1. bookVolume 29 (2021): Issue 3 (September 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2658-2430
First Published
30 Mar 2015
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Managerial Entrenchment and Firm Performance: Evidence from Moroccan Listed Companies

Published Online: 28 Oct 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 29 (2021) - Issue 3 (September 2021)
Page range: 40 - 62
Received: 28 Aug 2020
Accepted: 22 Apr 2021
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2658-2430
First Published
30 Mar 2015
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Purpose: Grounded in agency and entrenchment theories, this study assumes that CEOs’ propensity to entrench themselves can affect firm performance. The purpose of this article is to investigate the relationship between dimensions and mechanisms through which managers entrench themselves and influence firm performance.

Methodology: The article uses OLS regression to explain the assumed relationships between managerial entrenchment and firm performance. The study is based on a sample of 55 Moroccan listed companies over the period 2010–2015.

Findings: Taken together, the findings contribute to a better understanding of the effect of several entrenchment pathways on firm performance. These findings imply that managerial entrenchment is not necessarily detrimental, as suggested by some governance theories. On the contrary, it can have a beneficial effect on wealth creation.

Research limitations/implications: This study faces several limitations. The first appears in the sample size of its quantitative element. The second is related to the variables used to measure managerial entrenchment. The current research explores the effects of the most commonly used measures and some non-retained measures could be pertinent in verifying the assumed relationships.

Originality/value: This analysis is one of the few studies conducted in the African countries that scrutinize the impact of managers’ entrenchment determinants (ownership, duality, age, and tenure) on firm performance.

Keywords

JEL Classification

Agrawal, A. and Knoeber, C.R. (1996). Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331397.10.2307/2331397 Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, R. and Reeb, D. (2003). Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567.10.1111/1540-6261.00567 Search in Google Scholar

Berle, A. and Means, G. (1991). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315133188.10.4324/9781315133188 Search in Google Scholar

Berrone, P., Cruz, C. and Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355.10.1177/0894486511435355 Search in Google Scholar

Byrd, J., Parrino, R. and Pritsch, G. (1998). Stockholder–Manager Conflicts and Firm Value. Financial Analysts Journal, 54(3), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v54.n3.2177.10.2469/faj.v54.n3.2177 Search in Google Scholar

Cannella, A.A. and Holcomb, T.R. (2005). A Multi-Level Analysis of the Upper-Echelons Model. Research in Multi-Level Issues, 4, 195–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04009-9.10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04009-9 Search in Google Scholar

Castanias, R.P. and Helfat, C.E. (1992). Managerial and windfall rents in the market for corporate control. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18(2), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(92)90025-7.10.1016/0167-2681(92)90025-7 Search in Google Scholar

Casson, M. (1999). The economics of family firms. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 47(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03585522.1999.10419802.10.1080/03585522.1999.10419802 Search in Google Scholar

Charreaux, G. (2008). À la recherche du lien perdu entre caractéristiques des dirigeants et performance de la firme: gouvernance et latitude managériale. Economie et Sociétés, 1831–1868. Search in Google Scholar

Charreaux, G. (2002). L’actionnaire comme apporteur de ressources cognitives. Revue française de gestion, 5(141), 77–107. Search in Google Scholar

Chen, G.L. and Hambrick, D.C. (2012). CEO replacement in turnaround situations: executive (mis) fit and its performance implications. Organization Science, 23(1), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0629.10.1287/orsc.1100.0629 Search in Google Scholar

Combs, J.G., Ketchen, D.J., Perryman, A.A. and Donahue, M.S. (2007). The Moderating Effects of CEO Power on the Board Composition-Firm Performance Relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1300–1323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00708.x.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00708.x Search in Google Scholar

Cruz, C.C., Gómez-Mejia, L.R. and Becerra, M. (2010). Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO-TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48036975.10.5465/amj.2010.48036975 Search in Google Scholar

Dalton, D.R. and Dalton, C.M. (2011). Integration of micro and macro studies in governance research: CEO duality, board composition, and financial performance. Journal of Management, 37, 404–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310373399.10.1177/0149206310373399 Search in Google Scholar

Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D. and Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/259223.10.2307/259223 Search in Google Scholar

Dechow, P.M. and Sloan, R.G. (1991). Executive incentives and the horizon problem: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14(1), 51–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(91)90058-S.10.1016/0167-7187(91)90058-S Search in Google Scholar

Donaldson, L., and Davis, J.H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103.10.1177/031289629101600103 Search in Google Scholar

Drakos, A.A., and Bekiris, F.V. (2010). Corporate performance, managerial ownership and endogeneity: A simultaneous equations analysis for the Athens stock exchange. Research in International Business and Finance, 24(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2009.01.002.10.1016/j.ribaf.2009.01.002 Search in Google Scholar

Faccio, M., and Lasfer, M.A. (2000). Do occupational pension funds monitor companies in which they hold large stakes? Journal of Corporate Finance, 6(1), 71–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(99)00016-4.10.1016/S0929-1199(99)00016-4 Search in Google Scholar

Fama, E.F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1086/260866.10.1086/260866 Search in Google Scholar

Fama, E. and Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037.10.1086/467037 Search in Google Scholar

Farrar, D. and Glauber, R. (1967). Multicollinearity in Regression Analysis: The Problem Revisited. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49(1), 92–107. https://doi:10.2307/1937887.10.2307/1937887 Search in Google Scholar

Finkelstein, S. and D’Aveni, R.A. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1079–1108. https://doi.org/10.2307/256667.10.2307/256667 Search in Google Scholar

Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick, D.C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 484–503. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393314.10.2307/2393314 Search in Google Scholar

Fredrickson, J.W., Hambrick, D.C. and Baumrin, S. (1988). A Model of CEO Dismissal. AMR, 13, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306882.10.5465/amr.1988.4306882 Search in Google Scholar

Goyal, V.K. and Park, C.W. (2002). Board leadership structure and CEO turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00028-1.10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00028-1 Search in Google Scholar

Hambrick, D.C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254.10.5465/amr.2007.24345254 Search in Google Scholar

Hambrick, D.C. and Fukutomi, G.D. (1991). The seasons of a CEO’s tenure. The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 719–742. https://doi.org/10.2307/258978.10.2307/258978 Search in Google Scholar

Hambrick, D.C., Geletkanycz, M.A. and Fredrickson, J.W. (1993). Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140602.10.1002/smj.4250140602 Search in Google Scholar

Hambrick, D.C. and Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628.10.5465/amr.1984.4277628 Search in Google Scholar

Hermalin, B.E. and Weisbach, M.S. (1988). The determinants of board composition. RAND Journal of Economics, 19, 589–606. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555459.10.2307/2555459 Search in Google Scholar

Hiebl, M.R.W. (2013). Upper echelons theory in management accounting and control research. Journal of Management Control, 24(3), 223–240. https://doi:10.1007/s00187-013-0183-1.10.1007/s00187-013-0183-1 Search in Google Scholar

Holmström, B. (1999), Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective. The Review of Economic Studies, 66(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00083.10.1111/1467-937X.00083 Search in Google Scholar

Huang, G.L., Dong, F. and Li, H.Q. (2010). The relation of manager characteristics and corporate performance based on perspective of managerial entrenchment. Commercial Research, 9, 54–58. Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1994). The Nature of Man. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7(2), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1994.tb00401.x.10.1111/j.1745-6622.1994.tb00401.x Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X Search in Google Scholar

Krause, R., Semadeni, M. and Cannella, A.A. (2014). CEO Duality: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 40(1), 256–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313503013.10.1177/0149206313503013 Search in Google Scholar

Lee, H-k. and Park, J-H. (2008). The influence of top management team international exposure on international alliance formation. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 961–981. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00772.x.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00772.x Search in Google Scholar

Mignon, S. (2000). La Pérennité des Entreprises Familiales: Un Modèle Alternatif à la Création de Valeur pour l´Actionnaire? Finance Contrôle Stratégie, 3(1), 169–196. Search in Google Scholar

Morck, R., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1–2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90048-7.10.1016/0304-405X(88)90048-7 Search in Google Scholar

Neter, J., Wasserman, W. and Kutner, M.H. (1989). Applied Linear Regression Models. 2nd edition, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood. Search in Google Scholar

Pichard-Stamford, J.P. (2002). L’enracinement des dirigeants familiaux. In: J. Caby and G. Hirigoyen (eds.), La gestion des entreprises familiales. Paris-Economica. Search in Google Scholar

Pichard-Stanford, J.P. (2000). Légitimité et enracinement du dirigeant par le réseau des administrateurs. Finance Contrôle Stratégie, 4(3), 143–178. Search in Google Scholar

Pigé, B. (1998) Enracinement des dirigeants et richesse des actionnaires, Finance Contrôle Stratégie, 1(3), 131–158. Search in Google Scholar

Prevost, A., Rao, R. and Hossain, M. (2002). Determinants of board composition in New Zealand: A simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Empirical Finance, 9(4), 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5398(02)00002-6.10.1016/S0927-5398(02)00002-6 Search in Google Scholar

Rossow, G.J. (2005). Business ethics and corporate governance in Africa. Business & Society, 44(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305274851.10.1177/0007650305274851 Search in Google Scholar

Shivdasani, A. and Yermack, D. (1999). CEO Involvement in the Selection of New Board Members: An Empirical Analysis. The Journal of Finance, 54(5), 1829–1853. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00168.10.1111/0022-1082.00168 Search in Google Scholar

Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1989). Management Entrenchment: the Case of Manager Specific Investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90099-8.10.1016/0304-405X(89)90099-8 Search in Google Scholar

Smith, C. and Watts, R. (1992). The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(3), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(92)90029-W.10.1016/0304-405X(92)90029-W Search in Google Scholar

Stern, I. and Westphal, J.D. (2010). Stealthy Footsteps to the Boardroom: Executives’ Backgrounds, Sophisticated Interpersonal Influence Behavior, and Board Appointments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 278–319. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.278.10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.278 Search in Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J.E. and Edlin, A.S. (1995). Discouraging Rivals: Managerial Rent-Seeking and Economic Inefficiencies. American Economic Review, American Economic Association, 85(5), 1301–1312. Search in Google Scholar

Surroca, J. and Tribó, J.A. (2008). Managerial entrenchment and corporate social performance, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35(5–6), 748–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2008.02090.x.10.1111/j.1468-5957.2008.02090.x Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, A., Litschert, R.J. and Ramaswamy, K. (1991). The Performance Impact of Strategy-Manager Coalignment: An Empirical Examination, Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 509–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120704.10.1002/smj.4250120704 Search in Google Scholar

Very, P. (2004). The Management of Mergers and Acquisitions. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Search in Google Scholar

Wade, J., O’Reilly, C., and Chandratat, I. (1990). Golden Parachutes: CEOs and the Exercise of Social Influence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393510.10.2307/2393510 Search in Google Scholar

Westphal, J. and Zajac, E. (1995). Who Shall Govern? CEO/Board Power, Demographic Similarity, and New Director Selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 60–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393700.10.2307/2393700 Search in Google Scholar

Zenou, E. (2006). La contribution du dirigeant à la création de valeur: au-delà de la discipline. Une analyse empirique sur le marché français. Lecture presented at CEREN 17, Groupe ESC Dijon Bourgogne. Search in Google Scholar

Zingales, L.G. (2000). In Search of New Foundations. Journal of Finance, 55(4), 1623–1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00262.10.1111/0022-1082.00262 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo