1. bookVolumen 38 (2019): Edición 1 (June 2019)
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
2391-4491
Primera edición
20 Dec 2019
Calendario de la edición
4 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés
Acceso abierto

On Judge’s Trial Discourse in Chinese Courtroom from Goal-Driven Perspective

Publicado en línea: 11 Dec 2019
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 38 (2019) - Edición 1 (June 2019)
Páginas: 65 - 82
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
2391-4491
Primera edición
20 Dec 2019
Calendario de la edición
4 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés

Brown, Gillian, and George Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805226Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le. 2012. Attribution and judicial control in Chinese court judgments: a corpus-based study. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 19: 27-49.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbons, John. 2003. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hansell, Mark, and Cheryl S. Ajirotutu. 1982. Negotiating interpretations in interethnic settings. In Language and Social Identity, ed. John Gumperz, 85-95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620836.007Search in Google Scholar

Malcolm Coulthard and Alison Johnson. 2007. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Yuee, and Fan Hongya. 2002. Discourse Analysis. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

Liao, Meizhen. 2006. A study on “formulation” in Chinese courtroom interaction. Foreign Language Research 2: 1-8+13+80.Search in Google Scholar

Liao, Meizhen. 2005. Goal principle and goal analysis – exploration on new approaches to pragmatic study (part 2). Rhetoric Learning 4: 5-11.Search in Google Scholar

Liao, Meizhen. 2003. A Study on Courtroom Questions, Responses and Their Interaction. Beijing: Law PressSearch in Google Scholar

Lv, Wanying. 2006. Power Control in the Judge’s Discourse. Foreign Language Research 2: 9-13.Search in Google Scholar

O’Barr, William M. 1982. Linguistic Evidence: Language Power and Strategy in the Courtroom. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Roger W. Shuy. 2005. Creating Language Crimes: How Law Enforcement Uses (and Misuses) Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195181661.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meanings: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609213Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert C. 1978. Assertion. Syntax and Semantics 9: 78-95.10.1093/0198237073.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny. 1985. The Language of Power: Towards a Dynamic Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 765-783.10.1016/0378-2166(85)90003-7Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tian Hailong and Zhang Maizeng. 2006. Pragmatic and Societal Approaches to the Asymmetry of Power. Foreign Language and Research 2: 7-13.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Tieping. 1993. Summary of General Linguistics. Higher Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yule, George. 2000. Pragmatics. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zhao, Junfeng. 2007. Speech acts in courtroom and linguistic strategies. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies 2: 90-93.Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo