1. bookVolume 62 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
28 Feb 2007
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Eudragit S-100 coated sodium alginate microspheres of naproxen sodium: Formulation, optimization and in vitro evaluation / Alginatne mikrosfere naproksen natrija obložene Eudragitom S-100: Priprava, optimizacija i in vitro vrednovanje

Published Online: 15 Jan 2013
Page range: 529 - 545
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
28 Feb 2007
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

The aim of the study was to prepare site specific drug delivery of naproxen sodium using sodium alginate and Eudragit S-100 as a mucoadhesive and pH-sensitive polymer, respectively. Core microspheres of alginate were prepared by a modified emulsification method followed by cross-linking with CaCl2, which was further coated with the pH dependent polymer Eudragit S-100 (2.5 or 5 %) to prevent drug release in the upper gastrointestinal environment. Microspheres were characterized by FT-IR spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry and evaluated by scanning electron microscopy, particle size analysis, drug loading efficiency, in vitro mucoadhesive time study and in vitro drug release study in different simulated gastric fluids. Stability studies of the optimized formulation were carried out for 6 months. SEM images revealed that the surface morphology was rough and smooth for core and coated microspheres, respectively. Core microspheres showed better mucoadhesion compared to coated microspheres when applied to the mucosal surface of freshly excised goat colon. The optimized batch of core microspheres and coated microspheres exhibited 98.42 ± 0.96 and 95.58 ± 0.74 % drug release, respectively. Drug release from all sodium alginate microsphere formulations followed Higuchi kinetics. Moreover, drug release from Eudragit S-100 coated microspheres followed the Korsmeyer-Peppas equation with a Fickian kinetics mechanism. Stability study suggested that the degradation rate constant of microspheres was minimal, indicating 2 years shelf life of the formulation.

Keywords

1. P. R. Veerareddy and R. P. Manthri, Formulation and evaluation of compression coated piroxicam tablets for colon specific drug delivery, Acta Pharm. Sci. 52 (2010) 281-294.Search in Google Scholar

2. G. V. Mooter, Colon drug delivery, Exp. Opin. Drug Deliv. 3 (2006) 111-125; DOI: 10.1517/17425247.3.1.111.10.1517/17425247.3.1.111Search in Google Scholar

3. K. V. V. Kumar, T. Sivakumar and T. T. Mani, Colon targeting drug delivery system: A review on recent approaches, Int. J. Pharm. Biomed. Sci. 2 (2011) 11-19.Search in Google Scholar

4. M. K. Chourasia and S. K. Jain, Pharmaceutical approaches to colon targeted drug delivery systems, J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 6 (2003) 33-66.Search in Google Scholar

5. S. Jose, M. T. Prema A. J. Chacko, A. C. Thomas and E. B. Souto, Colon specific chitosan microsphere for chronotherapy of chronic stable angina, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 83 (2011) 277-283; DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.11.033.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.11.033Search in Google Scholar

6. P. Ricchi, R. Zarrilli, A. Palma and A. Acquaviva, Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in colorectal cancer: from prevention to therapy, Br. J. Cancer 88 (2003) 803-807; DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.660082910.1038/sj.bjc.6600829Search in Google Scholar

7. M. J. Thun, J. Henley and C. Patrono, Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as anticancer agents: mechanistic, pharmacologic, and clinical issues, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 94 (2002) 252-266; DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.4.252.10.1093/jnci/94.4.252Search in Google Scholar

8. H. Berkel, R. F. Holcombe, M. Middlebrooks and K. Kannan, Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and colorectal cancer, Epidemiol. Rev. 18 (1996) 205-217.10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017926Search in Google Scholar

9. M. George and T. E. Abraham, Polyionic hydrocolloids for the intestinal delivery of protein drugs: alginate and chitosan-a review, J. Control. Release 114 (2006) 1-14; DOI: org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.017.10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.017Search in Google Scholar

10. W. M Obeidat and J. C Price, Preparation and evaluation of Eudragit S 100 microspheres as pH-sensitive release preparations for piroxicam and theophylline using the emulsion-solvent evaporation method, J. Microencapsul. 23 (2006) 195-202; DOI: 10.1080/02652040500435337.10.1080/02652040500435337Search in Google Scholar

11. N. K. Thakral, A. R. Ray, D. B. Shalom, A. H. Eriksson and D. K. Majumdar, The quest for targeted delivery in colon cancer: mucoadhesive valdecoxib microspheres, Int. J. Nanomed. 6 (2011) 1057-1068; DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S19561.10.2147/IJN.S19561Search in Google Scholar

12. Z. Rahman, K. Kohli, R. K. Khar, M. Ali, N. A. Charoo and A. A. A. Shamsher, Characterization of 5-fluorouracil microsphere for colonic delivery, AAPS PharmSciTech. 7 (2006) E1-9; DOI: 10.1208/pt070247.10.1208/pt070247Search in Google Scholar

13. K. Ganguly, T. M. Aminabhavi and A. R. Kulkarni, Colon targeting of 5-fluorouracil using polyethylene glycol cross-linked chitosan microspheres enteric coated with cellulose acetate phthalate, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50 (2011) 11797-11807; DOI: 10.1021/ie201623d.10.1021/ie201623dSearch in Google Scholar

14. S. K. Umadevi, R. Thiruganesha, S. Suresha and K. B. Reddya, Formulation and evaluation of chitosan microspheres of aceclofenac for colon-targeted drug delivery, Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 31 (2010) 407-427; DOI: 10.1002/bdd.722.10.1002/bdd.722Search in Google Scholar

15. C. M. Lehr, J. M. Bowstra, J. J. Tukker and H. E. Junginger, Intestinal transit of bioadhesive microspheres in an in situ loop in the rat, J. Control. Release 13 (1990) 51-62; DOI: org/10.1016/0168-3659(90)90074-4.10.1016/0168-3659(90)90074-4Search in Google Scholar

16. J. P. Soarse, J. E. Santos, J. O. Chierice and E. T. G. Cavalheiro, Thermal behavior of alginic acid and its sodium salt, Ecl. Quím. Sao Paulo 29 (2004) 53-56.10.1590/S0100-46702004000200008Search in Google Scholar

17. M. S. Crcarevska, M. G. Dodov and K. Goracinova, Chitosan coated Ca-alginate microparticles loaded with budesonide for delivery to the inflamed colonic mucosa, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 68 (2008) 565-578; DOI: org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.06.007.10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.06.007Search in Google Scholar

18. A. Vaidya, A. Jain, P. Khare, R. K. Agrawal and S. K. Jain, Metronidazole loaded pectin microspheres for colon targeting, J. Pharm. Sci. 98 (2009) 4229-4236; DOI: 10.1002/jps.21742.10.1002/jps.21742Search in Google Scholar

19. P. Kumar and I. Singh, Formulation and characterization of tramadol loaded IPN microgels of alginate and gelatin: optimization using response surface methodology, Acta Pharm. 60 (2010) 295-310; DOI: 10.2478/v10007-010-0021-z.10.2478/v10007-010-0021-zSearch in Google Scholar

20. M. Maghsoodi, Physicomechanical properties of naproxen-loaded microparticles prepared from eudragit L100, AAPS PharmSciTech. 10 (2009) 120-128; DOI: 10.1208/s12249-009-9186-5.10.1208/s12249-009-9186-5Search in Google Scholar

21. J. G. Wagner, Interpretation of percent dissolved-time plots derived from in vitro testing of conventional tablets and capsules, J. Pharm. Sci. 58 (1969) 1253-1257; DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600581021.10.1002/jps.2600581021Search in Google Scholar

22. T. Higuchi, Mechanism of sustained-action medication; Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices, J. Pharm. Sci. 52 (1963) 1145-1149; DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600521210.10.1002/jps.2600521210Search in Google Scholar

23. P. Costa and J. M. S. Lobo, Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 13 (2001) 123-133.Search in Google Scholar

24. N. A. Peppas, Analysis of fickian and non-fickian drug release from polymers, Pharm. Acta Helv. 60 (1985) 110-111.Search in Google Scholar

25. H. R. Chueh, H. Zia and C. P. Rhodes, Optimization of sotalol floating and bioadhesive extended release tablet formulations, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 21 (1995) 1725-1747; DOI: 10.3109/03639049509069261.10.3109/03639049509069261Search in Google Scholar

26. N. A. Peppas and P. A. Burim, Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of polymer bioadhesion on soft tissues, J. Control. Release 2 (1985) 257-275; DOI: 10.1016/0168-3659(85)90050-1.10.1016/0168-3659(85)90050-1Search in Google Scholar

27. J. D. Smart, I. W Kellaway and H. E. C. Worthington, An in-vitro investigation of mucosa-adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 36 (1984) 295-299; DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1984.tb04377.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo