“What if?” Predicting Individual Users’ Smart Home Privacy Preferences and Their Changes

[1] Alessandro Acquisti. 2002. Protecting privacy with economics: Economic incentives for preventive technologies in ubiquitous computing environments. In Proceedings of Workshop on Socially-informed Design of Privacy-enhancing Solutions, UbiComp 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Alessandro Acquisti, Idris Adjerid, Rebecca Balebako, Laura Brandimarte, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Saranga Komanduri, Pedro Giovanni Leon, Norman Sadeh, Florian Schaub, Manya Sleeper, et al. 2017. Nudges for privacy and security: Understanding and assisting users’ choices online. CSUR 50, 3 (2017), 44.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Alessandro Acquisti, Laura Brandimarte, and George Loewenstein. 2015. Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 347, 6221 (2015), 509–514.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Alessandro Acquisti, Leslie K John, and George Loewenstein. 2013. What is privacy worth? The Journal of Legal Studies 42, 2 (2013), 249–274.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Noah Apthorpe, Yan Shvartzshnaider, Arunesh Mathur, Dillon Reisman, and Nick Feamster. 2018. Discovering smart home internet of things privacy norms using contextual integrity. Proceedings of IMWUT 2, 2 (2018), 59.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Paritosh Bahirat, Yangyang He, Abhilash Menon, and Bart Knijnenburg. 2018. A data-driven approach to developing IoT privacy-setting interfaces. In IUI 2018. ACM, 165–176.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Eun Kyoung Choe, Sunny Consolvo, Jaeyeon Jung, Beverly Harrison, and Julie A Kientz. 2011. Living in a glass house: a survey of private moments in the home. In Proceedings of UbiComp 2011. ACM, 41–44.Search in Google Scholar

[8] CIPR 2017. CIPR - Home automation device market grows briskly. (2017). https://www.voicebot.ai/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/cirp-news-release-2017-11-06-echo-home.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bogdan Copos, Karl Levitt, Matt Bishop, and Jeff Rowe. 2016. Is anybody home? Inferring activity from smart home network traffic. In SPW, 2016. IEEE, 245–251.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Karen L Courtney. 2008. Privacy and senior willingness to adopt smart home information technology in residential care facilities. Methods of Information in Medicine 47, 01 (2008), 76–81.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Karen L Courtney, George Demeris, Marilyn Rantz, and Marjorie Skubic. 2008. Needing smart home technologies: the perspectives of older adults in continuing care retirement communities. (2008).10.14236/jhi.v16i3.69419094406Search in Google Scholar

[12] Anupam Das, Martin Degeling, Daniel Smullen, and Norman Sadeh. 2018. Personalized privacy assistants for the internet of things: providing users with notice and choice. IEEE Pervasive Computing 17, 3 (2018), 35–46.Search in Google Scholar

[13] George Demiris, Brian K Hensel, Marjorie Skubic, and Marilyn Rantz. 2008. Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 24, 1 (2008), 120–124.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Jens Grossklags and Alessandro Acquisti. 2007. When 25 cents is too much: An experiment on willingness-to-sell and willingness-to-protect personal information. In WEIS 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Jason Hong. 2017. The privacy landscape of pervasive computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing 16, 3 (2017), 40–48.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Xiaodong Jiang, Jason I Hong, and James A Landay. 2002. Approximate information flows: Socially-based modeling of privacy in ubiquitous computing. In UbiComp 2002. Springer, 176–193.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Juniper 2017. Juniper - digital voice assistants. (2017). https://www.juniperresearch.com/researchstore/innovation-disruption/digital-voice-assistants/platforms-revenues-opportunities.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Bart P Knijnenburg, Alfred Kobsa, and Hongxia Jin. 2013. Dimensionality of information disclosure behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 71, 12 (2013), 1144–1162.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Scott Lederer, Jennifer Mankoff, and Anind K Dey. 2003. Who wants to know what when? privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing. In CHI’03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 724–725.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hosub Lee and Alfred Kobsa. 2016. Understanding user privacy in Internet of Things environments. In IEEE WF-IoT 2016. 407–412.10.1109/WF-IoT.2016.7845392Search in Google Scholar

[21] Jialiu Lin, Shahriyar Amini, Jason I Hong, Norman Sadeh, Janne Lindqvist, and Joy Zhang. 2012. Expectation and purpose: understanding users’ mental models of mobile app privacy through crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of UbiComp 2012. ACM, 501–510.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Bin Liu, Mads Schaarup Andersen, Florian Schaub, Hazim Almuhimedi, Shikun Aerin Zhang, Norman Sadeh, Yuvraj Agarwal, and Alessandro Acquisti. 2016. Follow my recommendations: A personalized privacy assistant for mobile app permissions. In SOUPS 2016. 27–41.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Bernard Lubin and Roger L Harrison. 1964. Predicting small group behavior with the self-disclosure inventory. Psychological Reports 15, 1 (1964), 77–78.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Naresh K Malhotra, Sung S Kim, and James Agarwal. 2004. Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research 15, 4 (2004), 336–355.10.1287/isre.1040.0032Search in Google Scholar

[25] Emily McReynolds, Sarah Hubbard, Timothy Lau, Aditya Saraf, Maya Cakmak, and Franziska Roesner. 2017. Toys that listen: A study of parents, children, and internet-connected toys. In Proceedings of CHI 2017. 5197–5207.Search in Google Scholar

[26] William Melicher, Mahmood Sharif, Joshua Tan, Lujo Bauer, Mihai Christodorescu, and Pedro Giovanni Leon. 2016. (Do Not) Track me sometimes: users’ contextual preferences for web tracking. PETS 2016, 2 (2016), 135–154.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Pardis Emami Naeini, Sruti Bhagavatula, Hana Habib, Martin Degeling, Lujo Bauer, Lorrie Cranor, and Norman Sadeh. 2017. Privacy expectations and preferences in an IoT world. In SOUPS 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Helen Nissenbaum. 2004. Privacy as contextual integrity. Wash. L. Rev. 79 (2004), 119.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Katarzyna Olejnik, Italo Dacosta, Joana Soares Machado, Kévin Huguenin, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan, and Jean-Pierre Hubaux. 2017. SmarPer: Context-aware and automatic runtime-permissions for mobile devices. In IEEE SP 2017. 1058–1076.10.1109/SP.2017.25Search in Google Scholar

[30] Leysia Palen and Paul Dourish. 2003. Unpacking privacy for a networked world. In CHI 2003. ACM, 129–136.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Pew 2 2017. Pew Research Center, The internet of things connectivity binge: what are the implications? (2017). http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/06/06/theme-3-risk-is-part-of-life-the-internet-of-things-will-be-accepted-despite-dangers-because-most-people-believe-the-worst-case-scenario-would-never-happen-to-them.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Yu Pu and Jens Grossklags. 2015. Using conjoint analysis to investigate the value of interdependent privacy in social app adoption scenarios. (2015).Search in Google Scholar

[33] Yu Pu and Jens Grossklags. 2016. Towards a model on the factors influencing social app users’ valuation of interdependent privacy. PETS 2016, 2 (2016), 61–81.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Yu Pu and Jens Grossklags. 2017. Valuating friends’ privacy: Does anonymity of sharing personal data matter?. In SOUPS 2017. 339–355.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Joel Ross, Lilly Irani, M Silberman, Andrew Zaldivar, and Bill Tomlinson. 2010. Who are the crowdworkers? shifting demographics in mechanical turk. In CHI’10 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2863–2872.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Daniel J Solove. 2005. A taxonomy of privacy. U. Pa. L. Rev. 154 (2005), 477.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Blase Ur, Pedro Giovanni Leon, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Richard Shay, and Yang Wang. 2012. Smart, useful, scary, creepy: perceptions of online behavioral advertising. In Proceedings of SOUPS 2012. ACM, 4.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Max Van Kleek, Reuben Binns, Jun Zhao, Adam Slack, Sauyon Lee, Dean Ottewell, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2018. X-ray refine: Supporting the exploration and refinement of information exposure resulting from smartphone apps. In Proceedings of CHI 2018. ACM, 393.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Primal Wijesekera, Arjun Baokar, Lynn Tsai, Joel Reardon, Serge Egelman, David Wagner, and Konstantin Beznosov. 2017. The feasibility of dynamically granted permissions: Aligning mobile privacy with user preferences. In IEEE SP 2017. 1077–1093.10.1109/SP.2017.51Search in Google Scholar

[40] Primal Wijesekera, Joel Reardon, Irwin Reyes, Lynn Tsai, Jung-Wei Chen, Nathan Good, David Wagner, Konstantin Beznosov, and Serge Egelman. 2018. Contextualizing privacy decisions for better prediction (and protection). In Proceedings of CHI 2018. ACM, 268.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Peter Worthy, Ben Matthews, and Stephen Viller. 2016. Trust me: doubts and concerns living with the internet of things. In Proceedings of DIS 2016. ACM, 427–434.Search in Google Scholar

• Understanding Privacy-Related Advice on Stack Overflow

• Revisiting Identification Issues in GDPR ‘Right Of Access’ Policies: A Technical and Longitudinal Analysis

• Employees’ privacy perceptions: exploring the dimensionality and antecedents of personal data sensitivity and willingness to disclose

• Visualizing Privacy-Utility Trade-Offs in Differentially Private Data Releases

• Analyzing the Feasibility and Generalizability of Fingerprinting Internet of Things Devices

• CoverDrop: Blowing the Whistle Through A News App

• Building a Privacy-Preserving Smart Camera System

• FP-Radar: Longitudinal Measurement and Early Detection of Browser Fingerprinting

• Are iPhones Really Better for Privacy? A Comparative Study of iOS and Android Apps

• How to prove any NP statement jointly? Efficient Distributed-prover Zero-Knowledge Protocols

• Editors’ Introduction

• PUBA: Privacy-Preserving User-Data Bookkeeping and Analytics

• Who Knows I Like Jelly Beans? An Investigation Into Search Privacy

• SoK: Plausibly Deniable Storage

• d3p - A Python Package for Differentially-Private Probabilistic Programming

• Updatable Private Set Intersection

• Knowledge Cross-Distillation for Membership Privacy

• RegulaTor: A Straightforward Website Fingerprinting Defense

• Privacy-Preserving Positioning in Wi-Fi Fine Timing Measurement

• Efficient Set Membership Proofs using MPC-in-the-Head

• Checking Websites’ GDPR Consent Compliance for Marketing Emails

• Comprehensive Analysis of Privacy Leakage in Vertical Federated Learning During Prediction

• Understanding Utility and Privacy of Demographic Data in Education Technology by Causal Analysis and Adversarial-Censoring

• User-Level Label Leakage from Gradients in Federated Learning

• Privacy-preserving training of tree ensembles over continuous data

• Differentially Private Simple Linear Regression

• Increasing Adoption of Tor Browser Using Informational and Planning Nudges