Is the Inter-American Human Rights System Biased? A Quantitative Analysis of Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Americas

American Convention on Human Rights (Nov. 22, 1969). OAS Treaty Series No. 36.Search in Google Scholar

ARRIAGADA, Milenko B.G. The New Legitimacy Challenges of Adjudication at the Inter-American Human Rights System in the Context of Latin American Democracies. SJD dissertation, American University, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

BIRON, Carey L. Controversial Inter-American Reforms Process to Continue. [online]. Available at: <http://www.ipsnews.net/2013/03/controversial-inter-american-reforms-process-to-continue/>Search in Google Scholar

BOYLE, Elizabeth H. and THOMPSON, Melissa. National Politics and Resort to the European Commission on Human Rights. Law & Society Review, 2001, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 321–44.10.2307/3185405Search in Google Scholar

BURGORGUE-LARSEN, Laurence and ÚBEDA de TORRES, Amaya. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Case Law and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

CAROZZA, Paolo. The Anglo-Latin Divide and the Future of the Inter-American System of Human Rights. Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2015, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 153–70.Search in Google Scholar

CAVALLARO, James L. and SCHAFFER, Emily J. Less as More: Rethinking Supranational Litigation of Economic and Social Rights in the Americas. Hastings Law Journal, 2004, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 217–82.Search in Google Scholar

CAVALLARO, James L. and BREWER, Stephanie E. Reevaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the 21^st Century: The Case of the Inter-American Court. American Journal of International Law, 2008, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 768–827.10.2307/20456681Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Chipping at the Foundations. [online]. Available at: <http://www.economist.com/node/21556599>Search in Google Scholar

CONCEPCIÓN, Natasha P. The Legal Implications of Trinidad & Tobago’s Withdrawal from the American Convention on Human Rights. American University International Law Review, 2001, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 847–90.Search in Google Scholar

Correa Calls for New Inter-American Human Rights System. [online]. Available at: <https://www.efe.com/efe/english/life/correa-calls-for-new-inter-american-human-rights-system/50000263-3064355>Search in Google Scholar

DULITZKY, Ariel E. Too Little, Too Late: The Pace of Adjudication of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review, 2013, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 131–208.Search in Google Scholar

EPSTEIN, David et al. Democratic Transitions. American Journal of Political Science, 2006, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 551–69.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00201.xApri DOISearch in Google Scholar

GROSSMAN, Claudio. Freedom of Expression in the Inter-American System for the Protection of Human Rights. Nova Law Review, 2001, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 411–42.Search in Google Scholar

GROSSMAN, Claudio. The Inter-American System of Human Rights: Challenges for the Future. Indiana Law Journal, 2008, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1267–82.Search in Google Scholar

GROSSMAN, Claudio. Challenges to Freedom of Expression Within the Inter-American System: A Jurisprudential Analysis. Human Rights Quarterly, 2012, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 361–403.10.1353/hrq.2012.0026Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

HELFER, Laurence R. Overlegalizing Human Rights: International Relations Theory and the Commonwealth Caribbean Backlash against Human Rights Regimes. Columbia Law Review, 2002, vol. 102, no. 7, pp. 1832–1911.10.2307/1123662Search in Google Scholar

HOLMUND, Caroline. Why Latin America Is Refusing to Follow the US on Human Rights. [online]. Available at: <https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2014/04/10/why-latin-america-is-refusing-to-follow-the-us-on-human-rights/>Search in Google Scholar

INGLEHART, Ronald and WELZEL, Christian. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. The Death Penalty in the Inter-American Human Rights System: From Restrictions to Abolition. Washington: Organization of American States, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

MORAVCSIK, Andrew. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization, 2000, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 217–52.10.1162/002081800551163Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

NEUMAN, Gerald L. Import, Export, and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law, 2008, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 101–23. OAS Concludes Formal Inter-American Human Rights “Strengthening” Process, but Dialogue Continues on Contentious Reforms. [online]. Available at: <http://www.ijrcenter.org/2013/03/24/oas-concludes-formal-inter-american-human-rights-strengthening-process-but-dialogue-continues-on-contentious-reforms/>10.1093/ejil/chn002Search in Google Scholar

OPPENHEIMER, Andrés. Trump May Weaken OAS — And Efforts to Restore Democracy in Venezuela. [online]. Available at: <http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/andres-oppenheimer/article138719758.html>Search in Google Scholar

PICQ, Manuela. Is the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Too Progressive? [online]. Available at: <http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/06/2012658344220937.html>Search in Google Scholar

PINTO, Mónica. The Crisis of the Inter-American System. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, 2013, vol. 107, pp. 127–29.10.5305/procannmeetasil.107.0127Search in Google Scholar

President Correa: We Need to Create a Human Rights System for Latin America. [online]. Available at: <http://www.andes.info.ec/en/news/president-correa-we-need-create-human-rights-system-latin-america.html>Search in Google Scholar

PRZEWORSKI, Adam et al. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.10.1017/CBO9780511804946Search in Google Scholar

RIVERA JUARISTI, Francisco J. US Exceptionalism and the Strengthening Process of the Inter-American Human Rights System. Human Rights Brief, 2013, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 19–25.Search in Google Scholar

ROGIN, Josh. House Panel Votes to Defund the OAS. [online]. Available at: <http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/07/20/house-panel-votes-to-defund-the-oas/>Search in Google Scholar

RUIZ-CHIRIBOGA, Oswaldo R. Is Ecuador That Wrong? Analyzing the Ecuadorian Proposals Concerning the Special Rapporteurship on Freedom of Expression of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Human Rights Brief, 2013, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 26–33.10.2139/ssrn.2034375Search in Google Scholar

RUIZ-CHIRIBOGA, Oswaldo R. The American Convention and the Protocol of San Salvador: Two Intertwined Treaties. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 2013, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 156–83.10.1177/016934411303100203Search in Google Scholar

Rules of Procedure of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (Mar. 18, 2013). Reprinted in Basic Documents in the Inter-American System, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

SHAVER, Lea. The Inter-American Human Rights System: An Effective Institution for Regional Rights Protection? Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2010, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 639–76.Search in Google Scholar

SHELTON, Dinah. The Rules and Reality of Petition Procedures in the Inter-American Human Rights System. Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2015, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–28.Search in Google Scholar

Statute of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (Oct. 31, 1979). Reprinted in Basic Documents in the Inter-American System, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

WHITE, Robin C.A. and BOUSSIAKOU, Iris. Separate Opinions in the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 2009, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 47–51.10.1093/hrlr/ngn033Search in Google Scholar

WILSON, Richard J. The United States’ Position on the Death Penalty in the Inter-American Human Rights System. Santa Clara Law Review, 2002, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1159–90.Search in Google Scholar

ZSCHIRNT, Simon and MENALDO, Mark. International Insurance? Democratic Consolidation and Support for International Human Rights Regimes. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2014, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 452–75.10.1093/ijtj/iju018Search in Google Scholar

Andrea Mortlock, Case 12.534, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 63/08, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.134, doc. 5 rev. 1 (2009).Search in Google Scholar

‘Baby Boy,’ Case 2141, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 23/81, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.54, doc. 9 rev. 1 (1981).Search in Google Scholar

Benedict Jacob, Case 12.158, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 56/02, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.117, doc. 1 rev. 1 (2003).Search in Google Scholar

Chad Roger Goodman, Case 12.265, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 78/07, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.130, doc. 22 rev. 1 (2007).Search in Google Scholar

Coard et al., Case 10.951, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 109/99, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.106, doc. 6 rev. 1 (1999).Search in Google Scholar

Community of the Rio Negro of the Maya Achi Indigenous People and its Members, Case 12.649, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 86/10, OEA/Ser.L/V/II, doc. 5 rev. 1 (2011).Search in Google Scholar

Dave Sewell, Case 12.347, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 76/02, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.117, doc. 1 rev. 1 (2003).Search in Google Scholar

Davlin Morris, Case 3552, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 60/82, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.61, doc. 22 rev. 1 (1983).Search in Google Scholar

Denton Aitken, Case 12.275, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 58/02, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.117, doc. 1 rev. 1 (2003).Search in Google Scholar

Desmond McKenzie et al., Case 12.023, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 41/00, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.106, doc. 6 rev. 1 (1999).Search in Google Scholar

Donnason Knights, Case 12.028, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 47/01, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.111, doc. 20 rev. 1 (2001).Search in Google Scholar

Earl Pratt, Case 9054, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 13/84, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.66, doc. 10 rev. 1 (1985).Search in Google Scholar

Eduardo Kimel, Case 12.450, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 111/06, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.130, doc. 22 rev. 1 (2007).Search in Google Scholar

Emilio Palacio, Carlos Nicolás Pérez Lapentti, Carlos Pérez Barriga, and César Pérez Bar-riga, Precautionary Measures 406/11, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., OEA/Ser.L/V/II.147, doc. 1 rev. 1 (2013).Search in Google Scholar

Grand Chief Michael Mitchell, Case 12.435, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 61/08, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.134, doc. 5 rev. 1 (2009).Search in Google Scholar

Haitian Interdiction, Case 10.675, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 51/96, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.95, doc. 7 rev. 1 (1997).Search in Google Scholar

Haniff Hilaire et al., Case 11.816, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 43/98, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.106, doc. 6 rev. 1 (1999).Search in Google Scholar

Jehovah’s Witnesses, Case 2137, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 31/78, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.47, doc. 13 rev. 1 (1979).Search in Google Scholar

Jessica Lenahan (Gonzales) et al., Case 12.626, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 80/11, OEA/Ser.L/V/II, doc. 69 rev. 1 (2011).Search in Google Scholar

Jorge Odir Miranda Cortez et al., Case 12.249, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 27/09, OEA/Ser.L/V/II, doc. 51 corr. 1 (2009).Search in Google Scholar

Joseph Thomas, Case 12.183, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 127/01, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.114, doc. 5 rev. 1 (2002).Search in Google Scholar

Juan Pablo Olmedo Bustos et al., Case 11.803, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 31/98, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.102, doc. 6 rev. 1 (1999).Search in Google Scholar

Karen Atala and Daughters, Case 12.502, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 139/09, OEA/Ser.L/V/II, doc. 51 corr. 1 (2009).Search in Google Scholar

Kuna Indigenous People of Madungandi and Embera Indigenous People of Bayano and their Members, Case 12.354, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 125/12, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.147, doc. 1 rev. 1 (2013).Search in Google Scholar

Lennox Boyce et al., Case 12.480, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 03/06, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.127, doc. 4 rev. 1 (2007).Search in Google Scholar

Leroy Lamey et al., Case 11.826, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 49/01, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.111, doc. 20 rev. 1 (2001).Search in Google Scholar

Lyndon Champagnie, Case 7505, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 27/86, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.68, doc. 8 rev. 1 (1986).Search in Google Scholar

Marcelino Hanríquez et al., Case 11.784, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 73/00, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.111, doc. 20 rev. 1 (2001).Search in Google Scholar

Maria Eugenia Morales de Sierra, Case 11.625, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 4/01, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.111, doc. 20 rev. 1 (2001).Search in Google Scholar

Mary and Carrie Dann, Case 11.140, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 75/02, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.117, doc. 1 rev. 1 (2003).Search in Google Scholar

Mauricio Herrera Ulloa, Case 12.367, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 64/02, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.118, doc. 5 rev. 2 (2003).Search in Google Scholar

Maya Indigenous Communities of the Toledo District, Case 12.053, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 40/04, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.122, doc. 5 rev. 1 (2005).Search in Google Scholar

Michael Edwards et al., Case 12.067, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 48/01, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.111, doc. 20 rev. 1 (2001).Search in Google Scholar

Milton García Fajardo et al., Case 11.381, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 100/01, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.114, doc. 5 rev. 1 (2002).Search in Google Scholar

National Association of Ex-Employees of the Peruvian Social Security Institute et al., Case 12.670, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 38/09, OEA/Ser.L/V/II, doc. 51 corr. 1 (2009).Search in Google Scholar

Noel Riley, Case 3102, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 25/81, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.54, doc. 9 rev. 1 (1981).Search in Google Scholar

Oscar Elías Biscet et al., Case 12.476, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 67/06, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.127, doc. 4 rev. 1 (2007).Search in Google Scholar

Paul Lallion, Case 11.765, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 55/02, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.117, doc. 1 rev. 1 (2003).Search in Google Scholar

Pedro Peredo Valderrama, Case 11.103, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 42/00, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.106, doc. 6 rev. 1 (1999).Search in Google Scholar

Peter Cash, Case 12.231, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 12/14, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.150, doc. 16 rev. 1 (2014).Search in Google Scholar

Rafael Ferrer-Mazorra et al., Case 9903, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 51/01, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.111, doc. 20 rev. 1 (2001).Search in Google Scholar

Residents of the Village of Chichupac and Neighboring Communities, Case 12.788, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 100/14, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.150, doc. 16 rev. 1 (2015).Search in Google Scholar

Ricardo Israel Zipper, Case 12.470, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 110/09, OEA/Ser.L/V/II, doc. 51 corr. 1 (2009).Search in Google Scholar

Roosevelt Edwards, Case 7604, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 7/84, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.63, doc. 10 rev. 1 (1984).Search in Google Scholar

Rudolph Baptiste, Case 11.743, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 38/00, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.111, doc. 20 rev. 1 (2001).Search in Google Scholar

Statehood Solidarity Committee, Case 11.204, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 98/03, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.118, doc. 5 rev. 2 (2003).Search in Google Scholar

Tyrone Dacosta Cadogan, Case 12.645, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 60/08, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.134, doc. 5 rev. 1 (2009).Search in Google Scholar

Undocumented Workers, Case 12.834, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 50/16, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.159 (2016).Search in Google Scholar

Wayne Smith, Hugo Armendariz et al., Case 12.562, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 81/10, OEA/Ser.L/V/II, doc. 5 rev. 1 (2011).Search in Google Scholar

Wesley Cuthbert, Case 9190, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 28/86, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.68, doc. 8 rev. 1 (1986).Search in Google Scholar

Yean and Bosico Children, Case 12.189, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 30/03, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.118, doc. 5 rev. 2 (2003).Search in Google Scholar

Granier et al. (Radio Caracas Televisión) v. Venezuela, Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs, Judgment, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (ser. C) No. 293 (June 22, 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Juridical Condition and Rights of the Undocumented Migrants, Advisory Opinion, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) No. 18 (Sept. 17, 2003).Search in Google Scholar

López Mendoza v. Venezuela, Merits, Reparations, and Costs, Judgment, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (ser. C) No. 233 (Sept. 11, 2011).Search in Google Scholar

• The Singapore Mediation Convention and International Business Mediation
• The Person of the Arbitrator in Comparative Perspective of Czech and German Law
• UN Treaty on Business and Human Rights or Investor-State Arbitration? A Sober Answer for the Better Protection of Human Rights
• The Significance of the Ultimatum in International Law: The Responsibility of the Head of the USSR for the Events of January 1991 in Lithuania
• Institutions Strengthening the Position of the Injured Party of the Offence of Failure to Pay Alimony under Section 196 of the Czech Criminal Code and in Selected European Legal Regulations
• The Universal Periodic Review and the Special Procedures: Weird Picasso Abstraction or a Thought-Out Drawing?
• Legal Perspectives on Smart City Data as a Commons
• Economic Abuse and Criminal Responsibility: Lithuanian Case Law on Domestic Violence
• The Gaps in the Regulation of Prohibition of Reformatio in Peius in Slovak Administrative Law in Central European Perspective
• Cyber Operations against Critical Financial Infrastructure: a Non-Destructive Armed Attack?
• The increasing role of the Charter when establishing the ‘genuine enjoyment’ test for static EU citizens – A result of the ECHR’s shortcomings?
• International Legal Personality of Transnational Corporations – Any Chance for the Theoretical Shift with Respect to a Legally Binding Instrument on Human Rights and TNCs?
• Personal Data Protection in Brazil: How Much Europeanization?
• “The Right to be Remembered?”: The Contemporary Challenges of the “Streisand Effect” in the European Judicial Reality