The aim of the article is to analyze the seams connecting the covering textiles in paraglider wing and estimate their physical strength. The most extreme flight parameters (the angle of attack and velocity) in the numerical model of the wing allow the determination of the mean pressure inside the contour and the maximal difference between the pressures on the inner and the outer material surfaces. The preprocessing stage and numerical calculations in Ansys environment consider three different covering materials. The tool Porous Media is used to create the objects of a given value of air permeability. The estimated parameter of seam is the maximal pressure difference between both sides of the covering material, which that interacts with the test results. The quality index of the seam is defined by the maximal force to seam rupture and relative elongation during rupture. The obtained results indicate that the seams are resistant to the pressure difference caused by the most extreme flight parameters.

#### Keywords

- Seam quality index
- paraglider wing

The paraglider wing is a flexible structure without stiffening components of the airfoil shape during the flight [1]. The entering vents on the leading edge secure the aerodynamic shape by the suitable air pressure inside the contour. The covering is made of impregnated synthetic textiles; the elements of prescribed properties and dimensions are connected by seams. The seam strength secures the airfoil shape and the air permeability of covering material.

The seams are subjected to various phenomena during the flight, for instance, heat transfer. The physical model determines the textile composite, composed of fabric and seam structure. The mathematical model includes the heat transfer equation and a set of conditions [2]. The impact of seams on heat insulation and moisture resistance is analyzed in a previous paper [3] for different types of sealed seams, typically used to connect the parts of clothing. The coupled transport is defined by the heat and mass transport equations and a set of conditions [4, 5]. The heat is transported with mass, and the mass transport with heat is negligible. The mass sorption in fibers is simulated as a two-stage phenomenon. The shape of textile structures subjected to diffusion can be optimized using the homogenization and the sensitivity expression [6]. The thermoplastic polymer creates additional protection, improves the aesthetic qualities, and retains the stiffness of laminates against creasing [7].

The problem can be solved on the microscale using the SolidWorks software in a 3D environment [8]. The method for measuring the surface geometry by laser techniques is applied to define the specific structure and properties, as well as the surface geometry of fabrics [9, 10].

The pressure inside the structure is determined using the numerical model of the wing and the flight parameters, namely, the angle of attack and velocity. The state variable in paraglider flow problems is the pressure distribution inside the contour. The ANSYS environment allows the creation of a finite volume mesh and numerical calculations related to three different covering materials. The ANSYS Fluent is divided into three stages: (i) the preprocessing stage prepares the geometry and numerical mesh;, (ii) the solving simulates the flow of paraglider wing made of permeable materials;, and (iii) the postprocessing stage visualizes the distribution of the state variable.

The main goals of the article are as follows: (i) determining the optimal angle of attack and the velocity of the wing during the flight, as well as the most extreme conditions in respect of the biggest inner forces inside the structure; (ii) specifying the mean pressure inside the wing contour and the maximal pressure difference between the inner and outer surfaces of textile covering as the measure of the seam load; and (iii) evaluating the seams connecting the covering material in terms of their strength. The material properties are varied from the best aerodynamic characteristics to the hydrolytic-mechanically degraded. The article continues previous analyses concerning the sensitivity of aerodynamic characteristics to the characteristics of the textiles applied [1].

The novelties in this study are the following. (i) The available literature does not introduce the sensitivity of pressure distribution within the contour to the angle of attack and the velocity of paraglider wing.; (ii) The connecting seams of a paraglider wing have not yet been analyzed and evaluated in terms of their strength.; and(iii) The analysis explains the aerodynamic safety of a paraglider in dynamic conditions in terms of material strength.

The geometric model is based on the universal paraglider wing. Let us project horizontally the paraglider on the _{j}_{j}

Next, 23 dimensionless coordinates that form the basic airfoil profile are defined on the circumference of the cross section on the

The coordinates of an optional point on the wing contour are determined by a simple program in the MatLab environment. These points create the wing geometry in the ANSYS

The computational domain of the wing geometry is a cuboid including a half of the paraglider structure. On the symmetry plane, the

A computational mesh is created for the extruded objects (i.e., the paraglider walls and the air inside the contour) using the procedure

The mesh is determined by the prescribed number of nodes on each edge, and the tool used is

The air inside the contour is approximated in the plane of symmetry by the cells of the prescribed volumes. The applied procedure

Therefore, the mesh is made of structural cells (the wing surfaces, and the air inside the wing contour) and nonstructural elements (the surrounding air) [12]. The quality parameters are acceptable: the parameter

The nodes of two adjacent meshes (the structural net inside the wing contour and the non-structural in surrounding air) are incompatible on the external surface of the wing, which is the critical disadvantage. However, the procedure

The turbulence model

The permeability is defined using the parameter

Information about the selected materials and parameters are shown in Table 1.

Values of the

^{2}] | |||
---|---|---|---|

Dominico Tex DMF 20 | 6 | 0.00010 | 2.236 × 10^{15} |

Porcher Marine 9017 PU E38A | 40 | 0.00067 | 8.385 × 10^{13} |

Skytex 36 | 200 | 0.00333 | 1.677 × 10^{13} |

The basic control parameter of stable calculations is the Courant number (_{n}_{n}_{n}

According to Figure 3a and Table 2, the best aerodynamic characteristics result from the textile fabric of the lowest permeability (the mean pressure inside the wing _{l}/_{d}] = 12.288). The covering fabric Porcher Marine 9017 PU E38A (used 20 years ago) presents apparently worse results [14]. However, the wing remains safe and stable during the flight. Its _{l}/_{d} ratio is 0.6627, lower than the _{l}/_{d} ratio for Dominico Tex DMF 20.

Example of interpretation of numeric values obtained in the course of numerical calculations (α = 6°;

Average pressure inside paraglider wing | 101,415.72 Pa | 101,412.6 Pa | 101,398.35 Pa |

Mass flow rate | 0.251 kg/s | 1.435 kg/s | 5.8542 kg/s |

Lift force | 1,091.045 N | 1,085.883 N | 812.2437 N |

Drag force | 88.7882 N | 93.4068 N | 199.7884 N |

^{l}/^{d} ratio | 12.288 | 11.6253 | 4.0655 |

_{l}/_{d}, ratio of lift coefficient by the drag coefficient.

The paraglider covered with Skytex 36 after flutter and hydrolysis is probably unable to fly. The uniform overpressure on the outer side of the leading edge probably disturbs the creation of overpressure inside the contour (Figure 3b). To verify the results, let us compare the pressure distribution on the upper and lower wing surfaces (Figure 4) and the values in Table 2. The increase in pressure on the leading edge is around 101,405 Pa, and the mean pressure inside the contour is 101,398.35 Pa (compatible with Figure 3b). The values are nearly comparable, so the flight is either impossible or unstable and extremely dangerous.

The covering materials with the lowest air permeability are subjected to the highest internal forces during the flight because of the highest pressure inside the wing. Therefore, the further calculations of forces transmitted through the seams necessitate a covering material of the lowest permeability. The pressure distribution is next analyzed for the angle α = 6° and the velocities

The _{l}/_{d} ratio = _{z}/_{x} (the ratio of the lift force to the drag force) is not particularly sensitive to velocity change; the maximal difference is equal to 0.008 (Figure 6b). The higher the velocity, the better is the aerodynamic characteristic. The velocity equal to _{l}/_{d} ratio to decrease slightly. The reasons are the vortices at the trailing edge caused by the increasing speed.

Let us now determine the angles of attack that provide the optimal and the most extreme conditions of flight. They are essential to define the pressure inside the wing contour as the measure of seam load. The distribution of forces is analyzed for the typical velocity _{l}/_{d} ratio = _{z}/P_{x}_{l}/_{d} ratio for the angle α = 4–6°. However, the flight is more stable for the maximal acceptable value α = 6°. Summarizing, the optimal flight parameters assumed during the analysis are α = 6°;

The biggest internal forces are caused by the most extreme conditions in relation to the angle of attack, i.e., the difference between the maximal pressure inside and the minimal pressure outside the covering (Figure 6a). The pressure difference is not sensitive to the variable velocity. Thus, the extreme flight parameters that indicate the biggest internal forces of the wing material, including seams, are the following α = 12°;

The physical model of seam rupture is complicated and unpredictable in the context of four phenomena: (i) the force to seam rupture is differently directed because of different pressures inside the contour; (ii) the dynamic conditions during the flight and tests generate different directions and values of the friction force; (iii) the frictional force between the thread and the fabric is variable; and (iv) the thread is subjected to elongation, which causes variable pressure and friction inside the seam.

Thus, the detailed parameters that interact with the test results and seam load are the following: (i) the mean pressure inside the wing covered with material of the lowest permeability (_{max}) and the minimal pressure outside (_{min}) the material of the lowest permeability (Δ_{max} – _{min} = 274 Pa).

The force transmitted through the paraglider seams can be calculated by the accurate method, i.e., introducing the elementary forces in the textile covering and connecting seams (Figure 8). Let us apply a rectangular piece of material between the first and second joints of the dimensions _{1} and _{0}. This part of the material is the largest and transmits the maximal pressure load. The segment _{1} corresponds to the distance between adjacent joints in the center of wing, whereas _{0} corresponds to the longest paraglider chord (Figure 1). The rectangular sample is attached with seams on both sides with a length of _{0}. The force caused by the pressure difference Δ_{max} – _{min} inside the wing covering can be expressed as follows:

The pressure difference is constant in the infinitesimal time step and the integral is simplified as follows:

On the other hand, the force caused by the pressure difference is balanced by the internal force in the seams, denoted by the formula:
_{sew1} and _{sew2} are the forces per unit length on the first and second joints/seams; _{sew1} and _{sew2} are the lengths of adequate seam. Assuming the constant forces _{sew1} = _{sew2} = _{sew} along the seam and the rectangular shape of material, we obtain the following from Eq. (6):

Comparing Eq. (5) and (7), the force acting on the seams per unit of length has the following form:

Introducing the dimensions of the paraglider's wing, the force is _{seam}

On the other hand, the sample teared during the tests is short, and the approximate force is of the order of _{seam} = 10–15 N.

Let us evaluate the seams prepared along both warp thread and weft thread directions of the fabrics Dominico Tex 20 DMF and Dominico Tex 30 DMF (Table 3). The sewn seams applied to connect the covering elements are made according to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 4916 [15, 16], and the seam number is 1.01.03/301.301 (Figure 9). The sewing conditions are the following: (i) the sewing threads – made of 100% polyester; (ii) the needle size and finish – Schmetz R 90 nickel plated; (iii) the stitch type – quilted seam 301; (iv) the stitch density – 3/cm; and (v) the test samples – prepared using the industrial sewing machine Siruba.

Characteristics of textile material tested; and the fabric applied on the bottom surface of the wing

^{2} | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

PA 6.6 100% + impregnant PU on the left-hand side of material | 34 | 0.05 | Ripstop | Warp: 616; weft: 668 | Warp: 340; weft: 338 | Warp: 22; weft: 25 | |

PA 6.6 100% + impregnant PU on the left-hand side of material | 37 | 0.07 | Ripstop | Warp: 504; weft: 508 | Warp: 400; weft: 432 | Warp: 21; weft: 25 |

PA, polyamide; PU, polyurethane.

The seam quality index is determined by (i) the maximal force to seam rupture

The strength of seams is tested using the testing machine INSTRON Series 5560, provided with the computer program of TX series. Samples of seams were subjected to tension within the distance equal to 100 mm between clamps of testing machine at the speed of load increase of 50 mm/min. Before testing, all samples were conditioned at standard conditions, i.e., relative humidity of 65% and temperature of 20°C. The same method was applied for both seams and fabric.

The test program includes the mean results obtained for the seams prepared along both warp thread and the weft thread directions. Analysis of bidirectional tests is significant because the seams are subjected to different loads during the normal flight, i.e., longitudinal and cross directions.

The maximal force to seam rupture depends on the warp/weft direction and longitudinal/cross orientation of the acting force (Figure 10). The differences are substantial (Figure 11). Measuring in the warp direction, the force is bigger for the longitudinal than the cross direction (

The relative elongation during rupture is almost comparable. Some differences exist in the warp direction for both fabrics (21%/23.3% for Dominico Tex 20 DMF, and 23%/27% for Dominico Tex 30 DMF). The uniform elongation of textile coverage in all directions is advantageous during the flight of paraglider.

Considering the quality index and theoretical calculations, the seams connecting the textile components made of Dominico Tex fabric are resistant to pressure inside the wing contour. Additionally, the factor of safety is relatively high. The Dominico Tex fabric is commonly used to cover the paraglider. Moreover, there is no information available about accidents resulting from tearing of the seams during the flight.

The paraglider wing is a complex structure subjected to different loads in dynamic conditions and various phenomena during the flight. Seams connecting the textile elements are the most loaded component of the wing, so it they should be resistant. The difficulty is a complicated physical description of seams, that which precludes the unequivocal formulation of the physical model. Thus, the only method left is to compare the theoretical force caused by the maximal pressure difference on the material surface with the seam quality index formulated during the tests. The mean pressure inside the contour remains a reference level of the load.

The mean pressure inside the wing and the maximal difference between the pressure on the inner and outer surfaces are determined using the CFD with the

The seam quality index is determined by the maximal force to rupture and the relative elongation during rupture. The forces in the warp/weft direction and longitudinal/cross orientation are quite different, which result in textile tearing. The relative elongation during rupture is comparable. The correct flight of the paraglider wing and the lack of available information about accidents caused by the tearing of seams indicate that the seams subjected to the current pressure inside the contour are resistant enough.

The interaction between the CFD/ANSYS

In the future, we intend to formulate the physical model of the seam subjected to variable dynamic loads. Theoretical considerations, description of the physical model, and tests of the seams should be introduced for other types of textiles.

#### Values of the Porous Resistance parameter for corresponding materials, based on Korycki and Szafrańska [3]

^{2}] | |||
---|---|---|---|

Dominico Tex DMF 20 | 6 | 0.00010 | 2.236 × 10^{15} |

Porcher Marine 9017 PU E38A | 40 | 0.00067 | 8.385 × 10^{13} |

Skytex 36 | 200 | 0.00333 | 1.677 × 10^{13} |

#### Characteristics of textile material tested; and the fabric applied on the bottom surface of the wing

^{2} | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

PA 6.6 100% + impregnant PU on the left-hand side of material | 34 | 0.05 | Ripstop | Warp: 616; weft: 668 | Warp: 340; weft: 338 | Warp: 22; weft: 25 | |

PA 6.6 100% + impregnant PU on the left-hand side of material | 37 | 0.07 | Ripstop | Warp: 504; weft: 508 | Warp: 400; weft: 432 | Warp: 21; weft: 25 |

#### Example of interpretation of numeric values obtained in the course of numerical calculations (α = 6°; v = 45 km/h)

Average pressure inside paraglider wing | 101,415.72 Pa | 101,412.6 Pa | 101,398.35 Pa |

Mass flow rate | 0.251 kg/s | 1.435 kg/s | 5.8542 kg/s |

Lift force | 1,091.045 N | 1,085.883 N | 812.2437 N |

Drag force | 88.7882 N | 93.4068 N | 199.7884 N |

^{l}/^{d} ratio | 12.288 | 11.6253 | 4.0655 |

Automatic Identification Of Wrist Position In A Virtual Environment For Garment Design Pressure Evaluation Of Seamless Yoga Leggings Designed With Partition Structure Experimental and Modelling Studies on Thermal Insulation and Sound Absorption Properties of Cross-Laid Nonwoven Fabrics Tensile Properties Analysis Of 3D Flat-Knitted Inlay Fabric Reinforced Composites Using Acoustic Emission From Raw To Finished Cotton—Characterization By Interface Phenomena A Study on the Woven Construction of Fabric Dyed With Natural Indigo Dye and Finishing for Applying to Product Design for Home Textile Products A Calculation Method for the Deformation Behavior of Warp-Knitted Fabric Nondestructive Test Technology Research for Yarn Linear Density Unevenness Numerical Simulation and Analysis of Airflow in the Condensing Zone of Compact Spinning with Lattice Apron Blend Electrospinning of Poly(Ɛ-Caprolactone) and Poly(Ethylene Glycol-400) Nanofibers Loaded with Ibuprofen as a Potential Drug Delivery System for Wound Dressings Application of Plasticized Cellulose Triacetate Membranes for Recovery and Separation of Cerium(III) and Lanthanum(III) Study On Structure And Anti-Uv Properties Of Sericin Cocoons Fit And Pressure Comfort Evaluation On A Virtual Prototype Of A Tight-Fit Cycling Shirt A Fabric-Based Integrated Sensor Glove System Recognizing Hand Gesture Developing Real Avatars for the Apparel Industry and Analysing Fabric Draping in the Virtual Domain Review on Fabrication and Application of Regenerated Bombyx Mori Silk Fibroin MaterialsThe Effects of Sensory Marketing on Clothing-Buying Behavior Transport of Moisture in Car Seat Covers Review on 3D Fabrication at Nanoscale Investigation of the Performance of Cotton/Polyester Blend in Different Yarn Structures Simulations of Heat Transfer through Multilayer Protective Clothing Exposed to Flame Determination of Sewing Thread Consumption for 602, 605, and 607 Cover Stitches Using Geometrical and Multi-Linear Regression Models Polyaniline Electrospun Composite Nanofibers Reinforced with Carbon Nanotubes Effect of Surface Modification of Himalayan Nettle Fiber and Characterization of the Morphology, Physical and Mechanical Properties Investigation of Actual Phenomena and Auxiliary Ultrasonic Welding Parameters on Seam Strength of PVC-Coated Hybrid Textiles Modeling Lean and Six Sigma Integration using Deep Learning: Applied to a Clothing Company Comparative Analysis of Structure and Properties of Stereoscopic Cocoon and Flat Cocoon Effect of Different Yarn Combinations on Auxetic Properties of Plied Yarns Analysis of Heat Transfer through a Protective Clothing Package Smart Textile for Building and Living Investigation of Twist Waves Distribution along Structurally Nonuniform Yarn 3D Body Scan as Anthropometric Tool for Individualized Prosthetic Socks Preliminary Experimental Investigation of Cut-Resistant Materials: A Biomimetic Perspective Durable Wash-Resistant Antimicrobial Treatment of Knitted Fabrics Study on the Thermal and Impact Resistance Properties of Micro PA66/PU Synergistically Reinforced Multi-Layered Biaxial Weft Knitted Fabric Composites Fea-Based Structural Heat Transfer Characteristic of 3-D Orthogonal Woven Composite Subjected to the Non-Uniform Heat Load Comfort-Related Properies of Cotton Seersucker Fabrics Conductive Heat Transfer Prediction of Plain Socks in Wet State A Novel Foam Coating Approach to Produce Abrasive Structures on Textiles Textronic Solutions Used for Premature Babies: A Review Effect of Lycra Weight Percent and Loop Length on Thermo-physiological Properties of Elastic Single Jersey Knitted Fabric Texture Representation and Application of Colored Spun Fabric Using Uniform Three-Structure Descriptor Analysis of Mechanical Behavior of Different Needle Tip Shapes During Puncture of Carbon Fiber Fabric Approach to Performance Rating of Retroreflective Textile Material Considering Production Technology and Reflector Size Influence of Multilayer Interlocked Fabrics Structure on their Thermal Performance Prediction of Standard Time of the Sewing Process using a Support Vector Machine with Particle Swarm Optimization Investigation of Heat Transfer in Seersucker Woven Fabrics using Thermographic Method Comfort-Related Properties of Double-Layered Woven Car Seat Fabrics Experimental Investigation of the Wettability of Protective Glove Materials: A Biomimetic Perspective An Integrated Lean Six Sigma Approach to Modeling and Simulation: A Case Study from Clothing SME Mechanical Properties of Composites Reinforced with Technical Embroidery Made of Flax Fibers Consumer Adoption of Fast-Fashion, Differences of Perceptions, and the Role of Motivations Across the Adoption Groups Development of the Smart T-Shirt for Monitoring Thermal Status of Athletes Assessment and Semantic Categorization of Fabric Visual Texture Preferences Microscopic Analysis of Activated Sludge in Industrial Textile Wastewater Treatment Plant Application of Coating Mixture Based on Silica Aerogel to Improve Thermal Protective Performance of Fabrics A Biomimetic Approach to Protective Glove Design: Inspirations from Nature and the Structural Limitations of Living Organisms Washing Characterization of Compression Socks Estimation of Seams in Paraglider Wing Development of a Small, Covered Yarn Prototype Determination of State Variables in Textile Composite with Membrane During Complex Heat and Moisture Transport Numerical Prediction of the Heat Transfer in Air Gap of Different Garment Models Biological Properties of Knitted Fabrics Used in Post-Burn Scar Rehabilitation Fabrication and Characterization of Fibrous Polycaprolactone Blended with Natural Green Tea Extracts Using Dual Solvent Systems Archaeology and Virtual Simulation Restoration of Costumes in the Han Xizai Banquet Painting Modeling of Material Characteristics of Conventional Synthetic Fabrics