[Alig R.A., Kline J.D., Lichtestein M., 2004. Urbanization on the US landscape: Looking ahead in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 69(2–3): 219–234.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.07.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Antrop M., 2004a. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 67(1–4): 9–26.10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Antrop M., 2004b. Rural-urban conflicts and opportunities. In: Jongman R.H.G. (ed.), The new dimensions of the European landscapes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 83–91.10.1007/978-1-4020-2911-0_6]Search in Google Scholar
[Bański J., 2006. Geografia wsi. PWN, Warsaw.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berger P.L., Luckmann T., 1966. The social construction of reality. Anchor Books, Garden City, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bertinelli L., Black D., 2004. Urbanization and growth. Journal of Urban Economics 56(1): 80–96.10.1016/j.jue.2004.03.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Biegańska J., Szymańska D., 2013. The scale and the dynamics of permanent migration in rural and peri-urban areas in Poland – some problems. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 21: 21–30.10.2478/bog-2013-0017]Search in Google Scholar
[Biegańska J., Dymitrow M., Grzelak-Kostulska E., 2014. Under urban mask: On rural landscapes with different logics. Special session at the 26th Permanent European Conference on the Study of the Rural Landscape – “Unraveling the logics of landscape”, 8–12 September 2014, Gothenburg, Sweden.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bossuet L., 2006. Peri-rural populations in search of territory. Sociologia Ruralis 46: 214–28.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00410.x]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brabyn L., 2009. Classifying landscape character. Landscape Research 34(3): 299–321.10.1080/01426390802371202]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brauer R., Dymitrow M., 2017. Human geography and the hinterland: The case of Torsten Hägerstrand’s ‘belated’ recognition. Moravian Geographical Reports 25(2): 74–84.10.1515/mgr-2017-0007]Search in Google Scholar
[Brenner N., 2013. Theses on urbanization. Public Culture 25(1): 85–114.10.1215/08992363-1890477]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cavallo A., Di Donato B., Marino D., 2016. Mapping and assessing urban agriculture in Rome. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 8: 774–783.10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.066]Search in Google Scholar
[Champion A., Hugo G., 2004. New forms of urbanization: Beyond the urban–rural dichotomy. Ashgate, Aldershot.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cloke P., Johnston R., 2005. Deconstructing human geography’s binaries. In: Cloke P., Johnston R. (eds), Spaces of geographical thought: Deconstructing human geography’s binaries. Sage, Thousand Oaks and New Dehli, London: 1–20.10.4135/9781446216293.n1]Search in Google Scholar
[Connell J., 2016. Soft country? Rural and regional Australia in country style. In: Dufty-Jones R., Connell J. (eds), Rural Change in Australia: Population, Economy, Environment. Routledge, London/New York: 211–234.10.4324/9781315607153]Search in Google Scholar
[Cosgrove D., 1984. Prospect, perspective and the evolution of the landscape idea. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 10(1): 45–62.10.2307/622249]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Courtney P., Mayfield L., Tranter R., Jones P., Errington A., 2007. Small towns as ‘sub-poles’ in English rural development: Investigating rural–urban linkages using sub-regional social accounting matrices. Geoforum 38(6): 1219–1232.10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.03.006]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Daniels S., 1989. Marxism, culture, and the duplicity of landscape. In: Richard P., Nigel T. (eds), New models in geography, 2. Unwin Hyman, London: 196–220.]Search in Google Scholar
[de Groot R., 2006. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multifunctional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 75(3–4): 175–18610.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.016]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[de Smet F., Teller J., 2015. Characterising the morphology of suburban settlements: A method based on a semi-automatic classification of building clusters. Landscape Research 41(1): 113–130.10.1080/01426397.2015.1045464]Search in Google Scholar
[Deng J.S., Wang K., Hong Y., Qi J.G., 2009. Spatio-temporal dynamics and evolution of land use change and landscape pattern in response to rapid urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning 92(3–4): 187–198.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.05.001]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Drexler D., 2013. Landscape, Paysage, Landschaft, Táj: The cultural background of landscape perceptions in England, France, Germany, and Hungary. Journal of Ecological Anthropology 16(1): 85–96.10.5038/2162-4593.16.1.7]Search in Google Scholar
[Duncan J.S., Duncan N.G., 2001. The aestheticization of the politics of landscape preservation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91(2): 387–409.10.1111/0004-5608.00250]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dymitrow M., Brauer R., 2016. Land or people? On the iatrogenesis of conflation. Acta Geobalcanica 2/2: 63–75.10.18509/AGB.2016.07]Search in Google Scholar
[Dymitrow M., 2013. Degraded towns in Poland as cultural heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies 19(7): 613–631.10.1080/13527258.2012.681681]Search in Google Scholar
[Dymitrow M., 2014. The effigy of urbanity or a rural parody? A visual approach to small-town public space. Journal of Cultural Geography 31, 1–31.10.1080/08873631.2013.873298]Search in Google Scholar
[Dymitrow M., Biegańska J., Grzelak-Kostulska E., 2017. Deprivation and the rural-urban trap. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie.10.1111/tesg.12263]Search in Google Scholar
[Dymitrow M., Stenseke M., 2016. Rural-urban blurring and the subjectivity within. Rural Landscapes: Society, Environment, History 3(1) 4: 1–13.10.16993/rl.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Forsyth A., 2012. Defining suburbs. Journal of Planning Literature 27(3): 270–281.10.1177/0885412212448101]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Friedman B., Krugman P., Skidelsky R., 2015. Economics after the crash: A discipline in need of renewal? Scandinavia House, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A.J., 2001. The spatial economy. Cities, regions, and the international trade. The MIT Press, Cambridge-London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fujita M., 2012. Thünen and the new economic geography. Regional Science and Urban Economics 42(6): 907–912.10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.12.002]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fujita M., Thisse J.F., 2002. Economies of agglomeration. Cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511805660]Search in Google Scholar
[Gobster P.H., Nassauer J.I., Daniel T.C., Fry G., 2007. The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology 22(7): 959–972.10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gregory D., Johnston R., Pratt G., Watts M., Whatmore S. (eds), 2009. The dictionary of human geography. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallent N., Andersson J., 2007. Representing England’s rural-urban fringe. Landscape Research 32(1): 1–21.10.1080/01426390601097495]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Guba E.G., Lincoln Y.S., 1994. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. (eds), Handbook of qualitative research 2: 163–194. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, London, New Delhi: 105–117.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halfacree K.H., 1993. Locality and social representation: Space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies 9(1): 23–37.10.1016/0743-0167(93)90003-3]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Halfacree K.H., 2009. Rurality and post-rurality. In: Kitchin R., Thrift N. (eds), International encyclopedia of human geography (Volume I). Elsevier, London: 449–456.10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00911-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Hartshorne R., 1939. The nature of geography: A critical survey of current thought in the light of the past. The Association Lancaster, Lancaster, PA.10.2307/2561063]Search in Google Scholar
[Henderson G.L., 2003. What (else) we talk about when we talk about landscape: For a return to the social imagination. In: Wilson Ch., Groth P. (eds), Everyday America: cultural landscape studies after J.B. Jackson. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA: 178–198.10.1525/9780520935907-015]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoggart K., 1990. Let’s do away with rural. Journal of Rural Studies 6(3): 245–257.10.1016/0743-0167(90)90079-N]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hubbard P., 2006. City. Routledge, Abingdon and New York.10.4324/9780203392256]Search in Google Scholar
[Hubbard P., Kitchin R., Bartley B., Fuller D., 2002. Thinking geographically: space, theory and contemporary human geography. Continuum, London, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaynes E.T., 2003. Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511790423]Search in Google Scholar
[Johansen P.H., Nielsen N.Ch., 2012. Bridging between the regional degree and the community approaches to rurality—A suggestion for a definition of rurality for everyday use. Land Use Policy 29(4): 781–788.10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.12.003]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jones M., Stenseke M., 2011. The issue of public participation in the European landscape convention, In: Jones M., Stenseke M. (eds), The European landscape convention. Challenges of participation. Springer Science, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: 1–23.10.1007/978-90-481-9932-7_1]Search in Google Scholar
[Knudsen J.M., Hjorth P.G., 1996. Elements of Newtonian Physics. Including Nonlinear Dynamics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-97673-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Krugman P., 1995. Urban concentration: The role of increasing returns and transport costs. In: Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics. The World Bank: 241–263.10.1093/wber/8.suppl_1.241]Search in Google Scholar
[Krzysztofik R., 2014. Geneza aglomeracji miast na obszarze Polski. University of Silesia Publishing House, Katowice.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krzysztofik R., 2016. Revisited question of centripetal and centrifugal forces in urban systems. Geographia Polonica 89(4): 429–442.10.7163/GPol.0066]Search in Google Scholar
[Krzysztofik R., Dymitrow M., Kantor-Pietraga I., Spórna T., 2016. Concept of urban hibernation. European Planning Studies 24(2): 316–343.10.1080/09654313.2015.1078296]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[LeSage J.P., Charles J.S., 2008. Using home buyers’ revealed preferences to define the urban–rural fringe. Journal of Geographical Systems 10(1): 1–21.10.1007/s10109-007-0055-z]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lincoln Y.S., Lynham S.A., Guba E.G., 2011. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In: Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research 4. Sage, Los Angeles–Washington DC: 97–128.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mahon M., 2007. New populations; shifting expectations: The changing experience of Irish rural space and place. Journal of Rural Studies 23(3): 345–356.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.01.006]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Martin R.L., Sunley P., 2012. Forms of emergence and the evolution of economic landscape. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 82(2–3): 338–351.10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.005]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Masuda J.R., Garvin T., 2008. Whose heartland? The politics of place in a rural-urban interface. Journal of Rural Studies 24(1): 112–123.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.08.003]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mazzochi C., Sali G., Corsi S., 2013. Land use conversion in metropolitan areas and the permanence of agriculture: Sensitivity Index of Agricultural Land (SIAL), a tool for territorial analysis. Land Use Policy 35: 155–162.10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.019]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mels T., Germundsson T., 2013. Figures in the revolutionary landscape: An introduction. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 95: 213–218.10.1111/geob.12021]Search in Google Scholar
[Millward H., Harrington L., Ilbery B., Beesley K., 2003. Milieux, viewpoints, and processes of change in the new countryside. In: Beesley K., Millward H., Harrington L. (eds), The new countryside: Geographic perspectives on rural change. Brandon University, Brandon: 9–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mitchell D., 2002. Cultural landscapes: The dialectical landscape – recent landscape research in human geography. Progress in Human Geography 26(3): 381–389.10.1191/0309132502ph376pr]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Molema M., 2012. The urban west and the rural rest: Framing in Dutch regional planning in the 1950s. Landscape Research 37(4): 437–450.10.1080/01426397.2012.687444]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mormont M., 1990. Who is rural? Or, how to be rural: Towards a sociology of the rural. In: Marsden T., Lowe P., Whatmore S. (eds), Rural restructuring. Global processes and their responses. David Fulton Publishers, London: 21–44.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moseley M.J., 2003. Rural development: Principles and practice. SAGE Publications Limited, London.10.4135/9781446216439]Search in Google Scholar
[Myga-Piątek U., 2012. Krajobrazy kulturowe. Aspekty ewolucyjne i typologiczne. University of Silesia Publishing House, Katowice.]Search in Google Scholar
[Naveh Z., 2001. Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 57(3–4): 269–284.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00209-2]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nefedova T., Pallot J., 2013. The multiplicity of second home development in the Russian Federation: A case of seasonal suburbanization. In: Roca Z. (ed.), Second home tourism in Europe: Lifestyle issues and policy responses. Routledge, London, New York: 91–121.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olsen J., 2002. On the units of geographical economies. Geoforum 33(2): 153–164.10.1016/S0016-7185(01)00034-3]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Olwig K.R., 1996. Recovering the substantive nature of landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 86(4): 630–653.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1996.tb01770.x]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Plucińska S., 2009. Pawłowice nie chcą być miastem. Dziennik Zachodni 27.07.2009. <http://www.dziennikzachodni.pl/artykul/146111,pawlowice-nie-chca-byc-miastem,id,t.html> 18.01.2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[Powe N.A., Shaw T., 2004. Exploring the current and future role of market towns in servicing their hinterlands: A case study of Alnwick in the North East of England. Journal of Rural Studies 20(4): 405–418.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2004.07.003]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Prové C., Dessein J., De Krom M., 2016. Taking context into account in urban agriculture governance: Case studies of Warsaw (Poland) and Ghent (Belgium). Land Use Policy 56: 16–26.10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.025]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Primdahl J., Andersen E., Swaffield S., Kristensen L., 2013. Intersecting dynamics of agricultural structural change and urbanisation within european rural landscapes: Change patterns and policy implications. Landscape Research 38(6): 799–817.10.1080/01426397.2013.772959]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Qviström M., 2010. Shadows of planning: On landscape/planning history and inherited landscape ambiguities at the urban fringe. Geografiska Annaler: Series B 92(3): 219–235.10.1111/j.1468-0467.2010.00349.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Qviström M., Cadieux K.V., 2012. Spatial order, scenic landscapes and sprawl: Peri-urban studies at the interface between landscape and planning history. Landscape Research 37(4): 395–398.10.1080/01426397.2012.692776]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Richling A., Solon J., 2011. Ekologia krajobrazu (Landscape ecology). PWN, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rose G., 1993. Feminism and geography: The limits of geographical knowledge. Polity Press, Cambridge, Malden, MA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sauer C.O., 1925. The morphology of landscape. University of California Publications in Geography 2(2): 19–54.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smart J.J.C., 1959. Sensations and brain processes. The Philosophical Review 68(2): 141–156.10.2307/2182164]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Smithers J., Joseph A.E., Armstrong M., 2005. Across the divide (?): Reconciling farm and town views of agriculture-community linkages. Journal of Rural Studies 21(3): 281–295.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.03.003]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Somerville P., Halfacree K., Bosworth G., 2014. Interrogating rural coherence (Conclusion). In: Bosworth G., Somerville P. (eds), Interpreting rurality: Multidisciplinary approaches. Routledge, London, New York: 278–296.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor N., 2007. Urban planning theory since 1945. Sage Publications Ltd., London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson I.H., 2012. Ten tenets and six questions for landscape urbanism. Landscape Research 37(1): 7–26.10.1080/01426397.2011.632081]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tornaghi Ch., 2014. Critical geography of urban agriculture. Progress in Human Geography 38(4): 551–567.10.1177/0309132513512542]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tribe J., Liburd J.J., 2016. The tourism knowledge system. Annals of Tourism Research 57: 44–61.10.1016/j.annals.2015.11.011]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tunströ M., Smas L., 2017. Spänningar på ett fält – stadsplaneringens diskurs och praktik på gränsen mellan innerstad och förort. Ymer 137: 145–164.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tveit M., Ode Å., Fry G., 2006. Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research 31(3): 229–255.10.1080/01426390600783269]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ulied A., Biosca O., Rodrigo R., 2010. Urban and rural narratives and spatial development trends in Europe. Mcrit SL, Barcelona.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walker P., Fortmann L., 2003, Whose landscape? A political ecology of the ‘exurban’ Sierra. Cultural Geographies 10(4): 469–491.10.1191/1474474003eu285oa]Search in Google Scholar
[Vaishar A., Zapletalová J., Nováková E., 2016. Between urban and rural: Sustainability of small towns in the 21 Czech Republic. European Countryside 8(4): 351–372.10.1515/euco-2016-0025]Search in Google Scholar
[von der Dunk A., Gret-Regamey A., Dalang T., Hersperger A.M., 2011. Defining a typology of peri-urban land use conflicts – A case study from Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning 101(2): 149–156.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Vos W., Meekes H., 1999. Trends in European cultural landscape development: Perspectives for a sustainable future. Landscape and Urban Planning 46(1–3): 3–14.10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-2]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Wand D.I.A., Nadin V., Zonnenveld W., Rooij R., 2014. Beyond urban-rural classifications: Characterising and mapping territories-in-between across Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 130: 50–63.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Ward N., Brown D.L., 2009. Placing the rural in regional development. Regional studies 43(10): 1237–1244.10.1080/00343400903234696]Search in Google Scholar
[Whitehand J., 2005. Urban morphology, urban landscape and fringe belts. Urban Design 93: 19–21.10.1016/j.cities.2004.04.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods M., 2009. Rural geography: Blurring boundaries and making connections. Progress in Human Geography 33(6): 849–858.10.1177/0309132508105001]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Woods M., 2010. Rural. Routledge, Abingdon, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wu F., Zhang F., Webster C., 2013. Informality and the development and demolition of urban villages in the Chinese peri-urban area. Urban Studies 50(10): 1919–1934.10.1177/0042098012466600]Search in Google Scholar
[Wylie J., 2007. Landscape. Routledge, London.10.4324/9780203480168]Search in Google Scholar
[Xin S., Tribe J., Chambers D., 2013. Conceptual research in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 41: 66–88.10.1016/j.annals.2012.12.003]Search in Google Scholar
