1. bookVolumen 34 (2018): Edición 1 (June 2018)
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
2391-4491
Primera edición
20 Dec 2019
Calendario de la edición
4 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés
Acceso abierto

Grammatical Issues in Judicial Interpretation – Does Legal Practice Needs Linguistic Theory? Based on Polish Courts’ Decisions

Publicado en línea: 04 Jul 2020
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 34 (2018) - Edición 1 (June 2018)
Páginas: 33 - 51
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
2391-4491
Primera edición
20 Dec 2019
Calendario de la edición
4 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés

Adams, Kenneth A. and Alan S. Kaye. 2007. Revisiting The Ambiguity of “And” and “Or” in Legal Drafting. St. John’s Law Review vol. 80: 1167–98.Search in Google Scholar

Berger, Linda L. 2004. What is the Sound of a Corporation Speaking? How the Cognitive Theory of Metaphor Can Help Lawyers Shape the Law. Journal of the Association of Legal Writing Directors 2004/2, vol. 169: 169–208.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Polish edition: Zagadnienia teorii składni. 1982. Transl. I. Jakubczak. Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków–Gdańsk–Łódź: Ossolineum).Search in Google Scholar

Dyer, Charles R. 2007. The Queen of Chula Vista: Stories of Self-Represented Litigans and a Call for Using Cognitive Lingusitics to Work with Them. Law Library Journal 99: 717–56.Search in Google Scholar

Endicott, Timothy. 2001. Vagueness in law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Farrell, Robert C. 2008. Why Grammar Matters: Conjugating Verbs in Modern Legal Opinions. Loyola University Chicago School of Law Law Review, vol. 40: 1–44.Search in Google Scholar

Guastini, Riccardo. 2006. A Sceptical View on Legal Interpretation. In Analisi e diritto 2005. Ricerche di giurisprudenza analitica, ed. by Paolo Comanducci and Riccardo Gaustini, 139–144. Torino: Giappichelli.Search in Google Scholar

Hart, Herbert L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Polish edition: Pojęcie prawa. 1998. Transl. J. Woleński. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Jellum, Linda D. 2008. Mastering Statutory Interpretation. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jodłowski S. 2002. Zasady Interpunkcji. Podręcznik. Wydanie nowe, zmienione i rozszerzone, ed. Jan Gostyń. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Tomasz Strutyński.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark. 2002. Brooklyn Law Review 67, no. 4: 949–62.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark. 2007. Mind, Metaphor, Law. Mercer Law Review 58/3: 845–68.Search in Google Scholar

Kirk, M. B. 1970-1971. Legal Drafting: The Ambiguity Of “And” and “Or”, Texas Tech Law Review, vol 2: 235–53.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1989. Cognitive Science and the Law. Toronto: University of Toronto.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: a Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press (Polish edition: Gramatyka kognitywna. Wprowadzenie. 2009. Transl. E. Tabakowska, M. Buchta, H. Kardela, W. Kubiński, P. Łozowski i in. Kraków: Universitas).Search in Google Scholar

Llewellyn, Karl N. 1950. Remarks on the Theory of Appellate Decision and the Rules or Canons about How Statutes Are to Be Construed. Vanderbilt Law Review, vol. 3: 395–406.Search in Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil i Robert S. Summers. 1991. Interpreting Statutes. A Comparative Study, ed. Neil MacCormick, Robert S. Summers. Routledge: Dartmouth–Worcester.Search in Google Scholar

Malinowski, Andrzej. 2006. Polski język prawny. Wybrane zagadnienia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo LexisNexis.Search in Google Scholar

Malinowski, Andrzej. 2008. Redagowanie tekstu prawnego. Wybrane wskazania logiczno-językowe. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo LexisNexis.Search in Google Scholar

Manzanares Javier V. 2014. Cognitive Linguistics and the Law. Anuari de Filologia. Estudis de Linguistica 4: 185–200.Search in Google Scholar

Marcin, Raymond B. 1977. Punctuation and the Interpretation of Statutes, Connecticut Law Review, vol. 9: 227–45.Search in Google Scholar

Opałek, Kazimierz and Jerzy Wróblewski. 1991. Prawo: Metodologia, filozofia, teoria prawa. Warszawa: Pastwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Search in Google Scholar

Osenga, Kristen. 2011. A Penguin’s Defence of the Doctrine of Equivalents: Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Patent Law. New York University Journal of Law & Liberty 6: 313–58.Search in Google Scholar

Rabault, Hugues. 1997. Les limites de l’interpretation juridictionelle (Polish edition: Granice wykładni sędziowskiej, Warszawa 1997. Tłum. B. Janicka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar).Search in Google Scholar

Scalia, Antonin and Bryan A. Garner. 2012. Reading Law: the interpretation of legal texts. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West.Search in Google Scholar

Schane Sanford A. 2006. Language and the Law. London–New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, J. 2010. Codified Canons and the Common Law of Interpretation, Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 98: 341–431.Search in Google Scholar

Solan, Lawrence (ed.) 2001. Symposium: Cognitive Legal Studies: Categorization and Imagination in the Mind of Law. A Conference in Celebration of the Publication of Steven L. Winter’s Book, A Clearing in the Forest: Law, Life, and Mind, Brooklyn Law Review vol. 67, no. 4.Search in Google Scholar

Solan, Lawrence M. 2010. The Language of Statutes. Laws and Their Interpretation. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226767987.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Solan, Lawrence. 2001. Why Laws Work Pretty Well, but not Great: Words and Rules in Legal Interpretation. Review of Words and Rules: the Ingredients of Language by Steven Pinker. Law and Social Inquiry 26: 243–71.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, John. 2002. Cognitive Grammar (Oxford Textbook in Linguistics). Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press (Polish edition: Gramatyka kognitywna. 2007. Transl. M. Buchta, Ł. Wiraszka. Kraków: Universitas).Search in Google Scholar

Tobor, Zygmunt. 2013. W poszukiwaniu intencji prawodawcy. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark and Mathew McCubbins. 2013. Concepts of Law. Southern California Law Review 86/3: 517–72.Search in Google Scholar

Winter, Steven. 2001. A Clearing In the Forest: Law, Life, and Mind. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wróblewski, Jerzy. 1990. Rozumienie prawa i jego wykładnia. Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków–Gdańsk–Łódź: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo