1. bookVolume 53 (2019): Issue 6 (December 2019)
Journal Details
First Published
19 Aug 2008
Publication timeframe
6 times per year
access type Open Access

Sharp Differences in the Timing of Male and Female Spring Arrival in the European Stonechat, Saxicola Rubicola, and the Whinchat, S. Rubetra (Passeriformes, Muscicapidae), in North-Eastern Ukraine

Published Online: 30 Dec 2019
Page range: 483 - 490
Received: 27 Jun 2019
Accepted: 27 Sep 2019
Journal Details
First Published
19 Aug 2008
Publication timeframe
6 times per year

Protandry, or the arrival of males prior to females to the breeding grounds is a widespread phenomenon in migratory birds though rarely examined in related species in which its manifestation can vary. European Stonechat and Whinchat are such a pair studied with use of individual marking in North-Eastern Ukraine in 1993–2008. An apparent protandry was found in Whinchat but not in European Stonechat. The difference between the arrival dates of male and female Whinchats (6 days) was significant. The mean time span between territory establishment by a male and subsequent pair formation was 10.6 days. By contrast, 38% of the first records of European Stonechats in spring were those of already paired birds and the difference between arrival dates of both sexes was non-significant. The proximate cause of protandry in Whinchat and its’ absence in European Stonechat seems to be the differences (or the lack thereof) in the onset of spring migration. The time lapse between the start of migration of male and female Whinchats originates at African wintering grounds and is maintained en route. The absence of the protandry in European Stonechat is probably a relict behaviour from the residency. The protandry in migratory populations of this species is yet to be developed.


Banik, M. 2006. Brood division: One more difference between Whinchat and Common Stonechat. Journal of Ornithology, 147 (5), 131–132.Search in Google Scholar

Berthold, P. 2001. Bird Migration. A general survey. 2nd ed., Oxford university press, Oxford, 1–272.Search in Google Scholar

Blackburn, E., Creswell, W. 2015. Fine-scale habitat use during the non-breeding season suggests that winter habitat does not limit breeding populations of a declining long-distance Palearctic migrant. Journal of Avian Biology, 46 (6), 622–633.Search in Google Scholar

Borowske, A. C. 2015. Effects of life history strategies on annual events and processes in the lives of tidal Marsh Sparrows. Doct. Diss. Paper 877. University of Connecticut, 1–203.Search in Google Scholar

Canal, D., Jovani, R., Potti, J. 2012. Multiple mating opportunities boost protandry in a pied fl ycatcher population. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66 (1), 67–76.Search in Google Scholar

Christidis, L. et al. 2018. The Howard and Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World, version 4.1 (Downloadable checklist). (https://www.howardandmoore.org).Search in Google Scholar

Coppack, T., Tøttrup, A. P., Spottiswoode, C. 2006. Degree of protandry reflects level of extrapair paternity in migratory songbirds. Journal of Ornithology, 147 (2), 260–265.Search in Google Scholar

Coppack, T., Pulido, F. 2009. Proximate control and adaptive potential of protandrous migration in birds. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 49 (5), 493–506.Search in Google Scholar

Currie, D., Thompson, D. B. A., Burke, T. 2000. Patterns of territory settlement and consequences for breeding success in the Northern Wheatear Oenanthe oenanthe. Ibis, 142 (3), 389–398.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, N. B. 1976. Food, flocking and territorial behaviour of the Pied Wagtail (Motacilla alba yarrellii Gould) in winter. Journal of Animal Ecology, 45 (1), P. 235–253.Search in Google Scholar

Delgado, F. P., Coppack, T. 2010. The mechanisms underlying protandrous migration in birds. In: 25th International Ornithological Congress. Abstracts. Campos do Jordao, SP, Brasil, 213.Search in Google Scholar

Gwinner, E., Rödl, T., Schwabl, H. 1994. Pair territoriality of wintering stonechats: behaviour, function and hormones. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 34 (5), 321–327.Search in Google Scholar

Harnos, A., Nóra, Á., Kovács, Sz., Lang, Zs., Csörgő, T. 2015. Increasing protandry in the spring migration of the Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) in Central Europe. Journal of Ornithology, 156 (2), 543–546.Search in Google Scholar

Helm, B., Fiedler, W., Callion, J. 2006. Movements of European Stonechats Saxicola torquata according to ringing recoveries. Ardea, 94 (1), 33–44.Search in Google Scholar

Higuchi, H., Hirano, T. 1983. Comparative ecology of White and Japanese Wagtails, Motacilla alba and M. grandis, in winter. Tori, 32: 1–11.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, E. D. H. 1961. The pair relationship and polygyny in the Stonechat. British Birds, 54 (6), 213–225.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, E. D. H. 1971. Observations on a resident population of Stonechats in Jersey. British Birds, 64 (5), 201–213.Search in Google Scholar

Kokko, H., Gunnarsson, T. G., Morrell, L. J., Gill, J. A. 2006. Why do female migratory birds arrive later than males? Journal of Animal Ecology, 75 (6), 1293–1303.Search in Google Scholar

Kostin, Yu. V. 1983. Birds of Crimea. Nauka, Moscow, 1–249 [In Russian].Search in Google Scholar

Lehikoinen, A., Santaharju, J., Møller, A. P. 2017. Sex-specific timing of autumn migration in birds: the role of sexual size dimorphism, migration distance and differences in breeding investment. Ornis Fennica, 94 (2), 53–65.Search in Google Scholar

Leisler, B. 1990. Selection and use of habitat of wintering migrants. In: Gwinner, E., ed. Bird Migration. Physiology and Ecophysiology. Springer Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg, 156–174.Search in Google Scholar

Lerche-Jørgensen, M. 2017. Songbirds on the move. Investigating migratory patterns, winter ecology and conservation of sub-Saharan migrants. Ph.D. thesis. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 1–134.Search in Google Scholar

Maggini, I., Bairlein, F. 2012. Innate sex differences in the timing of spring migration in a songbird. PLoS One, 7 (2), e31271.Search in Google Scholar

Matthysen, E. 1993. Nonbreeding social organization in migratory and resident birds. In: Power, D. M., ed. Current Ornithology. Vol. 11. Plenum press, New York, 93–141.Search in Google Scholar

Moreau, R. E., Moreau, W. M. 1928. XV. Some notes on the habits of Palearctic migrants while in Egypt. Ibis, 70 (2), 233–252.Search in Google Scholar

Morbey, Y. E., Ydenberg, R. C. 2001. Protandrous arrival timing to breeding areas: a review // Ecology Letters, 4 (6), 663–673.Search in Google Scholar

Newton, I. 2008. The Migration Ecology of Birds. Academic Press, London, 1–984.Search in Google Scholar

Pärt, T. 2001. The effects of territory quality on age-dependent reproductive performance in the northern wheatear, Oenanthe oenanthe. Animal Behaviour, 62 (2). 379–388.Search in Google Scholar

Petersen, B. 1947. Die geographische Variation einiger Fennoskandischer Lepidopteren. Zoologiska bidrag från Uppsala, 26, 329–531.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, J. S., Greig-Smith, P. 1980. Breeding and wintering sites of Stonechats. Bird Study, 27 (4), 255–256.Search in Google Scholar

Risely, A., Blackburn, E., Cresswell, W. 2015. Patterns in departure phenology and mass gain on African non-breeding territories prior to the Sahara crossing in a long-distance migrant. Ibis, 157 (4), 808–822.Search in Google Scholar

Rödl, T. 1994. The wintering of territorial Stonechat pairs (Saxicola torquata) in Israel. Journal of Ornithology, 136 (4), 423–433.Search in Google Scholar

Rubolini, D., Spina, F., Saino, N. 2004. Protandry and sexual dimorphism in trans-Saharan migratory birds. Behavioral Ecology, 15 (4), 592–601.Search in Google Scholar

Schmaljohann, H., Meier, C., Arlt, D. et al. 2015. Proximate causes of avian protandry differ between subspecies with contrasting migration challenges. Behavioral Ecology, 27 (1), 321–331.Search in Google Scholar

Spina, F., Massi, A., Montemaggiori, A. 1994. Back from Africa: who’s running ahead? Aspects of differential migration of sex and age classes in Palearctic-African spring migrants. Ostrich, 65 (2), 137–150.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, J. A. 2015. Determinants of variation in productivity, adult survival and recruitment in a declining migrant bird: the Whinchat (Saxicola rubetra). Ph.D. thesis. Lancaster University, Lancaster, 1–300.Search in Google Scholar

Tøttrup, A. P., Thorup, K. 2008. Sex-differentiated migration patterns, protandry and phenology in North European songbird populations. Journal of Ornithology, 149 (2), 161–167.Search in Google Scholar

Urquhart, E. 2002. Stonechats. A Guide to the Genus Saxicola. Christopher Helm, London, 1–320.Search in Google Scholar

Wiklund, C., Fagerström, T. 1977. Why do males emerge before females? A hypothesis to explain the incidence of protandry in butterfl ies. Oecologia, 31 (2), 153–158.Search in Google Scholar

Zahavi, A. 1971. The social behaviour of the White Wagtail Motacilla alba alba wintering in Israel. Ibis, 113 (2), 203–211.Search in Google Scholar

Zink, R. M., Pavlova, A., Drovetski, S., Wink, M., Rohwer, S. 2009. Taxonomic status and evolutionary history of the Saxicola torquata complex. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 52 (3) 769–773.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo