[
Abeysekera, I. (2018). Intangibles Disclosure on Entrepreneurial Small Businesses’ Websites to Influence Stakeholders’ Impressions. Australian Accounting Review, 30(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12277.10.1111/auar.12277
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Agostino, D. and Sidorova, Y. (2017). How social media reshapes action on distant customers: some empirical evidence. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(4), 777–794. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ0720152136.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andersen, S.E. and Høvring, C.M. (2020). CSR stakeholder dialogue in disguise: Hypocrisy in story performances. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.030.10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ardiana, P.A. (2019). Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainability Reporting: Evidence of Reputation Risk Management in Large Australian Companies. Australian Accounting Review, 29(4), 726–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12293.10.1111/auar.12293
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barone, E., Ranamagar, N. and Solomon, J.F. (2013). A Habermasian model of stakeholder (non) engagement and corporate (ir)responsibility reporting. Accounting Forum, 37(3), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.12.001.10.1016/j.accfor.2012.12.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bellucci, M. and Manetti, G. (2017). Facebook as a tool for supporting dialogic accounting? Evidence from large philanthropic foundations in the United States. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(4), 874–905. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ0720152122.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boesso, G. and Kumar, K. (2009). Stakeholder prioritization and reporting: Evidence from Italy and US, Accounting Forum, 33, 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2008.07.010.10.1016/j.accfor.2008.07.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheah, E.T., Jamali, D., Johnson, J.E.V. and Sung, MCh. (2011). Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility Attitudes: The Demography of Socially Responsible Investors. British Journal of Management, 22(2), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14678551.2011.00744.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cooper, S.M. and Owen, D.L. (2007). Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.001.10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cotter, J. and Najah, M. (2012). Institutional Investor Influence on Global Climate Change Disclosure Practices. Australian Journal of Management, 37(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896211423945.10.1177/0312896211423945
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crane, A. and Glozer, S. (2016). Researching CSR Communication: Themes, Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 1223–1225. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12196.10.1111/joms.12196
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crilly, D., Hansen, M. and Zollo, M. (2016). The Grammar of Decoupling: A CognitiveLinguistic Perspective on Firms’ Sustainability Claims and Stakeholders’ Interpretation. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 705–729. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0171.10.5465/amj.2015.0171
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cundill, G.J., Smart, P. and Wilson, H.N. (2018). Nonfinancial Shareholder Activism: A Process Model for Influencing Corporate Environmental and Social Performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20, 606–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12157.10.1111/ijmr.12157
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Danso, A., Adomako, S., Lartey, T., AmankwahAmoah, J. and OwusuYirenkyi, D. (2020). Stakeholder integration, environmental sustainability orientation and financial performance. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.038.10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.038
]Search in Google Scholar
[
David, R.J. and Han, S.K. (2004). A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.359.10.1002/smj.359
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davila, A., RodriguezLluesma, C. and Elvira, M.M. (2018). Engaging Stakeholders in Emerging Economies: The Case of Multilatinas. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 949–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1055101838207.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deegan, C. and Blomquist, C. (2006). Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWFAustralia and the Australian minerals industry. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4–5), 343–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.04.001.10.1016/j.aos.2005.04.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Denyer, D. and Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In: D. Buchanan and A. Bryman (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. London: Sage Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dias, A., Rodrigues, L.L., Craig, R. and Neves, M.E. (2018). Corporate social responsibility disclosure in small and mediumsized entities and large companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(2), 13–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ0520170090.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DitlevSimonsen, C.D. and Wenstøp, F. (2013). How stakeholders view stakeholders as CSR motivators. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(1), 137–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17471111311307868.10.1108/17471111311307868
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Driessen, P.H., Kok, R.A.W. and Hillebrand, B. (2013). Mechanisms for stakeholder integration: Bringing virtual stakeholder dialogue into organizations. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1465–1472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.009.10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. and Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14682370.2009.00276.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ElijidoTen, E., Kloot, L. and Clarkson, P. (2010). Extending the application of stakeholder influence strategies to environmental disclosures: An exploratory study from a developing country. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(8), 1032–1059. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571011092547.10.1108/09513571011092547
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erkens, M., Paugam, L. and Stolowy, H. (2015). Nonfinancial information: State of the art and research perspectives based on a bibliometric study. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, 21(3), 15–92. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.213.0015.10.3917/cca.213.0015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FernandezFeijoo, B., Romero, S. and Ruiz, S. (2013). Effect of Stakeholders’ Pressure on Transparency of Sustainability Reports within the GRI Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1055101317485.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GallegoÁlvarez, I. and Ortas, E. (2017). Corporate environmental sustainability reporting in the context of national cultures: A quantile regression approach. International Business Review, 26(2), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.09.003.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.09.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315–327. https://doi:10.1007/s105510079509y.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gunawan, J. (2015). Corporate social disclosures in Indonesia: stakeholders’ influence and motivation. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(3), 535–552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SRJ0420140048.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hales, J., Moon Jr., J.R. and Swenson, L.A. (2018). A new era of voluntary disclosure? Empirical evidence on how employee postings on social media relate to future corporate disclosures, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 68–69, 88–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.04.004.10.1016/j.aos.2018.04.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haller, A., Link, M. and Groß, T. (2017). The term ‘nonfinancial information’–a semantic analysis of a key feature of current and future corporate reporting. Accounting in Europe, 14(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2017.1374548.10.1080/17449480.2017.1374548
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herremans, I.M., Nazari, J.A. and Mahmoudian, F. (2015). Stakeholder Relationships, Engagement, and Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1055101526340.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hess, D., Rogovsky, N. and Dunfee, T.W. (2002). The next wave of corporate community investment: Corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 44, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166125.10.2307/41166125
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hess, D. and Warren, D.E. (2008). The Meaning and Meaningfulness of Corporate Social Initiatives. Business and Society Review, 113(2), 163–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14678594.2008.00317.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hillenbrand, C. and Money, K. (2013). Unpacking the Mechanism by Which Corporate Responsibility Impacts Stakeholder Relationships. British Journal of Management, 24(1), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14678551.2011.00794.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Høvring, C.M., Andersen, S.E., and Nielsen, A.E. (2018). Discursive Tensions in CSR Multistakeholder Dialogue: A Foucauldian Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1055101633304.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Howieson, W.B., Burnes, B. and Summers, J.C. (2019). Organisational leadership and/for sustainability: future directions from John Dewey and social movements. European Management Journal, 37(6), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.02.003.10.1016/j.emj.2019.02.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ISEA (1999). AccountAbility 1000 (AA1000): Standard, Guidelines and Professional Qualification. London: Institute of Social and Ethical AccountAbility.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ISO (2010). ISO 26000 and OECD Guidelines. Practical overview of the linkage. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardisation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jeffrey, C. and Perkins, J.D. (2013). Social Norms and Disclosure Policy: Implications from a Comparison of Financial and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 33(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2012.748468.10.1080/0969160X.2012.748468
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaur, A. and Lodhia, S. (2018). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability accounting and reporting: A study of Australian local councils. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 338–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ1220141901.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khojastehpour, M. and Shams, S.M.R. (2020). Addressing the complexity of stakeholder management in international ecological setting: A CSR approach. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.012.10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, C., Kim, J., Marshall, R. and Afzali, H. (2018). Stakeholder influence, institutional duality, and CSR involvement of MNC subsidiaries. Journal of Business Research, 91, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.044.10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.044
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kleyn, N., Abratt, R., Chi K. and Goldman, M.M. (2012). Building a strong corporate ethical identity: Key findings from suppliers. California Management Review, 54(3), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2012.54.3.61.10.1525/cmr.2012.54.3.61
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lai Cheng, W. and Ahmen, J. (2010). Incorporating stakeholder approach in corporate social responsibility (CSR): a case study at multinational corporations (MNCs) in Penang, Social Responsibility Journal, 6(4), 593–610. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111011083464.10.1108/17471111011083464
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lardo, A., Dumay, J., Trequattrini, R., and Russo, G. (2017). Social media networks as drivers for intellectual capital disclosure Evidence from professional football clubs. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(1), 63–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JIC0920160093.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liesen, A., Hoepner, A., Patten, D. and Figge, F. (2015). Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting? Empirical evidence from Europe, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(7), 1047–1074. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ122013–1547.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lodhia, S. and Martin, N. (2012). Stakeholder responses to the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act: An agenda setting perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571211191770.10.1108/09513571211191770
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lodhia, S. and Stone, G. (2017). Integrated reporting in an internet and social media communication environment: conceptual insights. Australian Accounting Review, 27(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12143.10.1111/auar.12143
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Looser, S. and Wehrmeyer, W. (2015). Stakeholder mapping of CSR in Switzerland, Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 780–830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SRJ0620140071.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LoulouBaklouti, S. and Triki, M. (2018). Preparers’ and users’ perception of intellectual capital information usefulness: A Tunisian exploratory study, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(3), 617–643. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC1220160147.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manetti, G. and Bellucci, M. (2016). The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(6), 985–1011. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ0820141797.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maon, F., Lindgreen, A. and Swaen, V. (2010). Organizational Stages and Cultural Phases: A Critical Review and a Consolidative Model of Corporate Social Responsibility Development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14682370.2009.00278.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Michelon, G., Rodrigue, M. and Trevisan, E. (2020). The marketization of a social movement: Activists, shareholders and CSR disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 80, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.101074.10.1016/j.aos.2019.101074
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mirvis, P.H. (2012). Employee Engagement and CSR: Transactional, Relational, and Developmental Approaches. California Journal of Management, 54(4), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2012.54.4.93.10.1525/cmr.2012.54.4.93
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mishra S. and Suar, D. (2010). Do stakeholder management strategy and salience influence corporate social responsibility in Indian companies? Social Responsibility Journal, 6(2), 306–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17471111011051784.10.1108/17471111011051784
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Noland, J. and Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder Engagement, Discourse Ethics and Strategic Management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14682370.2009.00279.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norifumi, K., Strange, R. and Zucchella, A. (2018). Stakeholder pressures, EMS implementation, and green innovation in MNC overseas subsidiaries. International Business Review, 27(5), 933–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.02.004.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.02.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Okazaki, S., Plangger, K., West, D. and Menéndez, H.D. (2020). Exploring digital corporate social responsibility communications on Twitter. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.028.10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Onkila, T., Joensuu, K. and Koskela, M. (2014). Implications of Managerial Framing of Stakeholders in Environmental Reports, Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 34(3), 134–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2013.870488.10.1080/0969160X.2013.870488
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, B.I., Chidlow, A. and Choi, J. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders influence on MNEs’ activities. International Business Review, 23(5), 966–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.02.008.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.02.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parker, C.M., Bellucci, E., Zutshi, A., Torlina, L., and Fraunholz, B. (2015). SME stakeholder relationship descriptions in website CSR communications. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(2), 364–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SRJ0920130114.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pérez, A., López, C. and GarcíaDe los Salmones, M. (2017). An empirical exploration of the link between reporting to stakeholders and corporate social responsibility reputation in the Spanish context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(3), 668–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjme.2017.05.003.10.1016/j.sjme.2017.05.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phiri, O., Mantzari, E. and Gleadle, P. (2019). Stakeholder interactions and corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices: Evidence from the Zambian copper mining sector. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(1), 26–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ0420162540.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pisano, S., Lepore, L. and Lamboglia, R. (2017). Corporate disclosure of human capital via LinkedIn and ownership structure An empirical analysis of European companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(1), 102–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JIC0120160016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pucci, T., Casprini, E., Galati, A. and Zanni, L. (in press). The virtuous cycle of stakeholder engagement in developing a sustainability culture: Salcheto winery. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.009.10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramírez Córcoles, Y., Santos Peñalver, J. F. and Tejada Ponce, Á. (2011). Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: stakeholders’ information needs. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(3), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931111154689.10.1108/14691931111154689
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramírez, Y. and Tejada, Á. (2019). Digital transparency and public accountability in Spanish universities in online media. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(5), 701–732. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC0220190039.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodrigue, M., Magnan, M. and Boulianne, E. (2013). Stakeholders’ Influence on Environmental Strategy and Performance Indicators: A Managerial Perspective. Management Accounting Research, 24, 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.06.004.10.1016/j.mar.2013.06.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scandelius, C. and Cohen, G. (2016). Achieving collaboration with diverse stakeholders – The role of strategic ambiguity in CSR communication. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3487–3499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.037.10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.037
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Surroca, J., Tribó, J.A. and Zahra, S.A. (2013). Stakeholder Pressure on MNEs and the Transfer of Socially Irresponsible Practices to Subsidiaries. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 549–572. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0962.10.5465/amj.2010.0962
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taghian, M., D’Souza, C. and Polonsky, M. (2015). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility,reputation and business performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(2), 340–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SRJ0620120068.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, Z. and Tang, J. (2018). Stakeholder Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation Congruence, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Environmental Performance of Chinese Small and MediumSized Enterprises. British Journal of Management, 29(4), 634–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/14678551.12255.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thijssens, T., Bollen, L. and Hassink, H. (2015). Secondary Stakeholder Influence on CSR Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Salience Theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 873–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1055101526233.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thomson, I., Dey, C. and Russell, S. (2015). Activism, arenas and accounts in conflicts over tobacco control. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(5), 809–845. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ0820131439.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vallaster, C., Lindgreen, A. and Maon, F. (2012). Strategically leveraging corporate social responsibility to the benefit of company and society: a corporate branding perspective. California Management Review, 54(3), 34–60. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2012.54.3.34.10.1525/cmr.2012.54.3.34
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, B., Hillenbrand, C., Money, K., Ghobadian, A. and Ireland, R.D. (2016). Exploring the Impact of Social Axioms on Firm Reputation: A Stakeholder Perspective. British Journal of Management, 27(2), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/14678551.12153.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yu, S. and Rowe, A.L. (2017). Emerging phenomenon of corporate social and environmental reporting in China. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ0920160064.
]Search in Google Scholar