1. bookVolume 66 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2449-8343
First Published
04 Apr 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Micromorphology and anatomy of fruits of Angelica archangelica L. (Apiaceae) and their intraspecific differentiation

Published Online: 27 Apr 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 66 (2020) - Issue 4 (December 2020)
Page range: 1 - 13
Received: 15 Nov 2020
Accepted: 17 Dec 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2449-8343
First Published
04 Apr 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

1. Rautio AM, Akselsson Linkowski W, Östlund L. They followed the power of the plant: historical sami harvest and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) of Angelica archangelica in Northern Fennoscandia. J Ethnobiol 2016; 36(3):617-636. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-36.3.61710.2993/0278-0771-36.3.617Search in Google Scholar

2. Liao CY, Downie SR, Li Q, Yu Y, He X, Zhou B. New insights into the phylogeny of Angelica and its allies (Apiaceae) with emphasis on East Asian species, inferred from nrDNA, cpDNA, and morphological evidence. Syst Bot 2013; 38(1):266-281. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1600/036364413X66206010.1600/036364413X662060Search in Google Scholar

3. Downie SR, Spalik K, Katz-Downie DS, Reduron J-P. Major clades within Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae as inferred by phylogenetic analysis of nrDNA ITS sequences. Plant Divers Evol 2010; 128(1):111-136. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/1869-6155/2010/0128-000510.1127/1869-6155/2010/0128-0005Search in Google Scholar

4. Feng T, Downie SR, Yu Y, Zhang X, Chen W, He X et al. Molecular systematics of Angelica and allied genera (Apiaceae) from the Hengduan Mountains of China based on nrDNA ITS sequences: phylogenetic affinities and biogeographic implications. J Plant Res 2009; 122(4):403-414. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10265-009-0238-410.1007/s10265-009-0238-419440815Search in Google Scholar

5. Spalik K, Reduron JP, Downie S. The phylogenetic position of Peucedanum sensu lato and allied genera and their placement in tribe Selineae (Apiaceae, subfamily Apioideae). Plant Syst Evol 2004; 243:189-210. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-003-0066-210.1007/s00606-003-0066-2Search in Google Scholar

6. Meusel H, Jäger EJ, Bräutigam S, Knapp HD, Rauschert S, Weinert E. Vergleichende Chorologie der Zentraleuropäischen Flora. 3. Jena 1992 [in German].Search in Google Scholar

7. Ojala A. Variation of Angelica archangelica ssp. archangelica (Apiaceae) in Northern Fennoscandia 1. Variation in Fruit Morphology. Ann Bot Fenn 1984; 21:103-15.Search in Google Scholar

8. Weinert E. Die taxonomische Stellung und das Areal von Angelica archangelica L. und A lucida L. Feddes Repert 1973; 84(4):303-314. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fedr.1973084040510.1002/fedr.19730840405Search in Google Scholar

9. Thellung A. Umbelliferae. In: Hegi G (ed.). Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. München 1926; 5(2):926-1537.Search in Google Scholar

10. Stroh P, Scott W. Angelica archangelica subsp. littoralis (Apiaceae) – a new native taxon for Britain. New J Bot 2017; 7(1):57-58. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20423489.2017.129735310.1080/20423489.2017.1297353Search in Google Scholar

11. Pyšek P, Sádlo J, Mandák B. Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 2002; 74: 97-186.Search in Google Scholar

12. Keil P. Ökologie der gewässerbegleitenden Agriophyten Angelica archangelica ssp. litoralis, Bidens frondosa und Rorippa austriaca im Ruhrgebiet. [Ecology of the agriophytes Angelica archangelica ssp. litoralis, Bidens frondosa and Rorippa austriaca on river banks of the Ruhr region, Germany]. Dissert Bot 1999; 321:1-186.Search in Google Scholar

13. Jackowiak B, Grabherr G. Zur Ausbreitung von Angelica archangelica L. an der Donau in Wien. Verh Zool-Bot Ges Österreich 1990; 127:113-122.Search in Google Scholar

14. Jehlik V, Rostański K. Angelica archangelica subsp. litoralis auch in der Tschechoslowakei. Preslia 1975; 47(2):145-157.Search in Google Scholar

15. Zając M, Zając A. Apophytes as invasive plants in the vegetation of Poland. Biodiv Res Conserv 2009; 15: 35-40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10119-009-0015-110.2478/v10119-009-0015-1Search in Google Scholar

16. Zając A, Zając M. Distribution atlas of vascular plants in Poland. Kraków 2001.Search in Google Scholar

17. Forycka A, Buchwald W. Variability of composition of essential oil and coumarin compounds of Angelica archangelica L. Herba Pol 2019; 65(4):62-75. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hepo-2019-002710.2478/hepo-2019-0027Search in Google Scholar

18. European Pharmacopoeia. 9th Edition 9.0, 2016: 1242, Suppl. 9.8:1348.Search in Google Scholar

19. Fröberg L. Angelica archangelica L. In: Jonsell B, Karlsson T (eds.). Flora Nordica 2010; 6:181-185.Search in Google Scholar

20. Latowski K. Taksonomiczne i chorologiczne problemy z arcydzięglem. Taxonomic and choro-logical problems with Angelica archangelica. In: Olszewski TS, Afranowicz R, Bociąg K (eds.). Współczesne kierunki badań botanicznych. Ogólnopolska Konferencja Naukowa; 14-15 paź-dziernika, Gdańsk 2005:13-14 [in Polish].Search in Google Scholar

21. Wojewódzka A, Baczyński J, Banasiak Ł, Downie SR, CzarnockaCieciura A, Gierek M, et al. Evolutionary shifts in fruit dispersal syndromes in Apiaceae tribe Scandiceae. Plant Syst Evol 2019; 305:401-414. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-019-01579-110.1007/s00606-019-01579-1Search in Google Scholar

22. Ostroumova TA. Fruit micromorphology in the Umbelliferae of the Russian Far East. Botanica Pacifica 2018; 7(1):41-49. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17581/bp.2018.0710710.17581/bp.2018.07107Search in Google Scholar

23. Morozowska M, Freitas MF, Luna BN, Toni KLGD. Comparative micromorphology and anatomy of seeds and endocarps of selected Primulaceae and their systematic implications. Plant Syst Evol 2020; 306:74. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01699-z10.1007/s00606-020-01699-zSearch in Google Scholar

24. Ullah F, Papini A, Shah SN, Zaman W, Sohail A, Iqbal M. Seed micromorphology and its taxonomic evidence in subfamily Alsinoideae (Caryophyllaceae). Microsc Res Tech 2019; 82(3):250-259. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jemt.2316710.1002/jemt.23167Search in Google Scholar

25. Liu M, Downie SR. The phylogenetic significance of fruit anatomical and micromorphological structures in Chinese Heracleum species and related taxa (Apiaceae). Syst Bot 2017; 42(2):313-325. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1600/154823217X69553910.1600/154823217X695539Search in Google Scholar

26. Ostroumova TA, Kljuykov EV. Fruit structure and microsculpture in the annual species of the genus Bupleurum, section Perfoliata (Umbelliferae). Phytol Balc 2015; 21 (2):117-127.Search in Google Scholar

27. Gamarra R, Ortúñez E, Galán Cela P, Guadaño V. Anacamptis versus Orchis (Orchidaceae): seed micromorphology and its taxonomic significance. Plant Syst Evol 2012; 298:597-607. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-011-0569-110.1007/s00606-011-0569-1Search in Google Scholar

28. Kahraman A, Ferhat Celep F, Dogan M, Guerin GR, Bagherpour S. Mericarp morphology and its systematic implications for the genus Salvia L. Section Hymenosphace Benth. (Lamiaceae) in Turkey. Plant Syst Evol 2011; 292(1):33-39. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0394-y10.1007/s00606-010-0394-ySearch in Google Scholar

29. Ostroumova TA, Pimenov MG, Ukrainskaja UA. Micromorphological diversity of hairs and emergences on fruits in the Umbelliferae and its taxonomic value. Bot Zhurn 2010; 95(9):1219-1231 [in Russian].Search in Google Scholar

30. Szkudlarz P. Taxonomy of South African ericas (Erica L.) and differentiation of their seeds. Biodiv Res Conserv 2006; 1-2:25-30.Search in Google Scholar

31. Barthlott W. Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nord J Bot 1981; 1:345-355.10.1111/j.1756-1051.1981.tb00704.xSearch in Google Scholar

32. Cutler DF, Brandham PE. Experimental evidence for the genetic control of leaf surface characters in hybrid Aloineae (Liliaceae). Kew Bull 1977; 32:23-32.10.2307/4117256Search in Google Scholar

33. Karcz J. Skaningowy mikroskop elektronowy w badaniach karpologicznych. Scanning electron microscope in carpological studies. Wiad Bot 1996; 40(3/4):55-65 [in Polish].Search in Google Scholar

34. Kljuykov EV, Zakharova EA, Ostroumova TA, Tilney PM. Most important carpological anatomical characters in the taxonomy of Apiaceae. Bot J Linn Soc 2020; 20:1-13.Search in Google Scholar

35. Pimenov MG, Ostroumova TA. Carpological characters in the Umbelliferae systematics. In: Lotova LI, Timonin AC (eds.). Kaden’s memorial book. Moscow 2014:158-172 [in Russian].Search in Google Scholar

36. Klimko M, Truchan M, Wysakowska I. Fruit and seed morphology of the genus Heracleum L. (Apiaceae) in Poland. Bot – Stec 2013; 17:13-24.Search in Google Scholar

37. Liu MR, Plunkett GM, Lowry PP, Van Wyk BE, Tilney PM. The taxonomic value of fruit wing types in the order Apiales. Am J Bot 2006; 93(9):1357-1368.10.3732/ajb.93.9.1357Search in Google Scholar

38. Kljuykov EV, Liu M, Ostroumova TA, Pimenov MG, Tilney PM, van Wyk BE. Towards a stan-dardised terminology for taxonomically important morphological characters in the Umbelliferae. S Afr J Bot 2004; 70:488-496.10.1016/S0254-6299(15)30233-7Search in Google Scholar

39. Barthlott W, Neinhuis C, Cutler D, Ditsch F, Meusel I, Theisen I et al. Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Bot J Linn Soc 1998; 126(3):237-260. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1998.tb02529.x10.1111/j.1095-8339.1998.tb02529.xSearch in Google Scholar

40. Jongejans E, Telenius A. Field experiments on seed dispersal by wind in ten umbelliferous species (Apiaceae). Plant Ecol 2001; 152:67-78.10.1023/A:1011467604469Search in Google Scholar

41. Briquet J. Carpologie comparée de l’Archangelica officinalis Hoffm. et Peucedanum palustre (L.). Moench. Candollea 1923; 1:501-520.Search in Google Scholar

42. Denisova GA. The development of the fruit of Archangelica decurrens Ldb. Bot Zhurn S.S.S.R 1961; 46(12): 1756-1765 [in Russian]Search in Google Scholar

43. Zobel AL, March RE. Autofluorescence reveals different histological localizations of furanocoumarins in fruits of some Umbelliferae and Leguminosae. Ann Bot 1993; 71:251-255.10.1006/anbo.1993.1032Search in Google Scholar

44. Zieliński J, Tomaszewski D, Gawlak M, Orlova L. Kłopotliwe derenie – Cornus alba L. i C sericea L. (Cornaceae). Dwa gatunki czy jeden? Troublesome dogwoods – Cornus alba L. and C sericea L. (Cornaceae). Two species or one? Rocznik PTD 2014; 62:9-23 [in Polish].Search in Google Scholar

45. Shepherd T, Robertson GW, Griffiths DW, Birch ANE, Duncan G. Effects of environment on the composition of epicuticular wax from kale and swede. Phytochemistry 1995; 40(2):407-417. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(95)00281-b10.1016/0031-9422(95)00281-BSearch in Google Scholar

46. Huttunen S. Effects of air pollutants on epicuticular wax structure. In: Percy KE, Cape J, Jagels R, Simpson CJ (eds.). Air pollutants and the leaf cuticle. Berlin Heidelberg 1994:81-96. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79081-2_610.1007/978-3-642-79081-2_6Search in Google Scholar

47. Zhang Q-Y, He X-J, Zhang Y-Ch. Anatomical studies on fruits and petioles of 8 species of Angelica L. from Sichuan Province. Plant Sci J 2005; 23(6):549-554.Search in Google Scholar

48. Bruni R, Barreca D, Protti M, Brighenti V, Righetti L, Anceschi L, et al. Botanical sources, chemistry, analysis, and biological activity of furanocoumarins of pharmaceutical interest. Molecules 2019; 24(11):2163. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules2411216310.3390/molecules24112163660068731181737Search in Google Scholar

49. Zobel AM, Brown SA, March RE. Histological localization of psoralens in fruits of Psoralea bituminosa. Can J Botany 1991; 69(8):1673-1678.10.1139/b91-212Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo