rss_2.0ICAME Journal FeedSciendo RSS Feed for ICAME Journalhttps://sciendo.com/journal/ICAMEhttps://www.sciendo.comICAME Journal 's Coverhttps://sciendo-parsed-data-feed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/60c5482175030c59037bb147/cover-image.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20210621T142609Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=604799&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKDOZOEZ7H%2F20210621%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=5c49a9d76d407d425d47dfb40f25bd2a1049a2407ddc029197e80bc2ec96c69b200300Complex systems for corpus linguistshttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2021-0005ARTICLE2021-06-12T00:00:00.000+00:00Claudia Claridge and Birte Bös (eds.). (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 346). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Publishing Company, 2019. vi. 312 pp. ISBN: 9789027203236(HB).https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2021-0007ARTICLE2021-06-12T00:00:00.000+00:00Cultural keywords in World Englishes: A GloWbE-based studyhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2021-0001ARTICLE2021-06-12T00:00:00.000+00:00-conditionals: Corpus-based classification and frequency distributionhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2021-0003ARTICLE2021-06-12T00:00:00.000+00:00Comparing written Indian Englishes with the new (CORINNE)https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2021-0006<abstract> <title style='display:none'>Abstract</title> <p>This article introduces the new <italic>Corpus of Regional Indian Newspaper Englishes</italic> (CORINNE). The current version of CORINNE contains news and other text types from regional Indian newspapers published between 2015 and 2020, covering 13 states and regions so far. The corpus complements previous corpora, such as the Indian component of the <italic>International Corpus of English</italic> (ICE) as well as the Indian section of the <italic>South Asian Varieties of English</italic> (SAVE) corpus, by giving researchers the opportunity to analyse and compare regional (written) Englishes in India.</p> <p>In the first sections of the paper we discuss the rationale for creating CORINNE as well as the development of the corpus. We stress the potential of CORINNE and go into detail about selection criteria for the inclusion of newspapers as well as corpus compilation and the current word count. In order to show the potential of the corpus, the paper presents a case study of ‘intrusive <italic>as’</italic>, a syntactic feature that has made its way into formal registers of Indian English. Based on two subcorpora covering newspapers from Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand, we compare frequencies and usage patterns of <italic>call (as)</italic> and <italic>term (as)</italic>. The case study lends further weight to the hypothesis that the presence or absence of a quotative in the majority language spoken in an Indian state has an impact on the frequency of ‘intrusive <italic>as</italic>’. Finally, we foreshadow the next steps in the development of CORINNE as well as potential studies that can be carried out using the corpus.</p> </abstract>ARTICLE2021-06-12T00:00:00.000+00:00Better data for more researchers – using the audio features of BNCwebhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2021-0004<abstract> <title style='display:none'>Abstract</title> <p>In spite of the wide agreement among linguists as to the significance of spoken language data, actual speech data have not formed the basis of empirical work on English as much as one would think. The present paper is intended to contribute to changing this situation, on a theoretical and on a practical level. On a theoretical level, we discuss different research traditions within (English) linguistics. Whereas speech data have become increasingly important in various linguistic disciplines, major corpora of English developed within the corpus-linguistic community, carefully sampled to be representative of language usage, are usually restricted to orthographic transcriptions of spoken language. As a result, phonological phenomena have remained conspicuously understudied within traditional corpus linguistics. At the same time, work with current speech corpora often requires a considerable level of specialist knowledge and tailor-made solutions. On a practical level, we present a new feature of BNCweb (Hoffmann et al. 2008), a user-friendly interface to the British National Corpus, which gives users access to audio and phonemic transcriptions of more than five million words of spontaneous speech. With the help of a pilot study on the variability of intrusive r we illustrate the scope of the new possibilities.</p> </abstract>ARTICLE2021-06-12T00:00:00.000+00:00Sandra Götz and Joybrato Mukherjee (eds.). (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2019. iv+267 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 0236 9.https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2021-0008ARTICLE2021-06-12T00:00:00.000+00:00Supporting the corpus-based study of Shakespeare’s language: Enhancing a corpus of the First Foliohttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2021-0002<abstract> <title style='display:none'>Abstract</title> <p>This article explores challenges in the corpus linguistic analysis of Shakespeare’s language, and Early Modern English more generally, with particular focus on elaborating possible solutions and the benefits they bring. An account of work that took place within the <italic>Encyclopedia of Shakespeare’s Language</italic> Project (2016–2019) is given, which discusses the development of the project’s data resources, specifically, the <italic>Enhanced Shakespearean Corpus.</italic> Topics covered include the composition of the corpus and its subcomponents; the structure of the XML markup; the design of the extensive character metadata; and the word-level corpus annotation, including spelling regularisation, part-of-speech tagging, lemmatisation and semantic tagging. The challenges that arise from each of these undertakings are not exclusive to a corpus-based treatment of Shakespeare’s plays but it is in the context of Shakespeare’s language that they are so severe as to seem almost insurmountable. The solutions developed for the <italic>Enhanced Shakespearean Corpus</italic> – often combining automated manipulation with manual interventions, and always principled – offer a way through.</p> </abstract>ARTICLE2021-06-12T00:00:00.000+00:00Modest XML for Corpora: Not a standard, but a suggestionhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2014-0004<abstract><title style='display:none'>Abstract</title><p> This paper argues for, and presents, a modest approach to XML encoding for use by the majority of contemporary linguists who need to engage in corpus construction. While extensive standards for corpus encoding exist - most notably, the Text Encoding Initiative’s Guidelines and the Corpus Encoding Standard based on them - these are rather heavyweight approaches, implicitly intended for major corpus-building projects, which are rather different from the increasingly common efforts in corpus construction undertaken by individual researchers in support of their personal research goals. Therefore, there is a clear benefit to be had from a set of recommendations (not a standard) that outlines general best practices in the use of XML in corpora without going into any of the more technical aspects of XML or the full weight of TEI encoding. This paper presents such a set of suggestions, dubbed Modest XML for Corpora, and posits that such a set of pointers to a limited level of XML knowledge could work as part of the normal, general training of corpus linguists. </p><p>The Modest XML recommendations cover the following set of things, which, according to the foregoing argument, are sufficient knowledge about XML for most corpus linguists’ day-to-day needs: use of tags; adding attribute value pairs; recommended use of attributes; nesting of tags; encoding of special characters; XML well-formedness; a collection of de facto standard tags and attributes; going beyond the basic de facto standard tags; and text headers.</p></abstract>ARTICLE2014-04-28T00:00:00.000+00:00Review: Alan Partington, Alison Dugiud and Charlotte Taylor. Patterns and meanings in discourse. Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS)https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2014-0018<abstract><title style='display:none'/><p/></abstract>ARTICLE2014-04-28T00:00:00.000+00:00Review: Martin Hilpert. Constructional change in English. Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntaxhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2014-0016<abstract><title style='display:none'/><p/></abstract>ARTICLE2014-04-28T00:00:00.000+00:00Late Modern English Medical Texts 1700–1800: A corpus for analysing eighteenth-century medical Englishhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2014-0007<abstract><title style='display:none'/><p/></abstract>ARTICLE2014-04-28T00:00:00.000+00:00Linking learner corpus and experimental data in studying second language learners’ knowledge of verb-argument constructionshttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2014-0006<abstract><title style='display:none'>Abstract</title><p> This paper combines data from learner corpora and psycholinguistic experiments in an attempt to find out what advanced learners of English (first language backgrounds German and Spanish) know about a range of common verbargument constructions (VACs), such as the ‘V about n’ construction (e.g. she thinks about chocolate a lot). Learners’ dominant verb-VAC associations are examined based on evidence retrieved from the German and Spanish subcomponents of ICLE and LINDSEI and collected in lexical production tasks in which participants complete VAC frames (e.g. ‘he ___ about the...’) with verbs that may fill the blank (e.g. talked, thought, wondered). The paper compares findings from the different data sets and highlights the value of linking corpus and experimental evidence in studying linguistic phenomena</p></abstract>ARTICLE2014-04-28T00:00:00.000+00:00Review: Hilde Hasselgård, Jarle Ebeling and Signe Oksefjell Ebeling (eds.). Corpus perspectives on patterns of lexishttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2014-0015<abstract><title style='display:none'/><p/></abstract>ARTICLE2014-04-28T00:00:00.000+00:00Review: Gaëtanelle Gilquin and Sylvie De Cock (eds.). Errors and disfluencies in spoken corporahttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2014-0012<abstract><title style='display:none'/><p/></abstract>ARTICLE2014-04-28T00:00:00.000+00:00Review: Anneli Meurman-Solin and Jukka Tyrkkö (eds.). Principles and practices for the digital editing and annotation of diachronic data (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 14)https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2014-0017<abstract><title style='display:none'/><p/></abstract>ARTICLE2014-04-28T00:00:00.000+00:00Powerful (yet simple) comparisons of a wide range of phenomena in British and American Englishhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2014-0002<abstract><title style='display:none'/><p/></abstract>ARTICLE2014-04-28T00:00:00.000+00:00Review: Karin Aijmer. Understanding pragmatic markers. A variational pragmatic approachhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2014-0010<abstract><title style='display:none'/><p/></abstract>ARTICLE2014-04-28T00:00:00.000+00:00Review: Gisle Andersen and Kristin Bech (eds.). English corpus linguistics: Variation in time, space and genrehttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2014-0011<abstract><title style='display:none'/><p/></abstract>ARTICLE2014-04-28T00:00:00.000+00:00Review: Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech and Sean Wallis (eds.). The verb phrase in English: Investigating recent language change with corporahttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/icame-2014-0008<abstract><title style='display:none'/><p/></abstract>ARTICLE2014-04-28T00:00:00.000+00:00en-us-1