1. bookVolume 13 (2020): Edizione 2 (December 2020)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2343-8908
Prima pubblicazione
30 Sep 2018
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Accesso libero

Increasing fault tolerance in service-level agreement constrained context-aware data networks

Pubblicato online: 31 Dec 2020
Volume & Edizione: Volume 13 (2020) - Edizione 2 (December 2020)
Pagine: 16 - 21
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2343-8908
Prima pubblicazione
30 Sep 2018
Frequenza di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

[1] M.Raza, “Service Level Agreement (SLA) Examples and Template,” www.bmc.com/blogs/sla-template-examples/Search in Google Scholar

[2] International Organization for Standardization “ISO/IEC 7498-1:1994 Information technology — Open Systems Interconnection — Basic Reference Model: The Basic Model,” www.iso.org/standard/20269.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

[3] M. Al-shawi and A. Laurent, “Designing for Cisco Network Service Architectures (ARCH),” 4th ed., Cisco Press, 2020, pp.302-303.Search in Google Scholar

[4] [RFC1157] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and J. Davin, “Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP),” RFC 1157, DOI 10.17487/RFC1157, May 1990, pp.2-3.Search in Google Scholar

[5] [RFC3954] Claise, B., Ed., “Cisco Systems NetFlow Services Export Version 9,” RFC 3954, DOI 10.17487/RFC3954, October 2004, pp.1-2.Search in Google Scholar

[6] [RFC4594] Babiarz, J., Chan, K., and F. Baker, “Configuration Guidelines for DiffServ Service Classes,” RFC 4594, DOI 10.17487/RFC4594, August 2006, pp.3-4.Search in Google Scholar

[7] O. Wendell, R. Healy, and D. Donohue. “CCIE routing and switching certification guide,” Indianapolis, IN: Cisco Press, 2010, pp.546-549Search in Google Scholar

[8] [RFC1191] Mogul, J. and S. Deering, “Path MTU discovery,” RFC 1191, DOI 10.17487/RFC1191, November 199010.17487/rfc1191Search in Google Scholar

[9] [RFC8201] McCann, J., Deering, S., Mogul, J., and R. Hinden, Ed., “Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6,” STD 87, RFC 8201, DOI 10.17487/RFC8201, July 201710.17487/RFC8201Search in Google Scholar

[10] [RFC2750] Herzog, S., “RSVP Extensions for Policy Control,” RFC 2750, DOI 10.17487/RFC2750, January 200010.17487/rfc2750Search in Google Scholar

[11] [RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., “A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4),” RFC 4271, DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[12] [RFC0792] Postel, J., “Internet Control Message Protocol,” STD 5, RFC 792, DOI 10.17487/RFC0792, September 1981, pp.4.Search in Google Scholar

[13] [RFC6691] Borman, D., “TCP Options and Maximum Segment Size (MSS),” RFC 6691, DOI 10.17487/RFC6691, July 2012, pp.3.Search in Google Scholar

[14] [RFC4443] Conta, A., Deering, S., and M. Gupta, Ed., “Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification,” STD 89, RFC 4443, DOI 10.17487/RFC4443, March 2006, pp.10.Search in Google Scholar

[15] ITU-T recommendation G.114, telecommunication standardization sector of itu series, g: transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks, www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.114-200305-I/Search in Google Scholar

[16] [RFC4594] Babiarz, J., Chan, K., and F. Baker, “Configuration Guidelines for DiffServ Service Classes,” RFC 4594, DOI 10.17487/RFC4594, August 200610.17487/rfc4594Search in Google Scholar

[17] [RFC3168] Ramakrishnan, K., Floyd, S., and D. Black, “The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP,” RFC 3168, DOI 10.17487/RFC3168, September 2001, pp.60-6110.17487/rfc3168Search in Google Scholar

[18] [RFC5348] Floyd, S., Handley, M., Padhye, J., and J. Widmer, “TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): Protocol Specification,” RFC 5348, DOI 10.17487/RFC5348, September 2008, pp.310.17487/rfc5348Search in Google Scholar

[19] [RFC8085] Eggert, L., Fairhurst, G., and G. Shepherd, “UDP Usage Guidelines,” BCP 145, RFC 8085, DOI 10.17487/RFC8085, March 2017, pp.2110.17487/RFC8085Search in Google Scholar

[20] [RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., “A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4),” RFC 4271, DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 200610.17487/rfc4271Search in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo