Analysis of Instantaneous Ship Resistance-Increase in Waves with CFD URANS

1 Storm-Tejsen J, Yeh HYH, Moran DD. Added resistance in waves. Trans Soc Nav Archit Mar Eng 81, 250–279, 1973. Search in Google Scholar

2 Fujii H, Takahashi T. Experimental study on the resistance increase of a ship in regular oblique waves. In Proceedings of the 14th ITTC, no. 351–360. Ottawa, 1975. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.1975.132 Search in Google Scholar

3 Nakamura S, Naito S. Propulsive performance of a containership in waves. J Soc Nav Archit Jpn 15, 24–48, 1977. Search in Google Scholar

4 Kashiwagi M, Sugimoto K, Ueda T, Yamasaki K, Arihama K, Kimura K, Yamashita R, Itoh A, Mizokami S. An analysis system for propulsive performance in waves. J Kansai Soc Nav Architect 241, 67–82, 2004. Search in Google Scholar

5 Kashiwagi, M. Hydrodynamic study on added resistance using unsteady wave analysis. J Ship Res 57, 220–240, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5957/JOSR.57.4.130036 Search in Google Scholar

6 Guo B, Steen S, Evaluation of added resistance of KVLCC2 in short waves. J Hydrodyn 23(6), 709–722, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60168-0 Search in Google Scholar

7 Park DM, Lee J, Kim Y. Uncertainty analysis for added resistance experiment of KVLCC2 ship. Ocean Eng 95, 143–156, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.12.007 Search in Google Scholar

8 Lee J, Park DM, Kim Y. Experimental investigation on the added resistance of modified KVLCC2 hull forms with different bow shapes. J Eng Marit Environ 231(2), 395–410, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

9 Lee JH, Kim BS, Kim Y. Study on steady flow effects in numerical computation of added resistance of ship in waves. In 10th International Workshop on Ship and Marine Hydrodynamics, Keelung, Taiwan, 5–8 November, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

10 Joncquez SAG. Second-order forces and moments acting on ships in waves. PhD Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark, 2009. Search in Google Scholar

11 Simonsen CD, Otzen JF, Nielsen C, Stern F. CFD prediction of added resistance of the KCS in regular head and oblique waves. In 30th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 2–7 November 2014. Search in Google Scholar

12 Stocker MR. Surge free added resistance tests in oblique wave headings for the KRISO container ship model. MS Thesis, University of Iowa, USA, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

13 Valanto P, Hong Y. Experimental investigation on ship wave added resistance in regular head, oblique, beam and following waves. In Proceedings of the 25th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Big Island. Hawaii, USA, 21–26 June 2015. Search in Google Scholar

14 Orihara H, Miyata H. Evaluation of added resistance in regular incident waves by computational fluid dynamics motion simulation using an overlapping grid system. J Mar Sci Technol 8, 47–60, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-003-0163-5 Search in Google Scholar

15 Guo BJ, Steen S, Deng GB. Seakeeping prediction of KVLCC2 in head waves with RANS. Appl Ocean Res 35, 56–67, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2011.12.003 Search in Google Scholar

16 Sadat-Hosseini H, Wu P, Carrica PM, Kim H, Toda H, Stern F. CFD verification and validation of added resistance and motions of KVLCC2 with fixed and free surge in short and long head waves. Ocean Eng 59, 240–273, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.12.016 Search in Google Scholar

17 Yang KK, Kim Y. Numerical analysis of added resistance on blunt ships with different bow shapes in short waves. J Mar Sci Technol 22, 245–258, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-016-0407-9 Search in Google Scholar

18 Faltinsen OM, Minsaas KJ, Liapis N, Skjørdal SO. Prediction of resistance and propulsion of a ship in a seaway. In Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Tokyo, Japan, no. 505–529, 1980. Search in Google Scholar

19 Kuroda M, Tsujimoto M, Fujiwara T, Ohmatsu S, Takagi K. Investigation on components of added resistance in short waves. J Jpn Soc Nav Archit Ocean Eng 8, 171–176, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe.8.171 Search in Google Scholar

20 Kuroda M, Tsujimoto M, Sasaki N, Ohmatsu S, Takagi, K. Study on the bow shapes above the waterline in view of the powering and green-house gas emissions in actual seas. J Eng Marit Environ 226(1), 23–35, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090211424116 Search in Google Scholar

21 Tsujimoto M, Shibata K, Kuroda M, Takagi K. A practical correction method for added resistance in waves. J Jpn Soc Nav Archit Ocean Eng 8, 141–146, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe.8.177 Search in Google Scholar

22 Liu SK, Papanikolaou A. On the prediction of added resistance of large ships in representative seaways. Ships and Offshore Struct 12, 690–696, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2016.1200452 Search in Google Scholar

23 Liu SK, Papanikolaou A. Approximation of the added resistance of ships with small draft or in ballast condition by empirical formula. Proc IME M J Eng Marit Environ no. 1–14, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090217710099 Search in Google Scholar

24 MPEC 70/INF.30. Air pollution and energy efficiency: Supplementary information on the draft revised guidelines for determining minimum propulsion power to maintain the manoeuvrability of ships in adverse conditions. IMO Report, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

25 Yang KK, Kim Y, Jung YW. Enhancement of asymptotic formula for added resistance of ships in short wave. Ocean Eng 148, 211–222, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.010 Search in Google Scholar

26 Maruo H. The drift of a body floating on waves. J Ship Res 4, 1–10, 1960. Search in Google Scholar

27 Newman JN, The drift force and moment on ships in waves. J. Ship Res. 11, 51–60, 1967. https://doi.org/10.5957/jsr.1967.11.1.51 Search in Google Scholar

28 Joncquez SAG. Comparison results from S-OMEGA and AEGIR. FORCE Technology Report No. FORCE107-24345, p. 21, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

29 Kim KH, Kim Y. Numerical study on added resistance of ships by using a time-domain Rankine panel method. Ocean Eng 38, 1357–1367, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.04.008 Search in Google Scholar

30 Kim KH, Seo MK, Kim Y. Numerical analysis on added resistance of ships. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 21, 21–29, 2012. Search in Google Scholar

31 Pletcher RH, Tannehill JC, Anderson DA. Computational fluid mechanics and heat transfer, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 2013. Search in Google Scholar

32 Tennekes H, Lumley JL. A first course in turbulence. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Chs. 2 and 5; 1972. Search in Google Scholar

33 Choi J, Yoon SB. Numerical simulations using momentum source wave-maker applied to RANS equation model. Coast Eng 56, 1043–1060, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2009.06.009 Search in Google Scholar

34 Park JC, Kim MH, Miyata H. Fully non-linear free-surface simulations by a 3D viscous numerical wave tank. Int J Numer Methods Fluid 29, 685–703, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19990330)29:6<685::AIDFLD807>3.0.CO;2-D Search in Google Scholar

35 Peric R, Abdel-Maksoud M. Reliable damping of free surface waves in numerical simulations, 63. Ship Technology Research, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09377255.2015.1119921 Search in Google Scholar

36 Tucker P. Turbulence. In: Advanced computational fluid and aerodynamics (Cambridge Aerospace Series, no. 260–361). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139872010.006 Search in Google Scholar

37 Menter FR, Kuntz M, Langtry R. Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. In: Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer 4(1), 625–632, 2003. Search in Google Scholar

38 ITTC Procedures, Guidelines, Uncertainty Analysis in CFD Verification and Validation, 7, 5-03-01-01, 2008. Search in Google Scholar

39 Ghaemi MH, Zeraatgar H. Analysis of hull, propeller and engine interactions in regular waves by a combination of experiment and simulation. J Mar Sci Technol 26(1), 257–272, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-020-00734-5 Search in Google Scholar

40 Ghaemi MH, Zeraatgar H. Negative impact of constant RPM control strategy on ship NOx emission in waves. Int J Energy Environ. Eng 1–16, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-022-00542-0 Search in Google Scholar

41 Acanfora M, Altosole M, Balsamo F, Micoli L, Campora, U. Simulation modeling of a ship propulsion system in waves for control purposes. J Mar Sci Eng 10(1), 36, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10010036 Search in Google Scholar

42 Chakrabarti S. Handbook of offshore engineering, Vols. 1 & 2. Elsevier; 2005. Search in Google Scholar

43 Ghaemi MH, Zeraatgar H, Bozorgmehr A. Analysis of correlation between instantaneous resistance-increase in waves and ship motion for reducing the fuel consumption, Sh. Offshore Struct. (Accepted for publication on 13.12.2024). Search in Google Scholar

44 ITTC Recommended procedures and guidelines: Practical guidelines for ship CFD applications. 2011. Search in Google Scholar

45 Sadeghi M, Zeraatgar H, Ghaemi MH, Barjasteh M. Time-domain numerical evaluation of ship resistance and motion in regular waves by using the CFD URANS method. International Symposium on Hydrodynamics in Ship Design Safety, Manoeuvring and Operation, HYDRONAV 2023, Sopot, Poland, Polish Register of Shipping and Gdansk University of Technology, 2023. Search in Google Scholar

46 Sadeghi M, Zeraatgar H. Investigation on the effect of anti-pitch fins for reducing the motion and acceleration of ships using computational fluid dynamics. Ocean Eng 267, 112965, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112965 Search in Google Scholar

47 Oyuela S, Ojeda HRD, Arribas FP, Otero AD, Sosa R. Investigating fishing vessel hydrodynamics by using EFD and CFD tools, with focus on total ship resistance and its components.J Mar Sci Eng 12, 622, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12040622 Search in Google Scholar

48 Chirosca AM, Medina A, Pacuraru F, Saettone S, Rusu L, Pacuraru S. Experimental and numerical investigation of the added resistance in regular head waves for the DTC hull. J Mar Sci Eng 11, 852, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11040852 Search in Google Scholar

49 Kim YR, Steen S, Diogo K, Muri H, Strømman AH. Modelling of ship resistance and power consumption for the global fleet: The MariTEAM model. Ocean Eng 281, 114758, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114758 Search in Google Scholar

50 Mittendorf M, Nielsen UD, Bingham HB, Dietz J. Assessment of added resistance estimates based on monitoring data from a fleet of container vessels. Ocean Eng 272, 113892, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113892 Search in Google Scholar

51 Liu, S, Papanikolaou, A. Improvement of the prediction of the added resistance in waves of ships with extreme main dimensional ratios through numerical experiments. Ocean Eng 273, 113963, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113963 Search in Google Scholar

52 Cho JH, Lee SH, Oh D, Paik KJ. A numerical study on the added resistance and motion of a ship in bow quartering waves using a soft spring system. Ocean Eng 280, 114620, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114620 Search in Google Scholar

53 Cepowski T. The use of a set of artificial neural networks to predict added resistance in head waves at the parametric ship design stage. Ocean Eng 281, 114744, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114620 Search in Google Scholar

54 Dai K, Li Y, Gong J, Fu Z, Li A, Zhang D. Numerical study on propulsive factors in regular head and oblique waves. Brodogradnja 73, 1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.21278/brod73103 Search in Google Scholar

55 Saydam AZ, Küçüksu GN, İnsel M, Gökçay S. Uncertainty quantification of self-propulsion analyses with RANS-CFD and comparison with full-scale ship trials. Brodogradnja 73, 4, 2022. https://doi.org/10.21278/brod73406 Search in Google Scholar

56 ITTC, General guidelines for uncertainty analysis in resistance tests. In 7.5-02-02-02, editor. ITTC- Recommended procedures 2014. Search in Google Scholar