[
Assunçao-Denis, M.-È., Tomalty, R. (2019). Increasing cycling for transportation in Canadian communities: Understanding what works. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 123, 288–304. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.11.010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Banerjee, A., Łukawska, M., Jensen, A. F., Haustein, S. (2021). Facilitating bicycle commuting beyond short distances: insights from existing literature. Transport Reviews, 42(1), 526–550. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2021.2004261.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bankwatch Network (2022). Urban public transport reform in Tbilisi. Tbilisi: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brand, C., Dons, E., Anaya-Boig, E., Avila-Palencia, I., Clark, A., de Nazelle, A., Gascon, M., Gaupp-Berghausen, M., Gerike, R., Götschi, G., Iacorossi, F., Kahlmeier, S., Laeremans, M., Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J., Orjuela, J.P., Racioppi, F., Raser, E., Rojas-Rueda, D., Standaert, A., Stigell, E., Sulikova, S., Wegener, S., Int Panis, L. (2021). The climate change mitigation effects of daily active travel in cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102764.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heinen, E., Buehler, R. (2019). Bicycle parking: a systematic review of scientific literature on parking behaviour, parking preferences, and their influence on cycling and travel behaviour. Transport reviews, 39(5) 630–656. DOI:10.1080/01441647.2019.1590477.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heinen, E., Maat, K., Wee, B. (2011). The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(2), 102–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2010.08.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heinen, E., Maat, K., Wee, B. (2012). The effect of work-related factors on the bicycle commute mode choice in the Netherlands. Transportation, 40, 23–43. DOI: 10.1007/s11116-012-9399-4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hernández-Orallo, J. (2013). ROC curves for regression, Pattern Recognition, 46(12), 3395–3411. DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2013.06.014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iwińska, K., Blicharska, M., Pierotti, L., Tainio, M., Nazelle, A. (2018). Cycling in Warsaw, Poland – Perceived enablers and barriers according to cyclists and non-cyclists. Transportation Research Part A, 113, 291–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kacharava, N., Maisuradze, N., Iskandarova, N. (2021). Traffic congestion and efficient ways to deal with it in Tbilisi, Georgia. Icontech international journal of surveys, engineering, technology, 5(4), 10–17. DOI: 10.46291/ICONTECHvol5iss4pp10-17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Litman, T. (2022). Evaluating Transportation Equity: Guidance for Incorporating Distributional Impacts in Transport Planning. Institute of Transportation Engineers, 92(4), 43–49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bai, L., Sze, N.N., Liu, P., Haggart, A.G. (2020). Effect of environmental awareness on electric bicycle users’ mode choices. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102320
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lusk, A.C., Morency, P., Miranda-Moreno, L.F., Willett, W.C., Dennerlein, J.T. (2013). Bicycle guidelines and crash rates on cycle tracks in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 103(7), 1240–1248. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301043.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Malhotra, N.K., Nunan, D., Birks, D.F. (2017). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, 5th Edition. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mansoor, U., Kashifi, T.M., Safi, F., Rahman, S.M. (2021). A review of factors and benefits of non-motorized transport: a way forward for developing countries. Environment Development and Sustainability, 24(2), 1560–1582. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01531-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mbachu H.I. Nduka E.C. Nja M.E. (2012). Designing a Pseudo R-Squared Goodness-of-Fit Measure in Generalized Linear Models. Journal of Mathematics Research, 4(2), 148–154 DOI: 10.5539/jmr.v4n2p148.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milković, M., Štambuk, M. (2015). To Bike or not to Bike? Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting Bicycle Commuting Among Students in Zagreb. Psihologijske teme, 24(2), 187–205. DOI: hrcak.srce.hr/142128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mohiuddin, H., Jamal, S., Bhuiya, M.R. (2022). To bike or not to bike: Exploring cycling for commuting and non-commuting in Bangladesh. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 14, 100614. DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100614.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muñoz, B., Monzon, A., López, E. (2016). Transition to a cyclable city: Latent variables affecting bicycle commuting. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 84, 4–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.10.006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nkurunziza, A., Zuidgeest, M., Brussel, M., Maarseveen, M.V. (2012). Examining the potential for modal change: Motivators and barriers. Transport Policy, 24, 249–259. DOI: 10.1016/j. tranpol.2012.09.002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pucher, J., Buehler, R. (2012). City Cycling. England: MIT press. DOI: 10.1016/j. ypmed.2013.05.006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roman, M., Roman, M. (2014). Bicycle Transport as an Opportunity to Develop Urban Tourism – Warsaw Example. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 151(30), 295–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.027.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tan Limin, Ma Changxi (2021). Choice behavior of commuters’ rail transit mode during the COVID-19 pandemic based on logistic model. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 8(2), 186–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtte.2020.07.002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torrisi, V., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Tesoriere, G., Campisi, T. (2021). Exploring the factors affecting bike-sharing demand: evidence from student perceptions, usage patterns and adoption barriers. Transportation Research Procedia, 52, 573–580. DOI: 10.1016/j. trpro.2021.01.068.
]Search in Google Scholar