1. bookVolume 9 (2022): Edizione 2 (December 2022)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2354-0036
Prima pubblicazione
16 Apr 2015
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Accesso libero

Evaluative Self-efficacy and its Potential Role in the Evaluation and Selection of Ideas: A Metacognitive Perspective

Pubblicato online: 04 Feb 2023
Volume & Edizione: Volume 9 (2022) - Edizione 2 (December 2022)
Pagine: 29 - 42
Ricevuto: 04 Jul 2022
Accettato: 27 Dec 2022
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2354-0036
Prima pubblicazione
16 Apr 2015
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

Ackerman, R., & Thompson, V.A. (2017). Meta-Reasoning: Monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 607–-617. doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.00410.1016/j.tics.2017.05.004 Search in Google Scholar

Beaty, R.E., & Silvia, P.J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 309–319. doi.org/10.1037/a002917110.1037/a0029171 Search in Google Scholar

Beghetto, R.A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. In M. Karwowski & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 4–19). Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00001-7 Search in Google Scholar

Berg, J.M. (2016). Balancing on the creative highwire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3), 433–468. doi.org/10.1177/000183921664221110.1177/0001839216642211 Search in Google Scholar

Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press. Search in Google Scholar

Corazza, G.E., (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267. doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.119562710.1080/10400419.2016.1195627 Search in Google Scholar

Dunning, D. (2003). Self-insight: Roadblocks and detours on the path to knowing thyself. Psychology Press. Search in Google Scholar

Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 83–87. doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.0123510.1111/1467-8721.01235 Search in Google Scholar

Guo, Y., Lin, S., Acar, S., Jin, S., Xu, X., Feng, Y. and Zeng, Y. (2022), Divergent thinking and evaluative skill: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Creative Behavior. doi.org/10.1002/jocb.53910.1002/jocb.539 Search in Google Scholar

Iyengar, S.S., & Lepper, M. (2006). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? In S. Lichtenstein & P. Slovic (Eds.), The construction of preference (pp. 300–322). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618031.017 Search in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., Han, M.H., & Beghetto, R.A. (2019a). Toward dynamizing the measurement of creative confidence beliefs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13, 193–202. doi.org/10.1037/aca000022910.1037/aca0000229 Search in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., & Beghetto, R.A. (2019b). Creative self-beliefs. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd Ed.). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316979839.021 Search in Google Scholar

Koriat, A. (2006). Are we frightened because we run away? Some evidence from metacognitive feelings. In B. Uttl, N. Ohta, & A.L. Siegenthaler (Eds.), Memory and emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 83–103). Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756232.ch5 Search in Google Scholar

Koriat, A. (2012). The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychological Review, 119, 80–113. doi: 10.1037/a002564810.1037/a0025648 Search in Google Scholar

Medeiros, K.E., Steele, L.M., Watts, L.L., & Mumford, M.D. (2018). Timing is everything: Examining the role of constraints throughout the creative process. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(4), 471–488. doi.org/10.1037/aca000014810.1037/aca0000148 Search in Google Scholar

Mumford, M.D., & McIntosh, T. (2017). Creative thinking processes: The past and the future. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51, 317–322. doi.org/10.1002/jocb.19710.1002/jocb.197 Search in Google Scholar

Puente-Díaz, R., & Cavazos-Arroyo, J. (2020). Creative metacognitive feelings as a source of information for creative self-efficacy, creativity potential, intrapersonal idea selection, and task enjoyment. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54, 499–507. doi.org/10.1002/jocb.38410.1002/jocb.384 Search in Google Scholar

Puente-Díaz, R., & Cavazos-Arroyo, J. (2021). Creative personal identity and creative mindsets and their implications for creative potential and metacognition: A latent variable and a latent class approach. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 8, 20–31. doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2021-001510.2478/ctra-2021-0015 Search in Google Scholar

Puente-Díaz, R., Cavazos-Arroyo, J., & Puerta-Sierra, L. (2021). Idea generation, selection, and evaluation: A metacognitive approach. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(4), 1015–1027. doi.org/10.1002/jocb.50510.1002/jocb.505 Search in Google Scholar

Puente-Díaz, R., Cavazos-Arroyo, J., & Vargas-Barrera, F. (2021). Metacognitive feelings as a source of information in the evaluation and selection of creative ideas. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100767. doi. org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.10076710.1016/j.tsc.2020.100767 Search in Google Scholar

Puente-Díaz, R., Cavazos-Arroyo, J., & Puerta-Sierra, L., & Vargas-Barrera, F. (2021). The contribution Openness to Experience and its two aspects to the explanation of idea generation, evaluation and selection: A metacognitive perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, 111240. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.11124010.1016/j.paid.2021.111240 Search in Google Scholar

Rietzschel, E.F., & Ritter, S. (2018). Moving from creativity to innovation. In R. Reiter-Palmon, V.L. Kennel, & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), Individual creativity in the workplace (pp. 3–34). Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-813238-8.00001-2 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., & Smith, W.R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(3), 295–302. doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90105-X10.1016/0191-8869(92)90105-X Search in Google Scholar

Sidi, Y., Torgovitsky, I., Soibelman, D., Miron-Spektor, E., & Ackerman, R. (2020). You may be more original than you think: Predictable biases in self-assessment of originality. Acta Psychologica, 203, 103002. doi. org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.10300210.1016/j.actpsy.2019.103002 Search in Google Scholar

Silvia, P.J. (2008). Discernment and creativity: How well can people identify their most creative ideas? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 139–146. doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.3.13910.1037/1931-3896.2.3.139 Search in Google Scholar

Steele, L.M., Johnson, G., & Medeiros, K.E. (2018). Looking beyond the generation of creative ideas: Confidence in evaluating ideas predicts creative outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 21–29. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.02810.1016/j.paid.2017.12.028 Search in Google Scholar

Terwiesch, C., & Ulrich, K.T. (2009). Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities. Harvard Business School Press. Search in Google Scholar

van Broekhoven, K., Belfi, B., Borghans, L., & Seegers, P. (2022). Creative idea forecasting: The effect of task exposure on idea evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 16(3), 519–528. doi. org/10.1037/aca000042610.1037/aca0000426 Search in Google Scholar

Watts, L.L., McIntosh, T.J., Gibson, C., Mulhearn, T.J., Medeiros, K.E., Mecca, J.T., & Cohen-Charash, Y. (2020). Mild affective shifts and creativity: Effects on idea generation, evaluation, and implementation planning. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(4), 985–1001. doi.org/10.1002/jocb.42710.1002/jocb.427 Search in Google Scholar

West, S.G., Taylor, A.B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). Guilford Press. Search in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD