1. bookVolume 22 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

“A Voice to Talk About it”: Cosmetologists as STEM Experts in Educational Technology Design and Implementation

Published Online: 24 Jan 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 22 (2019) - Issue 2 (December 2019)
Page range: 41 - 55
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

In the U.S. there are steady efforts by governmental and philanthropic organizations to increase the representation of students of colour in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). After years of mixed results, researchers and educators have started to question one size fits all notions of broadening participation. An increasing number of projects are challenging universalist assumptions by enrolling the expertise of culturally situated communities of practice in STEM lessons and the educational technologies that support them. While this research shows promising results for improving young people’s interest and performance in STEM, there has been little research on how these lessons and technologies might also benefit the communities whose expertise were originally enrolled. This paper details the design of educational technologies that bridge STEM and African American cosmetology. We report on a mixed-methods research project, conducted with a group of predominantly African American cosmetologists. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected to study their attitudes toward STEM before and after working with the technologies. Our results suggest positive changes in the cosmetologists’ attitudes. We end with a critical discussion about respecting the knowledge systems of underrepresented communities of practice in educational technology research and development.

Keywords

1. Banks, I. (2000). Hair matters: Beauty, power, and black women’s consciousness. New York, NY: NYU Press. Search in Google Scholar

2. Babbitt, W., Lachney, M., Bulley, E., & Eglash, R. (2015). Adinkra mathematics: A study of ethnocomputing in Ghana. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 110-135.10.17583/remie.2015.1399 Search in Google Scholar

3. Bennett, A. (2016). Ethnocompuational creativity in STEAM education: A cultural framework for generative justice. Teknokultura, 13(2), 587-612.10.5209/rev_TEKN.2016.v13.n2.52843 Search in Google Scholar

4. Bennett, A., Eglash, R., Lachney, M., & Babbitt, W. (2016). Design agency: Diversifying computer science at the intersections of creativity and culture. In M. Raisinghani (Ed.), Revolutionizing Education through Web-Based Instruction (pp. 35–56). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Search in Google Scholar

5. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Reforming schools through technology, 1980-2000. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674030107 Search in Google Scholar

6. Eglash, R., Bennett, A., O Donnell, C., Jennings, S., & Cintorino, M. (2006). Culturally situated design tools: Ethnocomputing from field site to classroom. American Anthropologist, 108(2), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2006.108.2.34710.1525/aa.2006.108.2.347 Search in Google Scholar

7. Eglash, R. (1999). African fractals: Modern computing and indigenous design. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Search in Google Scholar

8. Eglash, R., Babbitt, W., Bennett, A., Bennett, K., Callahan, B., Davis, J., Drazan, J., Hathawa, C., Hughes, D., Krishnamoorthy, M., Lachney, M., Mascarenhas, M., Sawyer, S., & Tully, K. (2017). Culturally Situated Design Tools: Generative justice as a foundation for STEM diversity. In P. Tripathi, Y. Rankin, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Moving Students of Color from Consumers to Producers of Technology (pp. 132–151). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2005-4.ch00710.4018/978-1-5225-2005-4.ch007 Search in Google Scholar

9. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Multicultural education series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Search in Google Scholar

10. Henderson, M. (2015). The (mis) use of community of practice: Delusion, confusion, and instrumentalism in educational technology research. In S. Bulfin, N. F. Johnson, & C. Bigum (Eds.), Critical perspectives on technology and education (pp. 127–140). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Search in Google Scholar

11. Lachney, M. (2017). Culturally responsive computing as brokerage: Toward asset building with education-based social movements. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(4), 420-439.10.1080/17439884.2016.1211679 Search in Google Scholar

12. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Vol. 521423740). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355 Search in Google Scholar

13. Majors, T. J. (2015). Shoptalk: Lessons in teaching from an African American hair salon. New York, NY: Teacher College Press. Search in Google Scholar

14. Malcom, S. M., & Malcom-Piqueux, L. E. (2013). Critical mass revisited: Learning lessons from research on diversity in STEM fields. Educational Researcher, 42(3), 176–178.10.3102/0013189X13486763 Search in Google Scholar

15. Margolis, J., Holme, J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Nao, K., & Stumme, S. (2008). Stuck in the shallow end: Race, education, and computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

16. Marx, S. (2016). Qualitative Research in STEM: Studies of Equity, Access, and Innovation. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315676449 Search in Google Scholar

17. National Science Board (2018). Science & Engineering Indicators 2018. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved November 26, 2018, from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/ Search in Google Scholar

18. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books. Search in Google Scholar

19. Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Search in Google Scholar

20. Patel, L. (2015). Countering coloniality in educational research: From ownership to answerability. Educational Studies, 50(4), 357–377.10.1080/00131946.2014.924942 Search in Google Scholar

21. Pawley, A. L., & Slaton, A. E. (2015, June). The Power and Politics of STEM Research Design: Saving the ‘Small N’. Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. doi: 10.18260/p.2490110.18260/p.24901 Search in Google Scholar

22. Resnick, M. (2017). Lifelong kindergarten: Cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/11017.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

23. Rosen, J. H., Newsome, A., & Usselman, M. (2011, June). Promoting Diversity and Public School Success in First Lego League State Competitions. Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/18880 Search in Google Scholar

24. Saldaña, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. Search in Google Scholar

25. Scott, K. A., Sheridan, K. M., & Clark, K. (2015). Culturally responsive computing: A theory revisited. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(4), 412–436.10.1080/17439884.2014.924966 Search in Google Scholar

26. Simpson, A. (2014). Mohawk interruptus: Political life across the borders of settler states. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Search in Google Scholar

27. Solomon, C. (1988). Computer environments for children: A reflection on theories of learning and education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2038.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

28. Tarlo, E. (2016). Entanglement: The secret lives of hair. London, UK: Oneworld Publications. Search in Google Scholar

29. Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). R-Words: Refusing Research. In Paris, D., & Winn, M. T. (Eds.), Humanizing Research: Decolonizing Qualitative Inquiry with Youth and Communities (pp. 223-247). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo