1. bookVolume 24 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
06 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Bond Strength Evaluation of Inlay-Retained Resin-Bonded Fixed Partial Dentures with Two Different Cavity Designs and Two Different Adhesive Systems: In Vitro Study

Published Online: 03 Mar 2020
Page range: 21 - 28
Received: 14 Dec 2019
Accepted: 03 Jan 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
06 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English

Background/Aim: The purpose of this in-vitro study was to compare the resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPD) fabricated using two different structural designs and two different antibacterial adhesive lutting protocols in regard to their resistance to debonding.

Keywords

1. Watanabe F, Powers JM, Lorey RE. In vitro bonding of prosthodontic adhesives to dental alloys. J Dent Res, 1988;67:479-483.Search in Google Scholar

2. Imbery TA, Eshelman EG. Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: A review of three decades of progress. J Am Dent Assoc, 1996;127:1751-1760.Search in Google Scholar

3. El-Mowafy O, Rubo MHM. Resin bonded fixed partial dentures: A literature review with presentation of a novel approach. Int J Prosthodont, 2000;13:460-467.Search in Google Scholar

4. Yamashita A, Yamami T. Procedures for applying adhesive resin (MMA-TBB) to crown and bridge restorations. Part I. The influence of dental non-precious alloys and the treatment of inner surface of metal to adhesion. J Jpn Prosthet Dent, 1982;26:584-591.Search in Google Scholar

5. Matsumura H, Tanoue N, Atsuta M. Adhesive bonding of stainless steels and their component metals. J Oral Rehabil, 2000;27:1054-1059.Search in Google Scholar

6. Livaditis GJ. Cast metal resin-bonded retainers for posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc, 1980;101:926-929.Search in Google Scholar

7. Creugers NH, Käyser AF, Van’t Hof MA. A seven-and-a-half-year survival study of resin-bonded bridges. J Dent Res, 1992;71:1822-1825.Search in Google Scholar

8. Gilmour ASM, Ali A. Clinical performance of resin-retained fixed partial dentures bonded with a chemically active luting cement. J Prosthet Dent, 1995;73:569-573.Search in Google Scholar

9. Boening KW. Clinical performance of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent, 1996;76:39-44.Search in Google Scholar

10. Shakal MAS, Pfeiffer P, Hilgers RD. Effect of tooth preparation design on bond strengths of resin-bonded prostheses: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent, 1997;77:243-249.Search in Google Scholar

11. El-Mowafy OM. Posterior resin-bonded fixed partial denture with a modified retentive design: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent, 1998;80:9-11.Search in Google Scholar

12. Chow TW, Chung RWC, Chu FCS, Newsome PRH. Tooth preparation designed for posterior resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent, 2002;88:561-564.Search in Google Scholar

13. Shimizu H, Takahashi Y. Retainer design for posterior resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: A technical report. Quintessence Int, 2004;35:653-654.Search in Google Scholar

14. Izgi AD, Kale E, Eskimez S. A prospective cohort study on cast-metal slot-retained resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses in single missing first molar cases: results after up to 7.5 years. J Adhes Dent, 2013;15:73-84.Search in Google Scholar

15. Stokholm R, Isidor F. Resin-bonded inley retained prostheses for posterior teeth. A 5-year clinical study. Int J Prosthodont, 1996;9:161-166.Search in Google Scholar

16. El-Mowafy O, Rubo MHM. Retention of a posterior resin-bonded fixed partial denture with a modified design: An in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont, 2000;13:425-431.Search in Google Scholar

17. Magne P, Perakis N, Belser UC, Krejci I. Stress distribution of inlay-anchored adhesive fixed partial dentures: A finite element analysis of the influence of restorative materials and abutment preparation design. J Prosthet Dent, 2002;87:516-527.Search in Google Scholar

18. Brännström M. The cause of postoperative sensitivity and its prevention. J Endod, 1986;12:475-481.Search in Google Scholar

19. Meiers JC, Kresin JC. Cavity disinfectants and dentin bonding. Oper Dent, 1996;21:153-159.Search in Google Scholar

20. Gultz J, Do L, Boylan R, Kaim J, Scherer W. Antimicrobial activity of cavity disinfectants. Gen Dent, 1999;47:187-190.Search in Google Scholar

21. Gürgan S, Bolay Ş, Kiremitçi A. Effect of disinfectant application methods on the bond strength of composite to dentin. J Oral Rehabil, 1999;26:836-840.Search in Google Scholar

22. Cao D, Hollis R, Christensen GJ, Christensen RP. Effect of tooth disinfecting procedures on dentin shear bond strength. J Dent Res, 1995;74:73.Search in Google Scholar

23. Türkün M, Türkün Ş, Ergücü Z, Ateş M. Is an antibacterial adhesive system more effective than cavity disinfectants? Am J Dent, 2006;19:166-170.Search in Google Scholar

24. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, et al. Micro-tensile bond strength of oneand two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent, 2003;16:414-420.Search in Google Scholar

25. Sturdevant JR, Brunson WD, Brantley CF. Bond strengths of resin-bonded metal castings. Dent Mater, 1985;1:219-224.Search in Google Scholar

26. Rammelsberg P, Pospiech P, Garnet W. Clinical factors affecting adhesive fixed partial dentures: A 6-year study. J Prosthet Dent, 1993;70:300-307.Search in Google Scholar

27. Garcia-Godoy F, Kaiser DA, Malone WF, Hubbard G. Shear bond strength of two resin adhesives for acid-etched metal prostheses. J Prosthet Dent, 1991;65:787-789.Search in Google Scholar

28. Cal E, Türkün LŞ, Türkün M, Toman M, Toksavul S. Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites. J Dent, 2006;34:372-380.Search in Google Scholar

29. Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B. Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res, 2006;85:941-944.Search in Google Scholar

30. Garcia RN, Reis AF, Giannini M. Effect of activation mode of dual-cured resin cements and low-viscosity composite liners on bond strength to dentin. J Dent, 2007;35:564-569.Search in Google Scholar

31. De Castro FL, De Andrade MF, Duarte Júnior SL, Vaz LG, Ahid FJ. Effect of 2% chlorhexidine on microtensile bond strength of composite to dentin. J Adhes Dent, 2003;5:129-138.Search in Google Scholar

32. Imazato S, Torii Y, Takatsuka T, Inoue K, Ebi N, Ebisu S. Bactericidal effect of dentin primer containing antibacterial monomer methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) against bacteria in human carious dentin. J Oral Rehabil, 2001;28:314-319.Search in Google Scholar

33. Imazato S. A new adhesive system incorporating an antibacterial MDPB: its efficacy and benefit. In: J. Tagami, editor. Self-etching primer: current status and its evolution. 1st ed. Tokyo: Kuraray Medical Inc; 2003. p. 67-77.Search in Google Scholar

34. Rissin L, Feldman RS, Kapur KK, Chauncey HH. Six-year report of the periodontal health of fixed and removable partial denture abutment teeth. J Prosthet Dent, 1985;54:461-467.Search in Google Scholar

35. Freilich MA, Niekrash CE, Katz RV, Simonsen RJ. The effects of resin-bonded and conventional fixed partial dentures on the periodontium: Restoration type evaluated. J Am Dent Assoc, 1990;121:265-269.Search in Google Scholar

36. Wood M, Thompson VP, Romberg E, Morrison G. Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. II. Clinical findings related to prosthetic characteristics after approximately 10 years. J Prosthet Dent, 1996;76:368-373.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo