1. bookVolume 17 (2014): Issue 2 (December 2014)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Case for ‘Passive’ Learning – the ‘Silent’ Community of Online Learners

Published Online: 03 Mar 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 17 (2014) - Issue 2 (December 2014)
Page range: 86 - 99
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This paper examines two modules within the Faculty of Social Sciences at The Open University (OU) and considers the extent to which ‘passive’ learning may be taking place. Both are level one modules (first year undergraduate) and use a combination of asynchronous (forums) and synchronous (Blackboard Collaborate technology, branded ‘OU Live’) technologies for teaching. The data reveals that student ‘passive engagement’ with forums (reading messages in a forum, but not ‘actively’ posting, colloquially known as lurking) is far higher than ‘active engagement’ (posting in the forum). The data also shows that participation in OU Live is very low. This initially suggests that teaching and learning strategies needs to be reconsidered, to encourage or increase ‘active engagement’. However, the data, alongside literature, also suggests that some students may find value in engaging ‘passively’. From the perspective of a Higher Education (HE) institute such as the OU, this may have implications for the tuition delivery strategy used to deliver the module material, as well as how staff development occurs for the tutors that deliver the material. For example, rather than focus a significant effort on encouraging students to participate in active forum use, the emphasis may need to be shifted to ensuring that appropriate/sufficient material is available to ‘passive engagers’.

1. Bayne, S. (2005). Deceit, desire and control: the identities of learners and teachers in cyberspace. In R. Land and S. Bayne (eds.), Education in Cyberspace, (pp. 21-41). Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.Search in Google Scholar

2. Beaudoin, M. (2002). Learning or lurking? Tracking the ‘invisible’ online student. In The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), (pp.147-155).10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00086-6Search in Google Scholar

3. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Open University Press.Search in Google Scholar

4. Blackboard (2013). Blackboard Collaborate. Available online at http://www.blackboard.com/Sites/International/EMEA/Platforms/Blackboard- Collaborate.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

5. Conole, G.; Dyke, M.; Oliver, M.; Seale, J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. In Computers and Education, 43(1-2), (pp.17-33).10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.018Search in Google Scholar

6. Dennen, V. (2008). Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behaviour. In Computers in Human Behaviour, 24(4), (pp.1624-1633).10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.003Search in Google Scholar

7. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. In Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), (pp.133-56).10.1080/13639080020028747Search in Google Scholar

8. Engeström, Y. (2007). From communities of practice to mycorrhizae. In J. Hughes; N. Jewson; L. Unwin (eds.), Communities of Practice: Critical Perspectives, (pp.41-54). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

9. New Media Consortium (2012). Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.Search in Google Scholar

10. Jones, C. (2004). Networks and learning: communities, practices and the metaphor of networks. In Association for Learning Technology Journal, 12(1), (pp.81-93).10.3402/rlt.v12i2.11252Search in Google Scholar

11. Kennedy, G.; Gray, K.; Tse, J. (2008). ‘Net Generation’ medical students: technological experiences of pre-clinical and clinical students. In Medical Teacher, (30)1, (pp.10-16).10.1080/01421590701798737Search in Google Scholar

12. McKendree, J.; Stenning, K.; Mayes, T.; Lee, J. and Cox, R. (1998). Why observing a dialogue may benefit learning. In Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14(2), (pp.110-119).10.1046/j.1365-2729.1998.1420110.xSearch in Google Scholar

13. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. In On the Horizon, 9(5), (pp.1-6).Search in Google Scholar

14. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.Search in Google Scholar

15. Seely Brown, J.; Collins, A.; Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. In Educational Researcher, 18(1), (pp.32-42).Search in Google Scholar

16. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. In Educational Researcher, 27(2), (pp.4-13).10.3102/0013189X027002004Search in Google Scholar

17. Smith, D.; Middleton, D. (2013). ‘It needs to be better than face to face’: Introducing Elluminate into a social sciences distance learning programme. In Enhancing Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences, 5(3), (pp.3-14).Search in Google Scholar

18. Smith, D.; Smith, K. (2013). Fifty shades of forums: the trouble with fantasy and dominance in asynchronous teaching and learning. In Proceedings of the UNISA Cambridge International Conference on Open, Distance and eLearning (University of South Africa), 2013.Search in Google Scholar

19. Thorpe, M. (2008). Effective online interaction: mapping course design to bridge from research to practice. In Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), (pp. 57-72).10.14742/ajet.1230Search in Google Scholar

20. Webb, E.; Jones, A.; Barker, P. van Schaik, P. (2004). Using e-learning dialogues in higher education. In Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(1), (pp. 93-103). 10.1080/1470329032000172748Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo