1. bookVolume 29 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)
Journal Details
First Published
30 Mar 2015
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

Audit Committee Formation: The Case of Poland

Published Online: 12 Jul 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 29 (2021) - Issue 2 (June 2021)
Page range: 169 - 212
Received: 18 Jul 2020
Accepted: 17 May 2021
Journal Details
First Published
30 Mar 2015
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

Purpose: This study investigates the determinants of audit committee (AC) formation in a semi-mandatory setting of a European economy, in which ownership and control are predominantly in the hands of families and business groups, and the voluntary practice of forming an AC has not been widely accepted.

Methodology: This research uses a sample of Polish nonfinancial firms listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE) in 2008–2015. The study implemented logistic regression to test the role of the supervisory board (SB) and companies’ compositional characteristics in AC creation.

Findings: Primary analysis provided evidence of an inverted association between commonly accepted determinants of AC formation – such as the number of independent members on the supervisory board (SB) – and accounting and finance expertise of the SB members. The study also revealed that companies with foreign ownership are more likely to have an AC.

Originality: This study indicates an important relationship between the existence of other SB committees as a meaningful determinant of AC formation. This article is valuable for supervisory bodies and regulators as they provide insights into factors that influence audit committee formation.


JEL Classification

Abdeljawad, I., Oweidat, G.A.I., and Saleh, N.M. (2020). Audit committee versus other governance mechanisms and the effect of investment opportunities: evidence from Palestine. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(3), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG06-2019-0185. Search in Google Scholar

Adams, R., Gray, S., and Nowland, J. (2011). Does gender matter in the boardroom? Evidence from the market reaction to mandatory new director announcements. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1953152.10.2139/ssrn.1953152 Search in Google Scholar

Adamska, A., Bohdanowicz, L., and Gad, J. (2017). Reakcje spółek publicznych na wprowadzenie obowiązku powoływania komitetu audytu. e-mentor, 4(71), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.15219/em71.1318.10.15219/em71.1318 Search in Google Scholar

Afify, H.A.E. (2009). Determinants of audit report lag: Does implementing corporate governance have any impact? Empirical evidence from Egypt. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 10(1), 56–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/09675420910963397.10.1108/09675420910963397 Search in Google Scholar

Ali, M.J., Singh, R.K.S., and Al-Akra, M. (2018). The impact of audit committee effectiveness on audit fees and non-audit service fees: Evidence from Australia. Accounting Research Journal, 31(2), 174–190.10.1108/ARJ-11-2015-0144 Search in Google Scholar

Aluchna, M. (2013). Kobiety we władzach spółek: dyskusja rekomendacji Unii Europejskiej. Przegląd Organizacji, 1, 30–36. https://doi.org/10.33141/po.2013. Search in Google Scholar

Archambeault, D., and DeZoort, F.T. (2001). Auditor opinion shopping and the audit committee: An analysis of suspicious auditor switches. International Journal of Auditing, 5(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1099-1123.00324.10.1111/1099-1123.00324 Search in Google Scholar

Beasley, M.S., and Petroni, K.R. (2001). Board Independence and Audit-Firm Type. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 20(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2001. Search in Google Scholar

Beasley, M.S., and Salterio, S.E. (2001). The relationship between board characteristics and voluntary improvements in audit committee composition and experience. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(4), 539–570. https://doi.org/10.1506/RM1J-A0YM-3VMV-TAMV.10.1506/RM1J-A0YM-3VMV-TAMV Search in Google Scholar

Bédard, J., and Gendron, Y. (2010). Strengthening the financial reporting system: Can audit committees deliver? International Journal of Auditing, 14(2), 174–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00413.x.10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00413.x Search in Google Scholar

Bekaert, G., and Harvey, C.R. (2002). Research in emerging markets finance: looking to the future. Emerging Markets Review, 3(4), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-0141(02)00045-6.10.1016/S1566-0141(02)00045-6 Search in Google Scholar

Belkhir, M. (2009). Board of directors’ size and performance in the banking industry. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(2), 201–221, https://doi.org/10.1108/17439130910947903.10.1108/17439130910947903 Search in Google Scholar

Best Practices Committee at the Corporate Governance Forum (2002). Best Practices in Public Companies in Poland. Warsaw: Corporate Governance Forum. Available at: http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/practices_2002.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Best Practice for GPW Listed Companies (2016). Warsaw Stock Exchange. Available at: https://www.gpw.pl/pub/GPW/o-nas/DPSN2016_EN.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Bohdanowicz, L. (2015). Struktury własnościowe spółek a rotacje prezesów zarządów – wyniki badań empirycznych. Zarządzanie i Finanse, 13(3), 165–181. Search in Google Scholar

Bradbury, M.E. (1990). The incentives for voluntary audit committee formation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 9(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(90)90019-V.10.1016/0278-4254(90)90019-V Search in Google Scholar

Bradbury, M.E., Ma, D., and Scott, T. (2019). Explanations for not having an audit committee in a ‘comply or explain’ regime. Australian Accounting Review, 29(4), 649–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12241.10.1111/auar.12241 Search in Google Scholar

Bushman, R.M., and Smith, A.J. (2003). Transparency, financial accounting information, and corporate governance. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 65–87. Search in Google Scholar

Carson, E. (2002). Factors associated with the development of board subcommittees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 10(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00263.10.1111/1467-8683.00263 Search in Google Scholar

Cernat, L. (2004). The emerging European corporate governance model: Anglo-Saxon, Continental, or still the century of diversity? Journal of European Public Policy, 11(1), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000164343.10.1080/1350176042000164343 Search in Google Scholar

Chau, G.K., and Gray, S.J. (2002). Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore. The International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7063(02)00153-X.10.1016/S0020-7063(02)00153-X Search in Google Scholar

Chau, G., and Leung, P. (2006). The impact of board composition and family ownership on audit committee formation: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2006. Search in Google Scholar

Chen, L., Kilgore, A., and Radich, R. (2009). Audit committees: voluntary formation by ASX non-top 500. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(5), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900910956829.10.1108/02686900910956829 Search in Google Scholar

Collier, P. (1993). Factors affecting the formation of audit committees in major UK listed companies. Accounting and Business Research, 23(1), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1993.9729909.10.1080/00014788.1993.9729909 Search in Google Scholar

Collier, P., and Zaman, M. (2005). Convergence in European corporate governance: The audit committee concept. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 753–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00468.x.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00468.x Search in Google Scholar

Coval, J.D., and Moskowitz, T.J. (2001). The geography of investment: Informed trading and asset prices. Journal of Political Economy, 109(4), 811–841, https://doi.org/10.1086/322088.10.1086/322088 Search in Google Scholar

Deli, D.N., and Gillan, S.L. (2000). On the demand for independent and active audit committees. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6(4), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(00)00016-X.10.1016/S0929-1199(00)00016-X Search in Google Scholar

DeZoort, F.T., and Salterio, S.E. (2001). The effects of corporate governance experience and financial reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee members’ judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(2), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2001. Search in Google Scholar

Dobija, D. (2011). Auditing jako element ładu korporacyjnego. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 64(120), 25–37. Search in Google Scholar

Dobija, D. (2015). Exploring audit committee practices: oversight of financial reporting and external auditors in Poland. Journal of Management & Governance, 19(1), 113–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-013-9281-6.10.1007/s10997-013-9281-6 Search in Google Scholar

Dwekat, A., Seguí-Mas, E., Tormo-Carbó, G., and Carmona, P. (2020). Corporate governance configurations and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Qualitative comparative analysis of audit committee and board characteristics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2879–2892. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2009.10.1002/csr.2009 Search in Google Scholar

Fama, E.F., and Jensen, M.C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1086/467038.10.1086/467038 Search in Google Scholar

García-Sánchez, I.M., Frias-Aceituno, J.V., and Garcia-Rubio, R. (2012). Determining factors of audit committee attributes: Evidence from Spain. International Journal of Auditing, 16(2), 184–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2012.00451.x.10.1111/j.1099-1123.2012.00451.x Search in Google Scholar

Guest, P.M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13518470802466121.10.1080/13518470802466121 Search in Google Scholar

Hassan, Y., and Hijazi, R. (2015). Determinants of the voluntary formation of a company audit committee: evidence from Palestine. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 11(1), 27–46. Search in Google Scholar

Hillman, A.J., and Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196729.10.5465/amr.2003.10196729 Search in Google Scholar

Huang, H., Lobo, G.J., and Zhou, J. (2009). Determinants and accounting consequences of forming a governance committee: Evidence from the United States. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(6), 710–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00769.x.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00769.x Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, M.C., and Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00769.x.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00769.x Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, J.L., Daily, C.M., and Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200303.10.1177/014920639602200303 Search in Google Scholar

Journal of Laws (2009, May 7). Certified Auditors, Their Self-Government, Entities Authorized to Audit Financial Statements and Public Supervision. http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20090770649/T/D20090649L.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Journal of Laws (2017, May 11). The act of 11 May 2017 on Certified Auditors, Audit Firms and Public Supervision. http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20170001089. Search in Google Scholar

Kaczmarek, S., Kimino, S., and Pye, A. (2012). Antecedents of board composition: The role of nomination committees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(5), 474–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00913.x.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00913.x Search in Google Scholar

Köhler, A.G. (2005). Audit Committees in Germany – Theoretical Reasoning and Empirical Evidence. Schmalchenbach Business Review, 57(3), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396715.10.1007/BF03396715 Search in Google Scholar

Kroll, M., Walters, B.A., and Wright, P. (2008). Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.649.10.1002/smj.649 Search in Google Scholar

Latusek, D., and Olejniczak, T. (2016). Development of trust in low-trust societies. Polish Sociological Review, 195, 309–325. Search in Google Scholar

Li, J., and Harrison, J.R. (2008). National culture and the composition and leadership structure of boards of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00697.x.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00697.x Search in Google Scholar

Lipton, M., and Lorsch, J.W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 59–77. Search in Google Scholar

Mangena, M., and Tauringana, V. (2007). Disclosure, corporate governance and foreign share ownership on the Zimbabwe stock exchange. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 18(2), 53–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-646X.2007.01008.x.10.1111/j.1467-646X.2007.01008.x Search in Google Scholar

Mangena, M., and Tauringana, V. (2008). Audit committees and voluntary external auditor involvement in UK interim reporting. International Journal of Auditing, 12(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00369.x.10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00369.x Search in Google Scholar

Mardjono, E.S., Chen, Y.S., and He, L.J. (2020). Earning management and the effect characteristics of audit committee, independent commissioners: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal Of Business And Society, 21(2), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.5430/rwe.v11n3p108.10.5430/rwe.v11n3p108 Search in Google Scholar

Mateescu, R.A. (2015). Corporate governance disclosure practices and their determinant factors in European emerging countries. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 14(1), 170. Search in Google Scholar

Méndez, C.F., and García, R.A. (2007). The effects of ownership structure and board composition on the audit committee meeting frequency: Spanish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00619.x.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00619.x Search in Google Scholar

Menon, K., and Williams, J.D. (1994). The use of audit committees for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(94)90016-7.10.1016/0278-4254(94)90016-7 Search in Google Scholar

Nicholson, G.J., and Kiel, G.C. (2007). Can directors impact performance? A case-based test of three theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 585–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00590.x.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00590.x Search in Google Scholar

Official Journal of the European Union (2006). Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Statutory Audits of Annual Accounts and Consolidated Accounts Amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and Repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC. Available at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2006/43/2014-06-16. Search in Google Scholar

Omer, T.C., Shelley, M.K., and Tice, F.M. (2020). Do director networks matter for financial reporting quality? Evidence from audit committee connectedness and restatements. Management Science, 66(8), 3361–3388. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3331.10.1287/mnsc.2019.3331 Search in Google Scholar

Pincus, K., Rusbarsky, M., and Wong, J. (1989). Voluntary formation of corporate audit committees among NASDAQ firms. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 8(4), 239–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(89)90014-8.10.1016/0278-4254(89)90014-8 Search in Google Scholar

Piot, C. (2004). The existence and independence of audit committees in France. Accounting and Business Research, 34(3), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2004.9729966.10.1080/00014788.2004.9729966 Search in Google Scholar

Post, C. and Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: a metaanalysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0319.10.5465/amj.2013.0319 Search in Google Scholar

Premuroso, R.F., and Bhattacharya, S. (2007). Is there a relationship between firm performance, corporate governance, and a firm’s decision to form a technology committee? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1260–1276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00645.x.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00645.x Search in Google Scholar

Putri, A.V., and Prasetyo, K. (2020). The Effect of Good Corporate Governance Mechanism on Earnings Management in Lq-45 Companies. Contemporary Economics, 14(4), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.11114/bms.v5i3.4313.10.11114/bms.v5i3.4313 Search in Google Scholar

Salloum, C., Jabbour, G., Digout, J., and Gebrayel, E. (2015). Managerial dominance over the board and audit committee independence in financial institutions. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 12(4), 33–42. Search in Google Scholar

Shahid, M.S., and Abbas, M. (2019). Does corporate governance play any role in investor confidence, corporate investment decisions relationship? Evidence from Pakistan and India. Journal of Economics and Business, 105(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2019. Search in Google Scholar

Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.1086/261385.10.1086/261385 Search in Google Scholar

Słomka-Gołębiowska, A., and Urbanek, P. (2016). Corporate boards, large blockholders and executive compensation in banks: Evidence from Poland. Emerging Markets Review, 28, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2016. Search in Google Scholar

Spira, L.F., and Bender, R. (2004). Compare and contrast: Perspectives on board committees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00389.x.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00389.x Search in Google Scholar

Srinidhi, B., Gul, F.A., and Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01071.x.10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01071.x Search in Google Scholar

Staszkiewicz, P. (2019). The application of citation count regression to identify important papers in the literature on non-audit fees. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(1), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-05-2017-1552.10.1108/MAJ-05-2017-1552 Search in Google Scholar

Wieczorek, A. (2012). Komitet audytu i komitet ds. wynagrodzeń w polskich bankach publicznych. Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne, 85, 309–340. Search in Google Scholar

Yeoh, P. (2007). Corporate governance models: Is there a right one for transition economies in Central and Eastern Europe? Managerial Law, 49(3), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090550710816483.10.1108/03090550710816483 Search in Google Scholar

Zaman Groff, M., and Valentinčič, A. (2011). Determinants of voluntary audit committee formation in a two-tier board system of a post-transitional economy – the case of Slovenia. Accounting in Europe, 8(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2011.621674.10.1080/17449480.2011.621674 Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, H., Owusu-Ansah, S. and Maggina, A. (2018). Board of directors, audit committee and firm performance: evidence from Greece. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 31, 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo