1. bookVolume 17 (2014): Issue 2 (December 2014)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Flipped-Classroom Approach: The Answer to Future Learning?

Published Online: 03 Mar 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 17 (2014) - Issue 2 (December 2014)
Page range: 172 - 182
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The study examines students’ assessments of the use of the flipped classroom approach in an undergraduate course in the Business Department at the College for Academic Studies in Israel. In its essence, learners prepare for classes by watching videos away from class, allowing the classroom encounter to focus on discussion, exercises, and discourse. Data were collected by a questionnaire distributed toward the end of the course. The students reported that watching videos between lessons enhanced interest, alleviated boredom, and enriched the learning. To a lesser extent, they reported it increased their involvement in learning, understanding of the learning material, and confidence in their ability to understand it. While acknowledging the convenience of watching course videos between classes, however, the participants clearly preferred to watch them in class. Multivariate analysis revealed that working students were less positive about using the flipped-classroom approach than non-working students, female students were more positive than male ones, and older students were more positive than younger ones. Furthermore, the stronger the senses of having classmates nearby, the more positive the participants were about the contribution of watching the videos.

Keywords

1. Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. In Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), (pp. 202-232).Search in Google Scholar

2. Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2). Available online at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/149/23010.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149Search in Google Scholar

3. Anderson, T. (2010). Theories for learning with emerging technologies. In G. Veletsianos (ed.), Immerging technologies in education, (pp. 23-36). Edmonton: AU Press.Search in Google Scholar

4. Ang, R.P. (2005). Development and validation of the Teacher-Student Relationship Inventory using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), (pp. 55-73).10.3200/JEXE.74.1.55-74Search in Google Scholar

5. Baker, J.W. (2000). The “classroom flip”: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. In Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning, (pp. 9-17).. Available online at http://works.bepress.com/j_wesley_baker/21/Search in Google Scholar

6. Bonk, C.J. and Khoo, E. (2014). Adding some TEC-VARIETY: 100+ Activities for motivating and retaining learners. Indiana: Open World Books.Search in Google Scholar

7. Brookfield, S.D. (2013). Powerful techniques for teaching adults. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

8. Chen, C.M. and Wu, C.H. (2015). Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. In Computers and Education, 80, (pp. 108-121).10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.015Search in Google Scholar

9. Fletcher, J.D. and Tobias, S. (2005). The multimedia principle. In R.E. Mayer (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, (pp. 117-133).10.1017/CBO9780511816819.008Search in Google Scholar

10. Griffin, D.K.; Mitchell, D. and Thompson, S.J. (2009). Podcasting by synchronising PowerPoint and voice: what are the pedagogical benefits? In Computers and Education, 53(2), (pp. 532-539).Search in Google Scholar

11. Harmon-Jones, E.; Simon, L.; Greenberg, J.; Pyszczynski, T.; Solomon, S.; McGregor, H. (1997). Terror management and self-esteem: Evidence that self-esteem reduces mortality salience effects. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, (pp. 24-26).10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.24Search in Google Scholar

12. Hirumi, A. (2006). Analyzing and designing e-learning interactions. In C. Juwah (ed.), Interactions in online education: Implications for theory and practice, (pp. 46-71). New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

13. Jukes, I.; McCain, T.; Crockett, L. (2010). Understanding the digital generation. Kelowna, B.C.: 21st Century Fluency Project & Corwin.Search in Google Scholar

14. Kurtz, G. ( ). Facebook Group as a space for interactive and collaborative learning. In The International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 1(4), (pp. 406-418).10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.057461Search in Google Scholar

15. Kurtz, G. ( ). Integrating Facebook Group and a Course Website: The Effect on Participation and Perceptions on Learning. In American Journal of Distance Education, 28( ), (pp. 253-263).10.1080/08923647.2014.957952Search in Google Scholar

16. Heatherton, T.F. and Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, (pp. 895-910).10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.895Search in Google Scholar

17. Lee, M.J.W. and Chan, A. (2007). Reducing the effects of isolation and promoting inclusivity for distance learners through podcasting. In Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), (pp. 85-105).Search in Google Scholar

18. Levi-Atzmon, G. (2014). Image-Supported Learning: Visual Language and Pedagogy. In N. Notzer (ed.), To Excel in Academic Teaching Lecturer Handbook of Updated Strategies and Competencies, (pp. 79-98). Or-Yehuda: The College for Academic Studies press (Hebrew)Search in Google Scholar

19. Lewalter, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals. In Learning and Instruction, 13(2), (pp. 177-189).10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00019-1Search in Google Scholar

20. Li, F.; Qi, J.; Wang, G. and Wang, X. (2014). Traditional classroom vs. e-learning in higher education: Difference between students’ behavioural engagement. In International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(2), (pp. 48-51).Search in Google Scholar

21. Lim, D.H. (2002). Perceived differences between classroom and distance education: seeking instructional strategies for learning application. In International Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), (pp. 21-35).Search in Google Scholar

22. Lomicka, L. and Lord, C. (2007). Social presence in virtual communities of foreign language (FL) teachers. In System, 35(2), (pp. 208-228).10.1016/j.system.2006.11.002Search in Google Scholar

23. Mayer, R.E. (2005). Principles of Multimedia Learning Based on Social Cues: Personalization, Voice and Image Principles. In R.E. Mayer (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, (pp. 201-212).10.1017/CBO9780511816819.014Search in Google Scholar

24. Meishar-Tal, H.; Kurtz, G. and Pitterse, E. (2012). Facebook groups as LMS: A case study. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (IRRODL), 13(4), (pp. 33-48). Available online at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1294/2337.Search in Google Scholar

25. Means, B.; Toyama, Y.; Murphy, R.; Bakia, M.; Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Available online at http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-basedpractices/ finalreport.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

26. Moore, M.G. and Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: a systems view. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.Search in Google Scholar

27. Morse, M. (2013). A quality of interrelating: describing a form of meaningful experience on a wilderness river journey. In Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 14(1), (pp. 42-55).Search in Google Scholar

28. Müller, T. (2008). Persistence of women in online degree completion programs. In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2). Available online at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/455/1042.Search in Google Scholar

29. Noonoo, S. (2012). Flipped learning founders set the record straight. In THE Journal, Available online at http://thejournal.com/articles/2012/06/20/flipped-learning-founders-qand- a.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

30. Palloff, R.M. and Pratt, K. (2011). The excellent online instructor: Strategies for professional development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

31. Piersol, L. (2014). Listening Place. In Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 17(2), (pp. 43-53).10.1007/BF03400969Search in Google Scholar

32. Selwyn, N. (2014). The Internet and Education. In Chairman’s Advisory, BBVA (eds.), 19 Key Essays on How Internet Changing our Lives, (pp. 191-217). OpenMind, BBVA. Available online at https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/en/article/the-internet-and-education/?fullscreen=true.Search in Google Scholar

33. Subrahmanyam, K. and Šmahel, D. (2011). Digital Youth: The Role of Media in Development. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC., New York, NY. Search in Google Scholar

34. Zhan, Z. and Mei. H. (2013). Academic self-concept and social presence in face-to-face and online learning: Perceptions and effects on students’ learning achievement and satisfaction across environments. In Computers & Education, 6, (pp. 131-138). 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo