Research on tobacco composition analysis and ratio optimization strategy using data mining technology
, et
19 mars 2025
À propos de cet article
Publié en ligne: 19 mars 2025
Reçu: 02 oct. 2024
Accepté: 29 janv. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0481
Mots clés
© 2025 Xingliang Li et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Chemical composition of tobacco tobacco
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | F | |
---|---|---|---|---|
a | -1.107 | 7.974 | -6.422 | 0.883 |
b | -1.644 | 7.71 | -6.57 | 0.516 |
c | -1.32 | 8.651 | -6.281 | 1.02 |
d | -1.069 | 8.09 | -6.163 | 0.981 |
e | -1.285 | 7.363 | -6.007 | 0.682 |
f | -1.52 | 8.417 | -6.178 | 0.864 |
g | -1.785 | 8.587 | -6.298 | 0.771 |
h | -2.161 | 9.382 | -6.926 | 0.746 |
i | -2.428 | 11.858 | -6.711 | 1.434 |
The eigenvectors in the top five main components
Index Thickness | Principal component | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Blade density | 0.81 | 0.047 | 0.303 | 0.033 | 0.206 |
Single leaf mass | 0.851 | 0.003 | 0.116 | 0.224 | 0.24 |
Balanced moisture content | 0.769 | −0.102 | 0.033 | −0.096 | −0.173 |
Pull | 0.154 | 0.319 | −0.676 | 0.608 | 0.075 |
Elongation | 0.028 | 0.818 | 0.182 | −0.214 | 0.322 |
Fill value | −0.197 | 0.84 | 0.039 | −0.065 | −0.259 |
Stemmatation | −0.3 | 0.085 | 0.674 | 0.62 | −0.174 |
Index | −0.732 | −0.183 | 0.078 | 0.093 | 0.505 |
Principal component factor load matrix
Constituent | Main component factor load | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Total nitrogen / % | 0.922 | 0.079 | −0.097 |
Chlorine / % | 0.848 | −0.092 | −0.257 |
Total sugar | 0.859 | 0.499 | 0.21 |
Reduced sugar / % | 0.781 | 0.235 | 0.593 |
Potassium chlorbium | −0.761 | 0.378 | 0.497 |
Potassium / % | −0.746 | 0.586 | 0.265 |
Nicotine / % | 0.197 | 1.004 | −0.312 |
Glycosoda ratio | 0.472 | 0.881 | −0.094 |
Nitrogen base ratio | −0.621 | 0.764 | −0.116 |
Bisugar ratio | 0.387 | −0.169 | 0.943 |
Characteristic root | 4.624 | 3.1 | 1.69 |
The percentage of variance / % | 46.319 | 30.937 | 16.644 |
Cumulative contribution rate | 46.319 | 77.256 | 93.900 |
The test of the best formula for the best raw material of tobacco
Serial Number | Odor | Tune | Volume Of Aroma | Aroma Quality | Offensive Odor | Aftertaste | Irritating | Total Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 | 19 | 8 | 7 | 19.5 | 15 | 16 | 86 |
2 | 4 | 17.5 | 9.5 | 7 | 18.5 | 15 | 16 | 85.5 |
3 | 4 | 16.5 | 10.5 | 7 | 17 | 15 | 16 | 82.5 |
Average | 84.5 |
Standardized concentration
Sample | Total Sugar | Reduction Sugar | Total Nitrogen | Total Vegetable Base | Total Vegetable Base | Chloride Ion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conventional Tobacco | 9.25 | 7.84 | 1.54 | 1.15 | 2.54 | 0.88 |
Ours | 7.88 | 7.65 | 0.33 | 0.15 | 0.75 | 0.36 |
Descriptive analysis of chemical constituents in different producing areas
Index | a | b | c | d | e | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Soluble sugar | M ± SD | 30.54±1.89 | 32.72±4.96 | 31.73±4.43 | 30.38±2.79 | 33.62±2.03 |
CV | 12.34 | 18.35 | 34.57 | 9.47 | 28.29 | |
Reduction sugar | M ± SD | 26.65±4.86 | 28.34±4.03 | 26.74±3.87 | 26.3±0.92 | 30.64±4.77 |
CV | 17.6 | 21.18 | 17.14 | 11.54 | 11.97 | |
Total nitrogen | M ± SD | 1.93±1.79 | 1.88±0.17 | 1.5±0.24 | 1.68±0.55 | 1.79±3.36 |
CV | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.05 | |
Ncotine | M ± SD | 1.8±1.47 | 2.51±1.33 | 2.81±3.38 | 2.74±3.36 | 2.04±3.34 |
CV | 0.14 | 0.38 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 0.16 | |
Potassium | M ± SD | 1.92±2.2 | 2.36±2.85 | 2.4±0.17 | 2.29±3.45 | 2.79±3.31 |
CV | 0.61 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.2 | 0.28 | |
Clorine | M ± SD | 0.37±4.76 | 0.4±4.81 | 0.22±2.35 | 0.23±0.6 | 0.61±4.66 |
CV | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.05 | |
Sarch | M ± SD | 3.33±1.3 | 2.53±0.55 | 4.42±2.43 | 2.75±2.12 | 3.93±1.37 |
CV | 0.22 | 0.4 | 1.17 | 0.76 | 0.42 | |
Glycosoda ratio | M ± SD | 14.69±4.98 | 15.3±0.27 | 13.66±4.09 | 12.53±3.98 | 14.62±4.61 |
CV | 24.04 | 33.89 | 21.59 | 6.33 | 17.09 | |
Nitrogen base ratio | M ± SD | 1.33±4.98 | 1.15±1.45 | 0.68±3.79 | 1.07±1.01 | 1.07±0.78 |
CV | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.09 | |
Potassium chlorbium | M ± SD | 5.53±2.58 | 10.01±4.8 | 8.33±1.79 | 7.56±3.69 | 9.97±4.36 |
CV | 3.26 | 23.08 | 50.78 | 14.56 | 13.19 |
Correlation coefficients between chemical indexes
Index | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Total sugar | 1 | |||||||||
2. Reduction sugar | 0.707 | 1 | ||||||||
3. Total nitrogen | −0.168 | −0.312 | 1 | |||||||
4. Nicotine | −0.499 | −0.452 | 0.343 | 1 | ||||||
5. Potassium | 0.367 | −0.01 | 0.395 | −0.292 | 1 | |||||
6. Chlorine | −0.157 | −0.079 | 0.298 | −0.073 | 0.13 | 1 | ||||
7. Starch | −0.101 | −0.038 | −0.242 | 0.11 | −0.28 | −0.054 | 1 | |||
8. Glycosoda ratio | 0.779 | 0.641 | −0.272 | −0.859 | 0.334 | 0.029 | −0.128 | 1 | ||
9. Nitrogen base ratio | 0.377 | 0.239 | 0.306 | −0.789 | 0.533 | 0.213 | −0.265 | 0.747 | 1 | |
10. Potassium chlorbium | 0.273 | −0.027 | 0.063 | −0.135 | 0.418 | −0.666 | −0.088 | 0.16 | 0.142 | 1 |
The correlation coefficient matrix of each index of different natural properties
Index | Thickness | Blade density | Single leaf mass | Balanced moisture content | Pull | Elongation | Fill value | Stemmatation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thickness | 1 | 0.682** | 0.494** | −0.023 | 0.062 | −0.054 | −0.068 | −0.441** |
Blade density | 0.685 | 1 | 0.524** | 0.144* | 0.031 | −0.165* | −0.102 | −0.488** |
Single leaf mass | 0.506** | 0.502** | 1 | 0.032 | −0.041 | −0.169* | −0.206* | −0.461** |
Balanced moisture content | −0.024 | 0.166* | 0.044 | 1 | 0.053 | 0.144 | −0.123 | −0.131 |
Pull | 0.078 | 0.042 | −0.042 | 0.051 | 1 | 0.453** | 0.035 | −0.085 |
Elongation | −0.074 | −0.161* | −0.162* | 0.134 | 0.463** | 1 | 0.086 | −0.021 |
Fill value | −0.082 | −0.116 | −0.202* | −0.116 | 0.025 | 0.098 | 1 | 0.194* |
Stemmatation | −0.439** | −0.489** | −0.449** | −0.123 | −0.113 | −0.024 | 0.207* | 1 |
The eigenvalues and contribution rate of each main component
Principal component | eigenvalue | Contribution rate | Cumulative contribution rate |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2.608 | 32.60% | 32.60% |
2 | 1.572 | 19.65% | 52.25% |
3 | 1.175 | 14.69% | 66.94% |
4 | 0.894 | 11.18% | 78.12% |
5 | 0.579 | 7.24% | 85.36% |
6 | 0.416 | 5.20% | 90.56% |
7 | 0.41 | 5.13% | 95.69% |
8 | 0.346 | 4.31% | 100% |
The harmful content of mainstream smoke
Sample | Carbon monoxide | Hydrocyanic acid | benzpyrene | Crodal aldehyde | phenol | Ammonia gas | NNK | Hazard index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conventional Tobacco | 12.2 | 95 | 4.21 | 18.65 | 3.08 | 3.9 | 7.05 | 6.65 |
Ours | 10.5 | 16 | 5 | 2.1 | 3.27 | 3.2 | 9.45 | 5.21 |