1. bookVolume 14 (2020): Edizione 2 (December 2020)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2657-9170
Prima pubblicazione
20 Dec 2019
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Accesso libero

Desired Traits in Mate Selection: A Survey of Hispanic-American Female Students

Pubblicato online: 08 May 2021
Volume & Edizione: Volume 14 (2020) - Edizione 2 (December 2020)
Pagine: 23 - 35
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2657-9170
Prima pubblicazione
20 Dec 2019
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

ARCHER, J. (1996) Sex Differences in Social Behavior: Are the Social Role and Evolutionary Explanations Compatible? American Psychologist. 51. Pp. 909–917.Search in Google Scholar

BOTWIN, M. D., BUSS, D. M. & SHACKELFORD, T. K. (1997) Personality and Mate Preferences: Five Factors in Mate Selection and Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Personality. 65:1. Pp. 107–136.10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.xSearch in Google Scholar

BUSS, D. M. & KENRICK, D. T. (1998) Evolutionary Social Psychology. In: Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T. & Linzey, G. (eds.) Handbook of social psychology. (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 982–1026.Search in Google Scholar

BUSS, D. M. (1989) Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 12. Pp. 1–14. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X00023992.10.1017/S0140525X00023992Search in Google Scholar

CLONINGER, C. (1980) Interpretation of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Structural Relations by Path Analysis: Theory and Applications to Assortative Mating. Genetical Research. 36 (2). Pp. 133–145. DOI:10.1017/S0016672300019765.10.1017/S0016672300019765Search in Google Scholar

EAGLY, A. H. & WOOD, W. (1999) The Origins of Sex Differences in Human Behavior: Evolved Dispositions Versus Social Roles. American Psychologist. 54. Pp. 408–423.10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408Search in Google Scholar

EAGLY, A. H., WOOD, W. & JOHANNESEN-SCHMIDT, M. C. (2004) Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities: Implications for the Partner Preferences of Women and Men. In: Eagly, A. H., Beall, A. & Sternberg, R. S. (eds.) The psychology of gender. (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford. Pp. 269–295Search in Google Scholar

FINN, D. & DONOVAN, A. (2013) PwC’s NextGen: A Global Generational Study 2013 Summary and Compendium of Findings. [Online] Available from: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/hr-management-services/publications/assets/pwc-nextgen.pdf [Accessed: 23 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar

FISMAN, R. et al. (2005) Gender Differences in Mate Selection: Evidence From a Speed Dating Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Volume 121, 2. Pp. 673–697. [Online] Available from: https://DOI.org/10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.673 [Accessed: 23 June 2020].10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.673Search in Google Scholar

HEATH, A. C. et al. (2014) Human Mate Selection and Addiction: A Conceptual Critique. Behavior Genetics. 44. Pp. 419–426. [Online] Available from: https://DOI.org/10.1007/s10519-014-9669-3 [Accessed: 23 June 2020].10.1007/s10519-014-9669-3Search in Google Scholar

HOUTS, R., ROBINS, E. & HOUSTON, T. (1996) Compatibility and Development of Premarital Relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 58. Pp. 7–20.10.2307/353373Search in Google Scholar

HOWARD, J. A., BLUMSTEIN, P. & SCHWARTZ, P. (1987) Social or Evolutionary Theories: Some Observations on Preferences in Human Mate Selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 53. Pp. 194–200.10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.194Search in Google Scholar

KAUTH, M. R. (2000) True Nature: A Theory of Sexual Attraction. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4615-4301-5Search in Google Scholar

KAUTH, M. R. (2005) Revealing Assumptions: Explicating Sexual Orientation and Promoting Conceptual Integrity. Journal of Bisexuality. 5 (4). Pp. 79–105.Search in Google Scholar

KHAZAN, O. (2014) Why College Students Need a Class in Dating. The Atlantic. 2 July. [Online] Available from: https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/07/whytodays-college-students-need-a-class-on-dating/373823/ [Accessed: 23 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar

KNAPP, M. L. (1978) Social Intercourse: From Greeting to Goodbye. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

LI, N. P., VALENTINE, K. A. & PATEL, L. (2010) Mate Preferences in the US and Singapore: A Cross-Cultural Test of the Mate Preference Priority Model. Personality and Individual Differences. 50 (2). Pp. 291–294. [Online] Available from: http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1129 [Accessed: 23 June 2020].10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.005Search in Google Scholar

LOOY, H. (2001) Sex Differences: Evolved, Constructed and Designed. Journal of Psychology and Theology. 29. Pp. 301–313.10.1177/009164710102900403Search in Google Scholar

REGAN, P. C. & BERSCHEID, E. (1997). Gender Differences in Characteristics Desired in a Potential Sexual and Marriage Partner. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality. 9. Pp. 25–37.10.1300/J056v09n01_02Search in Google Scholar

SPRECHER, S. (1998) Social Exchange Theories and Sexuality. The Journal of Sex Research. 35. Pp. 32–43.10.1080/00224499809551915Search in Google Scholar

SURRA, C. & HUGHES, D. (1997) Commitment Processes in Accounts of the Development of Premarital Relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 59. Pp. 5–21.10.2307/353658Search in Google Scholar

SURRA, C. (1990) Research and Theory on Mate Selection and Premarital Relationships in the 1980s. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 52. Pp. 844–856.10.2307/353306Search in Google Scholar

TWENGE, J. (2006) Generation Me. New York: Atria.Search in Google Scholar

WOOD, W. & EAGLEY, A. H. (2002) A Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Behavior of Women and Men: Implications for the Origins of Sex Difference. Psychological Bulletin. 128. Pp. 699–727.10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699Search in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD