The Olympic distance triathlon includes maximal exercise bouts with transitions between the activities. This study investigated the effect of an Olympic distance triathlon (1.5-km swim, 40-km bike, 10-km run) on pulmonary diffusion capacity (DL
Key words
- pulmonary function
- multi-sport activities
- athletic performance
- combined sport
The test of single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity is one of the most valuable clinical tests for pulmonary function and is among the most widely used tests of pulmonary gas exchange. DL
The pathophysiological mechanisms of the post-exercise decrease in DL
Indeed, the Olympic distance triathlon consists of three successive events (i.e. swim, cycle and run) performed at high intensity, thereby generating cumulative effects. The effects particularly concern the cardiovascular system, the risk of injury (Sellés-Pérez et al., 2019) and thermal adjustments, which are not usually experienced in a single sport (Taylor et al., 2014). High blood lactate concentrations and a significantly higher heart rate (HR) have been reported during the three segments of the triathlon (Lopes et al., 2012), in contrast to the low blood lactate concentrations of a marathon (Chevrolet et al., 1993). Moreover, it has been assumed that cycling generates elevated capillary pulmonary pressure in relation to the respiratory pattern and the crouched position (Boussana et al., 2001; Galy et al., 2003). This high capillary pulmonary pressure may induce mechanical stress and alterations in the blood-gas barrier. Interestingly, Galy et al. (2003) and Hue et al. (1999) reported that DL
The Olympic distance triathlon includes bouts of maximal intensity exercise, which may result in blood-gas barrier alterations. The aim of this study was to assess its effects on DL
Nine competitive male triathletes participated in this study (age: 24.25 ± 4.74 years, body height: 173.44 ± 6.11 cm, body mass: 63.08 ± 6.43 kg, oxygen uptake: 68.71 ± 1.70 ml∙kg-1∙min-1) (Table 1). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) to be an officially licensed triathlete with at least 2 years of experience, (2) to be part of a university training centre for triathletes of the University of Montpellier, and (3) to have a national and/or international sports level. All participants had normal pulmonary function and no known history of pulmonary or cardiovascular disease. They had been competing in the triathlon for 5.0 ± 2.3 years and were in the competitive period at the time of the study. They all trained regularly 16 h ± 2 h per week. Selected physical variables, training characteristics, finishing times and ranks in the present Olympic distance triathlon are provided in Table 1. All triathletes gave informed written consent before participating in the study, which was approved by the local laboratory ethics committee and in accordance with the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki for human subjects.
Selected physical and training characteristics, international short-distance triathlon performance, and rank of the nine male triathletes.
Training distances were averaged weekly during the study period.
Subject |
Age |
Height |
Body mass |
Training distances |
Triathlon |
HR |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Swim | Bike | Run | h:min | Max | Thvent | Max | Thvent | ||||
Mean | 24.2 | 173.44 | 63.08 | 13.8 | 244.44 | 42.2 | 2:13 | 68.71 | 47.2 | 177 | 142 |
2 | 8 | 2 | |||||||||
SD | 4.54 | 6.11 | 6.43 | 2.97 | 95.0 | 12.7 | 0.70 | 1.70 | 1.60 | 2.10 | 1.60 |
7 |
All participants performed an incremental cycle test before entering a three-phase protocol which took place before the Olympic distance triathlon (1.5-km swim, 40-km bike, 10-km run), at the end of the race, and 24 hours later. The incremental cycle test was performed on an electromagnetic cycle ergometer (Monark 864, Monark-Crescent AB, Varburg, Sweden). After a 3-min warm-up at 30 W, the power was increased by 30 W every minute until the participant reached volitional fatigue. Maximal oxygen uptake
DL
Spirometric tests (Pulmonet III Gould, sensorMedics, the Netherlands) provided measures of forced vital capacity (FVC, l), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1, l.s-1), FEV1/FVC (%), the mean forced expiratory flow during the middle half of FVC (FEF25-75%, l.s-1), forced expiratory flow rates at 75, 50 and 25% of FVC (FEF75%, FEF50%, FEF25%, respectively, l.s-1), total lung capacity (TLC, l), and residual volume (RV, l). Lung volumes and expiratory flows were compared with the reference values of the American Thoracic Society (ATS, 1986) to ensure that triathletes had values within the normal range.
All values are expressed as mean ± standard deviations (SD). The data were assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test and were found to be normally distributed. The predicted DL
The measured DL
Percentage of predicted values in pulmonary diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (%DL
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Variables | Pre-T | Post-T | Post-T-24 h |
---|---|---|---|
DL |
94.77 ± 7.08 | 87.55 ± 5.59 | 92.22 ± 9.92 |
FVC (l) | 5.40 ± 1.04 | 5.22 ± 1.11 | 5.28 ± 0.96 |
(% predicted) | 105.41 ± 11.92 | 104.78 ± 10.03 | 105.29 ± 9.13 |
FEV1 (l) | 5.11± 0.47 | 3.96 ± 0.6l* | 4.10 ± 0.62† |
(% predicted) | 103.88 ± 11.12 | 100.65 ± 10.76* | 102.56 ± 12.42† |
FEV1/FVC (%) | 86.56 ± 7.32 | 84.78 ± 6.59 | 85.67 ± 6.44 |
TLC (l) | 7.55 ± 1.38 | 7.21 ± 0.90 | 7.17 ± 1.33 |
(% predicted) | 106.58 ± 11.0 | 105.81 ± 12.11 | 106.11 ± 12.21 |
FEF25-75 (l.s-1) | 6.09 ± 0.52 | 4.08 ± 0.4l* | 4.75 ± 0.5l† |
(% predicted) | 91.21 ± 10.0 | 87 ± 9.0* | 89.33 ± 7.0† |
FEF50 (l.s-1) | 4.71 ± 1.11 | 4.75 ± 1.45 | 4.69 ± 1.13 |
(% predicted) | 100.4 ± 6.80 | 101.6 ± 8.50 | 99.6 ± 7.81 |
RV (l) | 1.90 ± 0.5l | 2.56 ± 0.41* | 1.95 ± 0.43 |
(% predicted) | 112.64 ± 2.05 | 117.35 ± 2.21 | 111.95 ± 0.14 |
DL
Figure 1A
Pulmonary diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DL

DL
Figure 1B
Pulmonary diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide to alveolar volume (DL

The predicted values of spirometric variables of triathletes at baseline: FVC (105.41 ± 11.92 %), FEV1 (103.88 ± 11.12 %), and TLC (106.58 ± 11.0 %), were greater than 80% of the predictive reference values of the ATS (1986) (Table 2).
Comparisons showed a significant decrease in FEV1 between pre-T and post-T (5.11 ± 0.47 l.s-1 vs. 3.96 ± 0.61 l.s-1) and between pre-T and post-T-24 h (5.11 ± 0.47 l.s-1 vs. 4.10 ± 0.62 l.s-1,
The main result of this study was the decrease in DL
The lack of difference between the measured DL
The 6% DL
The smaller % DL
DL
On the other hand, our data showed a decrease in pulmonary flows (FEV1 and FEF25-75%) 24 hours post-triathlon (Table 2). The result noted for FEV1 agrees with previous data collected after an endurance triathlon and a marathon (Zavorsky et al., 2014b) and suggests bronchoconstriction (i.e. reduced small airway calibre at low lung volume and peripheral airway constriction) persisting 24 hours after the race, similar to that observed in exercise-induced asthma.
To date, no study has focused on the time needed to repair the structural alterations in the blood-gas barrier following a maximal intensity exercise, as reported by Hopkins et al. (1997), or a marathon (Zavorsky et al., 2006, 2014a). Although the Olympic distance triathlon provoked structural blood-gas barrier alterations, the normal DL
Normal baseline DL
In conclusion, the present study showed reductions in DL
Figure 1A

Figure 1B

Percentage of predicted values in pulmonary diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (%DLCO) and % DLCO/VA and spirometric values observed at baseline (pre-T), after the triathlon (post-T) and 24 hours later (post-T-24 h). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Variables | Pre-T | Post-T | Post-T-24 h |
---|---|---|---|
DL |
94.77 ± 7.08 | 87.55 ± 5.59 | 92.22 ± 9.92 |
FVC (l) | 5.40 ± 1.04 | 5.22 ± 1.11 | 5.28 ± 0.96 |
(% predicted) | 105.41 ± 11.92 | 104.78 ± 10.03 | 105.29 ± 9.13 |
FEV1 (l) | 5.11± 0.47 | 3.96 ± 0.6l* | 4.10 ± 0.62† |
(% predicted) | 103.88 ± 11.12 | 100.65 ± 10.76* | 102.56 ± 12.42† |
FEV1/FVC (%) | 86.56 ± 7.32 | 84.78 ± 6.59 | 85.67 ± 6.44 |
TLC (l) | 7.55 ± 1.38 | 7.21 ± 0.90 | 7.17 ± 1.33 |
(% predicted) | 106.58 ± 11.0 | 105.81 ± 12.11 | 106.11 ± 12.21 |
FEF25-75 (l.s-1) | 6.09 ± 0.52 | 4.08 ± 0.4l* | 4.75 ± 0.5l† |
(% predicted) | 91.21 ± 10.0 | 87 ± 9.0* | 89.33 ± 7.0† |
FEF50 (l.s-1) | 4.71 ± 1.11 | 4.75 ± 1.45 | 4.69 ± 1.13 |
(% predicted) | 100.4 ± 6.80 | 101.6 ± 8.50 | 99.6 ± 7.81 |
RV (l) | 1.90 ± 0.5l | 2.56 ± 0.41* | 1.95 ± 0.43 |
(% predicted) | 112.64 ± 2.05 | 117.35 ± 2.21 | 111.95 ± 0.14 |
Selected physical and training characteristics, international short-distance triathlon performance, and rank of the nine male triathletes. Training distances were averaged weekly during the study period.
Subject |
Age |
Height |
Body mass |
Training distances |
Triathlon |
HR |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Swim | Bike | Run | h:min | Max | Thvent | Max | Thvent | ||||
Mean | 24.2 | 173.44 | 63.08 | 13.8 | 244.44 | 42.2 | 2:13 | 68.71 | 47.2 | 177 | 142 |
2 | 8 | 2 | |||||||||
SD | 4.54 | 6.11 | 6.43 | 2.97 | 95.0 | 12.7 | 0.70 | 1.70 | 1.60 | 2.10 | 1.60 |
7 |
Inter-Limb Muscle Property Differences in Junior Tennis Players The Pre-Exhaustion Method Does Not Increase Muscle Activity in Target Muscle During Strength Training in Untrained Individuals Neuromuscular Impact of Acute Hypertrophic Resistance Loading With and Without Blood-Flow Restriction Validity and Reliability of the Smart Groin Trainer for Measuring Hip Adduction Strength The Repeated Curve Sprint Test Appears to be an Appropriate Tool for Estimating Anaerobic Fitness in Young Trained Male Futsal Players Training with a Heavy Puck Elicits a Higher Increase of Shooting Speed Than Unloaded Training in Midget Ice Hockey Players Accuracy of Predicting One-Repetition Maximum from Submaximal Velocity in the Barbell Back Squat and Bench Press The Importance of Posture And Body Composition for the Stability and Selected Motor Abilities of Professional Handball Players Influence of Tactical Behaviour on Running Performance in the Three Most Successful Soccer Teams During the Competitive Season of the Spanish First Division Post-Activation Performance Enhancement in Sprinters: Effects of Hard Versus Sand Surfaces Cognitive Factors in Elite Handball: Do Players’ Positions Determine their Cognitive Processes? Effects of Postactivation Performance Enhancement on the Vertical Jump in High-Level Volleyball Athletes On-Court Change of Direction Test: An Effective Approach to Assess COD Performance in Badminton Players Movement Patterns of Polish National Paralympic Team Wheelchair Fencers with Regard to Muscle Activity and Co-Activation Time The Creation of Goal-Scoring Opportunities at the 2019 FIFA Women’s World Cup Assessing the Sprint Force-Velocity Profile in International Football Players with Cerebral Palsy: Validity, Reliability and Sport Class’ Profiles Handcycling Training in Men with Spinal Cord Injury Increases Tolerance to High Intensity Exercise Hand Grip Strength vs. Locomotor Efficiency in Sitting Volleyball Players Evidence‐Based Recovery in Soccer – Low‐Effort Approaches for Practitioners Anaerobic Variables as Specific Determinants of Functional Classification in Wheelchair Basketball Addition of in‐Play Cooling Breaks During Intermittent Exercise while Wearing Lacrosse Uniforms in the Heat Attenuates Increases in Rectal Temperature The Effects of Preferred Music and Its Timing on Performance, Pacing, and Psychophysiological Responses During the 6‐min Test Prevalence of Dehydration and the Relationship with Fluid Intake and Self‐Assessment of Hydration Status in Czech First League Soccer Players A Study Comparing Gait and Lower Limb Muscle Activity During Aquatic Treadmill Running With Different Water Depth and Land Treadmill Running Changes in Heart Rate Variability and Post‐Exercise Blood Pressure from Manipulating Rest Intervals Between Sets of Resistance Training