Revista y Edición

Volumen 67 (2022): Edición 1 (October 2022)

Volumen 66 (2022): Edición 1 (June 2022)

Volumen 65 (2022): Edición 1 (March 2022)

Volumen 64 (2021): Edición 1 (December 2021)

Volumen 63 (2021): Edición 1 (September 2021)

Volumen 62 (2021): Edición 1 (June 2021)

Volumen 61 (2021): Edición 2 (March 2021)

Volumen 60 (2020): Edición 1 (December 2020)

Volumen 59 (2020): Edición 1 (September 2020)

Volumen 58 (2020): Edición 1 (June 2020)

Volumen 57 (2020): Edición 1 (March 2020)

Volumen 56 (2019): Edición 1 (December 2019)

Volumen 55 (2019): Edición 1 (September 2019)

Volumen 54 (2019): Edición 1 (June 2019)

Volumen 53 (2019): Edición 1 (March 2019)

Volumen 52 (2018): Edición 1 (December 2018)

Volumen 51 (2018): Edición 1 (September 2018)

Volumen 50 (2018): Edición 1 (June 2018)

Volumen 49 (2018): Edición 1 (March 2018)

Volumen 48 (2017): Edición 1 (December 2017)

Volumen 47 (2017): Edición 1 (September 2017)

Volumen 46 (2017): Edición 1 (June 2017)

Volumen 45 (2017): Edición 1 (January 2017)

Volumen 44 (2016): Edición 1 (December 2016)

Volumen 43 (2016): Edición 1 (September 2016)

Volumen 41 (2016): Edición 1 (March 2016)

Volumen 40 (2015): Edición 1 (December 2015)

Volumen 39 (2015): Edición 1 (September 2015)

Volumen 38 (2015): Edición 1 (June 2015)

Volumen 37 (2015): Edición 1 (March 2015)

Volumen 36 (2014): Edición 1 (December 2014)

Volumen 35 (2014): Edición 1 (September 2014)

Volumen 34 (2014): Edición 1 (June 2014)

Volumen 33 (2014): Edición 1 (March 2014)

Volumen 32 (2013): Edición 1 (December 2013)

Volumen 30 (2013): Edición 2013 (June 2013)

Volumen 29 (2013): Edición 2013 (March 2013)

Volumen 28 (2012): Edición 2012 (December 2012)

Volumen 27 (2012): Edición 2012 (September 2012)

Volumen 26 (2012): Edición 2012 (June 2012)

Volumen 25 (2012): Edición 2012 (March 2012)

Volumen 24 (2011): Edición 2011 (December 2011)

Volumen 23 (2011): Edición 2011 (June 2011)

Volumen 22 (2011): Edición 2011 (March 2011)

Volumen 21 (2011): Edición 2011 (January 2011)

Volumen 20 (2010): Edición 2010 (December 2010)

Volumen 19 (2010): Edición 2010 (September 2010)

Volumen 18 (2010): Edición 2010 (June 2010)

Volumen 17 (2010): Edición 2010 (March 2010)

Volumen 16 (2009): Edición 2009 (December 2009)

Volumen 15 (2009): Edición 2009 (September 2009)

Volumen 14 (2009): Edición 2009 (June 2009)

Volumen 13 (2009): Edición 2009 (March 2009)

Detalles de la revista
Formato
Revista
eISSN
2080-945X
Publicado por primera vez
17 May 2010
Periodo de publicación
4 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés

Buscar

Volumen 33 (2014): Edición 1 (March 2014)

Detalles de la revista
Formato
Revista
eISSN
2080-945X
Publicado por primera vez
17 May 2010
Periodo de publicación
4 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés

Buscar

2 Artículos
Acceso abierto

Carex flava agg. (section Ceratocystis, Cyperaceae) in Poland: taxonomy, morphological variation, and soil conditions

Publicado en línea: 11 Mar 2015
Páginas: 3 - 51

Resumen

Abstract

Sedges of Carex flava agg., typical of moist or wet habitats, are difficult to classify because of a lack of clear-cut morphological differences between them and the existence of numerous hybrids. This monograph presents results of research conducted in 2007-2012 in various parts of Poland. The plant material consisted of 1852 living specimens of Carex flava agg., collected from 80 localities, and dried specimens from 26 herbaria and from 7 private collections. The analysis involved 45 morphological characters (34 quantitative and 11 qualitative) and 9 soil parameters. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate statistical methods were used to process the data. The results confirm the taxonomic classification dividing the C. flava group into 4 species: C. flava s.s., C. lepidocarpa, C. demissa, and C. viridula. This classification is based on (i) a high observed level of morphological separation of these taxa, resulting mostly from differences in generative characters, i.e. length of the utricle and its beak, and percentage ratio of beak length to total utricle length; (ii) integrity of the taxa at the sites where they coexist, although some intermediate forms resulting from hybridization are also present; (iii) habitat preferences of the taxa, especially the preference of C. lepidocarpa for calcareous sites and of C. demissa for slightly acidic soils. Thus in Poland the analysed taxa are morphologically well-defined and show clear ecological preferences. Continuous variation of morphological characters was observed among specimens of C. viridula, so it is not justifiable to distinguish its subspecies (sometimes classified even as separate species), described previously in literature. Consequently, the 2 subgroups of C. viridula were treated as local variants (i.e. varieties: var. viridula and var. pulchella), considering their different habitat requirements. Additionally, 5 hybrids were distinguished within C. flava agg.: C. ×alsatica [= C. demissa × C. flava], C. ×ruedtii [= C. flava × C. lepidocarpa], C. ×schatzii [= C. lepidocarpa × C. viridula], C. ×subviridula [= C. flava × C. viridula], and C. demissa × C. viridula; as well as 2 hybrids with C. hostiana as one of the parents: C. ×fulva [= C. demissa × C. hostiana] and C. ×leutzii [= C. hostiana × C. lepidocarpa].

Keywords

  • Carex flava agg.
  • section Ceratocystis
  • Cyperaceae
  • taxonomic classification
  • morphology
  • variation
  • soil conditions
  • hybrids
  • key to identification
Acceso abierto

Carex flava agg. (section Ceratocystis, Cyperaceae) in Poland: distribution maps and locality lists

Publicado en línea: 11 Mar 2015
Páginas: 52 - 87

Resumen

Abstract

This paper presents lists of localities and distribution maps of Carex taxa of the section Ceratocystis in Poland. Distribution maps of individual taxa are based on the ATPOL grid, using material deposited in Polish herbaria and private collectionsas well as material collected during field research in 2007-2012. The collected data indicate that (i) in Poland C. flava s.s. is the most common species of the section Ceratocystis, whereas C. hostiana is the rarest one; (ii) most of the localities of C. demissa are situated in southern Poland, especially in Małopolska, Podkarpacie, and Silesia Provinces (iii) C. lepidocarpa is most frequent in Polesie, Lublin Upland, Małopolska, and Pomerania; no records of this species in southernmost parts of Poland have been confirmed; (iv) C. viridula var. viridula is frequent in Poland, whereas C. viridula var. pulchella is only known from 2 localities in the north; (v) the most frequent hybrid in Poland is C. ×alsatica [C. demissa × C. flava], while C. ×ruedtii [C. flava × C. lepidocarpa], C. ×subviridula [C. flava × C. viridula], and C. ×schatzii [C. lepidocarpa × C. viridula] are reported less often; the rarest hybrids are C. demissa × C. viridula, C. ×fulva [C. demissa × C. hostiana], and C. ×leutzii [C. hostiana × C. lepidocarpa].

Keywords

  • Carex flava agg.
  • Carex hostiana
  • hybrids
  • Ceratocystis
  • Cyperaceae
  • distribution
  • ATPOL
  • Poland
2 Artículos
Acceso abierto

Carex flava agg. (section Ceratocystis, Cyperaceae) in Poland: taxonomy, morphological variation, and soil conditions

Publicado en línea: 11 Mar 2015
Páginas: 3 - 51

Resumen

Abstract

Sedges of Carex flava agg., typical of moist or wet habitats, are difficult to classify because of a lack of clear-cut morphological differences between them and the existence of numerous hybrids. This monograph presents results of research conducted in 2007-2012 in various parts of Poland. The plant material consisted of 1852 living specimens of Carex flava agg., collected from 80 localities, and dried specimens from 26 herbaria and from 7 private collections. The analysis involved 45 morphological characters (34 quantitative and 11 qualitative) and 9 soil parameters. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate statistical methods were used to process the data. The results confirm the taxonomic classification dividing the C. flava group into 4 species: C. flava s.s., C. lepidocarpa, C. demissa, and C. viridula. This classification is based on (i) a high observed level of morphological separation of these taxa, resulting mostly from differences in generative characters, i.e. length of the utricle and its beak, and percentage ratio of beak length to total utricle length; (ii) integrity of the taxa at the sites where they coexist, although some intermediate forms resulting from hybridization are also present; (iii) habitat preferences of the taxa, especially the preference of C. lepidocarpa for calcareous sites and of C. demissa for slightly acidic soils. Thus in Poland the analysed taxa are morphologically well-defined and show clear ecological preferences. Continuous variation of morphological characters was observed among specimens of C. viridula, so it is not justifiable to distinguish its subspecies (sometimes classified even as separate species), described previously in literature. Consequently, the 2 subgroups of C. viridula were treated as local variants (i.e. varieties: var. viridula and var. pulchella), considering their different habitat requirements. Additionally, 5 hybrids were distinguished within C. flava agg.: C. ×alsatica [= C. demissa × C. flava], C. ×ruedtii [= C. flava × C. lepidocarpa], C. ×schatzii [= C. lepidocarpa × C. viridula], C. ×subviridula [= C. flava × C. viridula], and C. demissa × C. viridula; as well as 2 hybrids with C. hostiana as one of the parents: C. ×fulva [= C. demissa × C. hostiana] and C. ×leutzii [= C. hostiana × C. lepidocarpa].

Keywords

  • Carex flava agg.
  • section Ceratocystis
  • Cyperaceae
  • taxonomic classification
  • morphology
  • variation
  • soil conditions
  • hybrids
  • key to identification
Acceso abierto

Carex flava agg. (section Ceratocystis, Cyperaceae) in Poland: distribution maps and locality lists

Publicado en línea: 11 Mar 2015
Páginas: 52 - 87

Resumen

Abstract

This paper presents lists of localities and distribution maps of Carex taxa of the section Ceratocystis in Poland. Distribution maps of individual taxa are based on the ATPOL grid, using material deposited in Polish herbaria and private collectionsas well as material collected during field research in 2007-2012. The collected data indicate that (i) in Poland C. flava s.s. is the most common species of the section Ceratocystis, whereas C. hostiana is the rarest one; (ii) most of the localities of C. demissa are situated in southern Poland, especially in Małopolska, Podkarpacie, and Silesia Provinces (iii) C. lepidocarpa is most frequent in Polesie, Lublin Upland, Małopolska, and Pomerania; no records of this species in southernmost parts of Poland have been confirmed; (iv) C. viridula var. viridula is frequent in Poland, whereas C. viridula var. pulchella is only known from 2 localities in the north; (v) the most frequent hybrid in Poland is C. ×alsatica [C. demissa × C. flava], while C. ×ruedtii [C. flava × C. lepidocarpa], C. ×subviridula [C. flava × C. viridula], and C. ×schatzii [C. lepidocarpa × C. viridula] are reported less often; the rarest hybrids are C. demissa × C. viridula, C. ×fulva [C. demissa × C. hostiana], and C. ×leutzii [C. hostiana × C. lepidocarpa].

Keywords

  • Carex flava agg.
  • Carex hostiana
  • hybrids
  • Ceratocystis
  • Cyperaceae
  • distribution
  • ATPOL
  • Poland

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo