1. bookVolume 11 (2021): Issue 3 (September 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
20 Feb 2019
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Constructability: Owners, Designers, and Contractors Practices in Industrial Projects

Published Online: 21 May 2021
Page range: 169 - 180
Received: 29 Aug 2020
Accepted: 31 Oct 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
20 Feb 2019
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The constructability theory is built on the premise that designated experts review and analyse a plan collectively to iron out obstacles that may cause failure to the plan and make the execution efficient and cost-effective. This paper aims to reveal constructability practices among stakeholders (owners, designers, and contractors) who are executing industrial projects in Saudi Arabia. The research commenced with an intensive review of related literature. The literature review enabled the researchers to develop a questionnaire (data collection tool) which was distributed among the stakeholders via E-mail. The received data were analysed using simple statistical tools such as means, frequency, etc. The Relative Importance Index (RII) was used to measure the level of benefits from the constructability implementation. The stakeholders were found to implement constructability at the project and, to some extent, at corporate levels. Besides, they use many Construction Industry Institute (CII) concepts emerging from well-constructability CII principles in industrial projects. They form teams consisting of personnel from their organizations and facilitators either from their organization or from constructability consulting organizations. They use effective constructability review techniques such as the log/file, brainstorming, and the design review checklist. The constructability implementation yields considerable benefits, including “Reduce engineering cost,” “Reduce construction cost,” “Reduce the amount of rework,” “Improve project safety,” “Reduce schedule duration,” and several others. The study contributes to the book of knowledge and provides practitioners with guidance in implementing constructability. Designers and contractors are advised to implement constructability at the corporate level.

Keywords

Adams, S. (1989). Practical buildability. Construction Industry Research Information Association. Butterworths. London. Search in Google Scholar

Akpan, E., Amade, B., Okangba, S., and Ekweozor, C. (2014). Constructability practices and project delivery processes in the Nigerian construction industry. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 5(1), 10-21. Search in Google Scholar

Akintoye, A. and Fitzgerald, E. (2000). A survey of current cost estimating practices in the UK. Construction Management and Economics, 18(2), 161-172. Search in Google Scholar

Al-Bogamy, A. and Dawood, N. (2015). Development of a client-based risk management methodology for the early design stage of construction processes. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management, 22(5), 493-515. Search in Google Scholar

Al-Gahtany, M., Al-Hammadi, Y., and Kashiwagi, D. (2016). Introducing a new risk management model to the Saudi Arabian construction industry. Procedia Engineering, 145 (ICSDEC 2016 - Integrating Data Science, Construction and Sustainability), 940-947. Search in Google Scholar

Almussad, A. (2018). Constructability implementation state of practice in Saudi construction projects. Master thesis, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. Search in Google Scholar

Al-Otaibi, M. and Price, A. (2010). Analysis and evaluation of criteria for pre-selecting contractors in the Saudi Arabian construction sector. In: Egbu, C. (Ed) Procs 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2010, Leeds, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 1141-1148. Search in Google Scholar

Al-Rashed, I., Al-Rashed, A., Taj, S. A., and Kantamaneni, M. P. K. (2014). Risk assessments for construction projects in Saudi Arabia. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 3(7), 1-6. Search in Google Scholar

Ansyorie, M. (2019). Concepts of constructability for project construction in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 669(1), 012062. Search in Google Scholar

Arditi, D., Elhassan, A., and Toklu, Y. C. (2002). Constructability analysis in the design firm. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(2), 117–126. Search in Google Scholar

Choi, I. and Song, H. (2014). Evaluation of the modular method for industrial plant construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 14(3),171-180. Search in Google Scholar

Clifford, W. S. and Schwinger, C. W. (2011). Tips for designing constructable steel-framed buildings. In NASCC: The Steel conference. Search in Google Scholar

Construction Industry Institute of Australia. (1993). Constructability principles file. Construction Industry Institute of Australia, Brisbane, Australia. Search in Google Scholar

Construction Industry Institute. (1987). Guideline for Implementing a Constructability Program, Austin. Search in Google Scholar

Construction Industry Institute. (1986). Constructability: A primer, Construction Industry Institute. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX. Search in Google Scholar

Construction Management Committee of the ASCE. (1991). Constructability and constructability programs: White paper. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 67–89. Search in Google Scholar

Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA). (1983). Buildability: an assessment. CIRIA Publications, (26). Search in Google Scholar

El-Malki, B. (2013). GCC Powers of Construction 2013: Meeting the Challenges of Delivering Mega Projects. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/sa/en/pages/realestate/articles/gcc-powers-of-construction-2013.html Search in Google Scholar

Farooqui, R. U. and Ahmed, S. M. (2008). Assessment of constructability practices among general contractors in Pakistan’s construction industry. In Proc., CIB W107 Construction in Developing Countries International Symposium. Search in Google Scholar

Gambatese, J. A., Pocock, J. B., and Dunston, P. S., eds. (2007). Constructability concepts and practice, construction institute. American Society of Civil Engineers. Reston, VA. Search in Google Scholar

Gambatese, J. A., Hinze, J., and Behm, M. (2005). Investigation of the viability of designing for safety. The Center to Protect Workers’ Rights (CPWR), Silver Spring. Search in Google Scholar

Gil, N., Tommelein, I. D., Kirkendall, R. L., and Ballard, G. (2004). Theoretical comparison of alternative delivery systems for projects in unpredictable environments. Construction Management and Economics, 22(5), 495–508. Search in Google Scholar

Griffith, A. and Sidwell, A. (1997). Development of constructability concepts, principles and practices. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 4(4), 295. Search in Google Scholar

Khan, S. (2015). An overview of constructability: a management tool for architects. Architecture Research, 5(5): 125-139. Search in Google Scholar

Kifokeris, D. and Xenidis, Y. (2017). Constructability: outline of past, present, and future research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(8), 1-13. Search in Google Scholar

Mosley, J. and Bubshait, A. (2019). Investigative study of project procurement methods and project performance indicators in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Construction Management, 1-13. Search in Google Scholar

Motsa, N., Oladapo, A. A., and Othman, A. A. E. (2008). The benefits of using constructability during the design process. Proceedings of the 5th Post Graduate Conference on Construction Industry Development, 158-167. Search in Google Scholar

Nawi, M. N. M., Kamar, K. A. M., Abdullah, M. R., Haron, A. T., Lee, A., and Arif, M. (2009). Enhancement of constructability concept: An experience in offsite Malaysia construction industry. Proceeding in Changing Roles; New Roles, New Challenges, 595–606. Search in Google Scholar

Nima, M., Abdul-Kader, M., Jaafar, M., and Riadh, G. (2001). Constructability implementation: A survey in the Malaysian construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 19(8), 819-829. Search in Google Scholar

Russell, J. S., Swiggum, K. E., Shapiro, J. M., and Alaydrus, A. F. (1994). Constructability related to TQM, value engineering, and cost/benefits. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 8(1), 31-45. Search in Google Scholar

Stamatiadis, N., Sturgill, R., and Amiridis, K. (2017). Benefits from constructability reviews. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 2889-2897. Search in Google Scholar

The Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand Incorporated (IPENZ) (2011). Constructability. Archived 2011-10-18 at the Wayback Machine Practice Note 13. Search in Google Scholar

Windapo, A. and Ogunsanmi, O. (2014). Evaluation of the barriers to the use of appropriate constructability practices on construction projects. Journal of Construction Project Management and Innovation, 4(1), 734-754. Search in Google Scholar

Wong, F., Lam, P., Chan, E., and Shen, L. (2007). A study of measures to improve constructability. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(6), 586. Search in Google Scholar

Yitmen, I. and Akyel, S. (2005). Challenges of best practices for constructability implementation: North Cyprus construction industry. In Proceedings of 11th joint CIB international symposium, combining forces, advancing facilities management and construction through innovation. Understanding construction business and companies in the new millennium, 1, 13-16. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo