1. bookVolume 16 (2020): Issue 2 (September 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1801-3422
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

How is Expert Knowledge Diffused in International Politics and What Makes It Actionable? Epistemic Infrastructure: a new Framework for Analysis

Published Online: 18 Sep 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 16 (2020) - Issue 2 (September 2020)
Page range: 455 - 477
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1801-3422
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The central focus of this article has been expert knowledge diffusion in international politics, particularly questions such as “how does expert knowledge move from its origin position to international politics and begin to influence it?”, “what decides that specific expert knowledge will diffuse within international politics and be actionable, and another expert knowledge will not?”, and “how do we research expert knowledge diffusion in international politics?”. Here an interdisciplinary study is presented and suggests an innovative approach to how to study expert knowledge diffusion in international politics: 1. The concept of epistemic infrastructure, where epistemic infrastructure is understood as the spatio-temporal hybrid entity with the agency which makes expert knowledge diffusion in international politics possible and which essentially structures this environment; and 2. Epistemic infrastructure as the framework for analysis, which offers a way to research the connections between science, technology, politics and society in the processes of expert knowledge diffusion in international politics.

Keywords

Abbott, A. (2005): Linked Ecologies: States and Universities as Environments for Professions, Sociological Theory. 23 (3): 245–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00253.x10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00253.xSearch in Google Scholar

Acuto, M. and Curtis, S. (eds.) (2014): Reassembling International Theory. Assemblage Thinking and International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137383969Search in Google Scholar

Adler, E. and Pouliot, V. (2011): International practices. International Theory 3 (1): 1–36.10.1017/CBO9780511862373Search in Google Scholar

Allan, B. B. (2018): From subjects to objects: Knowledge in International Relations theory. European Journal of International Relations 24 (4): 841–864.10.1177/1354066117741529Search in Google Scholar

Axlerod, R. (1976): Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Amin, A., and Cohendet, P. (2004): Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199253326.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Antoniades, A. (2003): Epistemic Communities, Episteme and the Construction of (World) Politics. Global Society 17 (1): 21–38.10.1080/0953732032000053980Search in Google Scholar

Baker, T. and McGuirk, P. (2017): Assemblage thinking as methodology: commitments and practices for critical policy research. Territory, Politics, Governance 5 (4): 425–442. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2016.123163110.1080/21622671.2016.1231631Search in Google Scholar

Borgatti, S.P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., Labianca, G. (2009): Network Analysis in the Social Sciences. Science 323 (5916): 892–5.10.1126/science.1165821Search in Google Scholar

Bueger, Ch. (2013): Communities of Security Practice at Work? The Emerging African Maritime Security Regime. African Security 6 (3–4): 297–316.10.1080/19392206.2013.853579Search in Google Scholar

Bueger, Ch. (2015): Making Thing Known. Epistemic Practices, the United Nations, and the Translation of Piracy. International Political Sociology 9 (1): 1–18.Search in Google Scholar

Bueger, Ch. and Gadinger, F. (2018): International Practice Theory, 2nd substantially revised edi-tion. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73350-0.10.1007/978-3-319-73350-0Search in Google Scholar

Burawoy, M. (2000): Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections, and Imaginations in a Postmodern World. With J.A. Blum, S. George, Z. Gille, T. Gowan, L. Haney, M. Klawiter, S.H. Lopez, S. Ó Riain, and M. Thayer.Search in Google Scholar

Burt, R.S. (1992): Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674029095Search in Google Scholar

Callon, M. (1986): Some elements of a sociology of translation; domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay, in Law J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Search in Google Scholar

Caplan, N. (1979): The Two-Communities Theory and Knowledge Utilization. American Behavioral Scientist 22 (3): 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642790220030810.1177/000276427902200308Search in Google Scholar

Coe, N.M. a Bunnell T.G. (2003): Spatializing’ knowledge communities: towards a conceptualization of transnational innovation networks. Global Networks. A journal of transnational affairs 3 (4): 437–456.10.1111/1471-0374.00071Search in Google Scholar

Collier, S.J. and A. Ong (2005): GlobalAssemblages, Anthropological Problems, in S.J. Collier and A. Ong (eds), GlobalAssemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethicsas Anthropological Problems. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. (1987): A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Desmond, M. (2014): Relational Ethnography. Theory and Society 43: 547–579.10.1007/s11186-014-9232-5Search in Google Scholar

Eller, J. D. (2014): Social Science and Historical Perspectives Science, Society, and Ways of Knowing. London: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, D. and Kim, L. (2001): Global Production Networks, Knowledge Diffusion, and Local Capability Formation: A Conceptual Framework. East West Center Working Papers, Economics Series 19, May, Honolulu.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2019): Microplastic Poolution, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/sam/index.cfm?pg=pollution#.Search in Google Scholar

Evers, H. D. (2000): Epistemic Cultures: Towards a New Sociology of Knowledge. Bielefeld Working paper 330. University of Bielefeld: Sociology of Development Research Centre.Search in Google Scholar

Fox, N. J. and Alldred, P. (2015): New materialist social inquiry: designs, methods and the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18 (4): 399–414, doi: 10.1080/13645579.2014.921458.10.1080/13645579.2014.921458Search in Google Scholar

Gergen, K. J. and Gergen, M. (2004): Social construction: Entering the dialogue. Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gilardy, F. (2012): Transnational diffusion: norms, ideas and policies. in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. Simmons (eds). Handbook of International Relations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 453–477.Search in Google Scholar

Gluckman, P. (2014): The art of science advice to government. Nature 507: 163–165.10.1038/507163aSearch in Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. (1973): The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–80.10.1086/225469Search in Google Scholar

Grundmann R. (2017): The Problem of Expertise in Knowledge Societies. Minerva 55 (1): 25–48. doi:10.1007/s11024-016-9308-710.1007/s11024-016-9308-7Search in Google Scholar

Haas, E.B. (1975): Is there a hole in the whole? Knowledge, technology, interdependence and the construction of international regimes. International Organization 39 (3): 827–876.10.1017/S0020818300031787Search in Google Scholar

Haas, P. M. (1992): Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (1): 1–35.10.1017/S0020818300001442Search in Google Scholar

Haas, P. (2004): When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4): 569–592, doi: 10.1080/1350176042000248034.10.1080/1350176042000248034Search in Google Scholar

Hajer, M.A. (1993): ‘Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Britain’, in The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, edited by Frank Fischer and John Forester, 43–77. Durham and London: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822381815-003Search in Google Scholar

Hall, J. (ed.) (1989): The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691221380Search in Google Scholar

Hveem, H. and Knutsen, C. (ed.) (2012): Governance and Knowledge. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203118450Search in Google Scholar

Checkel, J. (2005): International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organization 59 (4): 801–826, doi:10.1017/S0020818305050289.10.1017/S0020818305050289Search in Google Scholar

Christakic, N.A. and Fowler, J.H. (2007): The spread of obesity in a large social network in last 32 years. The New England Journal of Medicine 4 (357): 370–379.10.1056/NEJMsa066082Search in Google Scholar

Irwin, A. and Michael, M. (2003): Science, social theory and public knowledge. Open University Press: Philadelphia.Search in Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. (ed.) (2004): States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Joint Research Center – EU Science Hub. (non-dated), availible at: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en.Search in Google Scholar

Kahler, M. (2009): Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance. Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K. (1998): Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K.K. (2003): From Pipes to Scopes: The Flow Architecture of Financial Markets. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 4 (2): 7–23, doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2003.9672857.10.1080/1600910X.2003.9672857Search in Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K.K. (2005): Complex Global Microstructures: The New Terrorist Societies. Theory, Culture & Society 22 (5): 213–234, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405057200.10.1177/0263276405057200Search in Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K.K. (2007): Culture in global knowledge societies: knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 32 (4): 361–375.10.1179/030801807X163571Search in Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K.K. and Bruegger, U. (2002): ‘Traders’ Engagement with Markets’. Theory, Culture & Society 19 (5–6): 161–185, https://doi.org/10.1177/026327602761899200.10.1177/026327602761899200Search in Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2005): Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Law, J. (1987): ‘Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion’, in Bijker, Hughes & Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lazega, E. (1992): Micropolitics of Knowledge. Communication and Indirect Control in Workgroups. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, K.-Y., King, M., Bearman, P. S. (2010): Social Influence and the Autism Epidemic. AJS; American Journal of Sociology 115 (5): 1387–1434.10.1086/651448Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, D. and J.C. Sharman (2009). Policy diffusion and policy transfer. Policy Studies 30 (3): 269–288, doi: 10.1080/01442870902863851.10.1080/01442870902863851Search in Google Scholar

Mützel, S. (2009): Networks as Culturally Constituted Processes: A Comparison of Relational Sociology and Actor-network Theory. Current Sociology 57 (6): 871–887.10.1177/0011392109342223Search in Google Scholar

Newmark, A. J. (2002): An Integrated Approach to Policy Transfer and Diffusion. Review of Policy Research 19: 151–178, doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00269.x.10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00269.xSearch in Google Scholar

Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2003): Introduction: ‚Mode 2‘ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Minerva 41 (3): 179–194.10.1023/A:1025505528250Search in Google Scholar

Oliver, K., Lorenc, T. and Innvær, S. (2014): New directions in evidence-based policy research: A critical analysis of the literature. Health Res Policy Syst 12 (1): https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-34.10.1186/1478-4505-12-34Search in Google Scholar

Prince, R. (2010): Policy Transfer as Policy Assemblage: Making Policy for the Creative Industries in New Zealand. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 42 (1): 169–186, https://doi.org/10.1068/a4224.10.1068/a4224Search in Google Scholar

Ravetz, J. (2012): ‘Keep Standards High: Sociology of Science’. Nature 481 (7379): 25.Search in Google Scholar

Ravtz, J. (2016): How should we treat science’s growing pains? The Guardian, June 8.Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, E. (1983/2003): Diffusion of Innovations. (5th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG. (1975): International responses to technology: Concepts and trends. International Organization 29 (3): 557–583.10.1017/S0020818300031696Search in Google Scholar

Ryan P. G. (2015): ‘A Brief History of Marine Litter Research’, in Bergmann M., Gutow L., Klages M. (eds), Marine Anthropogenic Litter. Springer, Cham10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_1Search in Google Scholar

Saxenian, A.L. (1999): Silicon Valley’s New Immigrant Entrepreneurs. Public Policy Institute of California: San Francisco.10.1515/9781503619180-018Search in Google Scholar

Saxenian, A. (2008): The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. Economic Geography 84: 105–108, doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00393.x.10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00393.xSearch in Google Scholar

Sending, O.J. (2015) The Politics of Expertise: Competing for Authority in Global Governance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.4016693Search in Google Scholar

Schimmelfenning, F. (2008): EU political accession conditionality after the 2004 enlargement: consistency and effectiveness. Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 918–937.10.1080/13501760802196861Search in Google Scholar

Star, S.L. and Ruhleder K. (1994): Steps towards the ecology of infrastructure. Information system research: 253–264.10.1145/192844.193021Search in Google Scholar

Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2012): ‘For All By All?’ in Klees S.J., Samoff J., Stromquist N.P. (eds), The World Bank and Education. Comparative and International Education (A Diversity of Voices), 14. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.Search in Google Scholar

Stone, D. (2013): Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance, Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137022912Search in Google Scholar

Stone, D. (2010): ‘Knowledge and Policy Networks in Global Governance’, in Brigitte Young (ed.) Gender Knowledge and Knowledge Networks in the International Political Economy, Baden-Baden: Nomos.10.5771/9783845223858-36Search in Google Scholar

Strang, D. (1991): Adding Social Structure to Diffusion Models: An Event History Framework. Sociological Methods & Research 19 (3) 324–353.10.1177/0049124191019003003Search in Google Scholar

Voß, J.-P. and Simons, A. (2014): Instrument constituencies and the supply side of policy innovation: The social life of emissions trading. Environmental Politics 23: 735–754.10.1080/09644016.2014.923625Search in Google Scholar

Waisová, Š. (2018): Human security: An analysis of the dissemination of the idea in the world politics. Politics in Central Europe 14 (3): 75–99.10.2478/pce-2018-0019Search in Google Scholar

Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994): Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815478Search in Google Scholar

Weible, C., Sabatier, P. and Jenkins Smith, H. (2011): ‘A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework: An introduction to the special issue’. Policy Studies Journal 39: 349–360.10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00412.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wenger, E. (1998): Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932Search in Google Scholar

Wittrock, B., Wagner, P., and Wollmann, H. (1991): ‘Social science and the modern state: Policy knowledge and political institutions in Western Europe and the United States’, in P. Wagner, C. Weiss, B. Wittrock, & H. Wollman (eds.), Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads (Advances in Political Science, 28–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511983993.002.10.1017/CBO9780511983993.002Search in Google Scholar

World Bank (1998/1999): Knowledge for Development. World Development Report, availible at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5981.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo