1. bookVolume 29 (2023): Edition 1 (March 2023)
Détails du magazine
Première parution
30 Dec 2008
4 fois par an
Accès libre

Establishment of national diagnostic dose reference levels (DRLs) for routine computed tomography examinations in Jordan

Publié en ligne: 01 Feb 2023
Volume & Edition: Volume 29 (2023) - Edition 1 (March 2023)
Pages: 26 - 34
Reçu: 13 Oct 2022
Accepté: 10 Jan 2023
Détails du magazine
Première parution
30 Dec 2008
4 fois par an

1. Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ, et al. ICRP publication 135: diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Annals of the ICRP. 2017;46(1):1-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/014664531771720910.1177/014664531771720929065694 Search in Google Scholar

2. Rothenberg LN, Pentlow KS. CT dosimetry and radiation safety. In: Goldman LW, Fowlkes JB, eds. Medical CT and Ultrasound: Current Technology and Applications. Madison, Wis: Advanced Medical Publishing; 1995:519-553 Search in Google Scholar

3. Schauer DA, Linton OW. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements report shows substantial medical exposure increase. Radiology. 2009;253(2):293-296. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.253209049410.1148/radiol.253209049419864524 Search in Google Scholar

4. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: International basic safety standards. General safety requirements Part 3 (Spanish Edition). 2016. Search in Google Scholar

5. Santos J, etFoley S, Paulo G, et al. The establishment of computed tomography diagnostic reference levels in Portugal. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2014;158(3):307-317. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nct22610.1093/rpd/nct22624043875 Search in Google Scholar

6. de Gonzalez AB, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. The Lancet. 2004;363(9406):345-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15433-010.1016/S0140-6736(04)15433-015070562 Search in Google Scholar

7. Héliou R, Normandeau L, Beaudoin G. Towards dose reduction in CT: patient radiation dose assessment for CT examinations at university health center in Canada and comparison with national diagnostic reference levels. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2012;148(2):202-210. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncr02410.1093/rpd/ncr02421406432 Search in Google Scholar

8. Vassileva J, Rehani M. Diagnostic reference levels. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(1):W1-W3. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.14.1279410.2214/AJR.14.1279425539261 Search in Google Scholar

9. AAPM Report No. 96. The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. Report of AAPM task group 23: CT Dosimetry. 2008. https://doi.org/10.37206/9710.37206/97 Search in Google Scholar

10. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M. NRPB-W67 doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK–2003 review. National Radiation Protection Board.2005. Search in Google Scholar

11. Olugbenga A. An Overview of International Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: Basic Safety Standards. 2020. http://elibrary.nnra.gov.ng/jspui/handle/123456789/488 Search in Google Scholar

12. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: Revised December 1954. Annals of the ICRP/ICRP Publication. 1959;OS_1(1):iii-x. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-27402880014-610.1016/S0074-27402880014-6 Search in Google Scholar

13. Larsson CM. Waste disposal and the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection–Challenges for radioecology and environmental radiation protection. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2009;100(12):1053-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.07.00310.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.07.00319643515 Search in Google Scholar

14. Boal TJ, Pinak M. Dose limits to the lens of the eye: International Basic Safety Standards and related guidance. Annals of the ICRP. 2015. 44(1_suppl):112-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/014664531456232110.1177/014664531456232125816264 Search in Google Scholar

15. Rehani M, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Vañó E, et al. ICRP Publication 117. Radiological protection in fluoroscopically guided procedures performed outside the imaging department. Annals of the ICRP. 2010;40(6):1-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2012.03.00110.1016/j.icrp.2012.03.00122732420 Search in Google Scholar

16. Valentin J, Radiation and your patient: A guide for medical practitioners: ICRP Supporting Guidance 2: Approved by ICRP Committee 3 in September 2001. Annals of the ICRP. 2001;31(4):1-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6453(02)00007-610.1016/S0146-6453(02)00007-6 Search in Google Scholar

17. McCollough CH, Chen GH, Kalender W, et al. Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT. Radiology. 2012;264(2):567-580. https://doi.org//10.1148/radiol.1211226510.1148/radiol.12112265340135422692035 Search in Google Scholar

18. Brady SL, Mirro AE, Moore BM, Kaufman RA. How to appropriately calculate effective dose for CT using either size-specific dose estimates or dose-length product. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2015;204(5):953-958. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.14.1331710.2214/AJR.14.1331725729893 Search in Google Scholar

19. European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography (EUR 16262 EN). 2000. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d229c9e1-a967-49de-b169-59ee68605f1a Search in Google Scholar

20. Salama DH, Vassileva J, Mahdalyet G, el al. Establishing national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for computed tomography in Egypt. Physica Medica. 2017;39:16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.05.05010.1016/j.ejmp.2017.05.05028711184 Search in Google Scholar

21. Suliman II, Khamis HM, Ombada TH, et al. Radiation exposure during paediatric CT in Sudan: CT dose, organ and effective doses. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2015;167(4):513-518. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu32110.1093/rpd/ncu32125377750 Search in Google Scholar

22. Kaste SC, Brady SL, Yee B, et al. Is routine pelvic surveillance imaging necessary in patients with Wilms tumor? Cancer. 2013;119(1): 182-188. https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fcncr.2768710.1002/cncr.27687346110522736193 Search in Google Scholar

23. Pantos I, Thalassinou S, Argentos S, et al. Adult patient radiation doses from non-cardiac CT examinations: a review of published results. British Journal of Radiology. 2011;84(1000):293-303. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/6907061410.1259/bjr/69070614347346421266399 Search in Google Scholar

24. Razali MASM, Ahmad MZ, Roslee MAAM, Osman ND. Establishment of institutional diagnostic reference level for CT imaging associated with multiple anatomical regions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019:012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1248/1/01206710.1088/1742-6596/1248/1/012067 Search in Google Scholar

25. Treier R, Aroua A, Verdunet FR, et al. Patient doses in CT examinations in Switzerland: implementation of national diagnostic reference levels. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2010;142(2-4):244-254. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq27910.1093/rpd/ncq27920926508 Search in Google Scholar

26. Roch P, Aubert B, French diagnostic reference levels in diagnostic radiology, computed tomography and nuclear medicine: 2004–2008 review. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2013;154(1):52-75. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs15210.1093/rpd/ncs15222956562 Search in Google Scholar

27. European Commission. Radiation Protection N° 180. Diagnostic Reference Levels in Thirty-six European Countries. Part 2/2. Diagnostic reference levels in thirty-six European countries. 2014. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/nuclear-energy/radiation-protection/scientific-seminars-and-publications/radiation-protection-series-publications_en#ref-180 Search in Google Scholar

28. Abuzaid MM, Elshami W, Tekin HO, et al. Computed tomography radiation doses for common computed tomography examinations: a nationwide dose survey in United Arab Emirates. Insights into Imaging. 2020;11(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00891-610.1186/s13244-020-00891-6739972132748218 Search in Google Scholar

29. Aroua A, Samara ET, Bochudet FO, al. Exposure of the Swiss population to computed tomography. BMC medical imaging 2013.13(1): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-13-2210.1186/1471-2342-13-22373369323895057 Search in Google Scholar

30. Le Coultre R, Bize J, Champendal M, et al. Exposure of the Swiss population by radiodiagnostics: 2013 review. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016;169(1-4):221-224. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv46210.1093/rpd/ncv462491196126541187 Search in Google Scholar

31. Hayton A, Wallace A, Marks P, et al. Australian diagnostic reference levels for multi detector computed tomography. Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine. 2013.36(1):19-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-013-0180-610.1007/s13246-013-0180-623307142 Search in Google Scholar

32. Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, et al. US diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology. 2017;284(1):120-133. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.201716191110.1148/radiol.201716191128221093 Search in Google Scholar

33. Kanal KM, Butler PF, Chatfield MB, et al. US diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 pediatric CT examinations. Radiology. 2022;302(1):164-174. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.202121124110.1148/radiol.202121124134698569 Search in Google Scholar

34. Wardlaw G, Martel N. Sci-Thur PM – Colourful Interactions: Highlights 07: Canadian computed tomography survey: national diagnostic reference levels. Med Phys. 2016;43:4932-4933. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.496176710.1118/1.4961767 Search in Google Scholar

35. Kumamaru KK, Kogure Y, Suzuki M, et al. A strategy to optimize radiation exposure for non-contrast head CT: comparison with the Japanese diagnostic reference levels. Japanese Journal of Radiology. 2016;34(6):451-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-016-0545-310.1007/s11604-016-0545-327097808 Search in Google Scholar

36. Simantirakis, G, Hourdakis CJ, Economides S, et al. Diagnostic reference levels and patient doses in computed tomography examinations in Greece. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2015;163(3):319-324. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu18210.1093/rpd/ncu18224891405 Search in Google Scholar

37. Foley SJ, McEntee MF, Rainford LA. Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland. British Journal of Radiology. 2012;85(1018):1390-1397. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/1583954910.1259/bjr/15839549347402222595497 Search in Google Scholar

38. Khoramian D, Sistani S, Hejazi P. Establishment of diagnostic reference levels arising from common CT examinations in Semnan County, Iran. Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering. 2019;25(1):51-55. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2019-000810.2478/pjmpe-2019-0008 Search in Google Scholar

39. Ataç GK, Parmaksız A, İnalet T, al. Patient doses from CT examinations in Turkey. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2015;21(5):428.-434. https://doi.org/10.5152%2Fdir.2015.1430610.5152/dir.2015.14306455732926133189 Search in Google Scholar

40. Atlı E, Uyanık SA, Öğüşlüet U, et al. Radiation doses from head, neck, chest and abdominal CT examinations: an institutional dose report. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2021;27(1):147-151. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2020.1956010.5152/dir.2020.19560783772733475510 Search in Google Scholar

41. Kharita M, Khazzam S. Survey of patient dose in computed tomography in Syria 2009. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2010;141(2):149-161. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq15510.1093/rpd/ncq15520511400 Search in Google Scholar

42. Liang CR, Chen PXH, Kapuret J, et al. Establishment of institutional diagnostic reference level for computed tomography with automated dose-tracking software. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 2017;64(2):82-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.21010.1002/jmrs.210545433328247587 Search in Google Scholar

43. Vilar-Palop J, Vilar J, Hernández-Aguado I, et al. Updated effective doses in radiology. Journal of Radiological Protection. 2016;36(4):975-990. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/36/4/97510.1088/0952-4746/36/4/97527893456 Search in Google Scholar

44. Smith-Bindman R, Moghadassi M, Wilson N, et al. Radiation doses in consecutive CT examinations from five University of California Medical Centers. Radiology. 2015;277(1):134-141. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.201514272810.1148/radiol.2015142728461387125988262 Search in Google Scholar

45. Vilar-Palop J, Vilar J, Hernández-Aguado I, et al. Updated effective doses in radiology. Journal of Radiological Protection. 2016;36(4):975-990. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/36/4/97510.1088/0952-4746/36/4/975 Search in Google Scholar

46. Saeed MK, Alzoubi AS, Al-QahtaniJ. Regional survey of image quality and radiation dose in computed tomography examinations in Saudi Arabia. Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine. 2014;37(2):279-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-014-0256-y10.1007/s13246-014-0256-y24609761 Search in Google Scholar

47. Hasan N, Rizk C, Babikir E. National diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications and patient size for adults’ computed tomography in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2022:197(3):110147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.11014710.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110147 Search in Google Scholar

48. McNitt-Gray MF. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: Topics in CT: Radiation dose in CT. Radiographics. 2002;22(6):1541-1553. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.22602512810.1148/rg.22602512812432127 Search in Google Scholar

49. Taylor S, van Muylem A, Howarth N, et al. CT dose survey in adults: what sample size for what precision? European Radiology. 2017;27(1):365-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4333-310.1007/s00330-016-4333-327048530 Search in Google Scholar

50. Lee KL, Beveridge T, Sanagou M, et al. Updated Australian diagnostic reference levels for adult CT. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 2020;67(1):5-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.37210.1002/jmrs.372706324232040878 Search in Google Scholar

51. Karim MKA, Hashim S, Bradley DA, et al. Radiation doses from computed tomography practice in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2016;121:69-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.12.02010.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.12.020 Search in Google Scholar

52. Muhammad NA, Abdul Karim MK, Abu Hassanet H, et al. Diagnostic reference level of radiation dose and image quality among paediatric CT examinations in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Diagnostics. 2020;10(8):591. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics1008059110.3390/diagnostics10080591746037632823818 Search in Google Scholar

Articles recommandés par Trend MD