1. bookVolume 11 (2021): Issue 2 (May 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
20 Feb 2019
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Mediation Effect of Stakeholder Management between Stakeholder Characteristics and Project Performance

Published Online: 20 Oct 2020
Page range: 102 - 117
Received: 25 Apr 2020
Accepted: 15 Aug 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
20 Feb 2019
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo
Abstract

Effective stakeholder management (ESM) is a critical success factor for projects. The increasing complexity in the relationships among stakeholders and their diverse characteristics, including power and interests makes the management of stakeholders increasingly challenging. To date, much of the literature has focused on the stakeholder analysis with very limited to the direct and indirect relationships between stakeholder characteristics (SC) and project performance (PP). Therefore, the aim of this study is to fill these research gaps by empirically examining (1) the relationship(s) between SC and PP and (2) the mediation effect of ESM on the above-mentioned relationships. Data analysis was conducted using structural equation modelling. The findings suggest that stakeholder legitimate behaviour (LB), opposing behaviour (OB), and conflicting interests affect the ability to achieve both sets of quantitative and qualitative PP negatively. ESM has been identified as a key element to eliminate the negative effects of the aforementioned behaviours on qualitative (and not quantitative) PP measures.

Keywords

Aaltonen, K. (2011). Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process. International Journal of Project Management, 29(2), 165-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Aaltonen, K., Jaakko, K., and Tuomas, O. (2008). Stakeholder salience in global projects. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 509-516. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.004Search in Google Scholar

Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J., Havela, L., and Savage, G. (2015). Stakeholder Dynamics During the Project Front-End: The Case of Nuclear Waste Repository Projects. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 15-41. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21549Search in Google Scholar

Aaltonen, K. and Sivonen, R. (2009). Response strategies to stakeholder pressures in global projects. International Journal of Project Management, 27(2), 131-141. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.09.007Search in Google Scholar

Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., and Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507-525. doi:10.2307/256973Search in Google Scholar

Allen, P. J., Bennett, K., and Heritage, B. (2014). SPSS statistics: a practical guide version 22. South Melbourne, Victoria: Cengage Learning Australia.Search in Google Scholar

Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of project complexity—a review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 201-204. doi: 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3Search in Google Scholar

Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator- Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173Search in Google Scholar

Bear, N. L. (2015). Mastering Complex Projects: Principles for Success and Reliable Performance: White Paper. Sydney: Engineers AustraliaSearch in Google Scholar

Beringer, C., Jonas, D., and Gemunden, H. G. (2012). Establishing Project Portfolio Management: An Exploratory Analysis of the Influence of Internal Stakeholders' Interactions. Project Management Journal, 43(6), 16-32. doi:10.1002/pmj.21307Search in Google Scholar

Blodgett, J. G., Lu, L.-C., Rose, G. M., and Vitell, S. J. (2001). Ethical sensitivity to stakeholder interests: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(2), 190-202. doi:10.1177/03079459994551Search in Google Scholar

Blokhuis, E. G. J., Snijders, C. C. P., Han, Q., and Schaefer, W. F. (2012). Conflicts and cooperation in brownfield redevelopment projects: Application of conjoint analysis and game theory to model strategic decision making. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 138(3), 195-205. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000122Search in Google Scholar

Bond, U. E. (2015). Project management, leadership, and performance: A quantitative study of the relationship between project managers' leadership styles, years of experience and critical success factors (CSFs) to project success. (Dissertation/Thesis). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Brozovic, D. (2018). Strategic Flexibility: A Review of the Literature Strategic Flexibility. International journal of management reviews : IJMR, 20(1), 3-31.Search in Google Scholar

Brucker, K.D., Macharis, C., and Verbeke, A. (2013). Multi-criteria analysis and the resolution of sustainable development dilemmas: A stakeholder management approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(1),122-131. doi: 0.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.021Search in Google Scholar

Bryman, A., and Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods (Fourth ed.). United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Caniato, M., Vaccari, M., Visvanathan, C., and Zurbrugg, C. (2014). Using social network and stakeholder analysis to help evaluate infectious waste management: A step towards a holistic assessment. Waste Management, 34(5), 938-951. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.011Search in Google Scholar

Carpini, M. X. D., Cook, F. L., and Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 315-344. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630Search in Google Scholar

Cascetta, E., Cartenì, A., Pagliara, F., and Montanino, M. (2015). A new look at planning and designing transportation systems: A decision-making model based on cognitive rationality, stakeholder engagement and quantitative methods. Transport Policy, 38, 27-39. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.11.005Search in Google Scholar

Cheung, G. W., and Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing Mediation and Suppression Effects of Latent Variables Bootstrapping With Structural Equation Models. Organizational research methods, 11(2), 296-325.Search in Google Scholar

Chinyio, E. A., and Akintoye, A. (2008). Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: findings from the UK. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 591-599. doi: 10.1080/01446190802078310Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, R. G. (2016). Agile-stage-gate hybrids. Research Technology Management, 59(1), 21-29. doi:10.1080/08956308.2016.1117317Search in Google Scholar

Cox, R. F., Issa, R. R. A., and Ahrens, D. (2003). Management's Perception of Key Performance Indicators for Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(2), 142-151. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:2(142)Search in Google Scholar

Cragg, W., and Greenbaum, A. (2002). Reasoning about Responsibilities: Mining Company Managers on What Stakeholders are Owed. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 319-335. doi: 10.1023/a:1016523113429Search in Google Scholar

Damoah, I. S., and Akwei, C. (2017). Government project failure in Ghana: a multidimensional approach. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(1), 32-59. doi:10.1108/IJMPB-02-2016-0017Search in Google Scholar

Dao, B., Kermanshachi, S., Shane, J., Anderson, S., and Hare, E. (2016). Identifying and Measuring Project Complexity. Procedia Engineering, 145, 476-482. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.024Search in Google Scholar

Deegan, B., and Parkin, J. (2011). Planning cycling networks: human factors and design processes. Proceedings of the ICE-Engineering Sustainability, 164(1), 85-93.Search in Google Scholar

El-Gohary, N. M., Osman, H., and El-Diraby, T. E. (2006). Stakeholder management for public private partnerships. International Journal of Project Management, 24(7), 595-604.Search in Google Scholar

Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. (Foundations of modern sociology series). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Floricel, S., Michela, J. L., and Piperca, S. (2016). Complexity, uncertainty-reduction strategies, and project performance. International Journal of Project Management.Search in Google Scholar

Fowler, M., and Highsmith, J. (2001). The Agile Manifesto. Software Development, 9(8), 7.Search in Google Scholar

French, J. R. P., and Raven, B. (1959). The Bases of Social Power. In Group dynamic: Research and theory. Harper & Row, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Hales, C. (2001). Managing through organization: the management process, forms of organization and the work of managers (2nd ed.). Sydney, N.S.W.: Business Press, Thomson Learning.Search in Google Scholar

Havard, L., Brigand, L., and Carino, M. (2015). Stakeholder participation in decision-making processes for marine and coastal protected areas: Case studies of the south-western Gulf of California, Mexico. Ocean & Coastal Management, 116, 116-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.017Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication monographs, 85(1), 4-40.Search in Google Scholar

Herazo, B., and Lizarralde, G. (2016). Understanding stakeholders’ approaches to sustainability in building projects. Sustainable Cities and Society. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.019Search in Google Scholar

Hinkin, T. R., and Schriesheim, C. A. (1994). An Examination of Subordinate-Perceived Relationships Between Leader Reward and Punishment Behavior and Leader Bases of Power. Human Relations, 47(7), 779-800. doi: 10.1177/001872679404700702Search in Google Scholar

Ika, L. A. (2009). Project Success as a Topic in Project Management Journals. Project Management Journal, 40(4), 6-19. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20137Search in Google Scholar

Judd, C. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process Analysis: Estimating Mediation in Treatment Evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5(5), 602-619. doi: 10.1177/0193841X8100500502Search in Google Scholar

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, United States: Guilford publications.Search in Google Scholar

KPMG. (2017). Driving Business Performance: Project Management Survey. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg/.Search in Google Scholar

Lappi, T., and Aaltonen, K. (2017). Project governance in public sector agile software projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(2), 263-294. doi: 10.1108/ijmpb-04-2016-0031Search in Google Scholar

Leung, M. Y., Yu, J. Y., and Liang, Q. (2013). Improving Public Engagement in Construction Development Projects from a Stakeholder's Perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(11). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000754Search in Google Scholar

Lodge, M. (1986). A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing. The American political science review, 80(2), 505-519.Search in Google Scholar

Luyet, V., Schlaepfer, R., Parlange, M. B., and Buttler, A. (2012). A framework to implement Stakeholder participation in environmental projects. Journal of Environmental Management, 111, 213-219. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.026Search in Google Scholar

Martinez, N. M. (2016). Towards a network place branding through multiple stakeholders and based on cultural identities The case of “The Coffee Cultural Landscape” in Colombia. Journal of Place Management and Development, 9(1), 73-90. doi: 10.1108/jpmd-11-2015-0052Search in Google Scholar

McKenna, A., and Metcalfe, M. (2013). The linguistic turn in project conceptualization. International Journal of Project Management, 31(8), 1154-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.006Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., and Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022105Search in Google Scholar

Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., and Yang, J. (2015). Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 446-457. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.007Search in Google Scholar

Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., and Yang, R. (2018). Stakeholder complexity in large scale green building projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(11), 1454-1474. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-09-2016-0205Search in Google Scholar

Morsing, M., and Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338.Search in Google Scholar

Newcombe, R. (2003). From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approach. Construction Management and Economics, 21(8), 841-848.Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, T. S., and Mohamed, S. (2018). Stakeholder Management in Complex Projects. Paper presented at the The 7th World Construction Symposium 2018: Built Asset Sustainability: Rethinking Design, Construction and Operations, Colombo, Sri Lanka.Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, T. S., Mohamed, S., and Panuwatwanich, K. (2018). Stakeholder Management in Complex Project: Review of Contemporary Literature. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 8(2), 75-89.Search in Google Scholar

Olander, S. and Landin, A. (2005). Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(4), 321-328. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Olander, S. and Landin, A. (2008). A comparative study of factors affecting the external stakeholder management process. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 553-561.Search in Google Scholar

Oliveira D.F.G. and Rabechini Jr, R. (2019). Stakeholder management influence on trust in a project: A quantitative study. International Journal of Project Management, 37(1), 131-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Olsson, N. O. E. (2006). Management of flexibility in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.06.010Search in Google Scholar

Ommen, N. O., Blut, M., Backhaus, C., and Woisetschlager, D. M. (2016). Toward a better understanding of stakeholder participation in the service innovation process: More than one path to success. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2409-2416. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.010Search in Google Scholar

Pacagnella Júnior, A. C., Porto, G. S., Pacífico, O., and Salgado Júnior, A. P. (2015). Project stakeholder management: A case study of a Brazilian science park. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 10(2), 39-49. doi: 10.4067/S0718-27242015000200004Search in Google Scholar

Parent, M. M., and Deephouse, D. L. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 1-23.Search in Google Scholar

Park, H., Kim, Y.-W., Kim, H., and Kim, K. (2017). Stakeholder Management in Long-Term Complex Megaconstruction Projects: The Saemangeum Project. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(4), 5017002. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000515Search in Google Scholar

PMI. (2004). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (3rd ed.). Newtown Square, Pa: Project Management Institute, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

PMI. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (Vol. 4th;Fourth;). Newtown Square, Pa: Project Management Institute, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., and Sauter-Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth, Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rahim, M.A.,, Antonioni, D., and Psenicka, C. (2001). A structural equations model of leader power, subordinates' styles of handing conflict, and job performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(3), 191-211. doi: 10.1108/eb022855Search in Google Scholar

Reichart, J. (2003). A Theoretical Exploration of Expectational Gaps in the Corporate Issue Construct. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 58-69. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540190Search in Google Scholar

Sæbø, Ø., Flak, L. S., and Sein, M. K. (2011). Understanding the dynamics in e-Participation initiatives: Looking through the genre and stakeholder lenses. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 416-425. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.10.005Search in Google Scholar

Salancik, G. R., and Pfeffer, J. (1974). The Bases and Use of Power in Organizational Decision Making: The Case of a University. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 453-473.Search in Google Scholar

Schepper, S.D., Dooms, M., and Haezendonck, E. (2014). Stakeholder dynamics and responsibilities in Public–Private Partnerships: A mixed experience. International Journal of Project Management, 32(7), 1210-1222. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.006Search in Google Scholar

Serrador, P., and Pinto, J. K. (2015). Does Agile work? - A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006Search in Google Scholar

Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., and Maltz, A. C. (2001). Project Success: A Multidimensional Strategic Concept. Long Range Planning, 34(6), 699-725. doi: 10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00097-8Search in Google Scholar

Sutterfield, J. S., Friday-Stroud, S. S., and Shivers-Blackwell, S. L. (2006). A case study of project and stakeholder management failures: lessons learned. Project Management Quarterly, 37(5), 26.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, R., and Zolin, R. (2012). Forecasting Success on Large Projects: Developing Reliable Scales to Predict Multiple Perspectives by Multiple Stakeholders Over Multiple Time Frames. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 87-99. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21289Search in Google Scholar

Vidal, L. A., Marle, F., and Bocquet, J. C. (2011). Measuring project complexity using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 718-727. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.005Search in Google Scholar

Wang, T., Abdallah, M., Clevenger, C., and Monghasemi, S. (2019). Time–cost–quality trade-off analysis for planning construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, ahead-of-print (ahead-ofprint). doi: 10.1108/ECAM-12-2017-0271Search in Google Scholar

Yang, R. J. (2014). An investigation of stakeholder analysis in urban development projects: Empirical or rationalistic perspectives. International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), 838-849. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.011Search in Google Scholar

Yang, R. J., Wang, Y., and Jin, X. H. (2014). Stakeholders' Attributes, Behaviors, and Decision - Making Strategies in Construction Projects: Importance and Correlations in Practice. Project Management Journal, 45(3), 74-90. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21412Search in Google Scholar

Zidane, Y. J. T., Johansen, A., Ekambaram, A., and Hald, L. C. (2015). When Stakeholders Shape Successes or Bring Failures – A Case Study of an Algerian Megaproject. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 844-851. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.637Search in Google Scholar

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo