1. bookVolume 16 (2020): Issue 2 (September 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1801-3422
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Online Political Communication Research Methods

Published Online: 18 Sep 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 16 (2020) - Issue 2 (September 2020)
Page range: 433 - 454
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1801-3422
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The authors explored the research methods of the manifold studies on online political communication published in nine selected scientific journals over an 8-year period stretching from the beginning of 2009 to March 2017 and systematized the results into a comprehensive, methodological, “state-of-the-art” report. The main findings are that the most frequent method of researching online political communication is the quantitative or qualitative content analysis. Still, recurrent is the combination of methodological approaches, where the quantitative and qualitative techniques complement each other. Moreover, the research of political communication in general, but online especially, has become more an interdisciplinary field. Yet the collection and analysis of data from new media and social networks requires more and more advanced expert skills.

Keywords

Aragón, Pablo et al. (2013): Communication Dynamics in Twitter During Political Campaigns: The Case of the 2011 Spanish National Election. Policy & Internet 5(2): 183–206. DOI: 10.1002/1944-2866.POI327.10.1002/1944-2866.POI327Search in Google Scholar

Ausserhofer, Julian – Axel Maireder (2013): National politics on twitter Twitter. Structures and topics of a networked public sphere. Information, Communication & Society 16(3): 291–314. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050.10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050Search in Google Scholar

Bentivegna, Sara – Rita Marchetti (2015): Live tweeting a political debate: The case of the ‘Italia bene comune’. European Journal of Communication 30(6): 631–647. DOI: 10.1177/0267323115595526.10.1177/0267323115595526Search in Google Scholar

Bode, Leticia – Ben Epstein (2015): Campaign Klout: Measuring Online Influence During the 2012 Election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 12(2): 133–148. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2014.994157.10.1080/19331681.2014.994157Search in Google Scholar

Borah, Porismita (2016): Political Facebook Use: Campaign Strategies Used in 2008 and 2012 Presidential Elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13(4): 362–338. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2016.1163519.10.1080/19331681.2016.1163519Search in Google Scholar

Ceron, Andrea (2017), Intra-party politics in 140 characters. Party Politics 23(1): 7–17. DOI: 10.1177/1354068816654325.10.1177/1354068816654325Search in Google Scholar

Ceron, Andrea – Luigi Curini (2016): e-Campaigning in the 2014 European elections: The emphasis on valence issues in a two-dimensional multiparty system. Party Politics. DOI: 10.1177/1354068816642807.10.1177/1354068816642807Search in Google Scholar

Ceron, Andrea – Giovanna, d’Adda (2016): E-campaigning on Twitter: The effectiveness of distributive promises and negative campaign in the 2013 Italian election. New Media & Society 18(9): 1935–1955. DOI: 10.1177/1461444815571915.10.1177/1461444815571915Search in Google Scholar

Ceron, Andrea et al. (2014): Every tweet counts? How sentiment analysis of social media can improve our knowledge of citizens’ political preferences with an application to Italy and France. New Media & Society 16(2): 340–358. DOI: 10.1177/1461444813480466.10.1177/1461444813480466Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Peter John – Peter Jay Smith (2011): Digital Media in the 2008 Canadian Election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 8(4): 399–417. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2011.559734.10.1080/19331681.2011.559734Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, Christian (2013): Wave-riding and hashtag-jumping: Twitter, minority ‘third parties’ and the 2012 US elections. Information, Communication & Society 16(5): 646–666. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.783609.10.1080/1369118X.2013.783609Search in Google Scholar

Church, Scott H (2010): YouTube Politics: YouChoose and Leadership Rhetoric During the 2008 Election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 7(2–3): 124–142. DOI: 10.1080/19331681003748933.10.1080/19331681003748933Search in Google Scholar

Dang-Xuan, Linh et al. (2013): An investigation of influentials and the role of sentiment in political communication on twitter during election periods. Information, Communication & Society 16(5): 795–825. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.783608.10.1080/1369118X.2013.783608Search in Google Scholar

Druckman, James N. – Martin J. Kifer – Michael Parkin (2010): Timeless Strategy Meets New Medium: Going Negative on Congressional Campaign Web Sites, 2002–2006. Political Communication 27(1): 88–103. DOI: 10.1080/10584600903502607.10.1080/10584600903502607Search in Google Scholar

Edgerly, Stephanie et al. (2016): Posting about politics: Media as resources for political expression on Facebook. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13(2): 108–125. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2016.1160267.10.1080/19331681.2016.1160267Search in Google Scholar

Enli, Gunn Sara – Eli Skogerbø (2013): Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics. Information, Communication & Society 16(5): 757–774. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330.10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330Search in Google Scholar

Franch, Fabio (2013): (Wisdom of the Crowds): 2010 UK Election Prediction with Social Media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 10(1): 57–71. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2012.705080.10.1080/19331681.2012.705080Search in Google Scholar

Freelon, Deen – David Karpf (2015): Of big birds and bayonets: hybrid Twitter interactivity in the 2012 Presidential debates Information, Communication & Society 18(4): 390–406. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.952659.10.1080/1369118X.2014.952659Search in Google Scholar

Garrett, R. Kelly et al. (2012): New ICTs and the Study of Political Communication. International Journal of Communication 6: 214–231.Search in Google Scholar

Geber, Sarah – Helmut Scherer (2015): My Voter, My Party, and Me. American and German Parliamentarians on Facebook. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 12(4): 360–377. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2015.1101037.10.1080/19331681.2015.1101037Search in Google Scholar

Gerodimos, Roman – Jákup Justinussen (2015): Obama’s 2012 Facebook Campaign: Political Communication in the Age of the Like Button. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 12(2): 113–132. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2014.982266.10.1080/19331681.2014.982266Search in Google Scholar

Graber, Doris A. (2004): Methodological Developments in Political Communication Research, in Kaid, Lynda Lee (Ed.), Handbook of Political Communication Research, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 45–67.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Todd et al. (2013): Between Broadcasting Political Messages and Interacting with Voters. The use of Twitter during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Information, Communication & Society 16(5): 692–716. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581.10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581Search in Google Scholar

Gronbeck, Bruce E. (2009): The Web, Campaign 07–08, and Engaged Citizens: Political, Social, and Moral Consequences, in Denton Robert E. Jr. (Ed.), The 2008 Presidential Campaign, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 228–243.Search in Google Scholar

Gustafsson, Nils (2012): The subtle nature of Facebook politics: Swedish social network site users and political participation. New Media & Society 14(7): 1111–1127. DOI: 10.1177/1461444812439551.10.1177/1461444812439551Search in Google Scholar

Hendricks, John Allen – Robert E. Denton Jr. (2010): Political Campaigns and Communicating with the Electorate in the Twenty-First Century, in Hendricks, John Allen/ Robert E. Denton Jr. (Eds.), Communicator-in-Chief: How Barack Obama Used New Media Technology to Win the White House, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 1–18.Search in Google Scholar

Himelboim, Itai – Derek Hansen – Anne Bowser (2013): Playing in the Same Twitter Network. Political information seeking in the 2010 US gubernatorial elections. Information, Communication & Society 16(9): 1373–1396. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.706316.10.1080/1369118X.2012.706316Search in Google Scholar

Householder, Elizabeth E. – Heather L. LaMarre (2014): Facebook Politics: Toward a Process Model for Achieving Political Source Credibility Through Social Media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11(4): 368–382. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2014.951753.10.1080/19331681.2014.951753Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, Nigel A. – Darren G. Lilleker (2009): Building an Architecture of Participation? Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 6(3–4): 232–250. DOI: 10.1080/19331680903028438.10.1080/19331680903028438Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Janet Buttolph – H. T. Reynolds – Jason D. Mycoff (2008): Political science research methods. 6th edition, Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Dennis W. (2011): Campaigning in the Twenty-First Century: A Whole New Ballgame? New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780203878965Search in Google Scholar

Karlsen, Rune – Bernard Enjolras (2016): Styles of Social Media Campaigning and Influence in a Hybrid Political Communication System: Linking Candidate Survey Data with Twitter Data. The International Journal of Press/Politics 21(3): 338–357. DOI: 10.1177/1940161216645335.10.1177/1940161216645335Search in Google Scholar

Klotz, Robert J. (2010): The Sidetracked 2008 YouTube Senate Campaign. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 7(2–3): 110–123. DOI: 10.1080/19331681003748917.10.1080/19331681003748917Search in Google Scholar

Koc-Michalska, Karolina – Rachel Gibson/Thierry Vedel (2014): Online Campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political Actors and Citizens in the Aftermath of the Web.2.0 Evolution. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11(2): 220–244. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2014.903217.10.1080/19331681.2014.903217Search in Google Scholar

Larsson, Anders Olof (2015): Pandering, protesting, engaging. Norwegian party leaders on Face-book during the 2013 ‘Short campaign’. Information, Communication & Society 18(4): 459–473. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.967269.10.1080/1369118X.2014.967269Search in Google Scholar

Larsson, Anders Olof – Hallvard Moe (2012): Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign, New Media & Society 14 (5): 729–747. DOI: 10.1177/1461444811422894.10.1177/1461444811422894Search in Google Scholar

Lasswell, Harold D. (1927): Propaganda Techniques in the World War, New York, NY: Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Benjamin – Vincent Campbell (2016), Looking Out or Turning in? Organizational Ramifications of Online Political Posters on Facebook. The International Journal of Press/Politics 21(3): 313–337. DOI: 10.1177/1940161216645928.10.1177/1940161216645928Search in Google Scholar

Lister, Martin et al. (2009): New Media: a critical introduction. 2nd edition, Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Magin, Melanie et al. (2017): Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society 20(11): 1698–1719. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269.10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269Search in Google Scholar

Mascheroni, Giovanna – Alice Mattoni (2013): Electoral Campaigning 2.0 – the Case of Italian Regional Elections, Journal of Information Technology & Politics 10 (2): 223–240. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2012.758073.10.1080/19331681.2012.758073Search in Google Scholar

McKelvey, Karissa – Joseph DiGrazia – Fabio Rojas (2014): Twitter publics: how online political communities signaled electoral outcomes in the 2010 US house election. Information, Communication & Society 17(4): 436–450. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.892149.10.1080/1369118X.2014.892149Search in Google Scholar

Meraz, Sharon (2015): Quantifying Partisan Selective Exposure Through Network Text Analysis of Elite Political Blog Networks During the U.S. 2012 Presidential Election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 12(1): 37–53. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2014.974119.10.1080/19331681.2014.974119Search in Google Scholar

Mirer, Michael L. – Leticia Bode (2015): Tweeting in defeat: How candidates concede and claim victory in 140 characters. New Media & Society 17(3): 453–469. DOI: 10.1177/1461444813505364.10.1177/1461444813505364Search in Google Scholar

Nahon, Karine et al. (2011): Fifteen Minutes of Fame: The Power of Blogs in the Lifecycle of Viral Political Information. Policy & Internet 3(1): 1–28. DOI: 10.2202/1944-2866.1108.10.2202/1944-2866.1108Search in Google Scholar

Park, Chang Sup (2015): Applying “Negativity Bias” to Twitter: Negative News on Twitter, Emotions, and Political Learning. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 12(4): 342–359. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2015.1100225.10.1080/19331681.2015.1100225Search in Google Scholar

Parkin, Michael (2012): The Impact of Multimedia Technology on Candidate Website Visitors. Journal of Political Marketing 11(3): 143–164. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2012.699414.10.1080/15377857.2012.699414Search in Google Scholar

Raynauld, Vincent – Josh Greenberg (2014): Tweet, Click, Vote: Twitter and the 2010 Ottawa Municipal Election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11(4): 412–434. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2014.935840.10.1080/19331681.2014.935840Search in Google Scholar

Russmann, Uta (2011): Targeting Voters via the Web – A Comparative Structural Analysis of Austrian and German Party Websites. Policy & Internet 3(3): 1–23. DOI: 10.2202/1944-2866.1085.10.2202/1944-2866.1085Search in Google Scholar

Schweitzer, Eva Johanna (2011): Normalization 2.0: A longitudinal analysis of German online campaigns in the national elections 2002–9. European Journal of Communication 26(4): 310–327. DOI: 10.1177/0267323111423378.10.1177/0267323111423378Search in Google Scholar

Skovsgaard, Morten – Arjen Van Dalen (2013): Dodging the Gatekeepers? Social media in the campaign mix during the 2011 Danish elections. Information, Communication & Society 16(5): 737–756. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.783876.10.1080/1369118X.2013.783876Search in Google Scholar

Small, Tamara A. (2011): What the Hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society 14(6): 872–895. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572.10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572Search in Google Scholar

Statista.com (2017): Most famous social network sites worldwide as of January 2017, ranked by number of active users (in millions) [online], The Statistics Portal [cit. 2017-03-29]: available at<https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/>.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Tami K. – Youngwon Lee – April B. Baer (2010): ‘New media’ research publication trends and outlets in communication, 1990–2006. New Media & Society 12(4): 531–548. DOI: 10.1177/1461444809342762.10.1177/1461444809342762Search in Google Scholar

Towner, Terri L. – David A. Duolio (2011): An experiment of campaign effects during the YouTube election. New Media & Society 13 (4): 626–644. DOI: 10.1177/1461444810377917.10.1177/1461444810377917Search in Google Scholar

Vaccari, Cristian (2013): A tale of two e-parties: Candidate websites in the 2008 US presidential primaries. Party Politics 19(1): 19–40. DOI: 10.1177/1354068810391287.10.1177/1354068810391287Search in Google Scholar

Van Noort, Guda – Rens Vliegenhart – Sanne Kruikemeier (2016): Return on interactivity? The characteristics and effectiveness of Web sites during the 2010 Dutch local elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13(4): 325–364. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2016.1230921.10.1080/19331681.2016.1230921Search in Google Scholar

Vergeer, Maurice (2012): Politics, elections and online campaigning: Past, present… and a peek into the future. New Media & Society 15(1): 9–17. DOI: 10.1177/1461444812457327.10.1177/1461444812457327Search in Google Scholar

Vergeer, Maurice/Philip Hans Franses (2016): Live audience responses to live televised election debates: time series analysis of issue salience and party salience on audience behaviour. Information, Communication & Society 19(10): 1390–1410. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1093526.10.1080/1369118X.2015.1093526Search in Google Scholar

Vesnic-Alujevic, Lucia/Sofie Van Bauwel (2014), YouTube: A Political Advertising Tool? A Case Study of the Use of YouTube in the Campaign for the European Parliament Elections 2009. Journal of Political Marketing 13(3): 195–212. DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2014.929886.10.1080/15377857.2014.929886Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo