[
Appel, R. & Muysken P. 2005. Language contact and bilingualism. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bhaskararao, P. & Subbarao, K.V. (eds.). 2004. Non-nominative subjects. Vols. I-II. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boeckx, C. & Hornstein, N. & Nunes, J. 2007. Overt copies in reflexive and control structures: A movement analysis. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 15. 1-45.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, N. & Lasnik, H. 1995. The theory of principles and parameters. In Chomsky, N. The minimalist program, 13-127. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fukuda, S. 2008. Backward control. Language and Linguistics Compass 2/1. 168-195.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haddad, Y.A. 2007. Adjunct control in Telugu and Assamese. [Gainesville]: University of Florida. (Doctoral dissertation.)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haddad, Y.A. 2011. Control into conjunctive participle clauses: The case of Assamese. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hornstein, N. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 69-96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karttunen, F. 1976. Uto-Aztecan and Spanish-type dependent clauses in Nahuatl. In Steever, S.F. & Walker, C.A. & Mufwene, S.S. (eds.). Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, 150-58. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, R. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lalitha Murthy, B. 1994. Participial constructions: A cross-linguistic study. New Delhi: Delhi University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Landau, I. 2004. The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22. 811-877.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, F. 2003. Anaphoric R-expressions as bound variables. Syntax 6. 84-114.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, K.Y. 2009. Finite control in Korean. Iowa City: University of Iowa. (Doctoral dissertation.)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matras, Y. 2009. Language contact. New York: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nadkarni, M.V. 1975. Bilingualism and syntactic change in Konkani. Language 51. 672-83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nunes, J. 2001. Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry 31. 303-344.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nunes, J. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nunes, J. 2011. The copy theory. In Boeckx, C. (ed.). The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism, 143-172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polinsky, M. & Potsdam, E. 2006. Expanding the scope of control and raising. Syntax 9(2). 171-192.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Potsdam, E. 2006. Backward object control in Malagasy and principles of chain reduction. MS. University of Florida.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roy, G. & Kumar, R. (In press). Embedded clauses in two varieties of Bangla. Chennai: Indian Institute Of Technology–Madras.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sigurðsson, H.A. 1991. Icelandic case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9. 327-363.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sigurðsson, H.A. 2008. The case of PRO. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26. 403-450.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spyropoulos, V. 2007. Finiteness and control in Greek. In Davies, W.D. & Dubinsky, S. (eds.). New horizons in the analysis of control and raising, 159-183. Dordrecht: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Subbārāo, K.V. 2012a. South Asian languages: A syntactic typology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Subbārāo, K.V. 2012b. South Asian languages: A syntactic typology. (https://www.academia.edu/6666513/South_Asian_Languages_A_Syntactic_Typology) (Accessed on 2022-03-17.)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Subbārāo, K.V. 2017. Forward, backward, and partial copy control in Telugu. Indian Linguistics 78(1-2). 37-63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Subbarao, K.V. & Hakacham, U.R. & Sarju Devi, T. 2007. Case-marked PRO: Evidence from Rabha, Manipuri, Hindi-Urdu and Telugu. In Bielmeier, R. & Haller, F. (eds.). Linguistics of the Himalayas and beyond, 291-322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thomason, S.G. 2001. Language contact: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar