Rivista e Edizione

Volume 23 (2023): Edizione 3 (September 2023)

Volume 23 (2023): Edizione 2 (June 2023)

Volume 23 (2023): Edizione 1 (March 2023)

Volume 22 (2022): Edizione 4 (December 2022)

Volume 22 (2022): Edizione 3 (September 2022)

Volume 22 (2022): Edizione 2 (June 2022)

Volume 22 (2022): Edizione 1 (March 2022)

Volume 21 (2021): Edizione 4 (December 2021)

Volume 21 (2021): Edizione 3 (September 2021)

Volume 21 (2021): Edizione 2 (June 2021)

Volume 21 (2021): Edizione 1 (March 2021)

Volume 20 (2020): Edizione 4 (December 2020)

Volume 20 (2020): Edizione 3 (September 2020)

Volume 20 (2020): Edizione 2 (June 2020)

Volume 20 (2020): Edizione 1 (March 2020)

Volume 19 (2019): Edizione 4 (December 2019)

Volume 19 (2019): Edizione 3 (September 2019)

Volume 19 (2019): Edizione 2 (June 2019)

Volume 19 (2019): Edizione 1 (March 2019)

Volume 18 (2018): Edizione 4 (December 2018)

Volume 18 (2018): Edizione 3 (September 2018)

Volume 18 (2018): Edizione 2 (June 2018)

Volume 18 (2018): Edizione 1 (March 2018)

Volume 17 (2017): Edizione 4 (December 2017)

Volume 17 (2017): Edizione 3 (September 2017)

Volume 17 (2017): Edizione 2 (June 2017)

Volume 17 (2017): Edizione 1 (March 2017)

Volume 16 (2016): Edizione 4 (December 2016)

Volume 16 (2016): Edizione 3 (September 2016)

Volume 16 (2016): Edizione 2 (June 2016)

Volume 16 (2016): Edizione 1 (March 2016)

Volume 15 (2015): Edizione 4 (December 2015)

Volume 15 (2015): Edizione 3 (September 2015)

Volume 15 (2015): Edizione 2 (June 2015)

Volume 15 (2015): Edizione 1 (March 2015)

Volume 14 (2015): Edizione 4 (January 2015)

Volume 14 (2014): Edizione 3 (September 2014)

Volume 14 (2014): Edizione 2 (June 2014)

Volume 14 (2014): Edizione 1 (March 2014)

Volume 13 (2013): Edizione 4 (December 2013)

Volume 13 (2013): Edizione 3 (September 2013)

Volume 13 (2013): Edizione 2 (June 2013)

Volume 13 (2013): Edizione 1 (March 2013)

Volume 12 (2012): Edizione 4 (December 2012)

Volume 12 (2012): Edizione 3 (October 2012)

Volume 12 (2012): Edizione 2 (January 2012)

Volume 12 (2012): Edizione 1 (January 2012)

Volume 11 (2011): Edizione 4 (January 2011)

Volume 11 (2011): Edizione 3 (January 2011)

Volume 11 (2011): Edizione 2 (January 2011)

Volume 11 (2011): Edizione 1 (January 2011)

Volume 10 (2010): Edizione 4 (January 2010)

Volume 10 (2010): Edizione 3 (January 2010)

Volume 10 (2010): Edizione 2 (January 2010)

Volume 10 (2010): Edizione 1 (January 2010)

Volume 9 (2009): Edizione 4 (January 2009)

Volume 9 (2009): Edizione 3 (January 2009)

Volume 9 (2009): Edizione 2 (January 2009)

Dettagli della rivista
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1804-1663
ISSN
1213-2446
Pubblicato per la prima volta
19 Feb 2010
Periodo di pubblicazione
4 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

Cerca

Volume 13 (2013): Edizione 1 (March 2013)

Dettagli della rivista
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1804-1663
ISSN
1213-2446
Pubblicato per la prima volta
19 Feb 2010
Periodo di pubblicazione
4 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

Cerca

0 Articoli
Accesso libero

To What Extent are Stock Returns Driven by Mean and Volatility Spillover Effects? – Evidence from Eight European Stock Markets

Pubblicato online: 20 Apr 2013
Pagine: 3 - 29

Astratto

Abstract

The paper investigates mean and volatility spillover effects from the U.S and EU stock markets as well as oil price market into national stock markets of eight European countries. The study finds strong indication of volatility spillover effects from the US-global, EU-regional, and the world factor oil towards individual stock markets. While both mean and volatility spillover transmissions from the US are found to be significant, EU mean spillover effects are negligible. To evaluate the magnitude of volatility spillovers, the variance ratios are also computed and the results draw to attention that the individual emerging countries’ stock returns are mostly influenced by the U.S volatility spillovers rather than EU or oil markets. Additionally, examination of only global and regional stock markets spillover transmissions into European stock markets also confirms the dominating presence of the U.S spillover transmissions. Furthermore, I also implement asymmetric tests on stock returns of eight markets. The stock market returns of Hungary, Poland, Russia and the Ukraine are found to respond asymmetrically to negative and positive shocks in the US stock returns. The weak evidence of asymmetric effects with respect to oil market shocks is found only in the case of Russia and the quantified variance ratios indicate that presence of oil market shocks are relatively higher for Russia. Moreover, a model with dummy variable confirms the effect of European Union enlargement on stock returns only for Romania. Finally, a conditional model suggests that the spillover effects are partially explained by instrumental macroeconomic variables, out of which exchange rate fluctuations play the key role in explaining the spillover parameters rather than total trade to GDP ratios in most investigated countries.

Parole chiave

  • Stock markets
  • the U.S
  • E.U
  • volatility spillovers
  • emerging markets
  • mean
  • oil price
  • exchange rates
  • asymmetric effects
Accesso libero

Job Differentiation vs. Unemployment

Pubblicato online: 20 Apr 2013
Pagine: 30 - 42

Astratto

Abstract

We use a matching model in which the horizontal job differentiation results from the rationale response of firms to the state of the labor market. We show that a decrease in the labor market tightness gives firms an incentive to raise the differentiation degree of jobs. Comparative statics suggests that an increase in unemployment benefits and in the minimum wage improves productivity of skilled workers by making jobs more differentiated, and leads to a raise in unemployment rate.

Parole chiave

  • Job Differentiation
  • Productivity
  • Matching
  • Unemployment
Accesso libero

Transparency in the Allocation of Municipal Grants for Sports and Voucher Systems in the Czech Republic

Pubblicato online: 20 Apr 2013
Pagine: 43 - 57

Astratto

Abstract

This paper will assess transparency in the decision-making process in sports grants allocation. In comparison with other parts of the public sector, surprisingly little is known about transparency in the sports sector. An increasing portion of public funds is spent on sport grants; this establishes the necessity for research. Can any positive effects of sports grants be expected to appear without transparency in the decisionmaking process? An examination of the process in reality is crucial for future public resources allocation. Based on the general assumption that NGOs are important actors in economic and political development, we address the Czech Republic at the municipal level.

The main goals of this paper are to assess the transparency of the allocation of public grants for sport organizations on the municipal level in the Czech Republic and to discuss one possible method for improving system transparency and efficiency: vouchers.

We discuss sport vouchers as a possible tool for improving transparency. Vouchers solve the problem of transparency in the decision-making process by transferring the purchasing power to the client. Although using sports vouchers as a tool for allocating public resources is quite rare, there are a few examples of this practice in the Czech Republic. We established two research questions: (1) Do sport clubs perceive the allocation of sport grants at the municipality level as transparent? (2) Do sport clubs consider a voucher system as helpful for the transparency? To answer these questions, we discuss the theory and specific conditions in the Czech Republic; we perform a survey among sport clubs and we examine examples of voucher implementation; and we discuss the general consequences of our results.

Keywords

  • Public sector
  • public finance
  • grants
  • sport
  • NGO
  • allocation rules
  • municipality
  • transparency
  • vouchers
0 Articoli
Accesso libero

To What Extent are Stock Returns Driven by Mean and Volatility Spillover Effects? – Evidence from Eight European Stock Markets

Pubblicato online: 20 Apr 2013
Pagine: 3 - 29

Astratto

Abstract

The paper investigates mean and volatility spillover effects from the U.S and EU stock markets as well as oil price market into national stock markets of eight European countries. The study finds strong indication of volatility spillover effects from the US-global, EU-regional, and the world factor oil towards individual stock markets. While both mean and volatility spillover transmissions from the US are found to be significant, EU mean spillover effects are negligible. To evaluate the magnitude of volatility spillovers, the variance ratios are also computed and the results draw to attention that the individual emerging countries’ stock returns are mostly influenced by the U.S volatility spillovers rather than EU or oil markets. Additionally, examination of only global and regional stock markets spillover transmissions into European stock markets also confirms the dominating presence of the U.S spillover transmissions. Furthermore, I also implement asymmetric tests on stock returns of eight markets. The stock market returns of Hungary, Poland, Russia and the Ukraine are found to respond asymmetrically to negative and positive shocks in the US stock returns. The weak evidence of asymmetric effects with respect to oil market shocks is found only in the case of Russia and the quantified variance ratios indicate that presence of oil market shocks are relatively higher for Russia. Moreover, a model with dummy variable confirms the effect of European Union enlargement on stock returns only for Romania. Finally, a conditional model suggests that the spillover effects are partially explained by instrumental macroeconomic variables, out of which exchange rate fluctuations play the key role in explaining the spillover parameters rather than total trade to GDP ratios in most investigated countries.

Parole chiave

  • Stock markets
  • the U.S
  • E.U
  • volatility spillovers
  • emerging markets
  • mean
  • oil price
  • exchange rates
  • asymmetric effects
Accesso libero

Job Differentiation vs. Unemployment

Pubblicato online: 20 Apr 2013
Pagine: 30 - 42

Astratto

Abstract

We use a matching model in which the horizontal job differentiation results from the rationale response of firms to the state of the labor market. We show that a decrease in the labor market tightness gives firms an incentive to raise the differentiation degree of jobs. Comparative statics suggests that an increase in unemployment benefits and in the minimum wage improves productivity of skilled workers by making jobs more differentiated, and leads to a raise in unemployment rate.

Parole chiave

  • Job Differentiation
  • Productivity
  • Matching
  • Unemployment
Accesso libero

Transparency in the Allocation of Municipal Grants for Sports and Voucher Systems in the Czech Republic

Pubblicato online: 20 Apr 2013
Pagine: 43 - 57

Astratto

Abstract

This paper will assess transparency in the decision-making process in sports grants allocation. In comparison with other parts of the public sector, surprisingly little is known about transparency in the sports sector. An increasing portion of public funds is spent on sport grants; this establishes the necessity for research. Can any positive effects of sports grants be expected to appear without transparency in the decisionmaking process? An examination of the process in reality is crucial for future public resources allocation. Based on the general assumption that NGOs are important actors in economic and political development, we address the Czech Republic at the municipal level.

The main goals of this paper are to assess the transparency of the allocation of public grants for sport organizations on the municipal level in the Czech Republic and to discuss one possible method for improving system transparency and efficiency: vouchers.

We discuss sport vouchers as a possible tool for improving transparency. Vouchers solve the problem of transparency in the decision-making process by transferring the purchasing power to the client. Although using sports vouchers as a tool for allocating public resources is quite rare, there are a few examples of this practice in the Czech Republic. We established two research questions: (1) Do sport clubs perceive the allocation of sport grants at the municipality level as transparent? (2) Do sport clubs consider a voucher system as helpful for the transparency? To answer these questions, we discuss the theory and specific conditions in the Czech Republic; we perform a survey among sport clubs and we examine examples of voucher implementation; and we discuss the general consequences of our results.

Keywords

  • Public sector
  • public finance
  • grants
  • sport
  • NGO
  • allocation rules
  • municipality
  • transparency
  • vouchers