A survey for Communication security of the embedded system

[1] Jabeen, Qamar, et al. “A survey: Embedded systems supporting by different operating systems.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.07899 (2016). Search in Google Scholar

[2] Al-Fuqaha, Ala, et al. “Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications.” IEEE communications surveys & tutorials 17.4 (2015): 2347-2376.10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095 Search in Google Scholar

[3] MCMILLAN R. How Hackers Attack Cars[EB/OL]. [2010-05-14]. http://www.pcworld.com/article/196320/how_hackers_attack_cars.html. Search in Google Scholar

[4] VAMOSIZHAN R. Embedded System Security[EB/OL]. [2012-10-01]. http://www.altera.com.cn/technology/systemdesign/articles/2012/embedded-security.html. Search in Google Scholar

[5] KIM L W, VILLASENOR J D. Dynamic function replacement for system-on-chip security in the presence of hardware-based attacks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2014, 63(2): 661-675. DOI:10.1109/tr.2014.231695210.1109/TR.2014.2316952 Search in Google Scholar

[6] BIDMESHKI M M, REDDY G R, ZHOU L, et al. Hardware-based Attacks to Compromise the Cryptographic Security of an Election System[C/OL]. [2017-03-02]. DOI:10.1109/iccd.2016.7753274.10.1109/ICCD.2016.7753274 Search in Google Scholar

[7] KIROVSKI D, DRINIĆ M, POTKONJAK M. Enabling Trusted Software Integrity[C/OL]. [2017-06-02]. DOI:10.1145/635508.605409.10.1145/635508.605409 Search in Google Scholar

[8] CHEN Y, VENKATESAN R, CARY M, et al. Oblivious hashing: A stealthy software integrity verification primitive[C]//Information Hiding. Heidelberg: Springer, 2003: 400-414. Search in Google Scholar

[9] SUH G E, O'DONNELL C W, DEVADAS S. AEGIS: A single-chip secure processor[J]. Information Security Technical Report, 2005, 10(2): 63-73. DOI:10.1016/j.istr.2005.05.00210.1016/j.istr.2005.05.002 Search in Google Scholar

[10] OWUSU E, GUAJARDO J, MCCUNE J, et al. OASIS: on achieving a sanctuary for integrity and secrecy on untrusted platforms[C]//Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer & Communications Security. New York: ACM, 2013: 13-24. DOI: 10.1145/2508859.2516678.10.1145/2508859.2516678 Search in Google Scholar

[11] GHOSH A K, SWAMINATHA T M. Software security and privacy risks in mobile e-commerce[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2001, 44(2): 51-57. DOI:10.1145/359205.35922710.1145/359205.359227 Search in Google Scholar

[12] CHEN P, DESMET L, HUYGENS C. A study on advanced persistent threats[C]//IFIP International Conference on Communications and Multimedia Security. Heidelberg: Springer, 2014: 63-72. DOI:10.1007/978-3-662-44885-4_5.10.1007/978-3-662-44885-4_5 Search in Google Scholar

[13] EDGAR C. Ghost Push Malware Can Root Devices and Install Unwanted Apps[EB/OL]. [2015-10-13]. https://www.androidauthority.com/ghost-push-malware-root-apps-fix-648735/. Search in Google Scholar

[14] KOVACS E. BlackEnergy Malware Used in Ukraine Power Grid Attacks[EB/OL]. http://www.securityweek.com/blackenergy-group-uses-destructive-plugin-ukraine-attacks. Search in Google Scholar

[15] LIU Y T, FAN R, TERZIJA V. Power system restoration: A literature review from 2006 to 2016[J]. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2016, 4(3): 332-341. DOI:10.1007/s40565-016-0219-210.1007/s40565-016-0219-2 Search in Google Scholar

[16] CVE.CVE-2016-4657[EB/OL].[2016-08-25]. https://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2016-4657. Search in Google Scholar

[17] BUGIEL S, DAVI L, DMITRIENKO A, et al. Practical and lightweight domain isolation on Android[C]//Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Security and Privacy in Smartphones and Mobile Devices. Chicago: ACM, 2011: 51-62. DOI: 10.1145/2046614.2046624.10.1145/2046614.2046624 Search in Google Scholar

[18] BALDIN D, KERSTAN T. Proteus, a hybrid virtualization platform for embedded systems[C]//Analysis, Architectures and Modelling of Embedded Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2009: 185-194.10.1007/978-3-642-04284-3_17 Search in Google Scholar

[19] S. Raza, S. Duquennoy, T. Chung, D. Yazar, T. Voigt and U. Roedig, “Securing Communication in 6LoWPAN with Compressed IPsec,” in Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems and Workshops (DCOSS), 2011 International Conference On, 2011, pp. 1-8.10.1109/DCOSS.2011.5982177 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Doraswamy, Naganand, and Dan Harkins. IPSec: the new security standard for the Internet, intranets, and virtual private networks. Prentice Hall Professional, 2003. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Hamed, Hazem, Ehab Al-Shaer, and Will Marrero. “Modeling and verification of IPSec and VPN security policies.” 13th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP'05). IEEE, 2005. Search in Google Scholar

[22] S. Raza, S. Duquennoy, J. Höglund, U. Roedig and T. Voigt, “Secure Communication for the Internet of Things—a comparison of link - layer security and IPsec for 6LoWPAN,” Security and Communication Networks, 2012.10.1002/sec.406 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Tan Xinglie, et al. “The Application of PKI Technology in IPSec Series Protocols.” Computer Science 30.5 (2003): 160-163. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Li X.F, Zhao Y.J, Quan C.B. Application of symmetric key encryption algorithm in IPsec protocol [J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrument, 2014, 28(1): 75-83 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Wang Jian, Wang Haihang, Yang Jian. The remote attestation extension of IPsec protocol [J]. Computer Science, 2011, 38(6): 49-53 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). RFC8446. The transport layer security (tls) protocol version 1.3[S]. USA: Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), 2018. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). RFC6101. The secure sockets layer (ssl) protocol version3.0[S]. USA: Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), 2011. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Jia Fangshu. Research on Security Technology Issues in the Application of Ssl Protocol [J]. Digital User, 2018, 36: 18-19 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Z. Z. Wang, Y. Wang. An improvement ssl protocol application research[J]. International Conference on Electronic Mechanical Engineering and Information Technology, 2011, 12(14): 4010-4012 Search in Google Scholar

[30] Wei Junlin, Duan Haixin, Wan Tao. Overview of Security Defects in https/tls Protocol Design and Implementation [J]. Journal of Information Security, 2018, 3(2): 1 Search in Google Scholar

[31] Tang Yi, Wang Zhishuang. Handshake data analysis of personal online banking ssl/tls protocol [J]. Software Guide, 2017, 16(6): 159-162 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Q. Fang, T. Zhe. Qos-aware optimization strategy for security ranking in ssl protocol[J]. IEEE, 2009, 9: 842-847 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Wu Zhijun, Jiang Yuanchun, Niu Fangchao. SSL protocol interactive authentication scheme for wide area information management system [J]. Information Security Research, 2017, 3(8): 718-726 Search in Google Scholar

[34] THAPLIYAL H, VARUN T S S, KUMAR S D. Adiabatic computing based low-power and DPA-resistant lightweight cryptography for IoT devices[C]//VLSI (ISVLSI), 2017 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on. Washington DC: IEEE, 2017: 621-626. DOI:10.1109/isvlsi.2017.115.10.1109/ISVLSI.2017.115 Search in Google Scholar

[35] Wang Kai, Chen Liyun, Wang Zengguang. Refined fingerprint attack method against https protocol website [J]. Journal of Academy of Armored Forces Engineering, 2018, 32(4): 99-104. Search in Google Scholar

[36] Liu Peng, Chen Houwu, Fang Xiao. Research on Network Security Situation Monitoring Mechanism and Model [J]. Information Network Security, 2018, 9: 66-69. Search in Google Scholar

[37] Ma Long, Sun Jianghui, Du Cheng. Research on Network Situation Awareness System Based on Traffic Analysis [J]. Information Technology, 2016, 9: 97-100. Search in Google Scholar

[38] Gao Feng Zhan, Yong Jiang. Research on Network Security Situational Awareness Visualization System [N]. Global Market Information Herald, September 2018. Search in Google Scholar

[39] Zhu Yijie, Yang Yulong, Li Shuai. Research on Network Security Situation Awareness Platform for Big Data Environment [J]. Network Security Technology and Application, 2018, 11: 52-54 Search in Google Scholar

[40] X. F. Liu. Machine learning based ddos attack detection from source side in cloud[C]. 2017 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing, American, 2017, 114-120. Search in Google Scholar

[41] Jiang Yibo, Wang Yuchen, Wang Wanliang. Research on Manet Network Intrusion Detection Performance Evaluation Method Based on Machine Learning [J].Computer Science, 2013, 40: 170-174. Search in Google Scholar

[42] MITCHELL M, TIAN G, WANG Z. Systematic audit of third-party android phones[C]//Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy. New York: ACM, 2014: 175-186. DOI:10.1145/2557547.2557557.10.1145/2557547.2557557 Search in Google Scholar

[43] ENCK W, GILBERT P, HAN S, et al. TaintDroid: An information-flow tracking system for realtime privacy monitoring on smartphones[J]. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS), 2014, 32(2): 5. DOI:10.1145/249452210.1145/2494522 Search in Google Scholar

[44] EGELE M, KRUEGEL C, KIRDA E, et al. PiOS: Detecting privacy leaks in iOS applications[J]. Network & Distributed System Security Symposium, 2011, 1: 280-291. Search in Google Scholar

[45] ARIAS O, SULLIVAN D, JIN Y. HA2lloc: Hardware-assisted secure allocator[C]//Proceedings of the Hardware and Architectural Support for Security and Privacy. New York: ACM, 2017: 8. DOI:10.1145/3092627.3092635.10.1145/3092627.3092635 Search in Google Scholar

[46] DAVI L, HANREICH M, PAUL D, et al. HAFIX: Hardware-assisted flow integrity extension[C]//Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Design Automation Conference. New York: ACM, 2015: 74. DOI:10.1145/2744769.2744847.10.1145/2744769.2744847 Search in Google Scholar

• A Survey on Automatic Design Methods for Swarm Robotics Systems
• Environmental Parameters Monitoring System
• Actuator control using TCP IP communication under LabVIEW USB6001 environment
• A survey for Communication security of the embedded system