-Based Policy Come True. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(1): 29-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109821400731374210.1177/1098214007313742Search in Google Scholar

Weiss, C.H., Murphy-Graham, E. and Birkeland, S. (2005). An Alternate Route to Policy Influence: How Evaluations Affect D.A.R.E. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1): 12-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214004273337 10.1177/1098214004273337Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo