[
Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T.M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165921
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T. & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T.M. & Pratt, M.G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
An, D. & Youn, N. (2018). The inspirational power of arts on creativity. Journal of Business Research, 85, 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anokhin, S. & Wincent, J. (2012). Start-up rates and innovation: A cross-country examination. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.47
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arden, R., Chavez, R., Grazioplene, R., & Jung, R. (2010). Neuroimaging creativity: A psychometric view. Behavioural Brain Research, 214(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Austin Z. & Sutton J. (2014). Qualitative research: getting started. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 67(6), 436-40. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v67i6.1406
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bouchiki, H. (1993). A constructivist framework for understanding entrepreneurship performance. Organization Studies, 14, 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069301400405
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chatterjee, A. & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 370–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chavez, M. & Zambrano, M. (2006). From blanqueamiento to reindigenización: Paradoxes of mestizaje and multiculturalism in contemporary Colombia. Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe, 80, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.18352/erlacs.9652
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiecher, A., Elisondo, R., Paoloni, P., & Donolo, D. (2018). Creatividad, género y rendimiento académico en ingresantes de ingeniería. Revista iberoamericana de educación superior, 9(24), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2018.24.266
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ford, C.M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112–1142. https://doi.org/10.2307/259166
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed). Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frey, B. (2018). The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation (Vols. 1–4). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Güss, D., Tuason, M., Göltenboth, N., & Mironova, A. (2018). Creativity Through the Eyes of Professional Artists in Cuba, Germany, and Russia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(2), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117730817
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hennessey, B. & Amabile, T. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hindle, K. (2010). How community context affects entrepreneurial process: A diagnostic framework. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22, 599–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2010.522057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horsburgh, D. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12, 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00683.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J. & Beghetto, R. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kline, T. (2017). Sample issues, methodological implications, and best practices. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 49(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000054
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koellinger, P. (2008) Why are some entrepreneurs more innovative than others? Small Business Economics, 31, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9107-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krumm, G., Arán, V., & Bustos, D. (2014). Inteligencia y creatividad: correlatos entre los constructos a través de dos estudios empíricos. Universitas Psychologica, 13(4), 1531–2143. http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY13-4.iccc
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leder, H. & Nadal, M. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode—Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Long, H. (2014). An empirical review of research methodologies and methods in creativity studies (2003–2012). Creativity Research Journal, 26(4), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.961781
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miles, M. (1979). Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 590–601. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392365
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Monroy, E., Gutierrez-Gonzalez, L., & Barrios, D. (2023). Creatividad, organizaciones y trabajo. Una revisión bibliográfica sobre estudios cualitativos. Interdisciplinaria. Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines, 40(3), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.16888/interd.2023.40.3.2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mumford, M.D. & Gustafson, S.D. (1988). Creativity Syndrome: Integration, Application, and Innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muñoz, F. (2011). Construcciones de la neurociencia al entendimiento de la creatividad humana. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 23(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ARIS.2011.v23.n2.36253
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peasgood, T., Mackenzie, B., Devlin, N., Rowen, D., Yang, Y., & Kim, D. (2023). Randomised comparison of online interviews versus face-to-face interviews to value health states. Social Science & Medicine, 323(2), 115818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115818
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robledo, I., Hester, K., Peterson, D., Barrett, J., Day, E., Hougen, D., & Mumford, M. (2012). Errors and understanding: The effects of error-management training on creative problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.677352
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romo, M. (1998). Teorías implícitas y creatividad artística. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 10, 11–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romo, M. & Alfonso, V. (2003). Implicit theories of Spanish painters. Creativity Research Journal, 15(4), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1504_8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Savaş, E.B., Verwijmeren, T., & van Lier, R. (2021). Aesthetic experience and creativity in interactive art. Art & Perception, 9(2), 167–198. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-bja10024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silvia, P.J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J.C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024071
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sirelkhatim, F. & Gangi, Y (2015). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review of curricula contents and teaching methods. Cogent Business & Management, 2, 105203. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1052034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, J.K. & Tinio, P.P.L. (2014). Introduction by the editors. In P.P.L. Tinio & J. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shusterman, R. (1997). The end of aesthetic experience. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 55, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/431602
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2003). Address by Mr Koïchiro Matsuura Director-General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) on the occasion of the second Proclamation of Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity and the award of the Arirang and Samarkand Taronasi Prizes for safeguarding, protecting and promoting cultural spaces or forms of popular or traditional cultural expression proclaimed by UNESCO as “Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity”. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000132537_eng?posInSet=4&queryId=ddf35e0a-6c51-4521-8e4c-fa9dbbef4b14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wong, H.Y.H. & Chan, C.K.Y. (2021). A systematic review on the learning outcomes in entrepreneurship education within higher education settings. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1213–1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2021583
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Woodman, R., Sawyer, J.E., & Griffin, R.W. (1993). Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/258761
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yeh, Y.-C., Hsu, W.-C., & Yastrubinskiy, E. (2021). Decomposing the influences of aesthetic experience processes on creativity learning through various consciousness interventions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100756
]Search in Google Scholar
, 