Molecular characterization of complex chromosomal changes in de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a case report

1. Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, Wheatley K, Harrison C, Harrison G, et al. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: Analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. Blood 1998;92:2322-33.10.1182/blood.V92.7.2322Search in Google Scholar

2. Slovak ML, Kopecky KJ, Cassileth PA, Harrington DH, Theil KS, Mohamed A, et al. Karyotypic analysis predicts outcome of preremission and postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. Blood 2000;96:4075-83.10.1182/blood.V96.13.4075Search in Google Scholar

3. Byrd JC, Mrozek K, Dodge RK, Carroll AJ, Edwards CG, Arthur DC et al. Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461). Blood 2002;100:4325-4336.10.1182/blood-2002-03-077212393746Search in Google Scholar

4. Dhoner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Büchner T, Burnett AK et al Diagnosis and management of acute Myeloid leukemia in adults: recommandations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European Leukemia Net. Blood 2010;115: 453-74.10.1182/blood-2009-07-23535819880497Search in Google Scholar

5. Schnittger S, Schoch C, Kern W, Mecucci C, Tschulik C, Martelli MF et al. Nucleophosmin gene mutations are predictors of favourable prognosis in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype. Blood 2005;106:3733-3739.10.1182/blood-2005-06-224816076867Search in Google Scholar

6. Steudel C, Wermke M, Schaich M, Schakel U, Illmer T, Ehninger G et al. Comparative analysis of MLL partial tandem duplication and FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations in 956 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2003;37:237-251.10.1002/gcc.1021912759922Search in Google Scholar

7. Lugthart S, Van Drunen E, Van Norden Y, van Hoven A, Erpelinck CAJ, Valk PJM et al. High EVI1 levels predict adverse outcome in acute myeloid leukemia: prevalence of EVI1 over-expression and chromosome 3q26 ab- normalities underestimated. Blood 2008;111:4329-4337.10.1182/blood-2007-10-11923018272813Search in Google Scholar

8. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A et al. The 2008 revision of the WHO classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood 2009;114:947-951.10.1182/blood-2009-03-20926219357394Search in Google Scholar

9. Mrozek K, Heinonen K, Bloomfield CD: Clinical importance of cytogenetics in acute myeloid leukaemia. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2001;14:19-47.10.1053/beha.2000.011411355922Search in Google Scholar

10. Grimwade D, Walker H, Harrison G, Oliver F, Chatters S, Harrison CJ, et al. Medical Research Council Adult LeukemiaWorking Party. The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia(AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial. Blood 2001;98:1312-20.10.1182/blood.V98.5.131211520776Search in Google Scholar

11. Rücker FG, Bullinger L, Schwaenen C, Lipka DB, Wessendorf S, Fröhling S, et al. Disclosure of candidate genes in acute myeloid leukemia with complex karyotypes using microarray-based molecular characterization. J Clin Oncol 2006;24(24):3887-94.10.1200/JCO.2005.04.5450Search in Google Scholar

12. Schoch C, Kern W, Schnittger S, Büchner T, Hiddemann W, Haferlach T. The influence of age on prognosis of de novo acute myeloid leukemia differs according to cytogenetic subgroups. Haematologica 2004; 89:1082-1090.Search in Google Scholar

13. Estey E, Döhner H: Acute myeloid leukaemia. The Lancet 2006; 368(9550):1894-1907.10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69780-8Search in Google Scholar

14. Mackinnon RN, Selan C, Zordan A, Wall M, Nandurkar H, Campbell LJ. CGH and SNP array using DNA extracted from fixed cytogenetic preparations and longterm refrigerated bone marrow specimens. Mol Cytogenet 2012;5:10.10.1186/1755-8166-5-10Search in Google Scholar

15. Kirsch DG, Kastan MB. Tumor-suppressor p53: implications for tumor development and prognosis. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:3158-3168.10.1200/JCO.1998.16.9.3158Search in Google Scholar

16. Rücker FG, Schlenk RF, Bullinger L, Kayser S, Teleanu V, Kett H et al. TP53 alterations in acute myeloid leukemia with complex karyotype correlate with specific copy number alterations, monosomal karyotype, and dismal outcome. Blood 2012;119(9):2114-21.10.1182/blood-2011-08-375758Search in Google Scholar

17. Harousseau JL. Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly. Blood Rev 1998;12:145-53.10.1016/S0268-960X(98)90012-1Search in Google Scholar

18. Dhoner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Büchner T, Burnett AK et al. Diagnosis and management of acute Myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European Leukemia Net. Blood 2010;115: 453-74. 10.1182/blood-2009-07-23535819880497Search in Google Scholar

• Changes in C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, human leukocyte antigen-B27, and immunoglobulins A, G, M in patients with ankylosing spondylitis
• Vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolated in tertiary care in Southern Thailand: Prevalence and characterization of biofilm formation
• Change of routine coagulation parameters in plasma samples with different hematocrit values
• Decision tree analysis as predictor tool for in-hospital mortality in critical SARS-CoV-2 infected patients
• Evaluation of muscle elasticity in patients with end-stage renal disease complicated with sarcopenia by real-time shear wave elastography multipoint measurement
• Diagnostic values of glial fibrillary acidic protein, neuron-specific enolase and protein S100β for sepsis-associated encephalopathy
• Association between adiponectin and ADIPOQ (rs 1501299) gene polymorphism in gestational diabetes mellitus patients
• Understanding the key differences between ISO 15189:2022 and ISO 15189:2012 for an improved medical laboratory quality of service