1. bookAHEAD OF PRINT
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2335-0245
First Published
06 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Application of Bio-Resorbable Membranes in Preventing Complications of Lower Jaw Surgery

Published Online: 11 Oct 2021
Volume & Issue: AHEAD OF PRINT
Page range: -
Received: 24 Feb 2021
Accepted: 20 Jun 2021
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2335-0245
First Published
06 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Summary

Background/Aim: Prevention of inflammation and alveolar bone atrophy is very important in oral surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the use of two osteoplastic bio-resorbable membranes in order to prevent inflammatory complications and atrophy of the alveolar part of the mandible after surgical interventions.

Material and Methods: We examined 86 patients 45-70 years old who were classified into four groups. In group 1, there were 21 patients who had a “bio-resorbable membrane type 1 implanted. The group 2 consisted of 23 persons treated with bio-resorbable membrane type 2. Only the occurrence of inflammatory complications after the placement of these membranes was monitored. Group 3 included 20 persons treated with membrane type 1 and group 4 included 22 patients treated with membrane type 2 to prevent both inflammatory complications and atrophy of the alveolar part of the mandible. The level of atrophy of the alveolar bone after one year was determined by cone-beam computed tomography. The obtained data were statistically evaluated.

Results: Six inflammatory complications (“dry socket”) have been identified in operated patients treated with a membrane type 1 (the first and the third groups). Only two “dry socket” occurred in patients treated with membrane type 2 (the second and fourth groups). Group 4 had significant advantages in the alveolar crest height 14.6 (11.2-22.3) and in its width 7.7 (5.1-10.2) both in relation to the indices of group 3 (11.1 (9.7-20.4) and 6.2 (4.2-9.0).

Conclusions: The bio-resorbable membrane type 2 prevented inflammatory complications in the short postoperative period after surgical interventions, as well as, the atrophy of the mandible.

Keywords

1. Pohodenko-Chudakova IO, Barmutzkaya AZ. Prevention of complications of acute odontogenic infection at the present stage. Stomatologist, 2010;1:20˗23.Search in Google Scholar

2. Iordanishvili AK, Ponomarev AA, Korovin NV, Gayvoronskaya MG. Frequency and structure of complications after removed of mandibular wisdom teeth. Bashkortostan Med J, 2016;11:71˗73.Search in Google Scholar

3. Storelli S, Del Fabbro M, Scanferla M, Palandrani G, Romeo E. Implant supported cantilevered fixed dental rehabilitations in partially edentulous patients: Systematic review of the literature. Part I. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018; 29:253˗274.10.1111/clr.13311Search in Google Scholar

4. Starch-Jensen T, Jensen JD. Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: a Review of Selected Treatment Modalities. J Oral Maxillofac Res, 2017;8:e3.10.5037/jomr.2017.8303Search in Google Scholar

5. Bazaeva IK, Lalieva ZV. Prevention of complications of dental implantation. Proceedings young scientists of Vladikavkaz scientific center of RAS. 2015;15:47˗53.Search in Google Scholar

6. Shi B. Aesthetic complications of immediate implant placement of anterior teeth. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2018;53:810-814.Search in Google Scholar

7. Chen W, Zhi M, Feng Z, Gao P, Yuan Y, Zhang C, et al. Sustained co-delivery of ibuprofen and basic fibroblast growth factor by thermo sensitive nanoparticle hydrogel as early local treatment of peri-implantitis. Int J Nanomedicine, 2019;21:1347˗1358.10.2147/IJN.S190781Search in Google Scholar

8. Garayev ZI, Javadov RA, Nasirova XB. Reduction of the ric of complication at the dental implantation. Sovremennaya stomatologiya, 2014;2:74˗76.Search in Google Scholar

9. Ushakov AR, Ushakov RV, Dautov HR, Korkin VV. The frequency of infectious and inflammatory complications after dental implantation. Proceedings of the VIII Internat Sci and Pract Conf Belgorod: Publishing house “Belgorod”, 2015;290˗294.Search in Google Scholar

10. Яров Ю. Обоснование схем поддерживающего лечения после дентальной имплантации. Вестник стоматологии, 2013;4:63-68. (in Russian)Search in Google Scholar

11. Andreasi BM, Andrisani C, Lopez MA, Gaudio RM, Lombardo L, Carinci F. Guided bone regeneration by means of a preformed titanium foil: A case of severe atrophy of edentulous posterior mandible. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents, 2016;30:35-41.Search in Google Scholar

12. Fickl S, Fischer K, Petersen N, Happe A, Schlee M, Schlagenhauf U, et al. Dimensional evaluation of different ridge preservation techniques: arandomized clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2017;37:403-410.10.11607/prd.2629Search in Google Scholar

13. Минина АН, Чернина ТН. Основы дентальной имплантации: Учебно-методическое пособие. Витебск: УО «Витебский государственный медицинский университет; 2013. (in Russian)Search in Google Scholar

14. Lazarenko AV, Kan VV, Terskih SA. Assessment of jaw bone parameters in patients of retirement age with complete and partial absence of teeth. Kuban Sci Med Bull, 2015;151:93-97.Search in Google Scholar

15. Rebrova OY. Statistical analysis of medical data. Application of „Statistica“ application software package. Moscow: Media sphere; 2002. (in Russian)Search in Google Scholar

16. Gerasimov AN. Medical statistics. Moscow: Medical Information Agency; 2007. (in Russian)Search in Google Scholar

17. Avila-Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol, 2019;46:195-223.10.1111/jcpe.13057Search in Google Scholar

18. Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Calori GM, Giannoudis PV. The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: current experimental and clinical evidence. BMC Med, 2012;10:81.10.1186/1741-7015-10-81Search in Google Scholar

19. Bubalo M, Lazić Z, Tatić Z, Milović R, Magić M. The use of collagen membranes in guided tissue regeneration. Vojnosanit Pregl, 2017;74:767-772.10.2298/VSP160117116BSearch in Google Scholar

20. Sbricoli L, Guazzo R, Annunziata M, Gobbato L, Bressan E, Nastri L. Selection of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration: A Literature Review. Materials (Basel), 2020;13:786.10.3390/ma13030786Search in Google Scholar

21. Bunyaratavej P, Wang HL. Collagen Membranes: A Review. J Periodontol, 2001:72;215-229.10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.215Search in Google Scholar

22. Pohodenko-Chudakova I, Tserakhava T, Maksimovich K, Zenkevich Y. Complication rate of osteoconductive membranes over fresh alveolar sockets. Stoma Edu J, 2017;4171-4174.10.25241/stomaeduj.2017.4(3).art.2Search in Google Scholar

23. Shevela TL, Pohodenko-Chudakova I, Groshev EY. Results for modern bandaging materials application in alveolitis treatment. Engineering of Biomater, 2011;14:13-14.Search in Google Scholar

24. Seliverstov DV, Kuznecov AV, Maskvnin VV, Kondrus’ IV, Novikov LA, Judin VA. The use of biological material “Collost” in the complex surgical treatment of pressure sores of IV degree. Rus Med J, 2015;13:776-780.Search in Google Scholar

25. Medvedev YuA, Dyachkova EYu. The surgical treatment of patients with jaw defects after removing teeth based on the utilization of osteoplastic material “Collost”. Int Rev Clin Practice and Health, 2015;6:38-45. (In Russian)Search in Google Scholar

26. D’Amato S, Tartaro G, Itro A, Santagata M. Mandibular bone regeneration after bone slat tehnique. Ann Stomatol, 2017;8:39-44.10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.039550716628736606Search in Google Scholar

27. Turri A, Elgali I, Vazirisani F, Johansson A, Emanuelsson L, Dahlin C, et al. Guided bone regeneration is promoted by the molecular events in the membrane compartment. Biomater, 2016;84:167-183.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.03426828682Search in Google Scholar

28. Thoma DS, Bienz SP, Figuero E, Jung RE, Sanz-Martín I. Efficacy of lateral bone augmentation performed simultaneously with dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol, 2019;46:257-276.10.1111/jcpe.1305030675733Search in Google Scholar

29. Lee HJ, Kim MJ, Kim YK, Yun PY. Extraction socket preservation using β-TCP coated with recombinant human BMP (rhBMP-2): randomized clinical prospective study. Oral Biol Res, 2011;35:110-115.10.21851/obr.35.2.201109.110Search in Google Scholar

30. Jeong HJ, Gwak SJ, Seo KD, Lee S, Yun JH, Cho YS, et al. Fabrication of Three-Dimensional Composite Scaffold for Simultaneous Alveolar Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Installation. Int J Mol Sci, 2020;21:1863.10.3390/ijms21051863708432932182824Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo