Choosing a journal to publish your research in can be time-consuming and even daunting, especially since most academic journals discourage multiple submissions in order to safeguard reviewers’ time. It is a common problem, no matter how experienced you are.
While early-career researchers are unfamiliar with well-respected journals in their field, experienced scholars can become too comfortable with submitting to the same journals, thus omitting to find a wider audience for their work.
A good way to start is to focus on which scholarly journals publish articles related to your subject area to achieve a good fit. You can ask your supervisor or colleagues for recommendations and visit your university’s library to check the journals they stock. It is also helpful to search online for calls for papers in your field and browse publishers’ websites.
Although multiple submissions are discouraged, it makes sense to have a shortlist of the best journals to publish research papers to go through, in case you receive a rejection. Check each academic journal’s aims and scope to find out if your paper is relevant to the journal’s audience and fitting with the journal’s purpose. You can also browse previous issues to see what type of articles they have published.
Does your paper fit a general-interest journal or do you need to find a specialist scholarly publication? Could your research be of interest to an international audience or is it more region-specific?
You might also want to read about the journal’s policies and procedures, especially its peer-review policy and what publishing option would benefit you – traditional or open-access journals.
It is important to publish in an academic journal with a good Impact Factor and steer away from predatory publishers, which exploit the pressure to publish within academia by luring researchers to submit their papers to low-quality journals and then charging high publication fees. Where you choose to publish your work can seriously impact your career progression, funding opportunities and professional reputation.
Prominent scientific and academic journals are indexed and listed in reputable databases – look beyond Google Scholar to information sources such as EBSCOHost, SCOPUS, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), the International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS), Clarivate Analytics -Web of Science, the Norwegian List, Sherpa Romeo and WorldCat. Another source of information you might want to consider is the Scimago Journal Rank, useful for finding prominent journals under a specific category.
Last but not least, do check the author’s guidelines – imagine having to cut down your paper from 5000 words to 3000 or reducing the number of your references because a certain journal imposes a limit! If possible, do start your shortlist while you are still working on your research paper, having a few target journals in mind with their specific requirements will increase the chances of publication.
You can browse Sciendo’s wide range of journals here to find your best match.
Whether you are a qualitative or quantitative researcher, here are our top tips to help you submit your research paper in confidence.
Meet online the Sciendo Sales representatives during the conference “Anthropology and Geography: Dialogues Past, Present and Future” on 14-18 September 2020: www.therai.org.uk/conferences/anthropology-and-geography The conference is co-organized by The British Academy, The British Museum, The Royal Anthropological Institute, The Royal Geographical Society, and SOAS University of London.
In a previous article entitled Publishing your first academic book, we advised early-career researchers to start publishing articles in reputable journals as a way to get experience and build up a career as academic authors. Open-access journals are particularly helpful because they are not behind a paywall and can reach a wider audience.
The research process expects ethical behaviour and good practice. As plagiarism and self-plagiarism are on the increase, academic publishers are using software to detect these instances of scientific misconduct.