[Alkin, M.C. (1985). A guide for evaluation decision makers. Beverly Hills: CA, Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alkin, M.C. and Coyle, K. (1988). Thoughts on Evaluation Utilization, Misutilization and Non- Utilization. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 14(3): 331-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(88)90027-210.1016/0191-491X(88)90027-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Cabinet Office (2008). Cabinet Manual 2008, Cabinet Office, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Wellington, New Zealand.]Search in Google Scholar
[Caroll, P. (2014). Ex Ante Evaluation in Australia and New Zealand: the case of Regulatory Impact Assessment, http://reggov2014.ibei.org/bcn-14-papers/41-19.pdf (15.10.2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Carroll, P. (2010). Does regulatory impact assessment lead to better policy? Policy and Society, 29(2): 113-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.00910.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Castalia (2012). Regulatory Impact Analysis Evaluation 2012, http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/regulatory/riareview/ria-review-jun12.pdf (15.10.2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Castalia (2013). Regulatory Impact Analysis Evaluation 2013, http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/regulatory/riareview/ria-review-jun13.pdf (15.12.2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Castalia (2014). Regulatory Impact Analysis Evaluation 2014: A Detailed Review of Options Analysis, http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/regulatory/riareview/ria-review-jun14.pdf (15.10.2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Clarke, A. (1999). Evaluation Research: An Introduction to Principles, Methods and Practice. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849209113]Search in Google Scholar
[Cousins, J.B. (2003). Utilization effects of participatory evaluation. In: T. Kellaghan, D.L. Stufflebeam and L.A. Wingate (eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation. Boston: Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_1610.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_16]Search in Google Scholar
[Cousins, J.B. and Leithwood, K.A. (1986). Current empirical research on evaluation utilization. Review of Educational Research, 56(3): 331-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654305600333110.3102/00346543056003331]Search in Google Scholar
[Cousins, J.B. and Leithwood, K.A. (1993). Enhancing knowledge utilization as a strategy for school improvement. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 14: 305-333.]Search in Google Scholar
[Drozd, M. (2014). Ocena skutków regulacji. Lecture in the framework of a post-graduate programme “Akademia Ewaluacji Programów Rozwoju Społeczno-Gospodarczego” (6th edition). Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dunlop, C.A., Maggetti, M., Radaelli, C.M. and Russel, D. (2012). The many uses of regulatory impact assessment: A meta-analysis of EU and UK cases. Regulation & Governance, 6(1): 23-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01123.x Gruening, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management. International Public Management Journal, 4(2001): 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7494(01)00041-110.1016/S1096-7494(01)00041-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Guerin, K. (2003). Encouraging Quality Regulation: Theory and Tools. New Zealand Treasury Working Paper 03/24. Wellington, http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/research-policy/wp/2003/03-24/twp03-24.pdf (15.12.2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Haber, A. and Szałaj, M. (eds.) (2009). Ewaluacja wobec wyzwań stojących przed sektorem finansów publicznych. Warszawa: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hertin, J., Jacob, K., Pesch, U. and Pacchi, C. (2009). The Production and Use of Knowledge in Regulatory Impact Assessment - An Empirical Analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 11: 413-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.01.00410.1016/j.forpol.2009.01.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Højlund, S. (2014). Evaluation use in the organizational context - changing focus to improve theory. Evaluation, 20(1): 26-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135638901351605310.1177/1356389013516053]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, K., Greenseid, L.O., Toal, S.A., King, J.A., Lawrenz, F. and Volkov, B. (2009). Research on Evaluation Use: A Review of the Empirical Literature From 1986 to 2005. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(3): 377-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109821400934166010.1177/1098214009341660]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, K.W. (1980). Stimulating Evaluation Use by Integrating Academia and Practice. Science Communication, 2(2): 237-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10755470800020020510.1177/107554708000200205]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, R.B. (1998). Toward a theoretical model of evaluation utilization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 21(4): 93-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(97)00048-710.1016/S0149-7189(97)00048-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Kupiec, T. (2014a). Użyteczność ewaluacji jako narzędzia zarządzania regionalnymi programami operacyjnymi. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 2(56): 52-67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kupiec, T. (2014b). Wykorzystanie ewaluacji w zarządzaniu programem operacyjnym na przykładzie RPO. Evaluation Conference, Kozminski University, Warszawa, 6 March 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kupiec, T. (2015). Ewaluacja jako narzędzie zarządzania w sektorze publicznym. Studia z Polityki Publicznej, 2, Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społeczne SGH.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ledermann, S. (2011). Exploring the Necessary Conditions for Evaluation Use in Program Change. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(2): 159-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109821401141157310.1177/1098214011411573]Search in Google Scholar
[Leeuw, F.L. and Furubo, J.E. (2008). Evaluation Systems: What Are They and Why Study Them?. Evaluation, 14(2): 157-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135638900708753710.1177/1356389007087537]Search in Google Scholar
[Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mark, M.M. and Henry, G.T. (2004). The Mechanisms and Outcomes of Evaluation Influence. Evaluation 10(1): 35-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135638900404232610.1177/1356389004042326]Search in Google Scholar
[New Zealand Treasury (2013). Regulatory impact analysis handbook. Wellington.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nilsson, M., Jordan, A., Turnpenny, J., Hertin, J., Nykvist, B. and Russel, D. (2008). The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making: an analysis of three European countries and the European Union. Policy Sciences, 41(4): 335-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-008-9071-110.1007/s11077-008-9071-1]Search in Google Scholar
[NZIER (2008). Compliance with Regulatory Impact Analysis Requirements: 2007 Evaluation [for the Ministry of Economic Development], http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/regulatory/riareview/ria-review-feb08.pdf (15.12. 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[NZIER (2011). Regulatory Impact Assessment Evaluation 2010, http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/regulatory/riareview/ria-review-feb11.pdf (15.12.2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD (1997). Regulatory Impact Analysis - Best Practices in OECD Countries. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/35258828.pdf (7.12.2014).10.1787/9789264162150-en]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD (2002). Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries: From Interventionism to Regulatory Governance.]Search in Google Scholar
[Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD (2008). Building an Institutional Framework for Regulatory Impact Analysis: Guidance for Policy Makers. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/40984990.pdf (7.12.2014).10.1787/9789264050013-en]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD (2008). Introductory Handbook for Undertaking Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA). Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/44789472.pdf (7.12. 2014). OECD (2009). Regulatory Impact Analysis: A Tool for Policy Coherence. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/42047618.pdf (7.12.2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Offices of the Ministers of Finance & Regulatory Reform (2013). Regulatory systems paper two: improving New Zealand’s regulatory performance, www.treasury.govt.nz/economy/regulation/inforeleases/pdfs/reg-2597298.pdf (15.10. 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Olejniczak, K. (2008). Mechanizmy wykorzystania ewaluacji. Studium ewaluacji średniookresowych INTERREG III. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olejniczak, K., Kupiec, T. and Raimondo, E. (2015). Brokerzy wiedzy. Nowe spojrzenie na rolę jednostek ewaluacyjnych. In: A. Haber and K. Olejniczak (eds.), (R)ewaluacja 2. Warszawa: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości.]Search in Google Scholar
[Osbourne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing Government. New York: Plume.]Search in Google Scholar
[Owen, J.M. (2007). Program evaluation: forms and approaches. London: The Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pallot, J. (1998). New Public Management Reform in New Zealand. The Collective Strategy Phase. International Public Management Journal, 1(1): 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7494(99)80083-X 10.1016/S1096-7494(99)80083-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Patton, M.Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Patton, M.Q., Grimes, P.S., Guthrie, K.M., Brennan, N.J., French, B.D. and Blyth, D.A. (1977). In search of impact: An analysis of the utilization of federal health evaluation research. In: C.H.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiss (ed.), Using social research in public policy making. Lexington, MA: Heath.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pawson, R. (2002). Evidence-based Policy: In: Search of a Method. Evaluation 8(2): 157-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135890200200800251210.1177/1358902002008002512]Search in Google Scholar
[Productivity Commission (2014). Regulatory institutions and practices. The New Zealand Productivity Commission, 30 June 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Radaelli, C.M. (2009). Desperately Seeking Regulatory Impact Assessments: Diary of a Reflective Researcher. Evaluation, 15: 31-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135638900809787010.1177/1356389008097870]Search in Google Scholar
[Radaelli, C.M. (2010). Rationality, Power, Management and Symbols: Four Images of Regulatory Impact Assessment. Scandinavian Political Studies, 33(2): 164-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2009.00245.x 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2009.00245.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Renda, A. (2006). Impact Assessment in the EU: The State of the Art and the Art of the State. Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rissi C., Sager F. (2013). Types of knowledge utilization of regulatory impact assessments: Evidence from Swiss policymaking. Regulation & Governance, 7: 348-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.1200210.1111/rego.12002]Search in Google Scholar
[Rist, R. and Stame, N. (eds.) (2006). From Studies to Streams: Managing Evaluative Systems. London: Transaction Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[RM (Council of Ministers) (2002). Rules of Procedure of the Council of Ministers. Act No 49 of the Council of Ministers of 19 March 2002, M.P. No. 13, item 221.]Search in Google Scholar
[RM (Council of Ministers) (2013). “Better Regulations” programme (“Lepsze Regulacje”) for 2012-2015, adopted by the Council of Ministers on 22 January 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rossi, P.H., Freeman H.E. and Lipsey, M.W. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, 7th edition, Thousand Oaks, London, Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sanderson, I. (2002). Making Sense of ‘What Works’: Evidence Based Policy Making as Instrumental Rationality? Public Policy and Administration, 17(3): 61-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095207670201700305 Saunders, M. (2012). The use and usability of evaluation outputs: A social practice approach.]Search in Google Scholar
[Evaluation, 18(4): 421-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135638901245911310.1177/1356389012459113]Search in Google Scholar
[Sawyer, A. (2008). Regulatory Impact Statements and Accountability: Recent Australasian Evidence. Journal of Australian Taxation, 11(1): 42-107.]Search in Google Scholar
[SGI (2014). Sustainable Governance Indicators, http://www.sgi-network.org/2014/ (7.10.2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Shulha, L.M. and Cousins, J.B. (1997). Evaluation use: Theory, research, and practice since 1986. Evaluation Practice, 18(3): 195-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0886-1633(97)90027-110.1016/S0886-1633(97)90027-1]Search in Google Scholar
[SSC (2014). A guide to New Zealand’s Central government agencies, State Service Commission 2014, http://www.ssc.govt.nz/sites/all/files/guide-to-central-govt-agencies-5sep2014.pdf (15.10. 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Staroňová, K. (2014). Analyzing scientific knowledge in documents: The case of regulatory impact assessment. Human Affairs, 24(3): 299-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0228-710.2478/s13374-014-0228-7]Search in Google Scholar
[The Treasury (2011). Regulatory Impact Statement - Regulating for Better Regulation - What is the Potential of a Regulatory Responsibility Act? http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/informationreleases/ris/pdfs/ris-tsy-rbr-mar11.pdf (15.10. 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiss, C.H., Murphy-Graham, E., Petrosino, A. and Gandhi, A.G. (2008). The Fairy Godmother - and Her Warts: Making the Dream of Evidence-Based Policy Come True. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(1): 29-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109821400731374210.1177/1098214007313742]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiss, C.H., Murphy-Graham, E. and Birkeland, S. (2005). An Alternate Route to Policy Influence: How Evaluations Affect D.A.R.E. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1): 12-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214004273337 10.1177/1098214004273337]Search in Google Scholar
