1. bookVolume 53 (2019): Issue 6 (December 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
19 Aug 2008
Publication timeframe
6 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Artificial Light at Night as a New Threat for Nature Conservation in Ukraine

Published Online: 30 Dec 2019
Page range: 459 - 470
Received: 25 May 2019
Accepted: 27 Oct 2019
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
19 Aug 2008
Publication timeframe
6 times per year
Languages
English

Human society benefits a lot from artificial light at night (ALAN), but in the same time it has led to a significant increase in light pollution of the night sky during the past decades. It has serious consequences on reproduction, navigation, foraging, habitat selection, communication, trophic and social interactions of the biota. Also widespread incursion of ALAN within protected areas has been evidenced for some countries, including the National Nature Parks (NNPs), Biosphere and Nature Reserves in the Steppe Zone and Crimea Mountains of Ukraine. However, the common situation with ALAN impact on protected areas within Ukraine is unclear yet. This research attempted to estimate the level of light pollution on the NNPs, Biosphere and Nature Reserves in the Forest, Forest-Steppe zones and Carpathian Mountains within Ukraine. Kmz layers of these protected areas and the New World Atlas of Artificial Sky Brightness, through Google Earth Pro, were used to calculate the level of artificial sky brightness for 33 NNPs, 2 Biosphere Reserves and 9 Nature Reserves. The results show that majority of studied protected areas are impacted by ALAN, but some of them stay almost under the dark sky still. The situation is unique for Europe, therefore these areas have the special value for biodiversity conservation and can be recognized as refugia where natural habitats are not influenced by ALAN. Based on obtained results, recommendations for improving of nature conservation management are given in the context of ALAN problem.

Keywords

Barentine, J. 2016. Going for the Gold: Quantifying and Ranking Visual Night Sky Quality in International Dark Sky Places. International Journal of Sustainable Lighting, 18 (2), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.26607/ijsl.v18i0.16Search in Google Scholar

Beier, P. 2006. Effects of artificial night lighting on terrestrial mammals. In: Rich, C., Longcore, T., eds. Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting. Island Press, Washington, DC, 15–42.Search in Google Scholar

Bennie, J., Davies, T. W., Cruse, D., Gaston, K. J. 2016. Ecological effects of artificial light at night on wild plants. Journal of Ecology, 104, 611–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.1255110.1111/1365-2745.12551Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bennie, J., Davies, T. W., Cruse, D., Inger, R., & Gaston, K. J. 2015 a. Cascading effects of artificial light at night: Resource-mediated control of herbivores in a grassland ecosystem. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370, 20140131. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0131Search in Google Scholar

Bennie, J., Davies, T. W., Duffy, J. P., Inger, R., Gaston, K. J. 2015 b. Contrasting trends in light pollution across Europe based on satellite observed night time lights. Scientific Reports, 4, 3789. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03789Search in Google Scholar

Bennie, J., Duffy, J. P., Davies, T. W., Correa-Cano, M. E., & Gaston, K. J. 2015 c. Global trends in exposure to light pollution in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sensing, 7, 2715–2730. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs7030271510.3390/rs70302715Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brygynets, O. M. 2013. Problems of the institutions of the natural reserve fund. In: Materials for the Committee hearings in the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine ‘The Natural Reserve Fund of Ukraine: Problems and Solutions’: Implementation of the National Environmental Policy Strategy in the Field of NatureConservation: Evaluation of the Public. Center for Environmental Education and Information, Kyiv, 48–54.Search in Google Scholar

Buchanan, B. W. 2006. Observed and potential effects of artificial night lighting on anuran amphibians. In: Rich, C., Longcore, T., eds. Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting. Island Press, Washington, DC, 192–220.Search in Google Scholar

Cinzano, P., Falchi, F., Elvidge, C. D. 2001. The first World Atlas of the artificial night sky brightness. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 328 (3), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04882.x10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04882.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Da Silva, A., Kempenaers, B. 2017. Singing from North to South: Latitudinal variation in timing of dawn singing under natural and artificial light conditions. Journal of Animal Ecology, 86 (6), 1286–1297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.1273910.1111/1365-2656.12739Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Da Silva, A., Valcu, M., Kempenaers, B. 2015. Light pollution alters the phenology of dawn and dusk singing in common european songbirds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370, 20140126. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0126Search in Google Scholar

Davies, T. W., Bennie, J., Gaston, K. J. 2012. Street lighting changes the composition of invertebrate communities. Biology Letters, 8, 764–767. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0216Search in Google Scholar

Davies, T. W., Coleman, M., Griffith, K. M., Jenkins, S. R. 2015. Night-time lighting alters the composition of marine epifaunal communities. Biology Letters, 11, 20150080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0080Search in Google Scholar

Degen, T., Mitesser, O., Perkin, E. K., Weiß, N. S., Oehlert, M., Mattig, E., Hölker, F. 2016. Street lighting: sex-independent impacts on moth movement. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 85 (5), 1352–1360. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.1254010.1111/1365-2656.12540Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Desouhant, E., Gomes, E., Mondy, N., Amat, I. 2019. Mechanistic, ecological, and evolutionary consequences of artificial light at night for insects: review and prospective. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 167 (1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.1275410.1111/eea.12754Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dick, R. 2014. Applied scotobiology in luminaire design. In Lighting Research and Technology, 46 (1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/147715351350575810.1177/1477153513505758Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dick, R. 2018. Guidelines for Outdoor Lighting (Low-Impact Lighting) for RASC Dark-Sky Protection Programs (Dark-Sky Preserves, Nocturnal Preserves, Urban Star Parks). Retrieved 9 January 2019, from https://www.darksky.org/wp-content/uploads/bsk-pdf-manager/RASC-GOL_2018_51.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Dominoni, D. M., Borniger, J. C., & Nelson, R. J. 2016. Light at night, clocks and health: from humans to wild organisms. Biology Letters, 12 (2), 20160015. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0015Search in Google Scholar

Dominoni, D. M., Quetting, M., Partecke, J. 2013) Long-term effects of chronic light pollution on seasonal functions of European blackbirds (Turdus merula). PLoS ONE, 8 (12), e85069. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085069Search in Google Scholar

Eisenbeis, G. 2006. Artificial night lighting and insects: attraction of insects to streetlamps in a rural seting in Germany. In: Rich, C., Longcore, T., eds. Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting. Island Press, Washington, DC, 281–304.Search in Google Scholar

Falchi, F., Cinzano, P., Duriscoe, D., Kyba, C. C. M., Elvidge, C. D., Baugh, K., … Furgoni, R. 2016. The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness. Science Advances, 2 (6), e1600377. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600377Search in Google Scholar

Frank, K. D. 2006. Effects of artificial night lighting on moths. In: Rich, C., Longcore, T., eds. Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting. Island Press, Washington, DC, 389–412.Search in Google Scholar

Gaston, K. J., & Bennie, J. 2014. Demographic effects of artificial nighttime lighting on animal populations. Environmental Reviews, 22 (4), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2014-000510.1139/er-2014-0005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gaston, K. J., Duffy, J. P., Bennie, J. 2015. Quantifying the erosion of natural darkness in the global protected area system. Conservation Biology, 29 (4), 1132–1141. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.1246210.1111/cobi.12462Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gauthreux, S. A., Belser, C. G. 2006. Effects of artificial night lighting on migrating birds. In: Rich, C., Longcore, T., eds. Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting. Island Press, Washington, DC, 67–93.Search in Google Scholar

Grubisic, M., van Grunsven, R. H. A., Kyba, C. C. M., Manfrin, A., Hölker, F. 2018. Insect declines and agroecosystems: does light pollution matter? Annals of Applied Biology, 173 (2), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.1244010.1111/aab.12440Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Guetté, A., Godet, L., Juigner, M., Robin, M. 2018. Worldwide increase in Artificial Light At Night around protected areas and within biodiversity hotspots. Biological Conservation, 223, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.04.01810.1016/j.biocon.2018.04.018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hallmann, C. A., Sorg, M., Jongejans, E., Siepel, H., Hofland, N., Schwan, H., … de Kroon, H. 2017. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total fl ying insect biomass in protected areas. PLOS ONE, 12 (10), e0185809. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185809Search in Google Scholar

Hearnshaw, J. 2012. A new Starlight Reserve for the central South Island of New Zealand. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 10 (H16), 736. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921314013192Search in Google Scholar

Hölker, F., Moss, T., Griefahn, B., Kloas, W., Voigt, C. C., Henckel, D., … Tockner, K. 2010 a. The dark side of light: A transdisciplinary research agenda for light pollution policy. Ecology and Society, 15 (4), 13. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03685-15041310.5751/ES-03685-150413Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hölker, F., Wolter, C., Perkin, E. K., Tockner, K. 2010 b. Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25 (12), 681–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.00710.1016/j.tree.2010.09.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hopkins, G. R., Gaston, K. J., Visser, M. E., Elgar, M. A., Jones, T. M. 2018. Artificial light at night as a driver of evolution across urban-rural landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16 (8), 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1828Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, W., He, G., Ni, Y. 2017. Assessment of light pollution impact on protected areas in China. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2/ W7, P. 1307–1312. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1307-201710.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1307-2017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kempenaers, B., Borgström, P., Loës, P., Schlicht, E., Valcu, M. 2010. Artificial night lighting affects dawn song, extra-pair siring success, and lay date in songbirds. Current Biology, 20 (19), 1735–1739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.02810.1016/j.cub.2010.08.028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Leather, S. R. 2018. “Ecological Armageddon” — more evidence for the drastic decline in insect numbers. Annals of Applied Biology, 172 (1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.1241010.1111/aab.12410Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Longcore, T., Rich, C. 2004. Ecological light pollution. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2 (4), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0191:ELP]2.0.CO;210.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0191:ELP]2.0.CO;2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Macgregor, C. J., Evans, D. M., Fox, R., Pocock, M. J. O. 2017. The dark side of street lighting: impacts on moths and evidence for the disruption of nocturnal pollen transport. Global Change Biology, 23 (2), 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.1337110.1111/gcb.13371Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Macgregor, C. J., Pocock, M. J. O., Fox, R., Evans, D. M. 2015. Pollination by nocturnal Lepidoptera, and the effects of light pollution: A review. Ecological Entomology, 40 (3), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.1217410.1111/een.12174Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Manfrin, A., Lehmann, D., van Grunsven, R. H. A., Larsen, S., Syväranta, J., Wharton, G., Hölker, F. 2018. Dietary changes in predators and scavengers in a nocturnally illuminated riparian ecosystem. Oikos, 127 (7). https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.0469610.1111/oik.04696Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Montevecchi, W. A. 2006. Influences of artificial light on marine birds. In: Rich, C., Longcore, T., eds. Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting. Island Press, Washington, DC, 94–113.Search in Google Scholar

Navara, K. J., Nelson, R. J. 2007. The dark side of light at night: Physiological, epidemiological, and ecological consequences. Journal of Pineal Research, 43 (3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079X.2007.00473.x10.1111/j.1600-079X.2007.00473.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nightingale, B., Longcore, T. 2006. Artificial night lighting and fishes. In: Rich, C., Longcore, T., eds. Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting. Island Press, Washington, DC, 257–276.Search in Google Scholar

Owens, A. C. S., Lewis, S. M. 2018. The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: A review and synthesis. Ecology and Evolution, 8 (22), 11337–11358 https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.455710.1002/ece3.4557Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Peregrym, M., Pénzesné Kónya, E., Vasyliuk, O. 2018. The impact of artificial light at night (ALAN) on the National Nature Parks, Biosphere and Naturе Reserves of the Steppe Zone and Crimean Mountains within Ukraine. Palearctic Grasslands, 39, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.21570/EDGG.PG.39.8-14Search in Google Scholar

Perkin, E. K., Hölker, F., Richardson, J. S., Sadler, J. P., Wolter, C., Tockner, K. 2011. The influence of artificial light on stream and riparian ecosystems: questions, challenges, and perspectives. Ecosphere, 2 (11), art122. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES11-00241.110.1890/ES11-00241.1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Perkin, E. K., Hölker, F., Tockner, K. 2014. The effects of artificial lighting on adult aquatic and terrestrial insects. Freshwater Biology, 59 (2), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.1227010.1111/fwb.12270Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Perry, G., Buchanan, B., Fisher, R. 2008. Effects of artificial night lighting on amphibians and reptiles in urban environments. In: Jung, R. E., Mitchell, J. C. eds. Urban Herpetology. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Salt Lake, Utah, 239–256.Search in Google Scholar

Raap, T., Pinxten, R., Eens, M. 2015. Light pollution disrupts sleep in free-living animals. Scientific Reports, 5, 13557. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1355710.1038/srep13557Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Raap, T., Pinxten, R., Eens, M. 2016. Artificial light at night disrupts sleep in female great tits (Parus major) during the nestling period, and is followed by a sleep rebound. Environmental Pollution, 215, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.10010.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.100Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Raap, T., Pinxten, R., Eens, M. 2018. Cavities shield birds from effects of artificial light at night on sleep. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology, 329 (8–9), 449–456 https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.217410.1002/jez.2174Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Raap, T., Sun, J., Pinxten, R., Eens, M. 2017. Disruptive effects of light pollution on sleep in free-living birds: Season and/or light intensity-dependent? Behavioural Processes, 144, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.08.01110.1016/j.beproc.2017.08.011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rich, C., Longcore, T., eds. 2006. Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting. Island Press, Washington, DC, 1–480.Search in Google Scholar

Robert, K. A., Lesku, J. A., Partecke, J., Chambers, B. 2015. Artificial light at night desynchronizes strictly seasonal reproduction in a wild mammal. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20151745. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1745Search in Google Scholar

Rowse, E. G., Lewanzik, D., Stone, E. L., Harris, S., Jones, G. 2015. In: Voigt, C., Kingston, T., eds. Bats in the Anthropocene: Conservation of Bats in a Changing World. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland,187–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25220-9_710.1007/978-3-319-25220-9_7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rudenko, L. H., ed. 2007. National Atlas of Ukraine. DNVP Kartografiya, Kyiv,.1–440.Search in Google Scholar

Sierro, A., Erhardt, A. 2019. Light pollution hampers recolonization of revitalised European Nightjar habitats in the Valais (Swiss Alps). Journal of Ornithology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-019-01659-610.1007/s10336-019-01659-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Stone, E. L., Jones, G., Harris, S. 2012. Conserving energy at a cost to biodiversity? Impacts of LED lighting on bats. Global Change Biology, 18 (8), 2458–2465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02705.xSearch in Google Scholar

Stone, E. L., Harris, S., Jones, G. 2015. Impacts of artificial lighting on bats: A review of challenges and solutions. Mammalian Biology, 80 (3), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2015.02.00410.1016/j.mambio.2015.02.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Touzot, M., Teulier, L., Lengagne, T., Secondi, J., Théry, M., Libourel, P.-A., … Mondy, N. 2019. Artificial light at night disturbs the activity and energy allocation of the common toad during the breeding period. Conservation Physiology, 7 (1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coz00210.1093/conphys/coz002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

van Geffen, K. G., Groot, A. T., van Grunsven, R. H. A., Donners, M., Berendse, F., Veenendaal, E. M. 2015 a. Artificial night lighting disrupts sex pheromone in a noctuid moth. Ecological Entomology, 40 (4), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.1220210.1111/een.12202Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

van Geffen, K. G., van Eck, E., de Boer, R. A., van Grunsven, R. H. A., Salis, L., Berendse, F., Veenendaal, E. M. 2015 b. Artificial light at night inhibits mating in a Geometrid moth. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 8 (3), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.1211610.1111/icad.12116Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

van Geffen, K. G., van Grunsven, R. H. A., van Ruijven, J., Berendse, F., Veenendaal, E. M. 2014. Artificial light at night causes diapause inhibition and sex-specific life history changes in a moth. Ecology and Evolution, 4 (11), 2082–2089. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.109010.1002/ece3.1090Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

van Grunsven, R. H. A., Jähnichen, D., Grubisic, M., & Hölker, F. 2018. Slugs (Arionidae) benefit from nocturnal artificial illumination. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology, 329 (8–9), 429–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.217010.1002/jez.2170Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

van Langevelde, F., Ettema, J. A., Donners, M., WallisDeVries, M. F., Groenendijk, D. 2011. Effect of spectral composition of artificial light on the attraction of moths. Biological Conservation, 144 (9), 2274–2281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.00410.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

van Langevelde, F., van Grunsven, R. H. A., Veenendaal, E. M., Fijen, T. P. M. 2017. Artificial night lighting inhibits feeding in moths. Biology Letters, 13 (3), 20160874. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0874Search in Google Scholar

Verovnik, R., Fišer, Ž., Zakšek, V. 2015. How to reduce the impact of artificial lighting on moths: A case study on cultural heritage sites in Slovenia. Journal for Nature Conservation, 28, 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2015.09.00210.1016/j.jnc.2015.09.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zapata, M. J., Sullivan, S. M. P., Gray, S. M. 2019. Artificial Lighting at Night in Estuaries — Implications from Individuals to Ecosystems. Estuaries and Coasts, 42 (2), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-018-0479-310.1007/s12237-018-0479-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo