1. bookVolume 2021 (2021): Issue 3 (July 2021)
Journal Details
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

The Role of Privacy in Digitalization – Analyzing Perspectives of German Farmers

Published Online: 27 Apr 2021
Page range: 334 - 350
Received: 30 Nov 2020
Accepted: 16 Mar 2021
Journal Details
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

Technological progress can disrupt domains and change the way we work and collaborate. This paper presents a qualitative study with 52 German farmers that investigates the impact of the ongoing digitalization process in agriculture and discusses the implications for privacy research. As in other domains, the introduction of digital tools and services leads to the data itself becoming a resource. Sharing this data with products along the supply chain is favored by retailers and consumers, who benefit from traceability through transparency. However, transparency can pose a privacy risk. Having insight into the business data of others along the supply chain provides an advantage in terms of market position. This is particularly true in agriculture, where there is already a significant imbalance of power between actors. A multitude of small and medium-sized farming businesses are opposed by large upstream and downstream players that drive technological innovation. Further weakening the market position of farmers could lead to severe consequences for the entire sector. We found that on the one hand, privacy behaviors are affected by adoption of digitalization, and on the other hand, privacy itself influences adoption of digital tools. Our study sheds light on the emerging challenges for farmers and the role of privacy in the process of digitalization in agriculture.


[1] Larissa Aldehoff, Meri Dankenbring, and Christian Reuter. Renouncing privacy in crisis management? people’s view on social media monitoring and surveillance. Proceedings of the Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM), pages 1184 – 1197, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Oscar Bermeo-Almeida, Mario Cardenas-Rodriguez, Teresa Samaniego-Cobo, Enrique Ferruzola-Gómez, Roberto Cabezas-Cabezas, and William Bazán-Vera. Blockchain in agriculture: A systematic literature review. In International Conference on Technologies and Innovation, pages 44–56. Springer, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00940-3_4.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Tom Biselli and Christian Reuter. On the relationship between it privacy and security behavior: A survey among german private users. Wirtschaftsinformatik 2021 Proceedings, pages 1–17, 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Anja-Tatjana Braun, Eduardo Colangelo, and Thilo Steckel. Farming in the Era of Industrie 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 72:979–984, 2018. ISSN 22128271. 10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.176. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827118303342.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Isabelle Carbonell. The ethics of big data in big agriculture. Internet Policy Review, 5(1), 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Kovila P.L. Coopamootoo and Thomas Groß. Why privacy is all but forgotten. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2017(4):97 – 118, 01 Oct. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/popets-2017-0040. URL https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/popets/2017/4/article-p97.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Juliet M Corbin and Anselm Strauss. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1):3–21, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Sven Cravotta and Markus Grottke. Digitalization in german family firms–some preliminary insights. Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business, 4(1):1–25, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1344/jesb2019.1.j051.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Helmut Doll, Ferdinand Fasterding, and Klaus Klare. Auswirkungen des landwirtschaftlichen Erbrechts auf den agrarstrukturellen Wandel in Deutschland. German Journal of Agricultural Economics, (670-2016-45544):5, 2001. 10.22004/ag.econ.98863. URL http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/98863.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Olakunle Elijah, Tharek Abdul Rahman, Igbafe Orikumhi, Chee Yen Leow, and MHD Nour Hindia. An overview of internet of things (iot) and data analytics in agriculture: Benefits and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5 (5):3758–3773, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Eurostat. Agriculture: Labour force by sex, legal statusof holding and working time, 2016. URL https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/agriculture/data/database.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Jody L Ferris. Data privacy and protection in the agriculture industry: Is federal regulation necessary. Minn. JL Sci. & Tech., 18:309, 2017. URL https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1422&context=mjlst.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Robert Finger, Scott M Swinton, Nadja El Benni, and Achim Walter. Precision Farming at the Nexus of Agricultural Production and the Environment. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 11(1):313–335, 2019. 10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-093929. URL http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-093929.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Aysha Fleming, Emma Jakku, Lilly Lim-Camacho, Bruce Taylor, and Peter Thorburn. Is big data for big farming or for everyone? perceptions in the australian grains industry. Agronomy for sustainable development, 38(3):24, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Spyros Fountas, Simon Blackmore, Daniel Ess, Steven Hawkins, G Blumhoff, James Lowenberg-Deboer, and Claus Sorensen. Farmer experience with precision agriculture in denmark and the us eastern corn belt. Precision Agriculture, 6(2):121–141, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Alistair Fraser. Land grab/data grab: precision agriculture and its new horizons. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 46 (5):893–912, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[17] David Froelicher, Patricia Egger, João Sá Sousa, Jean Louis Raisaro, Zhicong Huang, Christian Mouchet, Bryan Ford, and Jean-Pierre Hubaux. UnLynx: A Decentralized System for Privacy-Conscious Data Sharing. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2017(4):232–250, oct 2017. ISSN 2299-0984. 10.1515/popets-2017-0047. URL https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/popets/2017/4/article-p232.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Markus Gandorfer, Sebastian Schleicher, Sebastian Heuser, and Johanna Pfeiffer. Landwirtschaft 4.0 – Digital-isierung und ihre Herausforderungen. pages 9–19, 2017. URL https://www.lfl.bayern.de/mam/cms07/ilt/dateien/digitalisierung_und_ihre_herausforderungen.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Lan Ge, Christopher Brewster, Jacco Spek, Anton Smeenk, Jan Top, Frans van Diepen, Bob Klaase, Conny Graumans, and Marieke de Ruyter de Wildt. Blockchain for agriculture and food: Findings from the pilot study. Number 2017-112. Wageningen Economic Research, 2017. 10.18174/426747.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Catherine Han, Irwin Reyes, Álvaro Feal, Joel Reardon, Primal Wijesekera, Narseo Vallina-Rodriguez, Amit Elazari, Kenneth A. Bamberger, and Serge Egelman. The price is (not) right: Comparing privacy in free and paid apps. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2020(3):222 – 242, 01 Jul. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0050. URL https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/popets/2020/3/article-p222.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Sohaib S. Hassan, Christian Reuter, and Levan Bzhalava. Perception or capability? – an empirical investigation of the factors influencing the adoption of social media and public cloud in german smes. International Journal of Innovation Management, pages 1–29, 2020. 10.1142/S136391962150002X.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Reshma Kamath. Food Traceability on Blockchain: Wal-mart’s Pork and Mango Pilots with IBM. The Journal of the British Blockchain Association, 1(1):1–12, jul 2018. ISSN 25163949. 10.31585/jbba-1-1-(10)2018. URL https://jbba.scholasticahq.com/article/3712-food-traceability-onblockchain-walmart-s-pork-and-mango-pilots-with-ibm.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Maria Kernecker, Andrea Knierim, Angelika Wurbs, Teresa Kraus, and Friederike Borges. Experience versus expectation: farmers’ perceptions of smart farming technologies for cropping systems across Europe. Precision Agriculture, 21 (1):34–50, feb 2020. ISSN 1385-2256. 10.1007/s11119-019-09651-z. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-019-09651-zhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11119-019-09651-z.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Sebastian Linsner, Franz Kuntke, Gina Maria Schmidbauer-Wolf, and Christian Reuter. Blockchain in agriculture 4.0 - an empirical study on farmers expectations towards distributed services based on distributed ledger technology. In Proceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2019, MuC’19, page 103–113, New York, NY, USA, 2019. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450371988. 10.1145/3340764.3340799. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3340799.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Rob Lokers, Rob Knapen, Sander Janssen, Yke van Randen, and Jacques Jansen. Analysis of Big Data technologies for use in agro-environmental science. Environmental Modelling & Software, 84:494–504, oct 2016. ISSN 13648152. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.017. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815216304194.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Nathan Malkin, Joe Deatrick, Allen Tong, Primal Wijesekera, Serge Egelman, and David Wagner. Privacy attitudes of smart speaker users. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2019(4):250 – 271, 01 Oct. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2019-0068. URL https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/popets/2019/4/article-p250.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[28] William Melicher, Mahmood Sharif, Joshua Tan, Lujo Bauer, Mihai Christodorescu, and Pedro Giovanni Leon. (Do Not) Track Me Sometimes: Users’ Contextual Preferences for Web Tracking. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2016(2):135–154, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1515/popets-2016-0009. URL https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/popets/2016/2/article-p135.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[29] David L Morgan. Focus groups as qualitative research, volume 16. Sage publications, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Pardis Emami Naeini, Sruti Bhagavatula, Hana Habib, Martin Degeling, Lujo Bauer, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Norman Sadeh. Privacy expectations and preferences in an iot world. In Thirteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2017), pages 399–412, Santa Clara, CA, July 2017. USENIX Association. ISBN 978-1-931971-39-3. URL https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2017/technical-sessions/presentation/naeini.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Marcelo Nery, Rodrigo Santos, Wallas Santos, Vitor Lourenco, and Marcio Moreno. Facing digital agriculture challenges with knowledge engineering. In 2018 First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Industries (AI4I), pages 118–119. IEEE, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Nathan Pelletier, Eric Audsley, Sonja Brodt, Tara Garnett, Patrik Henriksson, Alissa Kendall, Klaas Jan Kramer, David Murphy, Thomas Nemecek, and Max Troell. Energy Intensity of Agriculture and Food Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36(1):223–246, 2011. 10.1146/annurev-environ-081710-161014. URL https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-081710-161014.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Anh Pham, Italo Dacosta, Bastien Jacot-Guillarmod, Kévin Huguenin, Taha Hajar, Florian Tramèr, Virgil Gligor, and Jean-Pierre Hubaux. PrivateRide: A Privacy-Enhanced Ride-Hailing Service. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2017(2):38–56, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/popets-2017-0015. URL https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/popets/2017/2/article-p38.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Mondal Pinaki and Virenda Kumar Tewari. Present status of precision farming: a review. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(12):1124–1133, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijar.2007.1.10.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Áine Regan, Stuart Green, Paul Maher, et al. Smart farming in ireland: Anticipating positive and negative impacts through a qualitative study of risk and benefit perceptions amongst expert actors in the irish agri-food sector. In Proceedings of the 13th European International Farm Systems Association Symposium, Chania, Greece, pages 1–5, 2018. URL http://ifsa.boku.ac.at/cms/fileadmin/Proceeding2018/Theme4_Regan.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Christian Reuter. Information Technology for Peace and Security - IT-Applications and Infrastructures in Conflicts, Crises, War, and Peace. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, 2019. ISBN 978-3-658-25651-7. 10.1007/978-3-658-25652-4. URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-658-25652-4.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Karin Rosskopf and Peter Wagner. Vom Daten- zum Wissensmanagement : Wofür verwenden Landwirte einen Computer ? In GIL Jahrestagung, pages 225–228, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Hamza Saleem and Muhammad Naveed. SoK: Anatomy of Data Breaches. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2020(4):153–174, oct 2020. ISSN 2299-0984. 10.2478/popets-2020-0067. URL https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/popets/2020/4/article-p153.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Mark Shepherd, James A Turner, Bruce Small, and David Wheeler. Priorities for science to overcome hurdles thwarting the full promise of the ‘digital agriculture’revolution. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Daniel Smullen, Yuanyuan Feng, Shikun Aerin Zhang, and Norman Sadeh. The best of both worlds: Mitigating trade-offs between accuracy and user burden in capturing mobile app privacy preferences. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2020(1):195 – 215, 01 Jan. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0011. URL https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/popets/2020/1/article-p195.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Statistisches Bundesamt. Land- und Forstwirtschaft. In Statistisches Jahrbuch 2019, chapter 19, pages 487–520. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), Wiesbaden, 2019. URL https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Querschnitt/Jahrbuch/statistisches-jahrbuch-2019-dl.pdf?{_}{_}blob=publicationFile.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Michael E Sykuta. Big Data in Agriculture: Property Rights, Privacy and Competition in Ag Data Services. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, (1030-2016-83141):18, jun 2016. 10.22004/ag.econ.240696. URL http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/240696.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Antonis Tzounis, Nikolaos Katsoulas, Thomas Bartzanas, and Constantinos Kittas. Internet of Things in agriculture, recent advances and future challenges. Biosystems Engineering, 164:31–48, dec 2017. ISSN 15375110.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.09.007. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1537511017302544.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Sjaak Wolfert, Lan Ge, Cor Verdouw, and Marc-Jeroen Bogaardt. Big Data in Smart Farming – A review. Agricultural Systems, 153:69–80, may 2017. ISSN 0308521X.10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0308521X16303754.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Yu Gu and Tiaobin Jing. The IOT research in supply chain management of fresh agricultural products. In 2011 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce (AIM-SEC), pages 7382–7385. IEEE, aug 2011. ISBN 978-1-4577-0535-9. 10.1109/AIMSEC.2011.6011477. URL http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6011477/.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Airong Zhang, Emma Jakku, Rick Llewellyn, and EA Bake. Surveying the needs and drivers for digital agriculture in australia. Farm Policy Journal, 15(1):25–39, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Verena Zimmermann, Paul Gerber, Karola Marky, Leon Böck, and Florian Kirchbuchner. Assessing users’ privacy and security concerns of smart home technologies. i-com, 18 (3):197–216, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo