1. bookTom 31 (2021): Zeszyt 1 (December 2021)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2299-6885
Pierwsze wydanie
28 Dec 2012
Częstotliwość wydawania
1 raz w roku
Języki
Angielski
Otwarty dostęp

Online revisions in Swedish as a foreign language – a longitudinal study

Data publikacji: 03 Mar 2022
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 31 (2021) - Zeszyt 1 (December 2021)
Zakres stron: 4 - 14
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2299-6885
Pierwsze wydanie
28 Dec 2012
Częstotliwość wydawania
1 raz w roku
Języki
Angielski

Barkaoui, K. (2016). What and When Second-Language Learners Revise When Responding to Timed Writing Tasks on the Computer: The Roles of Task Type, Second Language Proficiency, and Keyboarding Skills. The Modern Language Journal 100(1), s. 320–340.10.1111/modl.12316 Search in Google Scholar

Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. The Psychology of Education and Instruction Series. Broadway, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar

Britton, J. et al. (1975). The Development of Writing Abilities (11-18). London: Schools Council. Search in Google Scholar

Chennoweth, N. A., Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in Writing. Generating Text in L1 and L2. Written Communication 18(1), s. 80–98.10.1177/0741088301018001004 Search in Google Scholar

Faigley, L., Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing Revision. College Composition and Communication 32(4), s. 400–414.10.2307/356602 Search in Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research 57(4), s. 481–506.10.3102/00346543057004481 Search in Google Scholar

Flower, L., Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication 32(4), s. 365–387.10.2307/356600 Search in Google Scholar

Flower, L. et al. (1986). Detection, diagnosis and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication 37(1), s. 16–55.10.2307/357381 Search in Google Scholar

Kellogg, R. T.(1996). A model of working memory in writing.[I:]: M. Levy & S. Ransdell (red.), The science of writing: theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (s. 57–71). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar

Kowal, I. (2011). Online revisions in FL writing: general rules and individual differences. [I:] J. Arabski & A. Wojtaszek (red.), Individual learner differences in SLA (s. 309–320). Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters. Search in Google Scholar

Kowal, I. (2016). The Dynamics of Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Second Language Development. Kraków: Jagiellonian University Press.10.4467/K9474.72/16.16.6986 Search in Google Scholar

Lindgren, E., Sullivan, K. P. (2006). Analysing Online Revision. [I:] E. Lindgren & K. P. H. Sullivan (red.), Computer Keystroke Logging and Writing : Methods and Applications (s. 157–188). Amsterdam: Brill. Search in Google Scholar

New, E. (1999). Computer-aided writing in French as a foreign language: A qualitative and quantitative look at the process of revision. The Modern Language Journal, Volume 1, s. 80–97.10.1111/0026-7902.00007 Search in Google Scholar

Rohman, D. G. (1965). Pre-Writing the Stage of Discovery in the Writing Process. College Composition and Communication 16(2), s. 106–112.10.2307/354885 Search in Google Scholar

Sommers, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication 31(4), s. 378–388.10.2307/356588 Search in Google Scholar

Stevenson, M. et al. (2006). Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL, Journal of Second Language Writing 15(3), s. 201–233. Search in Google Scholar

Strömqvist, S. & Malmsten, L. (1998). Scriptlog pro 1.04 - user’s manual. Technical. Göteborg: University of Göteborg. Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo