1. bookVolume 13 (2020): Issue 1 (June 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Regulatory Cybernetics: Adaptability and Probability in the Public Administration’s Regulations

Published Online: 02 Jun 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 13 (2020) - Issue 1 (June 2020)
Page range: 133 - 156
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Dynamic perspectives from systems theory and cybernetics are used in this paper to introduce the self-adaptable legal regulation or individual decision-making based on Bayes networks. The latter, by using similar elements as systems theory or cybernetics can help decision-makers not only to quantify the evidential strengths of hypotheses but also to take the most probable decision. Nowadays legal science and the public administration with it that prepares the majority of draft legal rules, do not sufficiently address legal forms from which rules’ content derives. The increasing speed of change and the consequent shortness of operative rules should force decision-makers to consider the new forms of legal norms and decisions that would still respect the objectivity and impartiality of decision-making.

Keywords

Ackoff, Russell Lincoln. 1999. Re-Creating the Corporation: A Design of Organizations for the 21stCentury. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Philip. 1999. “Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science.” Organization Science, June. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.3.216.10.1287/orsc.10.3.216Search in Google Scholar

Ashby, William Ross. 1957. An Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Chapman and Hall.10.1063/1.3060436Search in Google Scholar

Ashby, W. Ross. 1960. Design for a Brain: The Origin of Adaptive Behavior. London: Chapman and Hall.10.5962/bhl.title.7309Search in Google Scholar

Bayes Server. 2018. “Introduction to Bayesian Networks.” 2018. Available at https://www.bayesserver.com/docs/introduction/bayesian-networks (last accessed 9. 4. 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Beer, Stafford. 1966. Decision and Control: The Meaning of Operational Research and Management Cybernetics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Beer, Stafford. 1994. Beyond Dispute: The Invention of Team Syntegrity. Chichester, New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Black, Julia. 2008. “Forms and Paradoxes of Principles Based Regulation.” SSRN Scholarly Paper 1267722. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1267722.Search in Google Scholar

Braithwaite, John. 2002. “Rules and Principles: A Theory of Legal Certainty.” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 27, 47.Search in Google Scholar

Breyer, Stephen G., Richard B. Stewart, Cass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule. 2006. Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy: Problems, Text, and Cases. 6th edn. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Cairney, Paul. 2012. “Complexity Theory in Political Science and Public Policy.” Political Studies Review 10(3), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00270.x.10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00270.xSearch in Google Scholar

Callier, Frank M. and Charles A. Desoer. 2012. Linear System Theory. Verlag: Springer Science & Business Media.Search in Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. 1966. Philosophical Foundation of Physics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Edited by Martin Gardner. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Carrier, Richard. 2012. Proving History: Bayes’s Theorem and the Quest for the Historical Jesus. Amherst, N. Y: Prometheus Books.Search in Google Scholar

Cziko, Gary. 2000. The Things We Do: Using the Lessons of Bernard and Darwin to Understand the What, How, and Why of Our Behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Daellenbach, Hans G. 1996. Systems and Decision Making: A Management Science Approach. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. 5th printing edn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Engel, Christoph. 2013. “Legal Experiments – Mission Impossible ?” SSRN Scholarly Paper 2276566. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2276566.Search in Google Scholar

Feltz, Bernard, Marc Crommelinck, and Philippe Goujon. 2006. Self-Organization and Emergence in Life Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/1-4020-3917-4Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, George. 2012. Evidence. 3th edn. New York: Foundation Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gambrill, Eileen. 2012. Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Improving the Quality of Judgments and Decisions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Gerrits, Lasse. 2012. Punching Clouds: An Introduction to the Complexity of Public Decision-Making. Litchfield, AZ: ISCE PUB.Search in Google Scholar

Gerrits, Lasse and Peter Marks. 2017. Understanding Collective Decision Making: A Fitness Landscape Model Approach. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Graaf, Kars Jan, J. H. Jans, A. T. Marseille and J. Ridder (eds). 2007. Quality of Decision-Making in Public Law: Studies in Administrative Decision-Making in the Netherlands. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Grzeszick, Berndt. 2016. “Rationality Requirements on Parliamentary Legislation Under a Democratic Rule of Law.” In Klaus Meßerschmidt and A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana (eds). Rational Lawmaking under Review: Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court. Heidelberg: Springer, 61 – 88.Search in Google Scholar

Haynes, Philip. 2015. Managing Complexity in the Public Services. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315816777Search in Google Scholar

Herweijer, M. 2007. “Inquiries into the Quality of Administrative Decisionmaking.” In Kars Jan Graaf, J. H. Jans, A. T. Marseille and J. Ridder (eds). Quality of Decision-Making in Public Law: Studies in Administrative Decision-Making in the Netherlands, edited by. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 13 – 30.Search in Google Scholar

Heylighen, Francis. 1999. “The Science of Self-Organization and Adaptivity.” In Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity. Paris: EOLSS, Publishers Co.Search in Google Scholar

Heylighen, Francis. 2016. “Stigmergy as a Universal Coordination Mechanism I: Definition and Components.” Cognitive Systems Research, Special Issue of Cognitive Systems Research – Human-Human Stigmergy, 38, 4 – 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2015.12.002.10.1016/j.cogsys.2015.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Holland, John H. 2006. “Studying Complex Adaptive Systems.” Journal of Systems Science and Complexity 19(1), 1 – 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-006-0001-z.10.1007/s11424-006-0001-zSearch in Google Scholar

Howard, Ronald A. and Ali E. Abbas. 2015. Foundations of Decision Analysis. Boston: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Jacob, F. 1977. “Evolution and Tinkering.” Science (New York, N. Y.) 196(4295), 1161 – 1166.10.1126/science.860134Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel. 2013. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Reprint edn. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1999. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804649Search in Google Scholar

Kasemets, Aare. 2001. “Impact Assessment of Legislation for Parliament and Civil Society: A Comparative Study.” Proceedings of ECPRD Seminar. Available at https://www.riigikogu.ee/rva/ecprd/04_part_2.pdf (last accessed 9. 4. 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Kauffman, Stuart A. 1993. The Origins of Order. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kauffman, Stuart. 1996. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Reprint edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kauffman, Stuart A. 2010. Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion. Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. 2005. Pure Theory of Law. Clark, N. J.: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Keshtkar, A. R., A. Salajegheh, A. Sadoddin, and M. G. Allan. 2013. “Application of Bayesian Networks for Sustainability Assessment in Catchment Modeling and Management (Case Study: The Hablehrood River Catchment).” Ecological Modelling 268(C), 48 – 54.Search in Google Scholar

Kiel, L. Douglas. 2014. “Complexity Theory and Its Evolution in Public Administration and Policy Studies.” Complexity, Governance & Networks 1(1), 71 – 78. https://doi.org/10.7564/14-CGN9.10.7564/14-CGN9Search in Google Scholar

Klijn, Erik-Hans. 2008. “Complexity Theory and Public Administration: What’s New ?” Public Management Review 10(3), 299 – 317. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802002675.10.1080/14719030802002675Search in Google Scholar

Koliba, Christopher J., Jack W. Meek, Asim Zia and Russell W. Mills. 2010. Governance Networks in Public Administration and Public Policy. Boca Raton, Fla: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Lorenz, Edward N. 1963. “Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow.” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 20(2), 130 – 141. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2.10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 2004. Law as a Social System. Edited by Fatima Kastner, Richard Nobles, David Schiff and Rosamund Ziegert. Translated by Klaus A. Ziegert. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 2013. Introduction to Systems Theory. Translated by Peter Gilgen. Cambridge, UK, Malden, MA: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Meadows, Donella H. 2008. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. London: Chelsea Green Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1936. “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action.” American Sociological Review 1(6), 894 – 904.Search in Google Scholar

Meßerschmidt, Klaus and A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana (eds). 2016. Rational Lawmaking under Review: Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-33217-8Search in Google Scholar

Microsoft Research. 2019. “MSBNx.” Microsoft Download Center. 2019. Available at https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=52299 (last accessed 9. 9. 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Morçöl, Göktuğ. 2012. A Complexity Theory for Public Policy. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203112694Search in Google Scholar

Nielsen, Thomas Dyhre and Finn Jensen. 2007. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. 2018. “Regulatory Policy in Slovenia: Oversight Matters, OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform.” Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at http://www.oecd.org/slovenia/regulatory-policy-in-slovenia-9789264291690-en.htm (last accessed 12. 8. 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Page, Scott E. 2018. The Model Thinker: What You Need to Know to Make Data Work for You. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Parrillo, Vincent N. 2005. Contemporary Social Problems. 6th edn. Boston and New York: Pearson / Allyn and Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

Pearl, Judea. 2009. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803161Search in Google Scholar

Pearl, Judea. 2014. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Search in Google Scholar

Pontier, Jean-Marie. 2001. “L’expérimentation et Les Collectivités Locales.” Revue Administrative 320.Search in Google Scholar

Prigogine, Ilya and Isabelle Stengers. 1984. Order Out of Chaos. New York, N. Y.: Bantam Books.Search in Google Scholar

Room, Graham. 2011. Complexity, Institutions and Public Policy: Agile Decision-Making in a Turbulent World. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, Mass: Edward Elgar Pub.Search in Google Scholar

Room, Graham. 2016. Agile Actors on Complex Terrains: Transformative Realism and Public Policy. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315660769Search in Google Scholar

Rosenbloom, David, Robert Kravchuk and Richard Clerkin. 2014. Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector. 8th edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.Search in Google Scholar

Rousseau, Denise M. (ed.). 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ruhl, J. B. 1996. “Complexity Theory as a Paradigm for the Dynamical Law-and-Society System: A Wake-Up Call for Legal Reductionism and the Modern Administrative State.” Duke Law Journal 45(5), 851 – 928.Search in Google Scholar

Scalia, Antonin and Bryan A. Garner. 2012. Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. 1st edn. St. Paul, MN: West.Search in Google Scholar

Schreyögg, G. and J. Sydow. 2009. The Hidden Dynamics of Path Dependence: Institutions and Organizations. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230274075Search in Google Scholar

Shmueli, Galit, Peter C. Bruce, Mia L. Stephens and Nitin R. Patel. 2017. Data Mining for Business Analytics: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications with JMP Pro. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Sieber, Sam. 1981. Fatal Remedies: The Ironies of Social Intervention. New York and London: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4684-7456-5Search in Google Scholar

Snellen, I. G. and Erik-Hans Klijn. 2009. “Complexity Theory and Public Administration: A Critical Appraisal.” In Geert Teisman, Arwin van Buuren, and Lasse M. Gerrits (eds). Managing Complex Governance Systems. London; New York: Routledge, 17 – 36.Search in Google Scholar

Sutherland, Jabez Gridley. 1891. Statutes and Statutory Construction. Chicago: Callaghan and Company.Search in Google Scholar

Teisman, Geert, Arwin van Buuren and Lasse M. Gerrits. 2009. Managing Complex Governance Systems. London, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203866160Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Kenneth (ed.). 2003. The Early Sociology of Management and Organizations: Papers on the Science of Administration. New York and London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185(4157), 1124 – 1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.10.1126/science.185.4157.1124Search in Google Scholar

Vickers, Geoffrey. 1995. The Art of Judgment: A Study of Policy Making. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Waldrop, Mitchell M. 1993. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.Search in Google Scholar

Wiener, Norbert. 1961. Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.1037/13140-000Search in Google Scholar

Wiener, Norbert. 1989. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. London: Free Associations Books.Search in Google Scholar

Willems, Jacques Leopold. 1970. Stability Theory of Dynamical Systems. London: Thomas Nelson and Sond Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Wright, Sewall. 1931. “Evolution in Mendelian Populations.” Genetics 16(2), 97 – 159.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo