[
In the references, only publications concerning general aspects of legal linguistics are listed. Literature concerning specific legal-linguistic issues is provided in Additional materials mentioned in footnotes.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aarnio, Aulis. 1987. The Rational as Reasonable: A Treatise on Legal Justification. Dordrecht: Reidel.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andruszkiewicz, Marta. 2016. On Some of the Aspects of the Linguistic Theory of Law. Studies in Logic, Grammar, and Rhetoric vol. 49: 221–229.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cao, Deborah. 2004. Chinese Law. A Language Perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cornu, Gérard. 2005. Linguistique juridique. 3d ed. Paris: Montchrestien.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dworkin, Ronald. 1991. Law’s Empire. London: Fontana Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Engberg, Jan, Kjaer, Anne Lise. 2011. Approaches to Language and the Law – Some Introductory Notes. Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies vol. 46: 7–10.10.7146/hjlcb.v24i46.97359
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galdia, Marcus. 2014. Legal Discourses. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-653-04812-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galdia, Marcus. 2017. Lectures on Legal Linguistics. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.10.3726/b11443
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galdia, Marcus. 2020. The Comparative Element in Comparative Legal Linguistics. Comparative Legilinguistics vol. 43: 57–76.10.2478/cl-2020-0008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galdia, Marcus. 2021. Legal Constructs. Reflections upon Legal-Linguistic Methodology. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Rys.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbons, John. 2003. Forensic Linguistics. An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husa, Jaakko. 2015. A New Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford/Portland: Hart.10.5040/9781849469531
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husa, Jaakko. 2020. Language of Law and Invasive Legal Species – Endemic Systems, Colonisation and Viability of Mixed Law. Global Journal of Comparative Law vol. 9: 149–182.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackson, Bernard S. 1985. Semiotics and Legal Theory. London/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kalinowski, George. 1964. Introduction à la logique juridique: éléments de sémiotique juridique, logique des normes et logique juridique. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kozanecka, Paulina, Matulewska, Aleksandra, Trzaskawka, Paula. 2017. Methodology of Interlingual Comparison of Legal Terminology. Towards General Legilinguistic Translatology. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Contact.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lindroos, Emilia. 2015. Im Namen des Gesetzes. Eine vergleichende rechtslinguistische Untersuchung zur Formelhaftigkeit in deutschen und finnischen Strafurteilen. Rovaniemi: Lapin yliopisto.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lizisowa, Maria Teresa. 2016. Komunikacyjna teoria języka prawnego. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Contact.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lundmark, Thomas. 2012. Charting the Divide Between Common and Civil Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199738823.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marmor, Andrei. 2014. The Language of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mattila, Heikki E.S. 2002. Towards the Science of Legal Linguistics. In The Development of Legal Language, Mattila, H.E.S. (ed.), 167–191. Helsinki: Kauppakaari.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mattila, Heikki E.S. 2012a. Jurilinguistique comparée: Langage du droit, latin et langages modernes. Montréal: Y. Blais.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mattila, Heikki E.S. 2012b. Legal Vocabulary. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, Tiersma, P.M., Solan, L.M. (eds.), 27–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mattila, Heikki E.S. 2013. Comparative Legal Linguistics. Language of Law, Latin and Modern Lingua Francas, 2nd ed. Aldershot: Ashgate.10.5235/2049677X.2.1.143
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mattila, Heikki E.S. 2018. Legal Language. In Languages for Special Purposes, Humbley, J., Budin, G., Laurén, C. (eds.), 113–150. Berlin/Boston: W. de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110228014-006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matulewska, Aleksandra. 2013. Legilinguistic Translatology. A Parametric Approach to Legal Translation. Bern: P. Lang.10.3726/978-3-0351-0535-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mellinkoff, David. 1963. The Language of the Law. Boston/Toronto: Little, Brown & Co.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pigolkin, A. S. (ed.). 1990. Jazyk zakona. Moskva: Juridicheskaya literatura.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Poscher, Ralf. 2012. Ambiguity and Vagueness in Legal Interpretation. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, Tiersma P.M., Solan L.M. (eds.), 128–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salmi-Tolonen, Tarja. 2008. Language and the Functions of Law. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sourioux, Jean-Louis, Lerat, Pierre. 1975. Le langage du droit. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tiersma, Peter M. 1999. Legal Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aarnio, Aulis. 1989. Das regulative Prinzip der Gesetzesauslegung. Überlegungen zum Problem der Möglichkeit der einzig richtigen Entscheidung, Rechtstheorie vol. 20: 409-431.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alexy, Robert. 1983. Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andruszkiewicz, Marta. 2021. The Heritage of Cultural Determinants of Law and Literature: Methodological Findings, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 34: 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09743-4.10.1007/s11196-020-09743-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Austin, John Langshaw.1962. How to Do Things with Words? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beaudoin, Louis. 2002. Legal Translation in Canada. In The Development of Legal Language, H.E.S. Mattila (ed.), 115–130. Helsinki: Kauppakaari.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benedetti, Giuseppe. 1999. Diritto e linguaggio. Variazioni sul ‘diritto muto’, Europa e diritto privato vol. 1: 137–152.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Broekman, Jan M. 1984. Text als Institution. In Rechtstheorie, Supplement 6, Recht als Sinn und Institution, 145–167.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chan, Ho-yan. 2014. 两岸三地 (Liang An San Di), vol. 1. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chan, Ho-yan. 2015. 两岸三地 (Liang An San Di), vol. 2. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chan, Ho-yan. 2017. 两岸三地 (Liang An San Di), vol. 3. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dölle, Hans. 1949. Vom Stil der Rechtssprache. Tübingen: Mohr.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Felder, Ekkehard, Vogel, Friedemann (eds.) 2017. Handbuch Sprache im Recht. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110296198
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frändberg, Åke. 2001. Rättsordningen och rättstillämpningen. In Svensk rätt – en översikt, ed. Strömholm, S., 7–26. Uppsala: Justus.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaakeer, Jeanne. 2012. On the Study Methods of Our Time: Methodologies of Law and Literature. In Intersections of Law and Culture, Gisler, B., Borella, S.S., Wiedmer, C. (eds.), 133–149. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-28500-3_9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galdia, Marcus. 1998. Lakisaksa, in: Encyclopaedia Iuridica Fennica, vol. VI, Kansainväliset suhteet. 550–555. Helsinki: Suomalainen Lakimiesyhdistys.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galdia, Marcus. 2013. Strategies and Tools for Legal Translation. Comparative Legilinguistics vol. 16: 13–29.10.14746/cl.2013.16.6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Geer, Louis de. 1985 (1853). Om den juridiska stilen. Stockholm: Rediviva.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gény, François. 1921. Science et technique en droit privé positif, vol. 3. Paris: Sirey.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodman, Nelson. 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett Publ.10.5040/9781350928558
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gotti, Maurizio. 2012. Text and Genre. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, Tiersma P.M., Solan L.M. (eds.), 53–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław. 2011. Patterns in Linguistic Variation in American Legal English. A Corpus-Based Study. Frankfurt a.M.: P. Lang.10.3726/978-3-653-00659-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Großfeld, Bernhard. 1997. Sprache und Schrift als Grundlage unseres Rechts, Juristenzeitung 1997/633–646.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Großfeld, Bernhard. 1990. Unsere Sprache: Die Sicht des Juristen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.10.1007/978-3-322-86365-2_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grunau, Martin. 1961. Spiegel der Rechtssprache. Flensburg: Verlag Kurt Gross.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, vol. 1 and 2. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hare, R.M. 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hart, H.L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husa, Jaakko. 2007. Kreikan oikeus ja oikeuskieli. Helsinki: Suomalainen Lakimiesyhdistys.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Javornik-Čubrić, Marijana. 2018. Što je pravna lingvistika, Lingua Montenegrina vol. 22: 31–37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kubacki, Artur Dariusz. 2014. Pluricentryzm w niemieckim języku standardowym i specjalistycznym, Comparative Legilinguistics vol. 17: 163–181.10.14746/cl.2014.17.10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laurén, Christer. 2002. Iconism and Special Language. In The Development of Legal Language. Mattila, H.E.S. (ed.), 11–20. Helsinki: Kauppakaari.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leveneur, Laurent (ed.) 2016. Dossier spécial. Code civil. Projet de réforme du droit des contracts, du régime général et de la preuve des obligations. Paris: LexisNexis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mimin, Pierre. 1970. Le style des jugements. 4th ed. Paris: Librairies Techniques.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nowak–Michalska, Joanna. 2012. Modalność deontyczna w języku prawnym na przykładzie polskiego i hiszpańskiego kodeksu cywilnego. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Rys.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perelman, Chaim, Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. 1958. Traité de l’argumentation – La nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prieto Ramos, Fernando. 2015. Quality Assurance in Legal Translation: Evaluating Process, Competence and Product in the Pursuit of Adequacy, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law vol. 28 (1): 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-014-9390-9.10.1007/s11196-014-9390-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ross, Alf. 1966. Om ret og retfærdighed. En indførelse i den analytiske retsfilosofi. København: Nyt Nordisk Forlag K. Busck.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schauer, Frederick (ed.). 1993. Law and Language. Aldershot/Hong Kong: Dartmouth.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schönherr, Fritz. 1985. Sprache und Recht. Aufsätze und Vorträge. Wien: Manz‘sche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schroeder, François Michel. 1978. Le nouveau style judiciaire. Paris: Dalloz.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shaw, Julia A. 2011. The Continuing Relevance of Ars Poetica to Legal Scholarship and Modern Lawyer, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law vol. 25/1: 71–93.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tiersma, Peter M., Solan, Lawrence M. (eds.) 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vogel, Friedemann (ed.) 2019. Legal Linguistics Beyond Borders: Language and Law in a World of Media, Globalisation and Social Conflict. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.10.3790/978-3-428-55423-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wedberg, Birger. 1928. Lagstil. Några citat och reflektioner. Stockholm: Norsted.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weihofen, Henry. 1980. Legal Writing Style. 2nd ed. St. Paul: West Publishing Co.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weisberg, Richard. 1992. Poethics and Other Strategies of Law and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wright, Georg Henrik von. 1951. Deontic Logics, Mind vol. 60: 1–15.10.1093/mind/LX.237.1
]Search in Google Scholar
