1. bookTom 24 (2010): Zeszyt 1 (April 2010)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2719-9509
Pierwsze wydanie
01 Jan 1992
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Otwarty dostęp

The Influence of Cigarette Designs and Smoking Regimes on Vapour Phase Yields

Data publikacji: 30 Dec 2014
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 24 (2010) - Zeszyt 1 (April 2010)
Zakres stron: 34 - 46
Otrzymano: 01 Oct 2008
Przyjęty: 23 Aug 2009
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2719-9509
Pierwsze wydanie
01 Jan 1992
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski

1. Burns, D. M., E. Dybing, N. Gray, S. S. Hecht, C. Anderson, T. Sanner, R. O'Connor, M. V. Djordjevic, C. Dresler, P. Hainaut, M. Jarvis, A. Opperhuizen, and K. Straif: Mandated lowering of toxicants in cigarette smoke: A description of the WHO TobReg proposal; Tob. Control 17 (2008) 132–141.Search in Google Scholar

2. TobReg: The scientific basis of tobacco product regulation; Report of a WHO Study Group (TobReg); WHO Technical Report Series 945, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

3. Hammond, D., F. Wiebel, L. T. Kozlowski, R. Borland, K. M. Cummings, R. J. O'Connor, A. McNeill, G. N. Connolly, D. Arnott, and G. T. Fong: Revising the machine smoking regime for cigarette emissions: Implications for tobacco control policy; Tob. Control 16 (2007) 8–14.Search in Google Scholar

4. Pickworth, W., P. Houlgate, M. Schorp, M. Dixon, M. F. Borgerding, and G. Zaatari: A review of human smoking behaviour data and recommendations for a new ISO standard for machine smoking of cigarettes; Report of the Ad Hoc WG9 smoking behaviour review team to ISO/TC 126 WG9 2005, see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/mgt27a00 (accessed April 2010)Search in Google Scholar

5. Scherer, G., M. Urban, J. Engl, H. -W. Hagedorn, and K. Riedel: Influence of smoking charcoal filter tipped cigarettes on various biomarkers of exposure; Inhal. Toxicol. 18 (2006) 821–829.Search in Google Scholar

6. Waller, R. E. and P. Froggatt: Product modification; Brit. Med. Bull. 52 (1996) 193–205.10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a0115268746307Search in Google Scholar

7. European Commission Directive: On the approxi-mation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products; 2001/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 5 June 2001.Search in Google Scholar

8. LeMoigne, C., D. Raverdy-Lambert, N. Tardif, J. M. Loureau, and G. LeBourvellec: Market survey: Study on the cigarette design used in Europe; CORESTA Congress, 2007, Jeju, Korea Abstr. SSPT 02, p. 16, see http://www.coresta.org/Past_Abstracts/Jeju2007-SmokeTech.pdf (accessed April 2010)Search in Google Scholar

9. O'Connor, R. J., K. M. Cummings, A. McNeill, and L. T. Kozlowski: How did UK cigarette makers reduce tar to 10 mg or less?; Brit. Med. J. 332 (2006) 302.Search in Google Scholar

10. European Commission Report: Draft standardisation mandate to CEN relating to the fire safety requirement for cigarettes; Document 32/2008-EN 4 th May 2008.Search in Google Scholar

11. ISO Standard 3308: Routine analytical smoking machine - Definition and standard conditions; International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva 2000.Search in Google Scholar

12. Borgerding, M. F., J. A. Bodnar, and D. E. Wingate: The 1999 Massachusetts Benchmark Study - Final Report; presented to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health 24th July 2000, see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/yek21c00 (accessed April 2010)Search in Google Scholar

13. Health Canada: Determination of “Tar”, Nicotine and Carbon Monoxide in Mainstream Tobacco Smoke; see http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/alt_formats/hecs-sesc/pdf/tobac-tabac/legislation/reg/indust/method/_main-principal/nicotine-eng.pdf (accessed April 2010)Search in Google Scholar

14. ISO 3402: Tobacco and tobacco products - Atmo-sphere for conditioning and testing; International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva 1999.Search in Google Scholar

15. Health Canada methods, see http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/tobac-tabac/legislation/reg/indust/method/index-eng.php#main (accessed April 2010)Search in Google Scholar

16. Wagner, K. A., R. Higby, and K. Stutt: Puff by puff analysis of selected mainstream smoke constituents in the Kentucky Reference 2R4F cigarette; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2005) 273–279.Search in Google Scholar

17. Baker, R. R., M. Dixon, and C. Hill: The incidence and consequence of filter vent blocking amongst British smokers; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 18 (1998) 71–83.Search in Google Scholar

18. Mathis, D.: Flow rate dependence of ventilation; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1987) 11–19.Search in Google Scholar

19. Dashley, F.: Simultaneous puff by puff filter and tobacco rod ventilation measurements; BAT Report, 1980, RD 1768 in Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, Bates number 570521653/1696Search in Google Scholar

20. Morie, G. P.: Some factors that affect the diffusion of carbon monoxide out of cigarettes; Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 174–176.Search in Google Scholar

21. Mariner, D. C., M. Booty, G. Mullard, and C. J. Shepperd: A comparison of German smokers’ exposure to tar and nicotine using analysis of smoked cigarette filters with yields from a range of machine smoking regimes; Poster presented at the 9th Annual European Meeting of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, Madrid, Spain, October 3–6, 2007, see http://www.bat-science.com/groupms/sites/bat_7awfh3.nsf/vwPagesWebLive/DO7AXGPQ/$FILE/medM D7DTCV7.pdf?openelement (accessed April 2010)Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo