1. bookVolumen 64 (2021): Edición 1 (June 2021)
Detalles de la revista
Primera edición
30 Sep 2018
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año
access type Acceso abierto

A Comprehensive Summary of Available Legislation and Practices in Demolition and Construction & Demolition Waste Management in the Arctic Region

Publicado en línea: 17 Jul 2021
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 64 (2021) - Edición 1 (June 2021)
Páginas: 145 - 162
Recibido: 31 Mar 2021
Aceptado: 26 Jun 2021
Detalles de la revista
Primera edición
30 Sep 2018
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año

The need for better natural resource use is currently increasingly recognised, and high emphasis is given to the circularity of building materials and the reduction of activities with negative environmental impact. Legislation, guidelines, and other documentation play an important role in improving demolition activities and construction and demolition waste (CDW) management. Good practices in CDW handling is not achievable without knowledge about CDW recovery techniques described in guidelines and other documents.

Demolition activities in arctic regions could be more challenging due to harsh climate conditions, and therefore the cooperation between Russia, Norway and Finland was established to boost the uptake of good practices in demolition activities and CDW management. The main subject of this article is an overview of presently used demolition practices, CDW management, and verification of areas where practices with lower environmental impact and increase of material circularity could be utilised. Two fundamental documents, namely “EU Construction & Demolition Waste Management Protocol” and “Guidelines for the waste audits before demolition and renovation works of buildings” [1, 2], were published by the European Union (EU) in 2019 and serve as a foundation for changes in demolition activities and CDW management in EU and adventitiously also in the Russian Federation and Norway.


1. European Commission “Guidelines for the waste audits before demolition and renovation works of buildings”. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

2. European Commission, The Directorate-General for Environment “EU Construction & Demolition Waste Management Protocol”. Official Journal of the European Union. 2016. No. June, p. 1–22. DOI 10.3390/su11133638.Search in Google Scholar

3. Menegaki M & Damigos D: “A review on current situation and challenges of construction and demolition waste management”. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, Vol 13, 2018, pp. 8-15.10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.02.010Search in Google Scholar

4. Ibrahim M & Ibrahim M: “Estimating the sustainability returns of recycling construction waste from building projects”. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol 23, 2016, pp. 78-93.10.1016/j.scs.2016.03.005Search in Google Scholar

5. Jin Ruoyo J, Li B, Zhou T, Wanatowski D & Piroozfar P: “An empirical study of perceptions toward construction and demolition waste recycling and reuse in China”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol 126, 2017, pp. 86-98.10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.034Search in Google Scholar

6. Tucker R & Park J: “Overcoming barriers to the reuse of construction waste material in Australia: a review of the literature”. International Journal of Construction Management, Vol 17, No 3, 2017, pp. 228-237.10.1080/15623599.2016.1192248Search in Google Scholar

7. Umar U, Shafiq N, Malakahmad A, Nuruddin M & Khamidi M: “A review on adaptation of novel techniques in construction waste management and policy”. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, Vol 19, No 2, 2017, pp. 1361-1373.10.1007/s10163-016-0534-8Search in Google Scholar

8. Domingo N & Luo H: “Canterbury earthquake construction and demolition waste management: issues and improvement suggestions”. Internation journal of disaster risk reduction, Vol 22, 2017, pp. 130-138.10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.003Search in Google Scholar

9. Faleschini F, Zanini M, Hofer L, Zampieri P & Pellegrino C: “Sustainable management of demolition waste in post-quake recovery processes: The Italian experience”. International journal of disaster risk reduction, Vol 24, 2017, pp. 172-182.10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.06.015Search in Google Scholar

10. Abarca-Guerrero L, Maas G & Twillert H: “Barriers and Motivations for Construction Waste Reduction Practices in Costa Rica”. Resources, Vol 6, No 4, 2017, pp. 69.10.3390/resources6040069Search in Google Scholar

11. Magalhães R, Danilevicz  & Saurin T: “Reducing construction waste: A study of urban infrastructure projects”. Waste Management, Vol 67, 2017, pp. 265-277.10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.02528551278Search in Google Scholar

12. Ding Z, Zhu M, Tam V, Yi G & Tran C: “A system dynamics-based environmental benefit assessment model of construction waste reduction management at the design and construction stages”. Journal of cleaner production, Vol 176, 2018, pp. 676-692.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.101Search in Google Scholar

13. Ajayi S, Oyedele L, Bilal M, Akinade O, Alaka H & Owolabi H: “Critical management practices influencing on-site waste minimisation in construction projects”. Waste Management, Vol 59, 2017, pp. 330-339.10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.04027839690Search in Google Scholar

14. Hajek, P. C3 Design of sustainable construction. [online]. [Accessed 23 February 2021] Available from: https://slideplayer.com/slide/15831861/.Search in Google Scholar

15. Swedish Iron and Steel Makers Association; Jernkontoret: Stockholm, Sweden, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

16. European Commission: “Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives”. Official Journal of the European Union, Vol 312, No 3, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

17. Thanwadee C: “Investigation of factors affecting a construction waste recycling decision”. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, Vol 33, No 3, 2016, pp. 214-226.10.1080/10286608.2016.1161030Search in Google Scholar

18. European Environment Agency: “Construction and demolition waste: challenges and opportunities in a circular economy”. Jan 2020.Search in Google Scholar

19. SINTEF Byggforsk: “700.804”, “Planlegging av rivearbeider”. Oslo, Norway, 2011 (In Nowegian).Search in Google Scholar

20. European Environment Agency: “The case for increasing recycling: Estimating the potential for recycling in Europe”. Jun 2020.Search in Google Scholar

21. European Environment Agency: “The European environment – state and outlook 2020”. Dec 2019.Search in Google Scholar

22. Huang B, Wang X, Kua H, Geng Y, Bleischwitz R & Ren J: “Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R principle”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol 129, 2018, pp. 36-44.10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.029Search in Google Scholar

23. Yuan H: “Barriers and countermeasures for managing construction and demolition waste: A case of Shenzhen in China”. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol 157, 2017, pp. 84-93.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.137Search in Google Scholar

24. Ajayi, Saheed O & Lukumon O: “Policy imperatives for diverting construction waste from landfill: Experts’ recommendations for UK policy expansion”. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol 147, 2017, pp. 57-65.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.075Search in Google Scholar

25. Ann T, Poon C, Wong A, Yip R & Jaillon L: “Impact of Construction Waste Disposal Charging Scheme on Work Practices at Construction Sites in Hong Kong”. Waste Management, Vol 33, No 1, 2013, pp. 138-146.10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.02323122205Search in Google Scholar

26. Oyedele L, Ajayi S & Kadiri K: “Use of recycled products in UK construction industry: An empirical investigation into critical impediments and strategies for improvement”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol93, 2014, pp. 23-31.10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.09.011Search in Google Scholar

27. Lu W & Tam V: “Construction waste management policies and their effectiveness in Hong Kong: A Longitudinal review”. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, Vol 23, 2013, pp. 214-223.10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.007Search in Google Scholar

28. Hossain, Uzzal M, Wu Z & Poon C: “Comparative environmental evaluation of construction waste management through different waste sorting systems in Hong Kong”. Waste Management, Vol 69, 2017, pp. 325-335.10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.04328781157Search in Google Scholar

29. Ulubeyli S, Kazaz A & Arslan V: “Construction and demolition waste recycling plants revisited: management issues”. Procedia Engineering, Vol 172, 2017, pp. 1190-1197.10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.139Search in Google Scholar

30. Statisk sentralbyrå, Avfall fra byggeaktivitet. [Online]. [Accessed 23 February 2021]. Available from: (In Norwegian).Search in Google Scholar

31. Miljødirektoratet, Avfallsplan 2020-2025. [online]. [Accessed 22 February 2021]. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/c6a9a384d90c4af18bfd8458f3167708/avfallsplan-2020-2025.pdf (In Norwegian).Search in Google Scholar

32. Lovdata, Lov om planlegging og byggesaksbehandling (plan- og bygningsloven). [Online]. [Accessed 23 February 2021]. Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2008-06-27-71/*#&#x2a (In Norwegian).Search in Google Scholar

33. Lovdata, Lov om vern mot forurensinger og om avfall (Forurensningsloven). [Online]. [Accessed 23 February 2021]. Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1981-03-13-6 (In Norwegian).Search in Google Scholar

34. Lovdata, Forskrift om gjenvinning og behandling av avfall (avfallsforskriften). [Online]. [Accessed 23 February 2021]. Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2004-06-01-930/*#* (In Norwegian).Search in Google Scholar

35. Lovdata, Forskrift om begrensning I bruk av helse- og miljøfarlige kjemikalier og andre produkter (produktforskriften). [Online]. [Accessed 23 February 2021]. Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2004-06-01-922 (In Norwegian)Search in Google Scholar

36. Iacoboaea C, Aldea M & Petrescu F “Construction and demolition waste-a challenge for the construction and demolition waste - a challenge for the European Union? Theoretical and empirical researches in urban management”. 2019.Search in Google Scholar

37. Haku - Suomi.fi. [online]. [Accessed 23 February 2020]. Available from: https://www.suomi.fi/haku?p=0&q=Purkamisluvat&sl=false (In Finish).Search in Google Scholar

38. Norwegian Standard: “NS 3459:2012”, “Exchange of data for specifications, price information and settlements in building and civil engineering works”. Norway, 2012, 56 pp. (In Norwegian).Search in Google Scholar

39. Byggforskerserien [Online]. [accessed 16.02.2021]. Available from: https://www.byggforsk.no/byggforskserien (In Norwegian).Search in Google Scholar

40. Directory for Buildingquality: “TEK17” [online]. [Accessed 11.02.2021]. Available from: https://dibk.no/regelverk/byggteknisk-forskrift-tek17/ (In Norwegian).Search in Google Scholar

41. Nation Standards of Russia: “Construction Standards and Regulations 12-04-2002”, “Safty in construction. Part 2. Construction works”. Moscow, Russia, 2002, 36 pp.Search in Google Scholar

42. Lehtonen K “Purkutyöt – opas tekijöille ja teettäjille”. Ministry of the environment publications [online]. 2019. [Accessed 23 February 2020]. Available from: https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/161884/YM_2019_29.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y#page=5&zoom=auto,-82,754 (In Finish).Search in Google Scholar

43. Norwegian Standard: “NS 8141-2:2013”, “Vibration and shock - Guideline limit values for construction work, open-pit and pit mining and traffic - Part 2: Effects of vibration on construction works from construction activities other than blasting, and from traffic”. Norway, 2013, 20 pp. (In Norwegian).Search in Google Scholar

44. Norwegian Standard: “NS 9431:2011”, “Classification of Waste”. Norway, 2011, 24 pp. (In Norwegian).Search in Google Scholar

45. Interstate standard “GOST 32495-2013. Aggregates, fines and its mixtures made from recycled reinforced and non-reinforced concrete. Specifications”. Moscow, Russia, 2015, 13 pp.Search in Google Scholar

46. Norwegian Environment agency “Faktaark M-14/2003 Disposal of concrete and brick waste”, 2 pp. (In Norwegian).Search in Google Scholar

47. Government Decree on the Recovery of Certain Wastes in Earth Construction (843/2017) – Legislation in force – FINLEX ®. [Online]. [Accessed 8 February 2021]. Available from: 843/2017 English - Translations of Finnish acts and decrees - FINLEX.Search in Google Scholar

48. Land Use and Building Act 132/1999 - Legislation in force - FINLEX ®. [online]. [Accessed 23 February 2020]. Available from: https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/1999/19990132 (In Finish).Search in Google Scholar

49. Ympäriston-suojelu Ympäristöasioiden hallinta kiviainestuotannossa Suomen ympäristökeskus Paras käyttökelpoinen tekniikka (BAT). In : ISBN 978-952-11-3810-2 (In Finish).Search in Google Scholar

50. SINTEF Byggforsk: “241.070” “Avfallshåndtering I byggesaker. Planlegging og dokumentasjon”. Oslo, Norway, 2017. (In Nowegian).Search in Google Scholar

51. SINTEF Byggforsk: “700.802”, “Miljøkartlegging og miljøanering ved riving og ombygging”. Oslo, Norway, 2018, 19 pp. (In Norwegian).Search in Google Scholar

52. Nation Standards of Russia: “SP 325.1325800.2017”, “Building and construction. Rules for the production of demolition and recycling”. Moscow, Russia, 2017, 56 pp.Search in Google Scholar

53. Nation Standards of Russia: “ Construction regulation 51.13330.2011”, “Noise protection and rooms acoustics”. Moscow, Russia, 2011, 33 pp.Search in Google Scholar

54. NOSTROY: “No 2.33.53-2011”, “Demolition (dismantling) of buildings and structures”. Moscow, Russia, 2012, 38 pp.Search in Google Scholar

55. European Panel Federation (EPF), 2016. [online]. [Accessed 16 February 2021]. Available from: http://www.fir-recycling.com/.Search in Google Scholar

56. Baumann H & Tillman A: “The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA”, Studentlitteratur, Dimograf, Poland, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

57. Broadbent C: “Steel’s recyclability: demonstrating the benefits of recycling steel to achieve a circular economy”. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol 21, No 11, 2016, pp. 1658-1665.10.1007/s11367-016-1081-1Search in Google Scholar

58. Knoeri C, Sanyé-Mengual E & Althaus H: “Comparative LCA of recycled and Conventional concrete for structural applications”. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol 18, No 5, 2013, pp. 909-918.10.1007/s11367-012-0544-2Search in Google Scholar

59. Mah C M, Fujiwara T & Ho C S: “Concrete Waste Management Decision Analysis Based On Life Cycle Assessment”. Chemical Engineering Transaction, Vol. 56, pp. 25-30. DOI:10.3303/CET1756005.Search in Google Scholar

60. European Commission: “Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste”. Official Journal of the European Union, Vol 182, No 1, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

61. Norwegian Environment agency “Betong- og teglavfall”. [Online]. [Accessed 16 February 2021]. Available from: https://miljostatus.miljodirektoratet.no/tema/avfall/avfallstyper/betong--og-teglavfall/ (In Norwegian).Search in Google Scholar

62. Norwegian Standard: “NS-EN 12620:2002+A1:2008+NA:2016”, “Aggregates for Concrete”. Norway, 2016, 68 pp.Search in Google Scholar

63. Norwegian Standard: “NS-EN 206:2013+A1:2016+NA:2020”, “Concrete – Specification, performance, production and conformity”. Norway, 2020, 120 pp.Search in Google Scholar

64. Nation Standards of Russia: “GOST 26633-2015”, “Heavy-weight and sand concrete. Specifications”. Moscow, Russia, 2016, 16 pp.Search in Google Scholar

65. Fedotkina O, Gorbashko E & Vatolkina E: “Circular Economy in Russia: Drivers and Barriers for Waste Management Development”. Sustainability, Vol 11, No 5837, 2019.10.3390/su11205837Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo