[ALBELDA, R. & TILLY, C. (1997) Glass Ceilings and Bottomless Pits: Women’s Work, Women’s Poverty. Boston: South End Press.10.1111/j.1743-4580.1998.tb00058.x]Search in Google Scholar
[BAERT, S., DE PAUW, A. S. & DESCHACHT, N. (2016) Do Employer Preferences Contribute to Sticky Floors? The Journal of Work and Policy. 69 (3), pp. 714–736.]Search in Google Scholar
[BARRETO, M., RYAN, M. K. & SCHMITT, M. T. (2009) Introduction: Is the glass ceiling still relevant in the 21st century? In: Barreto, M., Ryan, M. K., & Schmitt, M. T. (eds.) Psychology of women book series. The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. Washington: American Psychological Association.10.1037/11863-000]Search in Google Scholar
[BORDO, S. (1993) Unberable Weight. Feminism, Western Culture and the Body. Ber-kley: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[DERKS, B. (2017) Quee bee syndrome. In: Rogelberg. S. G. (eds.) The SAGE Encyclope-dia of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[DERKS, B., ELLEMERS, N., LAAR, C. & GROOT, K. (2011) Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee? British Journal of Social Psychology. 50, pp. 519–535.]Search in Google Scholar
[DERKS, B., LAAR, C. & ELLEMERS, N. (2016) The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly. 27, pp. 456–469.10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.007]Search in Google Scholar
[ELLEMERS, N., VAN DEN HEUVEL, H., DE GILDER, D., MAASS, A. & BONVINI, A. (2004) The underrepresentation of women in science: differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British Journal of Social Psychology. 43 (3), pp. 315–338.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eurostat (2014) Labour market. [Online] Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/5786257/KS-HA-14-001-04-EN.PDF/6e76839c-650e-43d9-80f8-ca12da933f07. [Accessed: 14th May 2018].]Search in Google Scholar
[FANIKO, K., ELLEMERS, N. & DERKS, B. (2016) Queen Bees and Alpha Males: Are successful women more competitive than successful men? European Journal of Social Psychology. 46 (7), pp. 903–913.]Search in Google Scholar
[FARADY-BRASH, F. (2009) Working Life as a House a tale of floors, walls and ceiling. In: Paludi, M.A. (eds.) Feminism and Women’s Rights Worldwide. Vol. 1. Heritage, Roles, and Issues (Women’s Psychology). Santa Barbara—Denver: Praeger.]Search in Google Scholar
[GARTELL, C. & COOPER, C. L. (2007) No (cracks) in the glass ceiling: women managers, stress and the barriers to success. In Bilmoria, D. & Piderit, S. K. (eds.) Handbook on Women in Business and Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elger Publishing Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[GROMKOWSKA-MELOSIK, A. (2002) Kobiecość w kulturze globalnej: rekonstrukcje i reprezentacje. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Wolumin.]Search in Google Scholar
[GROMKOWSKA-MELOSIK, A. (2008) Indywidualizm, liberalna edukacja i paradoksy emancypacji kobiet. In: Gromkowska-Melosik, A. & Gmerek, T. (eds.) Problemy nierówności społecznej w teorii i praktyce edukacyjnej. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.]Search in Google Scholar
[GROMKOWSKA-MELOSIK, A. (2011) Edukacja i (nie)równość społeczna kobiet. Studium dynamiki dostępu. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.]Search in Google Scholar
[GROMKOWSKA-MELOSIK, A. (2013) Kobieta epoki wiktoriańskiej: tożsamość, ciało i medykalizacja. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.]Search in Google Scholar
[GROMKOWSKA-MELOSIK, A. (2016) Społeczne konstrukcje agresji dziewcząt. Wybrane konteksty i kontrowersje. Studia Edukacyjne. 39, pp. 61–72.]Search in Google Scholar
[KILBOURNE, J. (1994) Still Killing us Softly: Advertising and the Obsession with Thinners. In: Fallon, P., Katzman, M. A. & Wooley, S. C. (eds.) Feminist Perspetives on Eating Disorders, New York: The Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[LIPS, H. (2013) The Gender Pay Gap: Challenging the Rationalizations. Perceived Equity, Discrimination, and the Limits of Human Capital Models. Sex Roles. 68 (3), pp. 169–185.]Search in Google Scholar
[MARCINIAK, A. (2004) Niewidzialne bariery awansu kobiet—apokryf „szklanego sufitu”? Zeszyty Studiów Doktoranckich. Akademia Ekonomiczna w Poznaniu. Wydział Ekonomii, no. 19, pp. 5–19. [Online] Available from: http://kim1.efs.gfkm.pl/userfiles/file/KIM/literatura/A_Marciniak_szklany%20sufit.pdf. [Accessed: 16th May 2018].]Search in Google Scholar
[MAVIN, S. (2008) Queen Bees, Wannabees and Afraid to Bees: No More ‘Best Enemies’ for Women in Management? British Journal of Management. 19, pp. 75–S84.]Search in Google Scholar
[MELOSIK, Z. (2010) Tożsamość, ciało i władza w kulturze instant. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD (2016) Gender differences in employment outcomes. [Online] Available from: https://www.oecd.org/els/soc/LMF_1_6_Gender_differences_in_employment_outcomes.pdf. [Accessed: 14th May 2018].]Search in Google Scholar
[POLKOWSKA, D. (2007) Bariery w dostępie kobiet do rynku pracy a kontrakt płci. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny. 1, pp. 231–243.]Search in Google Scholar
[SZYMCZAK, E. (2016) Dynamika dostępu kobiet do studiów politechnicznych. Teoria i praktyka społeczna. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.]Search in Google Scholar
[TITKOW, A. (2007) Tożsamość polskich kobiet. Ciągłość, zmiana, konteksty. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Filozofii i Socjologii PAN.]Search in Google Scholar
[ZHAO, S. & FOO, M. D. (2016) Queen Bee Syndrome. The real reason women do not promote women. Center for Creative Leadership. [Online] Available from: https://www.ccl.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Queen-Bee-Syndrome.pdf. [Accessed: 18th May 2018].10.35613/ccl.2016.1066]Search in Google Scholar
