1. bookVolume 12 (2012): Issue 3 (July 2012)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2300-8733
ISSN
1642-3402
First Published
25 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Effect of Silage from Maize and Strip-Cropped Sorghum and Maize on Dairy Cow's Yield and Milk Composition

Published Online: 24 Jul 2012
Volume & Issue: Volume 12 (2012) - Issue 3 (July 2012)
Page range: 367 - 379
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2300-8733
ISSN
1642-3402
First Published
25 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Effect of Silage from Maize and Strip-Cropped Sorghum and Maize on Dairy Cow's Yield and Milk Composition

In an experiment conducted on 34 mid-lactation dairy cows of the Red-and-White and Black-and-White breed, in a random square design, the effect of maize or sorghum-maize silage present in partly mixed ration (PMR) on milk yield, milk composition and blood serum parameters was investigated. The PMR diet contained maize silage, which compared with PMR diet contained sorghum-maize silage made from strip-cropped plants. Both fodder plants were harvested with a 4-row precision chopper, which cut 2 rows of maize and 2 rows of sorghum, giving mixed maize/sorghum forage. The feeding experiment lasted 84 days and consisted of four sub-periods, each 21 days in length to record milk yield, feed and milk chemical composition, and blood parameters. In addition to PMR diets containing part of ration compound feedingstuffs, the cows received part of compound feedingstuffs given at feed stations to meet their nutritional requirement. The compound feedingstuffs in station were controlled by an electronic system related to actual cow's milk yield. Chemical composition of both silages and milk production efficiency were compared. The average dry matter intake in both groups was 18.80 vs 20.4±1.95 kg/day, but compound feedingstuff intake from station was 3.61 vs 4.56 (P>0.01). Milk yield was 21.8 and 20.5±0.51 kg/day, respectively (P>0.01). The amount of standardized fat and protein content of milk (FPCM) was 21.0 and 20.2 kg/g ±0.48 kg/day (P≥0.01). No significant differences were found in the fat, protein, casein, lactose, urea, total solids and solids not fat percentage of milk or in milk traits (acidity, renneting time, density) among groups (P≥0.01). Feeding cows PMR ration with maize silage significantly elevated total cholesterol (P<0.05), but decreased urea levels in blood plasma (P<0.01). It is concluded that strip cropping of sorghum and maize could be an alternative to maize grown as a pure stand in maize high-risk areas for dairy cows in mid-lactation.

Keywords

AOAC (1998). Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 16th Edition, Washington D. C., USA.Search in Google Scholar

Aydin G., Grant R. J., O'Rear J. (1999). Brown midrib sorghum in diets for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 82 (10): 2127-2135.Search in Google Scholar

Berenji J., Dahlberg J. (2004). Perspectives of sorghum in Europe. J. Agron. Crop. Sci., 190: 33-338.Search in Google Scholar

Bolsen K. K. (2004). Sorghum Silage: A Summary of 25 Years of Research at Kansas State University. Proc.: The Southwest Dairy Herd Management Conference, Macon, Georgia, USA, pp. 16-17.Search in Google Scholar

Cole C. A., Kaiser A. G., Piltz J. W., Harden S. (1996). An evaluation of sorghums for silage production in northern New South Wales. Proc. 3rd Australian Sorghum Conference, Tamworth, NSW. Eds M. A. Foale, R. G. Henzell, J. F. Kneipp. Australian Institute of Agricultural Science Occasional Publication, 93: 127-139.Search in Google Scholar

Dulphy J. P., Demarquilly C. (1981). Problems particuliers aux ensilages prevision de la valuer nutrive des aliments des ruminants. INRA Publ., pp. 81-104.Search in Google Scholar

Emile J. C., Al-Rifaï M., Charrier X., Leroy P., Barriere Y. (2006). Grain sorghum silages as an alternative to irrigated maize silage. Sustainable grassland productivity. Proc. 21st General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Badajoz, Spain, 3-6.04.2006, CABI Abstract.Search in Google Scholar

Grant R. J., Haddad S. G., Moore K. J., Pedersen J. F. (1995). Brown midrib sorghum silage for midlactation dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 78: 1970-1980.Search in Google Scholar

Grant R., Stock R. (1996). Harvesting corn and sorghum for silage, NebGuide. Pub. Cooperative Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, pp. 1-8.Search in Google Scholar

Gul I., Kilicalp N., Sumerli M., Kilic H. (2008). Effect of crop maturity stages on yield, silage chemical composition and in vitro digestibilities of the maize, sorghum and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids, grown in semi-arid conditions. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 7 (8): 1021-1028.Search in Google Scholar

Guorley L. M., Lusk J. W. (1978). Genetic parameters related to sorghum silage quality. J. Dairy Sci., 61: 1821-1827.Search in Google Scholar

Kozłowski S., Zielewicz W., Potkański A., Cieślak A., Szumacher-Strabel M. (2009). Effect of chemical composition of sugar sorghum and the cultivation technology on its utilization for silage production. Acta Agron. Hung., 57, 1: 67-78.Search in Google Scholar

Lance R. D., Foss D. C., Krueger C. R., Baumgardt B. R., Niedermeier R. P. (1964). Evaluation of corn and sorghum silages on the basis of milk production and digestibility. J. Dairy Sci., 47: 254-257.Search in Google Scholar

Lusk J. W., Karau P. K., Balogu D. O., Gourley L. M. (1984). Brown midrib sorghum or corn silage for milk production. J. Dairy Sci., 67: 1739-1744.Search in Google Scholar

Marsalis M. A. (2006). Sorghum forage production in New Mexico. NMSU Cooperative Extension Service Publication. Las Cruces, Guide A-332.Search in Google Scholar

Miller F. R., Stroup J. A. (2003). Brown midrib forage sorghum, sudangrass, and corn: What is the potential? Proc. 33rd California Alfalfa and Forage Symposium, pp.143-151.Search in Google Scholar

Mucha S., Brzóska F. (1983). Preliminary study of yield and chemical composition of sorghum hybrids with sudan grass grown in 1979 in Poland (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 10: 113-124.Search in Google Scholar

Nichols S. W., Froetschel M. A., Amos H. E., Ely L. O. (1998). Effect of fiber from tropical corn and forage sorghum silages on intake, digestion, and performance of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 81: 2383-2393.Search in Google Scholar

NRDC (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cows. Academy Press. Washington, D. C.Search in Google Scholar

Oliver A. L., Grant R. J., Pedersen J. F., O'Rear J. (2004). Comparison of brown midrib-6 and -18 forage sorghum with conventional sorghum and corn silage in diets of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 87: 637-644.Search in Google Scholar

Ortega G. A., Rubio R. R., Huertas V. E. (1972). Feeding value of grain sorghum silage and maize for milk production. Revista Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario, 7: 415-424.Search in Google Scholar

Ouda J. O., Njehia G. K., Ashino G. B., Mbui M. K. (2001). The potential of sorghum as ruminant feed resource. Proc. 28th Scientific Conference of the Tanzania Society of Animal Production, 28: 248-249.Search in Google Scholar

Polish Standards (PN-68-A-86122). Milk. Methods of investigation (in Polish). Polish Committee of Standarization, Warsaw.Search in Google Scholar

Roth G. W., Harper J. K. (1995). Forage sorghum. Agronomy Facts 48 The Pennsylvania State University. http://cropsoil.psu.edu/Extension/Facts/agfact48.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Sonon R. N., Souzo R., Pfaff L., Dickerosn J. T., Bolsen K. K. (1991). Effect of maturity at harvest and cultivar on agronomic performance of forage sorghum and nutritive value of selected sorghum silages. Kansas State University Cattlemen's Day, pp. 1-5.10.4148/2378-5977.2217Search in Google Scholar

Strzetelski J. (2009). IZ PIB-INRA Ruminant Nutrition Allowances (in Polish). Ed.: National Research Institute of Animal Production, Kraków.Search in Google Scholar

Subnel A. P. J., Meijer R. G. M., Straalen W. M., Van Taminga S. (1994). Efficiency of milk protein production in the DVE protein evaluation system. Livest. Prod. Sci., 40: 215-224.Search in Google Scholar

Śliwiński B. (2007). Effect of silage from sorghum grown in monoculture on cow's yield and milk composition. Report from research project no. 2235.1/2007. Ed.: National Research Institute of Animal Production, Kraków.Search in Google Scholar

Śliwiński B., Brzóska F. (2006). History of sorghum forage cultivation for silage and nutritive value (in Polish). Post. Nauk Roln., 1: 25-37.Search in Google Scholar

Tiryaki I., Andrews D. J. (2001). Germination and seedling cold tolerance in sorghum: I. Evolution of rapid screening methods. Agron. J., 93: 1386-1391.Search in Google Scholar

Undersander D. J., Smith L. H., Kaminski A. R., Kelling K. A., Doll J. D. (2000). Sorghum-Forage. Alternative Field Crops Manual. http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/afcm/forage.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Wedig C. L., Jaster E. H., Moore K. J., Merchen N. R. (1987). Rumen turnover and digestion of normal and brown midrib sorghum x sudan grass hybrid silages in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 70: 1220-1227.Search in Google Scholar

Young M. A., Dalke B. S., Sonon R. N. jr, Holthaus D. L., Bolsen K. K. (1996). Effect of grain content on nutritive value of whole-plant grain sorghum silage. Proc. XIth Int. Silage Conf., University of Wales, Aberystwyth, UK, p. 58.Search in Google Scholar

Yu J., Tuinstra M. R. (2001). Genetic analysis of seedling growth under cold temperature stress in grain sorghum. Crop. Sci., 41: 1438-1443.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo